Lawless Street (1950) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
Worst French movie of all time?
dbdumonteil27 April 2008
This one is a strong contender.It was based on a comic strip which everyone has forgotten today.I've never read it,but if it is as subtle as the film,I do not miss an awful lot.The main reason for which this flick is sought is Louis de Funes 's presence:he portrays a violin teacher with a very long beard (which predates Rabbi Jacob?).

The rest consists of grotesque gags ,lines for mentally retarded persons ,vulgar jokes .I dare you to watch this dud till the end.I called it quits halfway through.

This is the only feature film by Marcel Gibaud whose shorts,they say,are interesting.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Dire Streets
writers_reign4 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
There's only one comment on this title and it is by someone who, like my, loves French films, is contemptuous of the new wavelet and admires some of the same directors - Duvivier, Carne, Cayette, Tourneur etc. On the other hand we do on occasion see things differently usually when one of us is with disappointed and the other finds pleasure in a given title. This is both understandable and explainable inasmuch as one of us live in a France whose television provides access to a regular stream of the best French films of all vintages whilst the other lives in an England starved of French films. In the case of this title however we are in complete accord: This is dire, almost as bad as anything by Godard. Imagine a film crew penetrated the deepest jungles of Guyana, shot a documentary and left the equipment behind. The natives, cut off from civilization then stumbled on a routine rejected by the Marx Brothers in their first year in vaudeville and persuaded a group of failed burlesque comics to play in it. Multiply this by ten and you're still nowhere near the depths this plumbs.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
a curiosity
myriamlenys22 August 2019
Warning: Spoilers
If you're a comic book artist or a graphic illustrator, and if you want to adapt your work so that it becomes an animation movie, you need to be sure that your work will survive such an adaptation ; you also need to be sure that you've got the right skill set and experience. Otherwise you might be in for a rude awakening. (An example : Gary Larson drew excellent cartoons, but the animation movies based on these cartoons are far lower in quality.) If you want to adapt your work so that it becomes a full-length comedy with actual flesh-and-blood actors you need to be more cautious still : what was witty might become bland, what was cheeky might become cruel, what was exuberant might become grotesque, and so on. And of course you'd be facing major hurdles with regard to pacing, timing, overarching narrative and so on.

"The street without law" is a prime example of an adaptation which does not work - perhaps because it is too litteral, too faithful ? Anyway, it is clearly inferior in quality to Dubout's graphic work. Compare it, say, to the page-sized collection of little cartoons devoted to the French police, drawn for "Marianne" in 1934 : the paper page is far better. (Cops and robbers were a recurring theme in Dubout's work. He was also strangely obsessed by the idea of very large, very domineering women towering over their husbands.)

The result is difficult to watch ; it's a mess of grotesque characters, cardboard motivations, outlandish costumes, half-baked pastiche and 19th-century vaudeville. (Still, there was an exuberant dance scene which reminded me strangely of the celebrated dance contest in Spielberg's "1941".) Perhaps it is best not to watch it as a movie, but as some kind of surreal dream or drunken vision. Or simply study it as a cautionary tale - this is what happens when artistically gifted people think that they can handle every art form with equal facility.

Perhaps a few words about the late Albert Dubout (1905-1976). During the 1930's, Dubout reached considerable fame as a caricaturist, working for a variety of newspapers and satirical magazines. He also illustrated a number of books. He was still very popular in the 1950's. Lovers of French cinema may have encountered him as the artist who drew movie posters and illustrations for the work of Marcel Pagnol, such as "La Pétanque sur la Canebière" for "Fanny", which shows a teeming, frantic mass of fans observing a pétanque game. Watch the illustration and you'll learn a lot about his style and themes.

Albert Dubout's work seems to have been largely forgotten ; perhaps it's ripe for a new wave of admirers ? I'm not a particular fan of his oeuvre, but it deserves more recognition than it gets anno 2019...
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed