Late Autumn (1960) Poster

(1960)

User Reviews

Review this title
23 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Late-Period Ozu Reworks "Late Spring" by Focusing on a Mother-Daughter Bonding
EUyeshima24 July 2007
Even though the comparison is obviously intentional, Yasujiro Ozu's 1960 film is really a variation on his classic 1949 father-daughter drama, "Late Spring". He goes further with this parallel by having the wondrous Setsuko Hara, who played the daughter in the original film, play the mother in this one, even though only eleven years have elapsed. Gone is the alternately feisty, flirtatious and petulant manner that marked her earlier performance as Noriko, and in its place is that remarkable stillness and quiet warmth in her portrayal of Akiko that marked the best of Hara's later performances. She was barely forty during filming, yet she carries the gravitas of her role with uncommon ease. What remains consistent between her two performances is the unearthly devotion which ties the characters intractably to the world in which they have grown accustomed.

Ozu wrote the quietly perceptive script with longtime collaborator Kogo Noda, and the filmmaker's trademark touches - the narrative ellipses, the lack of melodrama, the low camera angles - are all here in their emotionally resonant glory. This time, the character of Akiko has such an easy sisterly bond with her daughter Ayako that neither has an interest in dating or marriage. While Akiko's situation is more or less accepted by society, Ayako's single status is a point of consternation, especially for three friends of Akiko's late husband, all of whom express feelings of unrequited love for the unavailable Akiko. They are jointly intent on finding Ayako a suitable husband and find one in Goto, a young, well-mannered bachelor with a suitable career. Akiko, however, demurs at the possibility of matrimony which leads the story through its inevitable paces.

Yôko Tsukasa is pretty and affecting as Ayako, though honestly no match for the younger Hara in the earlier film. More of that uninhibited spirit is present in Mariko Okada, who plays Ayako's friend and colleague Yuriko. She has a terrifically abrasive and amusing confrontation with the trio of embarrassed matchmakers, and the result comes across as a bit of an imbalance to the viewer now since Yuriko's Westernized independence is more compelling than Ayako's more innate diffidence. Adding more to the comedic aspects of the story, Shin Saburi, Nabuo Nakamura and Ryuji Kita play the matchmaking trio almost like a Shakespearean comedy troupe. Interestingly, Ozu uses a decidedly Italianate-sounding score to underscore the action, a nice unpredictable touch. This well-preserved film is not as essential as "Late Spring", but it is a worthy addition to Ozu's filmography.
28 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Lightness of touch with a tinge of sadness
GyatsoLa15 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
One of many great movies by Ozu, this is an apparently simple comedy (a comedy that puts a smile on your face rather than guffaws of laughter) but with depths of feeling and sadness that are, as always with Ozu movies, so unexpected. Although not by any means a 'major' or 'serious' movie, its full of touches that show what a masterly director he was.

Arranged marriages have a bad name for many people - I was very surprised on a recent trip to Kyoto to be told that they are still quite common - but this is a movie that shows that they are as full of the complexities and pitfalls of conventional romance. The story revolves around the clumsy attempts of three well meaning men to help out the wife of their late friend by acting as matchmakers for his daughter. Its complicated by the fact that all three of them were in love with the mother in their early years - unsurprising as the mother is played by the always luminous Setsuko Hara. The daughter is less than impressed by the matchmaking, especially when the men decide to set up one of their number with her mother.

The plot is in many ways very similar to Ozu's wonderful 'Late Spring', which starred many of the same actors. But while Late Spring was full of thematic richness and drama, this movie is a lot simpler, but is equally bitter sweet at the end. The happiness of the older characters at marrying off the younger generation is matched with an awareness of the loneliness of old age. Its also worth noting that the usual imaginative Ozu camera angles in this movie are matched with gorgeous colour and lovely set design.

One point of interest for this movie is that it was clearly intended as a crowd pleaser. For those who think that Ozu is too 'arty', this movie shows why he was hugely popular with ordinary cinema-goers in Japan and remains so to this day. His simple stories resonated deeply with Japanese people at a time of great change, but his genius is in the universality of these movies - they have never truly dated, the are as insightful and fascinating as ever.

In summary, this is not a movie in itself that will convince the doubtful about Ozu's right to be considered one of the all time great directors, but it is a delightful movie for any cinema lover (or for that matter, anyone interested in Japanese culture) to enjoy.
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Possess Your Soul In Patience
museumofdave15 March 2013
If you have never seen a film by Yasujiro Ozu, you may have difficulty adjusting to his restrained and subtle handling of emotions; identifying Ozu as a director not known for action-packed narrative is massive understatement, as his films reflect a less hectic time and an ancient culture slowly coming to terms with change.

On the surface, this film is simply about the separation occurring as a daughter marries and a parent is left behind. With Ozu, however, carefully and consistently arranging composition, with gentle humor and a quiet observation of the human condition, there is much to be gained from reflection, from watching people realistically and patiently coming to terms with change. No one screams and throws dishes, no one bleeds copiously or falls out of a window, no one even runs across the street. My grandmother used to say "possess your soul in patience," and that said, a viewer may need to do just that with Late Autumn; the willing viewer will be amply rewarded with this amazing examination of calm resignation in the face of a life change
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Approachable Ozu masterpiece
dvazp9 February 2006
Ozu's common themes of ageing, filial ties and modernisation are as present here as in many other of his films. But in this film, as well as the melancholy and gentleness we are accustomed to, there are large doses of comedy which makes this film far more accessible for the uninitiated.

The story centres around a widow (Setsuko Hara) and her daughter (Yoko Tsukasa). The daughter doesn't want to get married because she wants to care for her mother, whereas the mother wants her daughter to marry even though she realises she'll be left alone. So far everything is extremely familiar. Except that in this case the dead husband's friends get involved, trying to find suitors for both mother and daughter, thus creating comical situations, causing family tensions, and finally necessitating for the daughter's friend to step in and sort out the mess.

All in all highly recommended for anyone who wishes to try out this highly prestigious director, and a strong reminder for fans of why we love him so much.
47 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Charming...
samhill521514 November 2010
Of Ozu's trilogy on marriage Japanese style this one is my favorite. In fact many of my comments apply to the other two, Late Spring (1949) and Early Summer (1951). All three deal with the concept of marriage as seen in traditional Japanese society and even though to my western eyes it seems antiquated, Ozu manages to present it as a sensible, inherently logical way to pair two people. But what ultimately attracts me to his work is his presentation. The plot unfolds in a slow, languorous way. It's linear but with gaps in time which are fully explained so that we are not left guessing as to intervening events. What we see and hear is the important stuff. We, in essence, are eavesdropping on intimate family conversations, the kind of things discussed at every dinner table, things important to a family but more or less irrelevant to the outside world. Somehow Ozu makes that interesting. Naturally the actors play an important part and the presence of two of my favorite Japanese actors, Setsuko Hara and Chisu Ryu, in all three are a definite plus. So why is this one my favorite? Humor and lots of it. The first two are rather serious, drama-filled works where the characters exhibit much angst. Late Autumn on the other hand is light and airy, there's a bounce to it, and it's filled with a lot of sexual innuendo that is completely absent from the others. It's as if Ozu was saying to us that the post-WWII years was a time for Japan to buckle down to the serious work of rebuilding society. By 1960 the joy of living had returned to his country. It could afford the bumbling of three well-meaning and occasionally lecherous men whose efforts at match-making were only half successful.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An Update of "Late Spring", except the girls rule.
crossbow010621 January 2008
This story is basically a retelling of the excellent "late Spring", except now the always engaging Setsuko Hara plays the mother in the film rather than the daughter. The daughter, the beautiful Ayako played by Yoko Tsukasa, is being told its time to marry. Three friends of her late father (essentially uncles) attempt to arrange a suitable partner for her. Ozu has updated his films before and he always manages to keep them fresh. This time, it is both humorous as well as poignant. A great addition to the story is Ayako's best friend Yuriko, a spitfire who isn't afraid to speak her mind. I especially like the relationship of Akiko (Hara) and Ayako as mother and daughter. They seem very comfortable with each other. In the previous "Late Spring", there was more tension. That is what gives "late Spring" the nod as the better film, it is a masterpiece. In this film the acting is uniformly good to great and there are some standout scenes, especially between the always beautiful, gifted actress Setsuko Hara and Yoko Tsukasa. There is also a great scene between Yuriko and the three men who are trying to find a suitor for Ayako. By all means, watch this film, but don't miss "late Spring". This film is available on the 5 disc "Late Ozu" set and both the film and box set are highly recommended.
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ozu expands his view to include mothers.
bobsgrock14 December 2012
In many ways a retread of his earlier masterpiece Late Spring, which dealt with the relationship between a widowed father and his marry-able daughter, Ozu returned to familiar territory as he often did late in his career for a look at the flip-side. Here, the mother is widowed and desires to see her daughter married and happy. Three friends determine to intervene, leaving a trail of misunderstandings and hurt feelings in their attempt to appease all involved.

While this is certainly a familiar story for Ozu to tell, he somehow manages to inject new life into it every time out. Through a beautiful color palette and his famous visual style, Ozu explores a world of postwar Japan that finally appears to be picking itself up fifteen years after World War II. Western dress and behavior continues to seep into Japanese culture and Ozu seems to be picking up on the rapid evolution of change within his country throughout these late career works. His lack of interest in plot and storytelling leaves the viewer more time to focus on the atmosphere, the context in which the story is set. The result is a very pensive and serene feeling as one realizes that no matter what time or place, humans will always desire certain things. Companionship, love and happiness will never go out of style, even for widowed women.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Sweet-and-sour social comedy. Sublime ending
Teyss9 April 2016
Warning: Spoilers
The qualities of Yasujiro Ozu's movies are complex to demonstrate: simple stories of simple people, everyday dialogues, slow pace, fixed cameras, images with plain beauty. Also, they probably have more meaning for a Japanese audience who better understands their cultural, visual and historical references.

On the surface, many of Ozu's films seem similar: the plots look familiar and the style is recognisable among many. Yet he always introduces variations and progresses in his form with perfectionist care. He is a craftsman of cinema and as such, even subtle differences create an altogether new piece of art, like a painter representing different versions of resembling subjects.

Ozu was somewhat resistant to change. When he directed silent movies and the industry moved to talkies, he was unwilling to follow: he did so when he had no choice in 1936, nine years after the introduction of sound. He continued directing black and white movies until 1957 as he did not want to switch to colour. When he finally reluctantly did so, he liked it so much he only directed colour movies. However because he died in 1963, there are only six of these, in a carrier of more than 50 films. It is unfortunate, because his use of colour is masterly, as notably shows in "Late Autumn".

His masterpiece is considered to be "Tokyo Story" (1953). Nevertheless, despite all its qualities, I still prefer "Late Autumn" (original title "Quiet Autumn Day"). Its story is close to "Late Spring" (1949), but notably differs by the style (of which colour is only an element) and the humour.

THE OLD AND THE NEW

It is the story of two middle-aged men, Mamiya and Taguchi, who want to find a husband for the young Ayako, daughter of their late friend. However Ayako lives with her mother Akiko and does not want to leave her alone, so the ploy is to marry Akiko to their widowed friend Hirayama. As we see, the movie is about arranged marriages: the two women are tools of the male manoeuvre. But this will partly backfire, tactically and emotionally.

The movie shows a traditional society turning into a new one. On the one hand: arranged marriages, etiquette, dominant males working in top positions while their wives stay home. When Taguchi comes back home, he drops his clothes on the floor for his wife to pick up. His daughter prepares a bath for him. They think everything will happen according to their plans. Hirayama, however, is on the side: less dominant, more passive.

They believe they can be allowed anything.
  • Mamiya arrives late at the memorial service at the beginning and makes a disrespectful remark about being too early.
  • They make ill-placed allusions about a waitress being ugly, in front of her.
  • When Hirayama is turned down at the end, the two other men don't care.
  • Their intentions are decent, but because their mental frame is old-fashioned, they act clumsily.


On the other hand, their entourage escapes their control: this is when is movie is most humorous.
  • Their wives make sarcastic comments, either in front of them, either behind their back (i.e. the conversation between the two ladies).
  • Their children resist their authority, talk frankly, answer back. Taguchi's young son makes insulting gestures behind his father's back.
  • His daughter married because of love, not rationale, which her father does not understand.
  • At one point, Yuriko, who has a junior position in the company, scolds the three bewildered men. Already funny for a Western audience, this scene must have been a shock for 1960s Japanese spectators. Afterwards, she fools them by bringing them to a restaurant that is actually her parents'. And she manipulates Hirayama by promising Akiko will marry him.


IMMATURE CHARACTERS

More profoundly, the general stratagem reveals concealed passions: Mamiya and Taguchi were in love with Akiko, and actually still are. They are jealous Hirayama can marry her. They appear weaker than are willing to admit, manipulating others yet unable to acknowledge their emotions, while their wives perceive their hidden feelings. Bygone loves, deceased spouses, fading traditions: it is a nostalgic movie.

To illustrate the story, Ozu magnificently uses colours. Objects are flashy blue, green and most noticeably red. On the contrary, characters mainly dress in conventional tones. They are sometimes seen behind colourful objects in the foreground (bottles, bowls, glasses, cups, etc.). Also, Ozu occasionally introduces "empty" shots without persons. We feel as if objects had more presence than characters: the latter seem to play stereotyped roles. They have plain conversations, gossip, focus on simple ideas, spend their time drinking; they frequently look dull, indecisive, awkward or immature. The point of view on characters is slightly satirical. Exceptions are the quiet yet strong Akiko and the outspoken Yuriko.

SUBLIME ENDING

To be honest, until the end, the movie is "only" very good. However the last ten minutes are for me among the greatest in cinema history. Akiko and Ayako make a last trip together, which is very nostalgic and moving. Then, the marriage is dazzling, supported by ravishing music. Everybody is motionless and silent, like objects precisely. A few gazes loaded with emotions summarise the whole story: Akiko looks melancholic, Yuriko happy, Hirayama resentful, Taguchi's wife embarrassed (for Hirayama). Apart from Yuriko, there is no sign of joy. The newly wed, very handsome in their costumes, are stiff like statues, their faces without feelings. It feels as another "empty" shot. The entire scheme has culminated to this hollow formality: the final irony, wrapped in delightful form.

After a bitter scene where Hirayama expresses his rancour, the movie closes on Akiko. She has a sad and gentle look: she is alone, but her daughter can be happy, so she thinks. Her sacrifice is touching. The final image shows her corridor, but instead of having three lights on as usual, there are only two: Akiko is left with the remembrance of her late husband (two lights) since Ayako is gone (absent light).
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Expertly crafted but terribly familiar.
planktonrules12 June 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I have seen practically every film available that were directed by Yasujirô Ozu. While he's considered by many to be a genius, I would say that he was an ultra-conservative--a man who developed some interesting techniques and story ideas but never really changed with the times. So, if you see an Ozu film from 1935, 45, 55 or the early 60s, there is an amazing sameness about them--something no other director ever accomplished. This is not criticism--this is fact. Ozu did stories about the Japanese family--and very often about widowed parents striving to get their now adult children married. And, his actual techniques didn't vary much. Although "Late Autumn" is in color (a few of his later ones were), it uses the same stationary camera and floor level for the shots. Ozu truly was a man who liked to do variations on the same themes and in the same styles! Because of this, while "Late Autumn" is expertly crafted, it really isn't innovative in the least other than making both the main characters women.

This story begins with a memorial service for a man who has been dead for several years. After the service, three friends of the deceased and his widow discuss her as well as her 24 year-old daughter. They love these women and it hurts them to see the daughter is still unmarried despite being a lovely person. So, the three schemers decide that it's their task to get the girl married--whether she likes it or not! Unfortunately, their plans don't always go as they intended and ultimately it takes one of the young lady's friends to give them some assistance.

Other than this film be very mildly comic as well as the use of the three friends, the film is yet another lovely and very deliberately paced Ozu film. If you haven't seen too many of his films, then by all means watch this one. If you have and feel you've gone down this same road many times before, they try a film by another fine director. Even die-hard fans would agree that there is an amazing similarity between this and most of Ozu's films--particularly his later ones.
17 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
an excellent film, touching and tear-provoking
zzhou57 September 2005
Warning: Spoilers
just a simple family story rendered so touching: a mother and a daughter were confronted with choice of life when the father died. The dilemma involves the conflict of traditional Japanese values and modern individuality.

The story ends with the mother's self-sacrifice for the daughter's happy marriage. The disintegration of a family to embrace the new generation's happiness, in my eyes , is always cruel but inevitable

The film is tinged with nostalgia and subtle feelings. The end is my favorite: the mother's expression, half sad and suddenly lighted up... quite an antidote to the Hollywood's Happy-end
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Rebooted colorized version of "Late Spring"
jordondave-2808516 May 2023
(1960) Late Autumn (In Japanese with English subtitles) DRAMA

Yasujirô Ozu's remaking of "Late Spring", which is based on a novel written by Kôgo Noda called "Chichi to musume" and Ton Satomi about pressures to a 27 year old daughter to marry despite her being objectionable. In this case, the time is 1960, and the environment is more current except that the roles are now reversed, which in the 1949 original theatrical version, it was the daughter feeling pressure by her father, but in this version it's the mother who's played by Setsuko Hara who was also in the original, playing as the daughter felt pressured to marry by her father's associates. Anyways, in this scenario, it's starts off with the aftermath of a funeral, 27 year old Ayako Miwa and her mother Akiko Miwa (Setsuko Hara) have only each other now that that Akiko's husband of the family has been buried. And while there, some of her father's closest working associates see that Akiko's daughter is old enough to get married since she's 27 years old. They then try to accomplish this task by using deception, manipulation and lies to see to it that she settles down even though her mother would be lonely without her, and that the three grown men setting this up already have spouses and servants living with them. As much as I love to see Japanese icon actress Setsuko Hara in color instead of in black and white, this film still felt long since the film excuses the actions of it's working associates about marrying off a 27 or 28 year old woman who's not even related to any of them since theirs an adage in Japan that single girls will become 'old maids' which is only a myth. And instead of handling their own their own problems, why does it concern them to have her get married as quickly as possible which the film doesn't address this question as actress Hara was allowed to put in some of her two cents in, but only for so many scenes. Not as good as "Tokyo Story" since the situations feels much more forced and imposed upon than 1949 "Late Spring".
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Matchmaker, Matchmaker
boblipton14 July 2019
Setsuko Hara's husband is dead and his old college friends gather, as they often do anyway. The widow's daughter, Yôko Tsukasa, is 24, which means it's time she married. So they pick out a candidate, Keiji Sada. Only she's not interested, because she feels her mother needs her.

Well, we've seen this before in Ozu movies. In LATE SPRING, it was Miss Hara's turn to be a stubborn daughter worried about a widowed parent. Now, eleven years later, she's the widowed parent with a stubborn daughter. However, this one is pretty much as straight a comedy as Ozu turned out after the War, so just as it begins with a funeral, we can be certain it will end with a wedding. There are remarks made that are clearly asides to the audience, like every waitress and bartender apologizing for the delay in service, and the three friends who realize they need to get Miss Hara remarried and choose one of their number as the groom. Matters grow more confused, people are told about things that haven't been done, and it's the turn of Mariko Okada, as Miss Tsukasa's friend to whom she's not talking, to drag everyone together and get some straight answers out of them... and to lug the drunken men to her father's sushi joint, because he can use the business.

It's warm and funny and familiar to anyone who's seen Ozu's movies. It makes me wish I had friends and family like that.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Love Ozu but this plot...
elision1021 December 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I love everything about Ozu movies, and that they don't differ all that much doesn't bother me. And I realize it's Japan in the Sixties and people may not be so open with their feelings. Still, to have one-third of the film all based on a misunderstanding that could be immediately cleared up by someone saying "No, that didn't happen!" ruins the picture for me. But I'm no doubt in the minority.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Tedious
evening121 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Some middle-aged men with too much time on their hands take on a project -- to marry off a local widow so that her daughter can pursue her own wedded bliss.

The male resume- and photo-toting yentas select a groom for Mrs. Miwa, but don't clue her in on the plan. One mentions the scheme to Mrs. Miwa's daughter, Ayoko, who gets miffed and huffy because her mom supposedly left her out of the loop.

Are we supposed to see this as a zany comedy of errors? It left me bored. Making matters worse, we fritter away much additional time with a friend of Ayoko who is equally adept at being a busybody. Get a life, young lady!

I've seen some other films by Ozu, and, while finding them generally understated, thought they weren't half-bad. This one is probably best for die-hard fans.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Beautifully Touching Late Ozu
keithhmessenger15 December 2023
Warning: Spoilers
This 1960 film by the great Japanese writer-director Yasujiro Ozu can be viewed as being part of a significant transition in cinema history. The film's creator would himself be dead (a tragic early demise at the age of 60) in three years and Ozu's national cinema, within which the film-maker's quiet family dramas would take on iconic status (extending to world cinema), would begin transitioning to a new phase (popularly known as the Japanese New Wave). Late Autumn is closely related (sometimes being billed as a 'remake', despite being based on different source novels) to Ozu's earlier (1949) masterpiece, Late Spring, with the earlier film's (and Ozu regular) Setsuko Hara now playing the mother and widow Akiko Miwa to Yoko Tsukasa's daughter, Ayako, with Akiko looking to 'marry off' her daughter (as compared with the earlier film where Hara's character was in the daughter role to her widower father, played by Chishu Ryu, who returns here as Akiko's brother-in-law). Again, Ozu gives us a beautifully restrained family drama, this time in colour, and with a good deal more (ironic) humour than the earlier film, although Late Autumn's touching qualities eventually become just as evident they do in Late Spring.

Perhaps the main 'progression' in Late Autumn as compared to earlier Ozus is the developing independence of the female of the species (of course, Ozu is one of cinema's greatest ever directors of women, foregrounding their role in family and society more generally). We get a very stark (and revealing in terms of generational differences) comparison between mother Akiko - still bedecked in the traditional kimono and knowing 'her place' in (Japanese) society and the world - her daughter Ayako - more progressively attired and beginning to question the importance of marriage, but still 'fawning' in the company of men - and Mariko Akada's co-worker to Ayako, Yuriko Sasaki - the most 'liberated' and outspoken of all the women here, indeed confrontational in the film's defining sequence, where Yuriko faces off with Ozu's trio of middle-aged ex-acquaintances of Akiko's deceased husband, who are looking to 'marry off' both Ayako and Akiko. Indeed, so 'in your face' is Yuriko's stance in this set-piece that, despite the excellence of both Hara and Tsukasa, Akada could be regarded as having a film-stealing role. The aforementioned male trio (expertly played by Shin Saburi, Nobuo Nakamura and Ryuji Kita) are, of course, also pivotal to Ozu's drama, their role, in effect, morphing from 'patriarchal chauvinism' (even if somewhat light-hearted in tone), through their role as comedic backbone to the drama to finally admitting a degree of culpability in upsetting the Miwa family dynamic whilst, at the same time, revealing their (and Ozu's) overriding sense of humanism.

Visually, unsurprisingly given Ozu's well-established approach and his use again of veteran and long-time collaborator Yuharu Atsuta as cinematographer, Late Autumn is characterised by static, low-angle, perfectly framed shots (even if in colour) with the human drama punctuated by repeated, short series of shots of the film's (predominantly) interior settings. These short interludes, accompanied by Takanobu Saito's often melancholic score, serve to accentuate the subtle thoughtfulness of Ozu's creation.

Late Autumn may not quite reach the levels of subtle family emotion of Tokyo Story and Late Spring, but the film, with its notable themes of social development, is another undoubted masterpiece from its director.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An update to Japanese Classic 'Banshun' / 'Late Spring' with a gender change but with the same Classy Impact.
SAMTHEBESTEST15 February 2021
Akibiyori / Late Autumn (1960) : Brief Review -

An update to Japanese Classic 'Banshun' / 'Late Spring' with a gender change but with the same Classy Impact. Recently, i saw Banshun (1949) and was moved by the film. I never thought that a non-narrative classic of Ozu can ever get inspired version or should I say updated version because the ultimate factism of Banshun was something kind of unavoidable and irreplaceable. I don't hate to say it that i have been proved wrong by the Master Director as he reconstructed the similar story with Akibiyori with the change in Protagonist's gender and yet delivered a Classic film. Actually, this one is more explored version and has wider vision than Banshun and that's obvious because it was made after a decade so the filmmaking went ahead as expected. A widow tries to marry off her daughter with the help of her late husband's three friends. The similar story what we saw in Banshun with the Mother replacing the Father, and those three friends being a great addition. Unlike Banshun, this is far more entertaining with comic touch and quirky humour. It has funny moments created from daily life activities and issues which surely brings laughter when needed. The light tone momentum makes it engaging film and also provides a repeat value. I doubt if can watch Banahun on repeat mode again and again but it's a big YES for Akibiyori. Apart from that it is greatly filled with rich emotions and ethical sentiments that will stir your feelings. That emotional touch in the last 30 minutes is terrifically crafted from all angles. All the actors have done a great job. Ozu never fails to bring the best out of his cast and Akibiyori is yet another undeniable example of it. A grand salute to the legendary filmmaker Yasujiro Ozu for making such heartwarming films on definite family issue like 'Marriage' which has never been told in such classy manners ever by any Director in the cinema world.

RATING - 8/10*

By - #samthebestest
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Quite a wonderful movie
Jeremy_Urquhart13 December 2022
Apparently this is a semi-remake of one of Ozu's own films, which I haven't seen (Late Spring). It's also a little familiar to the most recent Ozu film I watched, 1962's An Autumn Afternoon. Besides having titles that share a word, each involves parents looking for partners for their daughter to marry. In An Autumn Afternoon, it's a father looking for someone for his daughter to marry, and in Late Autumn, it's a mother looking for someone to marry her daughter (with the help of three very entertaining male side characters, who sort of kick off the main plot without being the film's lead characters).

Yasujiro Ozu's films are slow and touching, but never dry or overly sentimental. Personally, I have to be in the right mood to get attached to them, but thankfully, tonight was the right mood. I found this very engaging throughout, and thought the characters were endearing, the visuals were very pleasant to look at, and the mix of drama and humour was pitch-perfect.

There is still the slow pacing that I was aware of here and there, but not too often, all things considered. Part of me felt like 130 minutes was a little long, but another part of me enjoyed spending over two hours with these characters and their important (but not too high stakes) life decisions. I even had to remind myself they were fictional, after I thought to myself right after the movie ended that I hoped a character would be okay in their life going forward... before pinching myself and realising that they're fictional, and there technically is no more life for them to live once the screen fades to black. I think that's the sign of good writing and acting right there.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Mother and daughter
TheLittleSongbird23 April 2020
Yasujiro Ozu was nearing the end of his nearly 35 year career, and a mostly great career it was too, when he did 1960's 'Late Autumn'. In fact he only did two films after. Those being 1961's 'The End of Summer' and his swansong 1962's 'An Autumn Afternoon' (one of the best swansongs in my opinion from any director), before his untimely death the following year aged just 60. His best films were amazing, and even when he was not at his peak he fared better than most.

'Late Autumn' is not one of Ozu's best films in my view and just slightly misses the extra something that his best work has. Do much prefer 'An Autumn Afternoon', 'Late Spring' and especially 'Tokyo Story', three of his justifiably acclaimed films. When saying that 'Late Autumn' is not one of his best, that is not meaning in any way that it is not a good film. Actually thought that it was still very good, with plenty of what makes his work so impressive evident.

Story-wise, 'Late Autumn' is very slight and somewhat over-familiar territory. It is not much different to what has been seen before with Ozu, being the third film of his to have the arranged marriage theme done a little more insightfully the previous times, and the early scenes drag a bit.

Also thought that some of the male roles were not developed enough and that they were not particularly interesting, outside of being well acted.

There is so much to love about 'Late Autumn' though. The female roles are far more interesting and quite meaty, again feeling real and not stock stereotypes and in situations that are relatable in any day and age. The mother and daughter relationship is very touchingly handled. Although the story is slight and not always perfect in pacing, it is also still very charming and has emotional impact and a sincere humanity. All the acting is great, especially from Setsuko Hara and Yoko Tsucksa bringing a lot of determined heart to their parts. Chishu Ryu excels in a role he always played beautifully.

Have no issues with the script either, which is very thoughtful, gently amusing, sly and heartfelt. Or with the sensitive direction from Ozu, which is also very clever visually. The style is very unmistakably him, complete with some clever transitions. Also nearly forgot to mention that 'Late Autumn' is quite interesting structurally, structured as blocks of linked scenes. The music matches the gentle and sometimes sly mood of the film.

Overall, very good. 8/10
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
More Of The Usual.
net_orders19 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Viewed on DVD. Restoration = ten (10) stars. A typical entry from this director minus shots of clothes lines and ugly overhead power lines. Instead of woman acting as uninvited/ interfering matchmakers, men assume this disrupting function. (Take just about any film previously made by this director, switch matchmaker gender roles, and you have the essence of the movie.) Powerful performances by the leading actresses dominate the film with most trying mightily (but not especially convincingly) to appear many years younger than they are in reality. They also provide some very funny line readings. Performances delivered by lead male actors are dull, colorless, two dimensional, and DE FACTO supporting roles. The film is much too long with too many boring scenes and sequences. Except for some exterior hiking scenes, the movie is studio bound. Phony street scenes and interior sets (especially of bars) look the same as those seen in other films from this director. Cinematography (color) is fine given the confines of being limited to static compositions and an old-time, narrow-screen aspect ratio. Subtitles could greatly benefit from further professional editing of grammar. They are often too long and gratuitous. Music mostly consists of cloning from the director's other films. A drug-free way for dealing with insomnia. WILLIAM FLANIGAN, PhD.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Japanese cinema classic
MarcoParzivalRocha26 June 2020
When the patriarch of a family dies, one of his friends decides to find a husband for his daughter, and in the middle, also for the recent widow. A beautiful work by Yasujiro Ozu, on the tradition of Japanese arranged weddings, with a touch of satire and comedy. We see many familiar faces in the cast, from previous films by Ozu, and we can even pretend that they are part of the same cinematographic universe, and thus create a thread with the narratives.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Overly familiar retread of former achievements.
theskulI4228 August 2008
Well, it was bound to happen eventually: The more films I viewed from noted Japanese auteur Yasujiro Ozu, there was going to come a time when my well of interest ran dry. I have now seen ten of his films, and Ozu seems unique among filmmakers, even the most praised, by being essentially the anti-Billy Wilder. Where Wilder's mind was so brilliantly scattered that he did pictures in nearly every conceivable genre, and did them well, Ozu was always more interested in mining different stories out of the same cloth, hopping from patch to patch on a quilt of nuanced familial drama. Where Wilder branched out, Ozu dug his roots in deep. He had an exclusive stable of actors, comprising some of the most talented and, like their helmsman, subtly versatile actors in the business, including the transcendent Chishu Ryu and the great Sestuko Hara, appearing here as the mother to the always-adorable Yoko Tsukasa, essaying the role that Hara herself brought to life in Late Spring. Ryu has the remarkable ability to present to us a man of any age with very little in the way of physical alterations (in the span of five years, he played father, brother and grandfather to Hara and was utterly convincing in all). Hara has the exact opposite gift: That of an ageless wonder. Early on in Late Autumn, a comment is made that Hara and her daughter Tsukasa look more like sisters than mother-daughter, and it's absolutely true. In the eleven-year span from Spring to Autumn, Hara has swapped roles but kept the same face, and she brings her A-game yet again, looking more weary and fatigued than ever before.

But there's a problem. Where Ozu's style had always seemed evocative and direct, here is seems...stilted and awkward. The use of direct address in discussions seems disjointed and stiff. What felt emotionally confrontational in Late Spring comes off here as almost amateurish, merely content to blandly cut back and forth between one talking head and another. The fact that he's done that all his career perhaps says something about this film as an individual entity. Or perhaps it's just become all too familiar. When you're looking to derive a myriad of tales from the same few thematic points, there's always the danger of indifference; having the same actors play similar characters doing similar things in similar ways in movies with similar titles, it's a testament to his brilliance that he managed to make it more than one film, but here, it all just strikes of creative exhaustion: He's seemingly run out of stories to the point that he's now reworking the similar stories he's already done, as this is almost directly a remake of his 1949 masterpiece Late Spring, except mostly from the female perspective. While it appears to be a monumental shift for such a gradual director (I still remember first experiencing Tokyo Story and being so startled by its singular tracking shot that I was shaken to my core), actually far too little is new. Most of the motions and emotions we are presented with were all essentially inferred in Late Spring, and this seems if nothing else, an unnecessary diversion to a place we're already been.

Now this is not to say that the film is a complete dud. Everyone involved is so talented that they can't help but stumble into several moments of effective heartstrain, most notable the touching restraint of the final shot, but I just can't shake the feeling that with Late Autumn, instead of hopping to a new stitch on the quilt, he's stepping right back onto trampled-down, treaded ground. Where Late Spring presented this story and devastated me, going right to my heart and laying me out flat. To Late Autumn I'm a bit more...subdued. I never connected to the characters or the situation in any tangible or meaningful way, and my response to the film was less "Holy crap" and more "ho-hum".

{Grade: 6.5/10 (B-/C+) / #24 (of 34) of 1960}
26 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
late autumn
mossgrymk9 September 2021
As the previous reviewer noted this is an "update" to "Late Spring." Don't know 'bout you but I don't particularly care for my "Late Spring" to be "updated", thanks very much. Nor do I particularly like Setsuko Hara taking over Chischu Ryu's role. Did kinda like the three businessmen/matchmaker/ suitors, though, so I'll give it a B minus for them.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One of the more entertaining Ozu films
mollytinkers10 October 2021
If this is your first Ozu film, you're better off starting at the "beginning" with Late Spring. If you've seen that one, or others in the "series", you'll probably like this one for its overall, cinematic refinement and its inclusion of more light-hearted dialogue and performances. If you're new to Japanese cinema altogether, I wouldn't begin with this movie, because it may strike you as boring.

With each of Ozu's movies that I see, it's clear, at least to me, that his intent was variations on a theme. As his career progressed, so did his approach to these variations. The template basically remains the same; but the internal workings of the story, cast, dialogue, surroundings, etc., are elevated just enough to sustain the film as a whole.

I will be watching The End Of Summer and An Autumn Afternoon soon to round out my Ozu experience. If you are a true foreign cinema buff and you don't mind deliberately slow-paced, reserved storytelling, treat yourself to Ozu's filmmaking. He's nothing if not consistent.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed