Lonesome (1928) User Reviews

America's last great silent film

[Levana · 9/10 · 8 February 1999]

If only this remarkable movie hadn't had the misfortune to be released just when the enthusiasm for sound was sweeping all before it, it would probably have been more appreciated at the time and remembered today as one of the all-time classics. As an expression of the isolation of city life, it builds up an atmosphere of desperation, in spite of its romance with a happy ending. The scene where the boy searches frantically for the girl throughout crowded Coney Island, buffeted this way and that by the uncaring throngs, turned away by the indifferent faces of the amusement park workers, has few equals for anguish. Also unforgettable is the montage that cuts from one to the other of the lovers (who have not yet met) while they are at work, the one at a factory, the other at a telephone switchboard; the motions of the hands and the machines build to a frantic, overwhelming pace.

Unfortunately, before the movie was released it was sadly mangled by the insertion of several sound sequences, which stop the continuity dead with their absolute stasis, and feature dialogue so thunderously inane you have to suspect it was written by the sound technician. Nonetheless, "Lonesome" remains one of the most sophisticated examples of the silent movie, an art form that was killed by sound almost as soon as it had reached maturity.

Charming!

[JohnHowardReid · 8/10 · 3 October 2011]

Despite Mordaunt Hall's slightly negative review in The New York Times (the critic has it for Fejos whom he constantly and consistently refers to as Doctor Fejos), this is a movie that has gathered a well-deserved reputation despite being burdened with three added sound sequences which are not only banal in themselves, but hold up the exposition of the charming plot. Fortunately, the DVD is the silent version. Alas, it is printed in black-and-white. No tints! That's a shame, but nonetheless you can get the drift of the story and see the excellent performances delivered by Tryon, Kent and the rest of the cast. As some of you know, Hal Roach built up Tryon as a comedian to replace Harold Lloyd, so it is something of a surprise to see him in a serious, romantic role, but he manages the transition supremely well. Barbara Kent is delightfully charming as the girl. Nostalgia lovers and history buffs will enjoy the well-staged location footage at Coney Island.

intoxicating, dated, lovely, charming, and very much of its time - and experimental wonder

[Quinoa1984 · 8/10 · 29 August 2017]

Lonesome is like the much more charming, if slightly less ambitious (and at the very end a bit too cute) cousin of Sunrise. It's appeal is in its simplicity, but where Sunrise was about a couple breaking apart and coming back together, this is much more streamlined and less tragic (though it does go for some tragic beats in the last twenty minutes of its slim 70-minute run-time): boy is lonely, girl is lonely, both work working-class jobs (factory/phone operator, what else in New York city in 1928?), they both decide separately after their (so-called!) friends go off on their own adventures to go to the beach and amusement park - is it Coney Island? I can't imagine it being anywhere else - and boy and girl meet as the boy tries to show off doing games. And that's it, that's the movie, and why it stands out (and got a sort-of restoration and Criterion treatment) is its presentation by its director.

I don't know much about Pal (Paul) Fejos except that he directed silent films and somewhat into the 1930's, and then sort of faded away into obscurity. It's a shame since a film like Lonesome shows his talents clearly: he has a keen sense of editing and that way that silent filmmakers sometimes had to super-impose images (perhaps a chip off the Abel Gance block perhaps, but not as ambitious), in particular when he's setting up the hustle/bustle of the city and then later in the film when things get more harrowing with the characters. That is to say when, inevitably, the main conflict is that they are separated in that great sea of people that makes up a massive crowd in a city (where, as the man, Jim, notes at one point, is so strange that you're surrounded by so many but still feel so alone).

The charm in the film comes in how the couple on screen - Barbara Kent and Glenn Tryon - are together; they're kind of like if you had one of those romantic "leads" in those really early Marx brothers movies, only they don't sing and the man is funny in that amusing- lightly- sarcastic way (i.e. bragging about his "six acres on Wall street" at first, which we and the girl knows isn't true, but it's fun to play along). Actually, speaking of that, this is an experimental film at heart for a number of reasons. It appears at first to be a silent film, and for 90% of it it surely is, and is shot like one with that film speed we associate with silent cinema on the whole (that kind of slightly-sped-up speed where its rhythm is distinctly of its cameras and era), and we know this because 10% of the film, more or less, is a *sound* film. No, really, we suddenly move from what is the obvious fluid camera style and wide shots of the crowds and intensity that comes with a camera that moves freely to what is clearly static shots in a studio so the actors are right under a microphone... and the acting is just as static.

That's not totally fair; this is considered, at least according to the trivia, one of the very first films to ever incorporate sound. On that level it's certainly extraordinary and important, but the problem is that it becomes jarring with the rest of the film which is shot with such passion and excitement (it's also frankly weird to hear the actor's speaking voices, whereas before, like I do with a lot of silent movies, I can think of my own voices for the actors that do not sound so... stilted). One of the sound scenes is also one where I wasn't sure if a cop was being sarcastic or not; our man Jim has been taken away by the cops after a roller-coaster ride where Mary, the girl, fainted and had to be taken away but Jim got separated and got rough with a cop. For a moment it seems like he'll be put away, but Jim pours his heart out (with some, I'm sorry, cringe-inducing lines), and the cop's reaction is hard to read since it sounds totally "pfft yeah right"... but then they let him go. Very strange.

But these aren't major complaints for a film that has so much to offer outside of those things. This is a movie that's joy is in its purity, that it's about these two people and how they meet and suddenly all of the usual problems of their everyday lives - the work, the drudgery, the intensity of being around so many people getting on/off the subways or being in the traffic - can float away since they have one another. And there are some moments of experimentation that do work, mostly involving (also, again, a touch of daring with Fejos) color: there's tinted scenes here, which isn't unusual for a silent film, but here it's how the colors are used, over the amusement park scenes to illuminate the lights at night, the performers in the park, the vibrancy that the night off a beach in the city brings.

There are so many moments of rich filmmaking, so much hope that this couple is able to inspire in a short amount of time, and because of the simplicity we're able to invest ourselves into their bond as it gets closer (maybe a little *too* quick, one might want to argue, falling in love within a day), that one can almost forgive a cutesy ending. Almost.

A lost masterpiece?

[Varlaam · 10/10 · 25 April 1999]

This film is outstanding.

A man and woman leave their respective rented rooms for work. He's a "punch presser"; she's a switchboard operator. After work, neither one feels up to joining friends; they just feel too ... single. But they both head to Coney Island. They meet, fall in love, get separated, return home distressed. A plot that simple, even clichéd, does not appear to hold much promise.

But the energy! The pacing is so frenetic. There's constant movement on camera, clocks ticking, crowds scurrying, throngs crushing, machines stamping, carnivals, streamers, roller coaster rides. Moments of relative calm come when the lovers are together.

The thrilling impersonality of the urban maelstrom has hardly been better depicted. I came away thinking it was one of the best things I've seen.

If you've seen "The Devil and Miss Jones", the Jean Arthur / Robert Cummings comedy from 1941, then you can't help but remember the Coney Island beach scene where everyone is packed in together with barely room to move.

Well, this film has a scene just like that one. In fact, the greater part of the film is that way. You're never so alone as when you're in a crowd. These scenes are funny, but they do make their point.

I saw a restored print of "Solitude" (as it was titled) with colour tinting and three sound sequences, courtesy of Cinematheque Ontario. The sound segments are just awful, so typical of the very earliest sound, but perhaps they're a blessing in disguise. The extraordinary quality of the silent film is spotlighted by the awkwardness of these three brief scenes: Jim and Mary on the beach, Jim and Mary near the midway, Jim at the police station.

The ultimate restoration of this elusive marvel would make the film silent throughout, liberating it from the stylistic cacophony of the stilted sound sequences.

Neither lead performer, Barbara Kent nor Glenn Tryon, was known to me previously. (Andy Devine is plainly recognizable however.) It seems that Tryon later became the producer of "Hellzapoppin" and "Hold That Ghost". He also holds the only acting credit for a film that anyone at all seems to have seen, "Variety Girl" from 1947. To me, Barbara Kent resembles Paulette Goddard somewhat, while Glenn Tryon looks like a brother to Don DeFore and Bob Cummings.

The screening I attended was the Toronto première of the restoration. Let's hope it now becomes more widely available.

My favorite film of ALL TIME! (and no spoilers here!)

[npalazzo1928 · 10/10 · 2 June 2013]

Out of all the films that have ever been made, why this one?

Because I've been so lucky to see this film at various classic film conventions over the years, despite the fact that the prints I've seen were showing their wear; and yes, there were a couple of clunky scenes where they were trying out sound for the first time. But in spite of that (which isn't really much to forgive) this is probably the only film of its kind that packed such an emotional punch because its story was so simple (as you can see from the other reviews contained herein) and built up to such an anxiety for Jim and Mary, making you wonder whether they will ever get together again because the film makes you feel that they are meant to be together. There's even a great piece of foreshadowing in the film which I won't mention because it hints at the ending, which, I'll never understand why people spoil because it's the very Heart and Soul of the film. If there was ever a film whose ending should NEVER be spoiled, it's Lonesome.

And I'm especially lucky in that--ever since I've seen this film--I've always wanted it to be restored and released on DVD; and I don't know how it happened, maybe because I've told so many people about it (without spoiling it!), maybe the Universe saw how much I loved this film...but it was finally restored and released--get this--on my birthday last year! I couldn't have asked for a more perfect birthday present!

For anyone who is or has been lonesome, for anyone who still believes in true love, for anyone who is lucky enough to have found their soul mate, this film was meant for you. In a way, it's a shame more films can't be made with the same quality of story and feeling as this one; but that's what makes Lonesome so unique.

To wrap this up...there was publicity booklet put out by the Universal Pictures exhibitors in 1928 which describes the plot (again without giving the ending away!) and ends with the challenge, "If Ever You Have Seen a More Beautiful or Enjoyable Picture - Please Name It." See? They knew...Thanks for reading this review.

I'm so alone,so lonely....

[dbdumonteil · 1 June 2009]

...that I cannot stand my own company...says the hero.

This could be the optimistic side of King Vidor's "the crowd".This era was a time when the pursuit of happiness was legitimate and "even with a face like that" you could hope to find the woman of your dreams.Robert Siodmak would make "Menschen Am Sonntag" and Marcel Carné "Nogent Eldorado Du Dimanche" soon after ,and would replace Coney Island by the banks of the Rhine or of the Seine.

1928 was the year before the crash .Even in the biggest city in the world ,you can be lonelier than the loneliest of creatures.He pretends he is a millionaire ,she pretends she is a princess ;in fact he is a working man,she is an operator .

It is not as optimistic as it seems at first sight.The crowds are hostile and do nothing to help them ,they are as selfish as today's crowds .

"Lonesome " is an important movie,if only for its simplicity and its spontaneity.Everything happens in the short space of one day (from the rude awakening to the night when solitude becomes even harder to bear ) and the two principals are really endearing ,almost matching Janet Gaynor and Charles Farrell.

NB:Paul Fejos would continue his career in France in the early thirties where he directed Annabella in a tragic melodrama ("Marie Legende Hongroise")and a remake of Feuillade's "Fantomas", the first third of which surpasses the original .

Cute, but no masterpiece

[zetes · 7/10 · 1 November 2002]

A young man and a young woman lead nearly identical lives throughout the day, he a punch-press operator and she a telephone operator. After work, both decide to go to Coney Island, where they meet, have fun, fall in love, and then lose each other. The movie's cute, but it isn't anything superb. There were two much better films made in the same year that Lonesome reminds me of. First, King Vidor's The Crowd, one of the best films of the period. That one takes place over quite a lot more time, but the styles are similar, with The Crowd being much more sophisticated in its narrative, characterization, etc. The Coney Island scenes are probably the most celebrated part of Lonesome, but these are nothing compared to those in the Harold Lloyd vehicle Speedy. Fejös exaggerates these scenes beyond belief, with so much confetti falling on the Coney Island patrons that one would think the crowd would drown in paper. This film is from the school of silent filmmaking where putting a lot of people on screen at the same time is considered ingenious. In comparison, the crowds of Speedy are believable, and that sequence is absolutely lovely. Lonesome also suffers from three intrusive sound sequences, which Universal forced in at the last minute. They stop the film dead in its tracks (but they are somewhat funny). Overall, the film is entertaining, if not too memorable. One particular sequence stands out as masterful: the man's and woman's workdays, edited back to back, with the whole screen surrounded by the numbers on a clock, translucent hands following the time. 7/10.

Two Ordinary People

[kidboots · 10/10 · 28 February 2013]

Two ordinary people - their personalities seem to jump out from the start of this brilliant film. Mary is cheery, greeting every day with a smile, Jim is a jokester, the life of the party, she is a switchboard operator, he is a machinist. But they are lonely and meet after taking the advice of a billboard that encourages people to have a fun day at Coney Island. Jim spies Mary on the bus and tries to attract her attention but it is only at the beach when Jim finds Mary's cherished ring that they get to know each other.

The version I saw was all silent, with Hungarian titles no less, probably packaged for Paul Fejo's own country, to show he was much more than a bacteriologist!!! Fejos was another import for Universal who, along with Fox, thoroughly embraced the European Expressionism movement that peaked in Hollywood in the late 1920s. Fejo didn't stay in America long and by the early 1930s he was back directing in Europe but with "Lonesome" he included some striking neo expressionistic camera effects including multiple super impositions etc.

Like "The Crowd" the two leads were played by relative unknowns and they were perfect in their roles. Barbara Kent had found fame of sorts by playing the good girl in "Flesh and the Devil" but who was going to remember her with Greta Garbo playing the villainess. Glen Tryon had failed to make the grade - initially he was a Hal Roach discovery who saw him as another Harold Lloyd. He was also given the role in Fejo's next film "Broadway". Both of them are almost too convincing as the lonely couple who as the evening progresses find themselves caring very deeply about the other person. They are separated when the roller coaster that Mary is riding in catches on fire and Jim, who is thought of as being a nuisance is hauled off to night court. There is an extended bit of silent dialogue here (similar to a scene on the beach where Jim is dreaming of blue picket fences etc) which was probably another "goat gland" sequence.

I thought Tryon was very moving - outside cocky but inside eaten up with loneliness. At one stage he says "I am so lonely and alone - I can't stand my own company". The emotion and the intentness builds as they look for each other at the fair that is now fast becoming desolate. At the end they both return to their flat, overcome by despair - he tries to play records and her little doll, the one memory of the day, falls off the table and breaks. They then discover that they live in the same building!!!

Fejo found the idea in a newspaper article about loneliness in New York but I think it shares similarities with a 1915 film "Young Romance". In the older movie, two youngsters who, unbeknown to themselves, work in the same department store, read the same romantic serial and go on a week's holiday determined to find some romance at any cost - preferably with someone wealthy. Mary and Jim, early in the movie, try to pretend to be more exotic that they really are, then Mary laughs and says that they have probably both been reading the same romantic serial!!

Highly, Highly Recommended.

Great visuals

[gbill-74877 · 7/10 · 5 July 2020]

A romantic comedy circa 1928, complete with some of the trademarks of the genre - a very obvious and sappy plot, but also sweet moments of tenderness. This one also has the advantage of being so old that just seeing the street life in New York, the trip out to the beach and amusement park rides of Coney Island, and some of the primitive but ethereal special effects of the day were all very interesting. Barbara Kent is a lot of fun and while Glen Tryon's character is probably a little too dorky, as a couple they're pretty endearing. The scene of them sitting in front of the waves at night, and the one of them dancing on a cloud with a crescent moon in the background are simply sublime.

The film has partial sound which works to its advantage - when we first hear them speak to one another at nearly the 30 minute point after having had nothing but intertitles before, it really stands out. The film uses overlays and plays with color tinting in ways that don't always work (and in fact were kind of jarring at one point), but it does add to the film's vibrancy. Its biggest issue is the story line, which is simple, predictable, and corny, something I can oftentimes forgive in a love story, but here it's a little much even for me. Still definitely worth watching though, if for nothing else, the visuals and the time travel back to 1928.

A cute, wonderful romance story

[sb88 · 8/10 · 4 March 2014]

It's a shame Lonesome hasn't been seen more widely by modern audiences. The limited acclaim it's received is well deserved.

Lonesome is very simple. It's no more than a little romantic movie of two people who fall in love and then appear to lose each other. But the whole thing is told expertly well. The camera moves about freely in many unique and interesting ways. Visually alone, it's quite the spectacle. It also helps that the two in the lead roles are enjoyable.

Glenn Tyron is good enough in his lead role, but his romantic interest, played by Barbara Kent, is the real star. She is fun and playful when needed, but her soulful eyes convey more pain then most people ever could with their voices. Her charisma is evident from shot one.

The only downside to the film is the inclusion of a few sound scenes. Clearly done just to cash in on the new craze, it actually only serves to grind the story to a halt. It forces the movie to become stationary, and the dialogue itself is pretty inane.

I cannot recommend the film strongly enough, though. It's as enjoyable of a romance as you'll ever see. There's nothing too complicated here: just two people falling in love, and it's a joy to see.

Lonesome review

[JoeytheBrit · 7/10 · 4 May 2020]

Little has changed, it seems, regarding the isolation endured by those sucked into the daily metropolitan rat race. Pal Fejos superbly captures the chaotic excitement of Coney Island, and holds our attention despite the lack of plot - although the last minute 'twist' is something of a let-down.

A Masterpiece of its Time

[EyeDunno · 10/10 · 29 April 2013]

Wonderfully-paced, great camera movements, excellent location photography. When you compare this with other films of its era, you'll see how well Lonesome was developed. Being visual, I'm always interested in camera placement and movement. While other films of its time showed static camera shots, Lonesome always wanted to keep the camera moving. The pace rarely lets up, soon after the male protagonist Jim, wakes up.

The version I refer to is the Eastman House-restored film. It's presented in a pristine, high- definition film transfer from original film stock, a nitrate print apparently from France. What a treat to watch life from the early 20th century, and the way it seems, the storyline could be presented today, in modern New York City.

This version has music and plenty of sound effects, but it's still one of the last silent films of the era. It's a fun treat, watching the facial expressions as the performers have to sell their emotions without voices. It must have been a trend-setting piece of filmmaking in its time. I only wish the pace on some of the films made today had as much entertainment packed inside.

Packed within the Eastman House print are several scenes with actual dialog between the two, and there's also a bit of color-tinted B/W to boot somewhere in the film. It's worth it for true film buffs to find the restored version. There's no heavy storyline here, just a guy finding it hard to meet a woman he finds attractive. The film really gives me another reason to smile.

One of the noisiest "silent" films

[gridoon2024 · 6/10 · 14 March 2023]

"Lonesome" can be seen as sort of a precursor to Chaplin's "City Lights", without quite the same level of artistry. It is certainly an audiovisual whirlwind: director Paul Fejos uses every trick he can think of (and that technology of the time would allow), including color snippets, abstract images, miniatures, rollercoaster POV shots, a non-stop musical score, sound effects, crowd noises, songs heard by the characters & the audience, and even three short dialogue scenes. The story is thin, though. Purportedly a film about loneliness in the Big City, it is actually more successful in indicating that people had a lot more fun a century ago, when they didn't have smart phones so they actually had to spend time with each other. Barbara Kent is beautiful and cute and I bet she melted many hearts in the 1928 theaters where this played. **1/2 out of 4.

Lonesome is one of the forgotten masterpieces of cinema.,,

[artihcus022 · 28 September 2008]

A sister of Sunrise and The Crowd, this film is more emotional and poetic than those landmarks and every bit as great. The plot concerns two working class American types, he works in the factory, she works on the intercom who meet by chance on a fairground and fall in love and then lose each other without knowing where the other lives.

The film's beginning is to be treasured, it follows in detail the morning ritual of first the girl and then the man in their respective homes. The effect conveyed is the organization and elegance of women over the tardy, rushed, half-baked activities of men. The love story between the two characters is so beautifully etched and played so naturalistically by the actors(Barbara Kent and Glenn Tryon) that the sense of loss in the latter half of the film is all the more painful and heart-breaking. The film deals with a certain truth about living in a city that has remained constant even after a good 80 years. At once a constant sense of community and at other an equally constant sense of loneliness from being in a crowd.

The visuals are more interesting than the story...

[AlsExGal · 8/10 · 31 December 2014]

... and I could say the same thing about Fejos' "Broadway", made a year later. Fejos recounts the tale of two lonely New Yorkers, Jim (Glen Tryon) and Mary (Barbara Kent), who find love and each other during a half day holiday at the beach and Coney Island. You first see the workday from Jim and Mary's perspective as they are ruled first by the tyranny of the alarm clock and then the tedium of the workday as you see a clock overlaying the image of each at work. Jim is a low-level machine operator, and Mary is a telephone operator. Then there are "the crowds". Jim and Mary are crowded at breakfast, at a diner filled with patrons, crowded on the subway, crowded at work, and crowded at the beach and amusement park. Yet both of them are completely alone in the world, which, especially in the attractive Miss Kent's case, seems somewhat inconceivable.

This late era silent has a dearth of title cards, which does not subtract from the film's enjoyment. In fact, what does subtract just a little are the short dialogue scenes that just don't make sense. One scene is Jim and Mary on the beach suddenly in the dark AND in color, with the crowd removed. Nothing they say shines any light on their situation or feelings at all. Another one is in a courtroom where Jim has been detained for being unruly. He gives a speech like a Bolshevik basically shaming the judge and ... the judge lets him go???? This social awareness seems very strange stuff coming from Jim who, up to that point, has seemed to be a very uncomplicated fellow. Very strange, but typical of talking scenes inserted into silent films at the dawn of sound.

What is extra special about this film is to see the lives of working class people in 1928. Notice that the workday that Jim and Mary are going through is a Saturday, and this was the norm back then and until some time after WWII. People would normally work half a day on Saturday and have only Sunday in its entirety as a day off. Catch this film if you can, even if you are not a huge silent film buff.

A small and simple love story in the thick of things - this could happen to anybody

[clanciai · 10/10 · 19 June 2019]

The striking character of this film is its extreme intensity in a fantastic camera work that keeps rushing on in breathless frenzy to the very bitter end of the film. It's almost like a documentary in its constant flow of following the crowds from the working places to the reckless carneval of Coney Island, never leaving the strenuous hard pace of life for one second, except for the moments when the lovers find each other. Then there is a touch of poetry, which also marks the film with a totally different character, which makes it doubly interesting. This film is like no other film, the closest in likeness is actually Eisenstein's "Battleship Potemkin" which also wallows in following the crowds in wild frenzy, but here the lovers provide some privacy and individualism, which is totally missing in Eisenstein's masterpiece, and this is certainly a masterpiece of the same rank but on a different level, for its very human touch of simplicity and basic togetherness. There are also some resemblance to Fritz Lang's "Liliom" with Charles Boyer, which also renders the carneval and wild pleasure hunting in frenzied rush of popular festivity in unforgettable cinematography.

Paul Fejos made many documentaries, he was a master and genius in observing and capturing life at its most original and basic level, his documentaries are from Madagascar, South East Asia, Peru apart from Europe and America, he made altogether 44 films, and this is just an example of his extremely personal and highly advanced art of the film.

Two ordinary lonesome people make an extraordinary Love-story.

[SAMTHEBESTEST · 7/10 · 28 December 2020]

Lonesome (1928) : Brief Review -

Two ordinary lonesome people make an extraordinary Love-story. This is not a film, it is a real life drama on screen with most amusing segments possible. I remember watching Oscar winning film Marty (1955) which tells the story of two lonesome people but now i realise that it was inspired from this film actually. Same story, just some changes here and there, dialogues and more serious conflicts that's it. Rest, it's just an extended copy. Lonesome is about two ordinary lonely people, a working class boy and a girl meet each other in amusement park. They enjoy the day in each other's company then lose each other after a small accident and then desperate search for the true love begins. Will they meet again or not? Like i said, Lonesome is not a Film, it's a real life on screen with no dramatic portion. Yes it has feature film elements to give it a curve but i enjoyed it like I was actually there in the film living that ordinary life. It's quick, pacy and engaging as the runtime is hardly about 70 minutes. It has comedy, romance, drama and little thrill that packs a great combo of entertainment and bet you're gonna want to watch it again. Lonesome catches the fun and romance of real life hence there's nothing that can be called insensible in the entire narrative. Glenn Tyron and Barbara Kent makes a lovely couple. The sweet chemistry between these two is nothing less than a magical experience. Lonesome never let me drop the grin smile from my face for a minute, i was smiling for whole 70 minutes and i don't remember when was the time that happened to me. Thanks to Paul Fejös for making such a wonderful, lovely and beautiful love story with no loops at all. I would have hated him if he had left one. Overall, Lonesome is very close to Classic tag and highly underrated. One of those rare pure love story before Hollywood lost it's virginity and descency. Come on make it popular.

RATING - 7.5/10*

By - #samthebestest

Not alone in loving this film

[TheLittleSongbird · 9/10 · 16 July 2020]

Have said more than once about holding a lot of silent films in very high regard and it was that that was my main reason for watching 'Lonesome', as well as it popping up as a recommendation here. The story also appealed to me, it may be old-fashioned but it sounded really charming too and it is the sort of film that really charms and tugs at the heartstrings when executed well. Had little doubt that 'Lonesome' would be good.

And it was good. More than good, make that great. 'Lonesome' (lovely title isn't it) is not quite one of my favourite silent films but, made during a very late period for silent films when cinema was starting to transition to sound, it is one of the best late silent films and one of the last great ones. Am very glad that there are others that loved 'Lonesome' as well, don't have much to add to what has already been said, and it is a shame that it isn't better known or appreciated more.

Do agree that the sound sequences were unneccessary and the sequences didn't seem as professional or as polished somehow as a result of inexperience in this still in infancy medium.

Likewise with that the twist attempt was very last minute feeling and felt thrown in.

Otherwise, 'Lonesome' is great. It is beautifully made for one thing, very sumptuously costumed and even better is the stylish photography that is like looking at professional level photographs without being too artsy or limited. The film is written too with sincerity and with an immense likeability and good-natured factor, nothing feeling corny or over-sentimentalised. The direction is accommodating while not allowing the film to drag.

Even if the story is a bit old-fashioned, its twinkling charm, poignancy and warm heart, as well as the crisp pace, more than makes up for that and makes that completely insignificant. The two leads' chemistry is incredibly sweet and touching and not in a sugary way. As well as difficult to resist, their affection comes through loud and clear. Glynn Tryon is an appealing male lead, and even better is Barbara Kent's nuanced turn.

In summary, great. 9/10.

relationships in a dead-end world

[lee_eisenberg · 8/10 · 8 February 2019]

A couple of things struck my mind while watching Paul Fejos's "Lonesome". One is of course that it's mostly silent with a few sound scenes. Another is that some of the scenes are tinted, one of the early instances of color in cinema.

But probably the most important thing is what the movie says about relationships. The repetitive jobs held by the protagonists reminded me of the mind-numbing job held by Charlie Chaplin's character at the beginning of "Modern Times". The characters later introduce themselves to each other but pretend to be rich, feeling too ashamed of themselves to admit they're stuck in dead-end jobs.

At the end of this day (the movie takes place over the course of less than twenty-four hours), these two will provide each other with the warmth and satisfaction that neither their employment nor the uncaring people around them will give. A bit like "The Shape of Water" in that sense. I recommend it.

One of the few last silents , before full talkies

[cynthiahost · 10/10 · 22 September 2012]

I saw a bad print ,on you tube ,with rock music and Czech titles.I was not aware that this was an American silent,and that actor in it was Glen Tyrone ,of king of jazz fame.I thought it was a Slovakian silent,but, when I read the i.m.b d . about it ,I was surprised.It was a silent that originally had synchronized music and sound effects and had talking sequences.I got real curious about it more.Then I read that it wasn't lost at all.It was played in archive theaters.I even suggest t.c.m if they could considered playing it .They ignored me .Then ,by surprise,I discovered that the restored version of lonesome was put On d.v.d. ,with four other Paul Fejos films.So I bought it.It was a good Tone poem about two lonely people ,played by Glen Tyron and Barbera Kent.She is a switch board operator ,while he is a machinist.They both end up meeting each other on Koney Island Beach.But only learn their name later on ,Mary,",so! it was Mary!Mary!, and Jim.The movie looks a little bit similar to Sunrise.Some of the Koney island amusement park night scenes were tinted ans stencil colored.It was a good effect.It also seemed that Andy Divine played a small part too, he was also a bit leaner in 28.The talking sequences looked like they were done in a hurry.The Camera did not move.Not even zoom lenses were used.The police station sequence was very static in it's sound talking photography.But they probably had a date type release the film and could not take more time for better shots, may be.In spite of this this is a very good silent ,sound classic film.One of the reason probably why it took time to get it on home video, was the fact,The song ,"always,written by Irving Berlin,Was in the movie as back ground music and a record sequence.The copy rights had to be paid to the Irving Berlin estate,may be.This comes with three other Paul Fejos classic films, Then talking version of Broadway, 1929.The silent version of ," The last performance,1929.It is worthy of collection.Available from Criterion and amazon.com and your specialty shops. I don't think wall mart would have this, may be. 09/22/12

Talkie Segments Constrast With Silent Ideals

[springfieldrental · 8/10 · 9 May 2022]

Silent movies had a unique appeal to viewers in early cinema in that they forced the public to use their imaginations to fill in the gaps when the characters were speaking to one another. Silents didn't require extensive inter titles to get the jest of the actors' conversations. Consequently, the actors became larger than life because they weren't dragged down by imperfections in tonality and delivery most mortals possess.

So when the first 'talkies' starting dribbling out of Hollywood after October 1927's "The Jazz Singer" was released, the voices emitting from the screen must have been jarring to those not used to hearing their acting idols speak. One of the first feature films after "The Jazz Singer" to contain a bit of audible dialogue was June 1928's "Lonesome." The film was initially released as a silent, then in September edited with three sequences of actual talking. The first talking sequence is 30 minutes into the film when Mary (Barbara Kent) and Jim (Glenn Tryon), meeting for the first time at Coney Island's amusement park, are sitting on the beach saying how lucky they are meeting each other. As one modern-day critic describes it, "They suddenly seemed very childlike and embarrassing compared to their 'silent selves,' perhaps even silly and sappy. They seemed flawed and human once I heard their voices. It was an interesting way for me to think about silence versus sound in cinema, as this film allows one to essentially to see both types in the same film."

Film critic Andrew Saris claimed "Lonesome" was "a tender love story in its silent passages, but crude, clumsy and tediously tongue-tied in its talkie passages." There is one sequence in the dialogue portion that justifies the talkie addition. Jim gets hauled into the police station after a cop accused him of roughing him up after he tried break through the crowd to get to Mary, who had fainted. The police commander, debating whether to charge Jim, at first plays hardball. But when Jim pleads his case, you can hear the change of tone of the adjudicating official when he decides to let him go. An inter title could never convey such a friendlier timbre of the officer.

The appeal of "Lonesome" is that the Paul Fejos-directed movie addresses a universal problem focused on singles living a solitary life in the big city. Jim, a keypunch machine operator at a city factory, and Mary, a telephone operator, work long hours. Their opportunities to meet the opposite sex are few. Fejos, a former medic with the Austrian Army on the front lines of World War One front lines whose love for theater transformed into directing film, used a bag of special effects tricks early on to cleverly portray the pair, using double exposures to show their routine day. The two do link up at the park and have a magical time staring into each other's eyes. Fejos colors his celluloid with hand-tinted and stencil-color segments to illustrate their romantic state.

Once "Lonesome" was released in June, Universal Studio executives felt adding the talking sequences to the movie would add some pizzazz. The studio borrowed a Movietone News sound recording truck from Fox Pictures, owners of the audio system, on the pretext it was conducting sound tests when actually it was filming the three audible sequences. Fejos wasn't involved in those shoots, which didn't dampen critics' enthusiasm for the film, citing it as the highlight of his career. "Lonesome" was a great success for Universal, partly because of the revolutionary insertion of those "talking" segments.

Interesting at many levels

[Philipp_Flersheim · 8/10 · 17 January 2022]

There are at least three levels at which 'Lonesome' is an extremely interesting film.

1. It is a sweet story of two lonely people in a big anonymous city who meet, fall in love and lose each other. The picture is well-acted, and the two lead actors Barbara Kent (Mary) and Glenn Tryon (Jim) are perfectly matched; they both give nuanced and sensitive performances.

2. The style of the picture is almost documentary, which makes it interesting from a social history point of view. In some ways, nothing much has changed over the last 100 years: People are still commuting to work, the subway in New York was as crowded as the London Underground is today (I don't know about New York in 2022), you get annoyed at the same kind of behaviour of your fellow passengers (e.g. Eating smelly food) etc. Obviously other things have changed: The type of work we do, for example, and we no longer bond over serialised novels published in newspapers that we read. Nevertheless, we are still living in what is recognisably the same kind of society. I found this aspect of 'Lonesome' particularly interesting.

3. Technologically, 'Lonesome' was highly innovative, being the perfect example of a film that came out during the transition phase from silent pictures to talkies to colour films. Initially, it looks like a normal black and white silent film to which music and some sound effects have been added. However, some scenes have spoken dialogue, and some are even in colour, or at least partly colorised. People back then must have felt they were living in an exciting age of innovation; I am sure they expected that within the next few years, all talking and maybe even all colour films would become the norm.

So why am I giving 'Lonesome' no more than 8 stars? Well, there are a few flaws. First, the dialogue sounds as stilted as if the actors were reading it from a sheet, and on top of that, a bit of it does not seem to make much sense (the scene at the police). It feels like an afterthought, like something director Pal Fejös inserted after having finished the rest of the film. Second, the colour effects are not particularly nice to look at. The colours are just garish. They were certainly innovative, but the film would look better without them. And finally, the plot is so simple that it barely exists. The only real problem the characters face appears almost at the end of the film, and its resolution does not logically follow from anything that happened earlier; it just comes about by chance. I am reserving 9 stars for pictures that are as good as perfect, and 10 for those that have some particular emotional quality or style that takes them into the small group of my favourite films (like e.g. 'North by Northwest', which for my taste must be one of the most stylish films ever made). 'Lonesome' is very good, but not as good as that. Hence 8 stars.

Two lonely people.

[st-shot · 8/10 · 6 November 2020]

Amid the crush of humanity known as New York City a couple of loners face another day in the hectic rat race. She's a switchboard operator, he handles a punch press in a factory. Their lives are mostly consumed by battling with the rush hour, noisy clients and the din of machinery. Yet in a city of millions they are alone struggling with a variant of despair. Reluctantly both head for Coney Island, cross paths, fall for each other and then abruptly separated.

A simple tale of boy meets girl boy loses girl (unintentionally) told in razzle dazzle style by director Pal Fejos. Conveying the chaos of of the big city, gruffly pushing its populace too and fro through daily life with little respite in the pre depression, heady Jazz Age Fejos brings the lovers together at Coney Island where he makes the most out of the surreal possibilities with some stunning imagery. Clearly weighted in favor of form over content the film is given extra boost by the sympathetic, relatable and well acted portrayals of Glenn Tryon and Barbara Kent as the sudden sweethearts.

An excellent example of silent film art as well as an outstanding document of the period told with energetic expressionism.

A unique masterpiece

[parkerbcn · 10/10 · 29 August 2021]

One of the last true masterpieces of American silent films (that unfortunately includes tree sound sequences not shot or approved by his director, that break a little the spell). A movie that reminds me of "Sunrise" in its inventiveness (without the direct fantasy element) and that should be regarded as a cinema classic, but is still quite unknown today. A mix of a humanistic story with a documentary feeling and a bravado camera work; it's a truly unique piece of cinema.