73
Metascore
12 reviews · Provided by Metacritic.com
- 90The New York TimesBosley CrowtherThe New York TimesBosley CrowtherIt is as cheerful and respectful an invasion of the realm of conscience that we have seen. And it comes very close to being the most enchanting picture of the year.
- Grant’s turn is thoroughly convincing because he himself appears to be having a terrific time: He’s expansive, graceful, and seems always on the verge of chuckling with goodwill.
- 80Time OutTime OutCary's charm works as successfully upon audiences as it does upon the film's characters, and his relaxed wit plus Loretta Young's delicate loveliness makes for a frothily touching comedy.
- 80The New York TimesWalter GoodmanThe New York TimesWalter GoodmanIf you can resist seeing Cary Grant playing an angel, David Niven playing a bishop and Loretta Young playing Loretta Young, you're too tough a critic for The Bishop's Wife.
- 80Los Angeles TimesLos Angeles TimesWhat really sets The Bishop's Wife apart is its subtlety; it never resorts to "what-might-have-been" magic to convey its message. [16 Jan 1992, p.11]
- 75Chicago TribuneMichael WilmingtonChicago TribuneMichael WilmingtonA Christmas perennial: a witty, polished, lushly sentimental and amusingly sexless romantic comedy in which suave angel Cary Grant mixes in the affairs of troubled bishop David Niven and his lovely wife Loretta Young. [24 Dec 2004, p.C10]
- 75Christian Science MonitorDavid SterrittChristian Science MonitorDavid SterrittCary Grant is irresistible as Dudley the angel, David Niven brings offbeat humor to the clergyman, and Loretta Young is refreshingly low-key as the title character. The picture is more witty than laugh-out-loud funny, but director Henry Koster serves up some fetching scenes, and there are snappy second-string performances from old pros like Monty Woolley, Elsa Lanchester, and James Gleason. [03 Jan 1997, p.15]
- 75TV Guide MagazineTV Guide MagazineThe picture runs on a bit long and it does pale by comparison to the book, but it was a welcome smile in 1947 and has the same effect today.
- 40Chicago ReaderDave KehrChicago ReaderDave KehrThere must be some excuse for this but I can't imagine what it is.