I Want a Divorce (1940) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
I Want A Better Movie
boblipton2 February 2019
Joan Blondell testifies as to Conrad Nagel's cruelty to her sister, Gloria Dickson in their divorce -- off the witness stand she agrees with him. She then goes to a diner, where she dumps coffee on Dick Powell. Soon they are married and broke. Dick is a lawyer, but the only opening he can find is with Sidney Blackmer's firm,specializing in divorces, and Joan can't stand the idea. However, Dick helps out their friend, Frank Fay, and he has a real knack for it. He goes to work for Blackmer, earning excellent money. It all reaches a breaking point...

There's lots of talent on display in this Paramount movie, including the always-delightful Harry Davenport and Jessie Ralph as Joan's grandparents. However, this movie, under the direction of Ralph Murphy, never quite works. It's supposed to start off as a comedy, but never really achieves that. Instead, it starts turning towards drama, and never really achieves that. Miss Dickon, who is supposed to serve as an object lesson in the dreariness and despair of divorce, never does anything to gain our sympathy, to make her suffering palpable to the audience. Furthermore, while Blondell and Powell were married when they made this movie, there isn't the sort of on-screen chemistry to raise this out of the ordinary. The result is good -- with a cast like that, it's hard to make a dull movie -- but never more than ordinary.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Do as we say, not as we do!
planktonrules14 April 2018
Back when "I Want a Divorce" was made, the leads, Joan Blondell and Dick Powell, were married. What makes this ironic is that just a few years later, the pair divorced...and this movie has such a strong anti-divorce theme.

The film begins with Geraldine (Blondell) being called into court to testify at her sister's divorce trial. The sister insists on divorce, though she never indicated why she didn't want to stay married and her husband wanted her to remain his wife. Through this case, Geraldine meets Alan (Powell) and they eventually fall in love and marry. They are happy but through the course of their marriage, Alan loses sight of this...and begins working too much as, you guessed it, a divorce lawyer. Will this couple survive or are they destined to be just like Alan's clients?

The film is very strange to watch today...not so much for its anti-divorce theme but because of its PRO-domestic violence bent. Yep, several times, folks make light of this and seem to think that a man needs to smack his wife around now and again...just to let her know who's boss! Undoubtedly, this will ruffle a few feathers in viewers. IF you can look past this, the film is modestly enjoyable but not much more.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The comedic portions seem a reach, while the film ends with a ridiculous preach
AlsExGal26 October 2022
This film rather meanders, but it picks up strength in the last half. That's mainly because the dramatic portions are its strengths and its comedic parts are its weaknesses, bordering on the inane at times.

The film opens on Gerry Brokaw (Joan Blondell) going to divorce court to testify against her sister Wanda's (Gloria Dickson) husband, David Holland (Conrad Nagel). You get the feeling - and you'd be right - that this is a rather trumped up divorce. That Wanda is determined to get a divorce she is not even sure she wants, and that her soon to be ex-husband is a nice guy and for sure doesn't want the divorce.

In the process of the divorce, Gerry meets Alan MacNally (Dick Powell). He is also there as a witness, and he is one of Wanda's "fast crowd" friends, although he doesn't act like one. Gerry has an instant dislike for him just because of that, but she gets to know him and of course they fall in love and get married. Problems crop up when Alan passes the bar and begins to represent people in divorces, which is something Gerry absolutely does not like, since she feels that puts him in the role of homewrecker. His legal reputation grows as does the gulf between him and Gerry. Meanwhile Wanda has discovered that she still loves her ex-husband, but that he has moved on. Pretty heavy melodramatic complications ensue.

I don't know why Joan Blondell and Dick Powell could not do comedy together. They had no problem doing it with anybody else. But when they tried doing it together you could tell it was an act. And to paraphrase what Spencer Tracy told a young Burt Reynolds - "Don't ever let them catch you acting". A real surprise here was Frank Faye as the MacNallys ' rather strange friend who is obsessed with fishing, yet always seems to be dressed in formal wear. He's really an asset to the film in this supporting role.

I'd say this is worth your time, especially the second half. It is just bit of a slog getting through the first half.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Half-hearted attempt to tackle a major theme!
JohnHowardReid29 April 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Director: RALPH MURPHY. Screenplay: Frank Butler. Original screen story: Adela Rogers St. John. Photography: Ted Tetzlaff. Film editor: LeRoy Stone. Art directors: Hans Dreier and Ernst Fegte. Music composed and directed by Victor Young. Assistant director: George "Dink" Templeton. Sound director: Loren Ryder. Producer: George Arthur.

Copyright 20 September 1940 (also U.S. release) by Paramount Pictures Inc. New York release at the Paramount: 2 October 1940. 75 minutes. This is the version reviewed below. However, a much longer cut of the film was released at the Sydney Mayfair on 15 November 1940. This version ran almost 95 minutes (8,539 feet).

SYNOPSIS: An odd film subject for Hollywood to attempt. Beneath a clever sugar-coating of comedy, the script dares to treat divorce as a social evil and to put forward a well-reasoned solution.

COMMENT: Paramount were obviously half-hearted about this pairing of real-life marrieds, Dick Powell and Joan Blondell. The film is no more than second-feature length, the direction is flat-footed and production values are distinctly moderate. Even Ted Tetzlaff's lighting photo¬graphy fails to measure up to his usual highly polished standard. Still the subject matter is certainly unusual for the censor-ridden 40s and represents a brave attempt to explore a commonplace situation that was virtually - so far as the cinema was concerned - taboo.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Divorce Lawyers Are Bottom Feeding Scum
bkoganbing17 August 2011
Both Dick Powell and Joan Blondell who were married to each other at the time this film was made and had multiple marriages in their lives star in this rather little known Paramount film from 1940 about the tragedy of divorce. No doubt about divorce is a tragedy and the premise of this film seems to be if there were no divorce lawyers there would be no divorces, that married people would just work it out. Both Powell and Blondell had left Warner Brothers where they were stars in the Thirties to freelance.

This film is terribly dated, but certainly in keeping with the Code which frowned on divorce at least in the abstract. Of course it's not so simple. Powell and Blondell meet during the divorce of Blondell's sister Gloria Dickson from Conrad Nagel each testifying at the proceedings under subpoena. Powell is in fact studying for the bar and when he passes it, he goes to work for high price divorce attorney Sidney Blackmer who was Nagel's counsel.

Powell and Blondell go through the usual married people problems and the thrust of the film is that people reach for the divorce lawyers too easily. And that they are a particularly bad group of bottom feeding shysters. Held up as an example of how married folks should deal with things is the 50+ years that Blondell and Dickson's grandparents Harry Davenport and Jessie Ralph have lasted.

The players are all sincere, but married life should only be as simple as I Want A Divorce makes it out. And five years later the Powells went and got one and married other folks.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
It's not getting married that's the important thing. It's staying married.
mark.waltz27 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
The wonderful Joan Blondell, star of all those tough girls with hearts of gold Warner Brothers films of the 1930's looses her spirit in this marital drama with comic overtones that tries but fails to land. She is first seen sitting in divorce court as a witness for her sister (Gloria Dickson) and is soon lamenting the end of her own new marriage, to rising hot shot divorce lawyer Dick Powell, the real life Mr. Joan Blonde if you want to switch tradition, and the future Mr. June Allyson after his own divorce from Ms. Blondell. I used to quip that Allyson costarred in this, and years later when Allyson and Blondell crossed paths on screen, it was in "The Opposite Sex", the musical version of divorce screwball comedy, " The Women".

Much of the drama surrounds Dickson, ex-husband, ex Conrad Nagel and their son Mickey Kuhn. That slows this down to a snail's pace, providing too much sappiness and little detail into why Powell and Blondell's marriage is failing. Jessie Ralph scores the laughs as Blondell and Dickson's wise granny, with ex-Mr. Barbara Stanwyck (Frank Fay) providing a few laughs as Powell's client pal getting his divorce from a a Lupe Velez like spitfire. Too much going on other than the main plot takes away from the main plot which does provide a few real in sites as to why marriages end. When it gets away from Dickson and Fay, the sparks light momentarily, but it's not enough for the film to completely involve you.

Those who know Blondell only from her cameo in "Grease" and portrayal by Kathy Bates in "Feud" will be interested in seeing her as the major star she once was, and film noir fans will be interested in seeing Powell outside his detective agency and those singing roles he pretty much gave up when the couple left Warner Brothers. As usual, Louise Beavers plays the bighearted housekeeper, always gaining attention in roles she kept one step above undignified simply through her grace and wit. A scene where Blondell coldly lets Beavers go due to the end of her marriage comes off awkwardly, but is strangely and uncomfortably real.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed