Riot in Juvenile Prison (1959) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Go ahead dig your grave as deep as you like
kapelusznik1826 January 2017
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILERS*** 1959 troubled youth movie with the entire cast of juvenile delinquents made up of white clean cut looking collage boys & girls with not a single inner city-Hispanic & African/America-teen in sight has bad boy Eddie Bassett, Scott Marlowe, lead not one but two major revolts against the prison administration that has him finally realize just how futile his efforts were. That's when Eddie and his fellow convicts are surrounded by the police and national guard in the warden's office and about to be blown to bits. This all started earlier when Eddie staged his first prison escape when two of his fellow prisoners were gunned down, after shooting at the prison guards,by prison guard Andy, Richard Reeves.

It's when prison psychiatrist Paul A. Furman,Jerome Thor, was put in charge of the "Joint" his policy of treating the unruly teenagers like human beings not hard core convicts that the response to it was amazing. At first not starting any trouble and getting along with each other-The prisoners and prison guards-trouble soon started brewing when Dr. Furman introduced women convicts into the place to keep the sex starved boys entertained. That blew Dr. Furman's plan to keep order in the place with the sex crazed Stu Killion, Richard Tyler,losing it during a Saturday night dance and attacking and raping woman prisoner Kitty Anderson,Virgina Aldridge,in the men's locker room.

Eddie who already was in hot water when he and his boys attacked and worked over Dr. Furman, who refused to press charges, now got into a deeper hole when he started a second uprising at the "Joint" in order to get his hands on prison guard Andy whom he held responsible for gunning down two of his friends while trying to escape! the revolt fizzled out when Dr. Furman, letting bygones be bygones, in risking his life talked Eddie and his fellow prisoners to give themselves up before things really got out of hand and someone got killed.

One of the many troubled youth movies to come out of the 1950's Hollywood that went out of its way to show youths like Eddie in a positive light not in what they did but in the reasons that made them that way. In Eddie's case it's revealed under hypnosis that he was traumatized at a young age when on his 7th birthday his drunken father coming home from work smashed his head in while his mom, who was too drunk to help him, just sat by and did nothing!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Bad kids
BandSAboutMovies1 June 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Dr. Paul Furman (Jerome Thor, whose trenchcoat from Foreign Intrigue is in the Smithsonian; he's in a lot of later Bronson movies like 10 to Midnight, Kinjite: Forbidden Subjects, Murphy's Law and Messenger of Death) takes over a reform school and makes some big changes, including easing the discipline, trusting the inmates more and, perhaps most importantly, making it co-ed.

Eddie Bassett (Scott Marlowe, who was in The Cool and the Crazy and had a long career of TV roles) is enjoying all this freedom and the interest of the girls that have arrived, like the shy Kitty Anderson (Virginia Aldridge) and the more in your face Babe (Dorothy Provine, That Darn Cat).

Everything goes bad when Kitty and Babe fight over him, which turns into a big rumble and even Dr. Furman gets involved when she's punched by Eddie.

The governor fires Furman and brings back Col. Ernest Walton (Lance Hoty), who was a strict believer in the power of discipline. One of his guards, Quillan (Richard Reeves) beats on Eddie, who decides to start a riot - a Riot In Juvenile Prison - that can only be stopped by Furman.

I mean, in the real world, they'd just tear gas these kids and shoot them, but go with director Edward L. Cahn (The Four Skulls of Jonathan Drake, Invasion of the Saucer Men, Creature With the Atom Brain) and Orville H. Hampton (whose career started in 1950 with movies like Rocketship X-M and ended in 1983 with The Dukes cartoon series; he also wrote Friday Foster) and watch a world where juvenile delinquents and authority can walk hand in hand into a sunshiny brand new day.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Hoyt and Reeves play nasty throughout, and they do it well
scsu197526 November 2022
Scott Marlowe stars as a tough kid at the Ditman Hall "State Training School for Boys." Apparently acting is not what these kids are being trained for. Marlowe leads a mini-breakout, but some of his gang are shot down by the guards and Marlowe is put in stir by the screws. After we're treated to multiple front page headlines of the problems at the school, the Governor of whatever state this is appoints a psychiatrist to run the school. The liberal shrink (Jerome Thor) immediately runs up against the school's conservative warden, played by John Hoyt. Hoyt's philosophy on discipline is somewhat to the right of Attila the Hun.

Thor's first initiative is brilliant; integrate the school by bringing in the chicks from the "Larkin School for Girls." (More front page headlines.) Now what could possibly go wrong here? The girls arrive to the sound of catcalls, whistles, and seem to enjoy every minute of it, setting the women's movement back 1000 years. The chicks are led by matrons Ann Doran and Marcia Henderson. The next day, during the co-ed breakfast, Marlowe and a muscle head named Stu vie for the attention of one of the chicks, played by Virginia Aldridge. Meanwhile, a rival chick (Dorothy Provine) has her sights set on Marlowe; she calls him "tall, dark, and delinquent." The inevitable rumble between Marlowe and Stu occurs, with Thor breaking it up. Henderson and Thor get off to a bad start, when she tells Thor his theories won't work. But then we find out Henderson's sister was once assaulted by a "sex psychopath." So Thor does some of his psycho-alkalizing on Henderson, which ticks her off, especially when she finds out this is not covered by Obamacare. Since Henderson and Thor can't stand each other, you know darn well that sooner or later, Henderson and Thor will do it 'til they're sore.

Undeterred by his first failure, Thor then announces that the School will start holding classes, showing films twice a week, holding a dance every two weeks, and eliminating armed guards. Marlowe and his two pals ("Dink" and "Matches") decide they are going to get even with one of the screws (tough guy Richard Reeves), who roughed up one of their friends. Thor intercepts them and is beaten up for his trouble.

The big dance rolls around, and Stu tries to assault Aldridge. When Thor tries to intervene, Stu pulls a shiv, but Marlowe clocks Stu. More front page headlines: sex assault at the school. Thor gets canned. Hoyt takes over and immediately turns the place back into the black hole of Calcutta. Marlowe manages to overpower Reeves, get his gun, and lead a revolt. Can Thor somehow intercede, save the day, and reform Marlowe? Hoyt calls Governor for help. Governor calls State Police for help. Audience calls manager for refund.

The "delinquents" seem to change on a dime, varying from being repulsive to contrite. Marlowe is decent in his role, but is just a little too mixed up for my tastes. Also, he occasionally sounds like Jon Stewart impersonating Donald Trump. Aldridge is blah, and I can't figure out any reason why she would be in reform school unless she was convicted of impersonating an actress. Provine, despite her cute looks, is snooty, unlikable, and her nasal voice does not help either. Thor is deadly dull as the psychiatrist. Henderson has some nice curves. But her hair is pasted into a bun, making her look almost as old as Doran, who has appeared in roughly 10,000 films.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Lousy
mls418211 June 2021
Most 1950s prison and delinquent movies have some camp value. This one does not. It sure doesn't have any social value. Dullsville daddy-o.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Unfolds in a pretty predictable manner
Wizard-825 January 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I had a pretty good idea how "Riot in Juvenile Prison" would play out even before I started to watch it. With the movie being made in the 1950s, I correctly guessed that all the "youths" would be played by actors who were in their early 20s at their youngest. I also correctly guessed that what might have been considered hard-hitting stuff back in 1959 would play out in an extremely tame manner more than fifty years later. Also, if you have seen even just one other prison drama that involves do-gooders trying to reform the system and hardened prisoners, the way this version unfolds will hold absolutely no surprises at all. The only thing I didn't predict was how thin the characters would be. For example, when it comes to the juvenile prisoners, we only learn the background and criminal record of just ONE of the juvenile prisoners. The only real positive attribute the movie can boast is that its production values are somewhat higher than most other juvenile delinquent productions of this period.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Lamest riot ever!
hemisphere65-117 June 2021
The story concept is perfect for a movie, but the actual story was so threadbare that if you blinked, you might miss it!

There were obviously no legal or law enforcement advisors consulted about the script, so the lack of realism was frightening.

Not as frightening as the acting, though!

Boring film with a few great lines (as in inadvertently hilarious great).
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Likable, vivid "teens in trouble"
Sleepy-1711 October 2003
The story really picks up when the new warden decides it's time for the juvenile joint to go co-ed! Decent acting and crowd choreography make this one of director Cahn's most enjoyable efforts. The riot scenes and the dance scenes are very well handled, and Scott Marlowe is effective as the "Rebel with Claws".
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Better Than The Title Suggests
dougdoepke24 January 2017
Reviewer msroz is really on target. The film's competently made, performed, and better than expected given the sleazy title. Trouble is, as msroz points out, the story's a cliché about a humane reformer (Thor) bringing kindness to a brutal reform school for boys. He's opposed by the resident warden (Hoyt) who only grudgingly cooperates. Not exactly cutting-edge material for its time.

Unfortunately, the screenplay includes two big stretches. First is the expected Hollywood ending that's an abrupt reversal of what's gone before. Second-- in my book at least-- is making the school co-educational. I just can't see how mixing teen-age girls with hormonally-driven boys is going to make anyone's job easier or more effective. Nonetheless, it does set up an audience-pleasing battle of the bra's, especially Dorothy Provine, who's soon to take a few steps up the Hollywood ladder and I can see why.

Shouldn't overlook several of Hollywood's best baddies of the period. We've got Scott Marlowe who snarled with the best of the teenage punks, as he does here. Then there's John Hoyt, his cruel face and manner perfect for a tough warden. And shouldn't neglect Richard Reeves as the hulking guard, ever an intimidating screen presence.

All in all, it's an excellent cast for a B-movie independent. So, if you can overlook some of the stretches, the film's got genuine compensations.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed