Vue d'ensemble
MOVIEmeter: 
Down 13% in popularity this week. See
why on
IMDbPro.
Contact:
View
company
contact information for Bride of the Gorilla on
IMDbPro.
Date de sortie:
octobre 1951 (USA)
suite
Accroche:
Her clothes torn away, screaming in terror!
suite
Intrigue:
The owner of a plantation in the jungle marries a beautiful woman. Shortly afterward, he is plagued by a strange voodoo curse which transforms him into a gorilla.
full summary |
add synopsis
Avis des utilisateurs:
Not good but not as bad as its reputation suggests.
plus de (17 total)
Equipe estimée complète
Détails supplémentaires
Autre(s) titre(s):
The Face in the Water (USA) (working title)
suite
Durée:
70 min | USA:66 min (DVD)
Rapport de forme:
1,37 : 1
suite
Son:
Mono (Western Electric Sound System)
Curiosités
Anecdotes:
Although it only took seven days to shoot the movie, Chaney was scheduled to go on a ten day publicity tour on behalf of the film which eventually grew to 4 1/2 months according to Chaney biographer Don Smith.
suite
Goofs:
Révélant des erreurs: When Dina goes searching for Barney in the jungle for the first time, we see a quick shot of a leopard climbing up into a tree. Although this scene is supposed to be outdoors (the jungle), both the leopard and the leaves around him are casting shadows on the "sky" behind them. The sky is obviously a wall or backdrop.
suite
Guillemet:
[
first lines]
Police Commissioner Taro:
[
narration] This is Jungle - lush, green, alive with incredible growth - as young as day, as old as time. I, Taro, Police Commissioner of Itman County, which borders the Amazonas River, know it as well as any man will ever know it. Isn't it beautiful? But I have also learned that beauty can be venomous...
suite
foire aux questions
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.
plus de (17 total)
Forum
Discuter de ce film avec les autres utilisateurs sur
Forum IMDb pour Bride of the Gorilla (1951)
Recommendations
Liens liés
In my movie reference books this movie is variously described as a "bomb" or recommended as a suitable choice for inclusion in the 100 worst movies of all time. Nevertheless, I have no qualms in saying that it is not that bad, and was quite happy to sit for 65 minutes (the short running time probably helps) and see it through until the end.
To begin with Curt Siodmak's story is interesting enough (as are many of his screen writing efforts), and has more than a touch of complex moral ambiguity. His direction here however has very little flair and tends to be on the perfunctory side. The low budget is a major constraint, and for the most part the film tends to be on the flat side visually, with unimpressive jungle scenes and minimal interior set pieces of the kind typical for a low budget production.
The cast (described in one reference book as 4 non-actors) are actually all competent, and Raymond Burr, in fact, is quite good in the part, managing to impart a human dimension to what could have been merely an unsympathetic villain. In fact it is interesting to actually analyse how much of the films dramatic load actually rests on his shoulders.