Four Girls in Town (1957) User Reviews

Sleeper About Talent Search in 1850s Hollywood; Most Underrated

[silverscreen888 · 7/10 · 28 June 2005]

This is a true sleeper of a "B" film. It is a film about Hoillywood filmmakers by Hollywood filmmakers--when there was still a "Hollywood"--comprised of studios and people who tried, on whatever level of ideas--to be professional about participating in a marketplace of a sort relating to talents, scripts, films, advertising and selling of these to ticket buyers. There are several strands of story at work in this narrative. A studio sexpot, "friend" of a producer, wants a part in a classic drama for which she unsuited; she balks at her assignment, so the studio's heads then decide to conduct a talent search, inviting four actresses to test for the part a la Gone With the Wing, to generate publicity. . A young studio functionary directs their visit and screen tests, one who want to be allowed to direct eventually. And we learn about the four hopefuls and get to see their progress and their reactions to Hollywood. George Nader plays Mike, the young director; the four girls are Julie Adams, Marianne Koch, Elsa Martinelli and Gia Scala. The men in their lives are Syndey Chaplin, Grant Williams, and John Gavin, as well as Nader. Jack Sher was both writer and director of this well- made Universal Studios' effort. Others in the large and interesting cast included Herbert Anderson, Hy Averback, Ainslie Pryor, Dave Barry, James Bell, Mabel Albertson, Maurice Marsac, Helene Stanto, Irene Corlett and Eugene Mazzola. Alexander North did the excellent music, Julia Heron the set decorations and Rosemary O'Dell the challenging costumes. The film is fascinatingly different, bright, and well-paced. The young cast is unusually-sincere and some such as Marianne Koch and Chaplin surprisingly good. The climax of course comes when the four aspirants face the studio heads' choice of a leading lady; some have already made life-choices before the announcement is made, others are paired off with the gentlemen; but the choice comes as a shock to all concerned--and life in a Hollywood of minds committing professional suicide through lack of clear definitions goes another step toward TV-hastened oblivion. This is a not a stylish nor a pretentious film; it is however intensely interesting as an "insider" film about Hollywood; and it is very entertaining as a presentation of characters and filmland types. recommended.

:

A quintessential '50s movie

[dinky-4 · 6/10 · 27 October 2003]

From its animated opening credits to the presence of such icons as George Nader and Julie Adams, this is one of those movies which could only have come out of the 1950s. It's glossy, it's superficial, it's utterly unconvincing in its depiction of behind-the-cameras Hollywood, and yet it has the sort of entertaining, audience-pleasing quality which a number of current movies seem to have lost. Of the four women who come to Hollywood via a talent search, each gets involved in a subplot which is neatly tied up before the final fade-out. Gia Scala gets lost in the shuffle but the other three women come across well, especially Elsa Martinelli who dominates every scene she's in with a slightly over-the-top performance. She and Julie Adams and Marianne Cook all have swimsuit scenes but Gia Scala does not.

George Nader also has a swimsuit scene but the other two "hunks" whom Universal was grooming for stardom -- John Gavin and Grant Williams -- do not.

Very little is actually shown of the film-making process and what is depicted is almost laughably unconvincing. Hollywood has always had a problem in filming "Hollywood" and this curio from the 1950s is no exception.

What does it take to find a new star?

[mark.waltz · 6/10 · 12 February 2019]

We can only hypothesize what starlets had to go through in the Golden Age of Hollywood when it came to being chosen as the new fine for the supposed hot new role of the year. A role like Scarlet O'Hara didn't come along every year, but in the legacy that is Hollywood history, films tell us that publicity departments look high and low for someone to come in as the new hot young thing to replace those who were aging and fading. Here, a Hollywood studio is casting for the role of the biblical heroine Esther, and it's up to handsome George Nader to find and test the most talented young women from around the world for what this film is claiming will be the Cleopatra of 1957. It is ironic that just a few years later, 20th Century Fox did its own film on the story of Esther but shows someone who had been around for a long time, Joan Collins.

Here, the four girls are very eclectic and not one even similar to the other. They are Julie Adams, Elsa Martinelli, Marianne Koch and Gia Scala, with only Adams obviously American and the rest European. The film focuses on how they are found, how they are contacted, how they prepare for the screen test, how the screen test is done and the results that occur after the decision is made. There is no real rivalry between the for women, as the film focuses on their own individual insecurities and outside issues that may stand in their way of their successfully playing the part.

A jazzy opening score over some clever animated credits gets the ball rolling and from there, the audience is taken to the location of where each of the four finalists are chosen. Adams, playing an actress in an Off-Broadway play, has a possessive stage mother (Mabel Albertson from "Bewitched" fame) while the other actresses have various romantic problems including one who has a very possessive lover. The story isn't really strong and it becomes pretty obvious who will not make it, but it is obvious that there is hope that something else will come along for them. It is still bittersweet, basically an update of the lavish MGM musical "Ziegfeld Girl" where real priorities of life goals are learn and stardom is granted to the one who probably has the greatest chance of a long career. It is enjoyable for what it is, and each of the stars gives their all to creating a unique characterization. fortunately, unlike other similar melodramas of the 1950's, this does not sink into camp and treats its subject seriously, giving it an above average score for a film of such similar plus as many others before and since.

corrections

[ckjarrett · 1 September 2003]

Actor Judson Pratt IS credited.

Art Direction by Alexander Golitzen and "Haworth". It can be assumed this is Ted Haworth.

Music Supervision by Joseph Gershenson; "Rhapsody for Four Girls" composed by Alex North

Assistant Director: Dick Maybery (one "r")

CinemaScope/Technicolor.

Credits above are from the film print itself.

Also, I have tried MANY times to get this credit added - to no avail: Jose Ferrer appears UNCREDITED as a movie director in this film.

If only ...

[mls4182 · 3/10 · 24 May 2023]

If only the life of a starlet in the 50s was this bland. No Hollywood wolves, no casting couch, etc.

The film is still boring with a plot stretched thin. There are no good lines. This film is so dull it doesn't even have camp value.

It does give jobs to Universal contract players. It got Julie Adams out of the Black Lagoon. It was a start for John Gavin who went on to become Universal's male beauty for the next seven years. Grant Williams was soon dropped after this picture.

Others along for this sleepwalk are the three European actresses and body builder turned wooden actor George Nader.

YouTube saved this film from total oblivion.

Spotlight on the ladies

[jjnxn-1 · 8/10 · 25 June 2016]

An fine example of the sort of film that isn't made anymore. Studio engineered vehicle to spotlight a crop of its newest and most promising contract players.

The men are more or less disposable and none had careers of much distinction, though John Gavin had a good run of leads in the late 50's/early 60's. Too bad he was such a mechanical actor he certainly had the looks of a leading man.

Likewise none of the ladies ever made it to major stardom but all reached some level of renown in their native countries and all four are incredibly beautiful. The lone American, Julie Adams in particular had a very successful 60 year long career as a respected performer. Martinelli had a brief Hollywood run and a decent career in Italy as did Koch once she returned to Germany. Even the ill-fated but exquisite Gia Scala had some memorable roles before her personal problems ruined her career and life.

Here they all get their moment to shine in a story that was probably old hat in silents, the plucky actresses who have to compete for a crack at the big time. It's lush, plush and pretty empty with some outdated 50's sensibilities but if you like films made with exceptional care with that old studio sheen this is one worthy checking out.

Glossy and Compelling

[twanurit · 8/10 · 16 May 2001]

This Hollywood drama begins with a world-wide search for an actress to play the title role in an upcoming epic "The Story of Esther", since Manning Studios is having issues with their temperamental star Rita Holloway (Helene Stanton). Four are finally chosen: an Austrian (Marianne Cook (Koch)), an Italian (Elsa Martinelli), a Frenchwoman (Gia Scala) and an American (Julie Adams), all brunette beauties. There's some fascinating backstage, back-lot sequences, all shot on the Universal-International sets. Some of the women find love after some trials and tribulations. The men include George Nader, John Gavin, Sydney Chaplin, Grant Williams, Maurice Marsac. There's also an unexpected denouement at the end. The story receives tremendous boost by being photographed in color and Cinemascope (although I haven't seen it in widescreen). The day and night beach scenes are striking, the music by Alex North is fascinating, costumes by Rosemary Odell beautiful. The supporting cast is filled with familiar faces, all excellent, with Mabel Albertson in particular a standout as Adams' pushy stage mother.

minor but colorful look at Hollywood

[hipthornton · 21 September 2002]

Hollywood never seemed to have the knack of looking at itself with a reasonable eye,preferring to show the public what the public itself perceived as Hollywood. Still,this is an entertaining little epic with attractive stars and reasonably entertaining story.Nice color and pretty costumes with four lovely leading ladies to wear them.The drama is a bit glossed over but still makes a good movie as an example of the fifties type of movie.

Quite enjoyable

[planktonrules · 8/10 · 18 February 2024]

When the movie begins, the studio is trying to sign a temperamental actress for an upcoming Biblical epic. However, her demands are so excessive, the studio decides instead to use a publicity stunt to cast the lead actress. They'll have a contest where women from around the world will be brought to Hollywood for screentests to find the perfect Esther in the epic.

Four unknown actresses are chosen...an Italian, an Austrian, a French woman and an American. THe story consists of their efforts to secure the roles and focuses mostly on how studios operate (or want the public to think they operate) and offers a lot of interesting stories.

The acting is generally very good, though I do think Elsa Martinelli was a poor choice in the film because her accent was too heavy. I am glad I had captions though audiences of 1957 must have struggled with her. The story is clever...with dramatic, humorous and romantic potions throughout. Overall a most enjoyable film...one which is better than I expected.