Vue d'ensemble
MOVIEmeter: 
Down 6% in popularity this week. See
why on
IMDbPro.
Contact:
View
company
contact information for Cat on a Hot Tin Roof on
IMDbPro.
Date de sortie:
20 septembre 1958 (USA)
suite
Accroche:
Just one pillow on her bed ... and just one desire in her heart!
suite
Intrigue:
Brick, an alcoholic ex-football player, drinks his days away and resists the affections of his wife, Maggie. His reunion with his father, Big Daddy, who is dying of cancer, jogs a host of memories and revelations for both father and son.
full summary |
add synopsis
Récompenses:
Nominated for 6 Oscars.
Another 2 wins
&
8 nominations
suite
Equipe vérifiée comme complète
Détails supplémentaires
Durée:
108 min
Rapport de forme:
1,85 : 1
suite
Son:
Mono (Westrex Recording System)
Curiosités
Anecdotes:
Although
Elia Kazan directed "Cat" on Broadway, he was not involved in the film, despite having two cinematic successes with
Tennessee Williams work
A Streetcar Named Desire (1951) and
Baby Doll (1956). Kazan had had trouble with Williams, demanding that he rewrite the third act of the play to bring Big Daddy back on stage. He also was tired of having critics call him a "co-author" of Williams work, which he knew he was not. He would eventually direct one more Williams play on Broadway,
Sweet Bird of Youth (1962), but that film also would be directed by
Richard Brooks.
suite
Goofs:
Erreurs factuelles: Although it is filled once in the afternoon, the ice bucket in Brick's bedroom stays full well into the evening even though it's never replenished.
suite
Bande son:
Soothe My Lonely Heart
suite
foire aux questions
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.
plus de (106 total)
Forum
Discuter de ce film avec les autres utilisateurs sur
Forum IMDb pour Cat on a Hot Tin Roof (1958)
suite
Recommendations
Liens liés
I have just read through most of the comments on this great film. A few responses here, then, first. I disclose that I haven't seen the play on which it was based, and so was unencumbered by either false expectations or relevant expertise. And I "walked in" on the film when Big Daddy disembarked from his plane. I'm undecided whether that makes me mendacious, for hiding from my ignorance, or if that'd just be "Bull!"
Natasha thought "Guys might get bored". I notice on the demographics that men outnumber the women among voters, by a factor of 3-4. I suspect that reflects the centrality (to my -- male -- mind) of the male-male relationships: Brick-Big Daddy, and Brick-Skipper.
Maggie of course was a lead character, but -- firstly -- Taylor didn't imbue her with... well, with the life-spirit that her character unwittingly and eloquently claimed at film's end: "The gift of new life, sired by Brick." (I paraphrase.) Hence, Maggie didn't show any spiritual renaissance as the plot developed. I should be better off, though, remarking that, indeed, the plot gave her no *reason* to change, since (as I recall things) she didn't ever learn anything non-ephemeral. Maggie had a good bit of life in her; but her character was essentially a tool for the development of and between Brick and Big Daddy. Brick's reconciliation with his wife had everything to do with his newfound appreciation of the meaning of mendacity, and nothing to do with either Maggie's past or the manner in which she brought it to discussion in the present. My feeling was that Brick took to heart his father's purportedly cynical line about the world being a system of mendacity in which we must make love to wives we no longer love -- transformed, in Brick's action, into a healthy rejection of indispensible myths and indispensible truths.
So, to conclude that thought. Without presuming to speak against the pleasure a woman viewer might take in the film, guys have more than a few enthralling moments and themes for themselves. My take, at least, is that men, particularly (or perhaps even uniquely), must grapple with forging an identity reconciling Brick's loyalty to Skipper -- and other high-minded ideals -- with his eventual absolution -- and acceptance of a flawed reality.
At this point I can't remember what else I wanted to mention. I disagree with most of Telegonus' assessment, though (or: the portions I am qualified to judge). It didn't strike me as dated. Nor did I notice of the behind-the-scenes Williams, "he is out to enlighten his audience on sexual matters; also on life in the then still exotic Deep South. " (This may well be my shortcoming.) That is, how was it an attack on "Middle America"? Perhaps Telegonus refers to the theme that money can't buy love; I tend to see avarice as a perversion for the extremes of society, the vigilant elites and the covetous proles.
That'll do. Now I must sleep and face the day tomorrow without Kentucky bourbon and its "cold mechanical click".