Hell to Eternity (1960) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
45 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
A Film Of Two Halves
Theo Robertson3 August 2013
This is a war bio-pic about Guy Gabaldon of the USMC . It's a strange film featuring two distinct halves . One of Gabaldon newly arrived in the Marine Corps and the second half concentrating on the battle of Saipan . When I say strange what I mean is that it's heavily clichéd but for someone reason it manages to hide the clichés very well

The first half features those loud American who constantly feature in these type of movies . They're drinkers , gamblers , womanisers and heaven help anyone who has no concept of the alpha male . What makes this part of the film interesting is that there's a nightclub scene that has rampant sexuality featuring a female character and Gabaldon played by Jeffrey Hunter which must have seemed somewhat explicit at the time

The second half features the bloody battle of Saipan and one interesting thing about the landings is that Japanese characters speak to Japanese characters in Japanese without the benefit of subtitles . Compare this to films at the time had Germans speaking to one another in English and characters speaking in their native tongue must have appeared unusual back in the day . The battle scenes are relatively graphic though little children turning reminded me of THE GREEN BERETS

The problem with this movie is that for something that is marketed as a war film it takes a long time to reach its destination of the battlefield and with the exception of the nightclub scene the film is very talkative with little in the way of incident which stops it from becoming a great film . As it stands it's okay though it helps if you watch it of the era of when it was made
16 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I was there
emc2228 April 2006
I have been trying to buy this movie but the prices are out of reach. I was on Okinawa in 1960 when this movie was filmed. Our battalion was the first to occupy the brand new barracks at Camp Schwabb. A lot of us marines were chosen to be in the Japanese army because of our looks or physical stature. yes I played the part of a Japanese soldier and during the bonsai attack I was killed. I must say I died very dramatically. I had the pleasure of meeting Jeffery Hunter, David Janssen, and Vic Damone. I think the movie was pretty good even though some important parts were omitted. I have read several articles on the life of Guy Gabaldon and he looked nothing like Jeffery Hunter. Have a nice day.
44 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
" I asked for a few prisoners. he brings in the whole dam Island "
thinker169112 March 2010
When the United States of America went to war with Imperial Japan, many a Japanese national joined the armed forces and served the U.S. with distinction and honor. Among those who stood out was this story of a young Chicano from Los Angeles. Good looking Jeffrey Hunter, plays Guy Gabaldon who was raised by a Japanese foster family. Despite the discredit of government officials who interned Japanese/American citizens at the beginning of World War II, the people endured their imprisonment with dignity and patience. Gabaldon, turned down by his own draft board, nevertheless, joins the Marines and meets two close friends, played by David Janssen and Vic Damone. The three make this story touching and believable and their combat experience creates a worthwhile saga. The movie centers on the volatile hard fought conflict on the island of Saipan, where a determined enemy refuses to surrender. Interestingly enough, Guy Gabaldon risks life and limb, saving the lives of thousands of America soldiers and Japanese civilians, yet fails to be nominated for the Medal of Honor. A great and Noble film which has since become a war-time Classic. ****
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Guy Gabaldon's story continues. . . .
stevenchavez683 January 2003
A great war/personal true story, as previously commented, about a Mexican-American young man from Boyle Heights (just east of Los Angeles) CA., who worked close with the migrant Japanese-American workers and learned to speak Japanese. He joined the USMC First Marine Division and was the recipient of the Naval Cross for his exploits on Saipan Island. He has since written a book "Saipan: Suicide Island" and comments heavily on the movie. Guy is proud of his Mexican-American heritage and very very proud of the First Marine Division - USMC. He lives in Northern California and is a great American. I say this because of his continued service to this country. He continues to get involved in services for the community and especially our youth. I was 11 years old when I saw this movie (1962) two years after it's release. I loved it for the war action and the personal story. I was impressed that this person cared and tried hard to do what he thought was the right thing. Vic Damone and David Jansen played good roles as well as Jeffery Hunter. Hollywood was reluctant to depict Mexicans on the screen as regular people. That is why Jeffery Hunter played an Italian-American in this film. Anthony Quinn had just completed "Requiem for a Heavyweight". Mr. Quinn lived in the same heights as Guy. My parents would tell us kids that he was one like us. I am not negative buy simply express my feeling and recollections. Anyway, I always recommend this movie to my friends and consider it in the Top 10 for war films. If ever the chance to read Guy's book or speak with him, do not pass on the opportunity. Check out this movie - there are wheels turning to remake this movie. Guy's story continues. ..
39 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Subject that begs a redo
chrissso21 November 2015
Warning: Spoilers
This film could have be one of the greatest American WW2 movies ever! Seriously, the subject is that potent.

This is not to say the filmmakers were not bold … they were just bold in sophomoric areas (specifically a sexually charged scene that was downright explicit … which is completely irrelevant to the story arc … as well as violent death scenes on the battlefield).

So ya the Director and Producer chose to titillate with sex and violence as opposed to making a striking social commentary. Such statements were more typical of the later 60's.

I love the fact that the film keeps us talking about Guy Gabaldon, he is a great American hero. More so the film is entertaining … despite many flaws … and has a decent cast (Mr Sulu meet Captain Christopher Pike) yet this film could have been so much more.

I believe in the cathartic power of film. I believe films should be honest. The story of Gabaldo is an amazing and powerful story … imagine how good this film could be if retold in the following fashion ...

1. You cast a Hispanic to play Gabaldon and you do not gloss over the fact he is Hispanic (Hispanics after all helped build this country and fought in our wars)

2. You get his size and age correct (5'4" and 18 years) … not all Americans are built like John Wayne

3. You reinforce the fact he was rescued and raised by a Japanese family (The film did a good job of this … it is important)

4. You expand the attention on the horrible plight of Japanese Americans … not sugar coat it ... and talk about the fact Italians and Germans never received such treatment

5. Pay some attention to his brothers who went on to fight for America in the 442 ... despite the fact they had been sent to Japanese concentration camps ... and talk about the accomplishments of the 442 in detail

6. Lose the silly scene in the apartment

7. Accurately portray Gabaldon's activities on Saipan.

Galbadon is a great American hero ... he is credited with over 1500 surrenders. Consider how many lives that saved! This story deserves an unbiased and honest retelling. It is a great American story.

6/10 for lacking courage
20 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great parts make up for some formulaic stuff in the first half
secondtake31 May 2017
Hell to Eternity

This is the first movie (from Hollywood) to deal with the incarceration of Japanese Americans in 1942 during WWII. Eighteen years is a long time for someone to get a feature together about the problem but in 1960 most of the country didn't know about (or care about) the injustice of this mass sweep of American citizens of Japanese descent. You might say this movie is required viewing just to put that piece into perspective.

The big flaw of the movie is the simplistic way it presents the situation beginning in the 1930s. An honest, decent (indeed, admirable) Japanese family in California takes in a non-Japanese kid name Guy who comes from a bad home and needs a family. The point is clear: the Japanese family is amazing, generous, and rather typical of immigrant families where the older generation doesn't know English very well and the kids are all assimilated. As stiff as it is in some ways, it's truly touching and a warming, disturbing story.

Jump ahead to Pearl Harbor and you can see where the conflict is coming. Guy is now enlistment age (as are his Japanese foster brothers, who are fighting in the European theater). What follows is a war movie based somewhat on fact-the unit he eventually joins fights the Japanese, and there is doubt, heroism, and tragedy and it's a well done story. I wonder whether audiences in 1960 quite got into it, so long after the events. (Other WWII movies were still being made, but many are about the exceptional parts of the war, like D-DAy in "The Longest Day" in 1962 or Nazi trials "Judgement in Nuremberg" in 1961.)

The main character is supposed to be based on a Mexican-American kid, but the actor (Jeffrey Hunter) is a very white American, which adds to the contrast (and meld) between cultures. (Hunter's big fame? He was the captain in the very first Star Trek episode, before Shatner.) He makes a visit to what is supposed to be Manzanar (but they show painfully little of what it would have been like). And he ends up fighting the Japanese because he knows the language.

Exactly half of the movie is about the lead-up to fighting-lots of chummy interactions, girl chasing in military clubs, and kind of 1960s lightweight entertainment. David Janssen is one of Hunter's sidekicks, and he's really good (he was famous for being the TV star in "The Fugitive"). When the fighting starts the movie clicks into place -in fact, director Phil Karlson is great with smaller budgets and yet keeping an honest intensity to the acting. The fighting is very realistic (mixing in only a small amount of archival footage). And the final impressive crisis between Guy and the remaining Japanese troops is unique and compelling. And the movie builds to this point believably.

A great movie this is not-but it has great parts, which is more than many movies can offer.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Eye-opening film about Japanese-Americans and WWII
BrianDanaCamp17 June 2011
HELL TO ETERNITY (1960) is, I believe, the first Hollywood film to depict the experiences of Japanese-Americans in the early stages of World War II. We see a young white guy and his Japanese female companion get harassed by patrons at a drive-in eatery in L.A. on December 7th as news of the sneak attack on Pearl Harbor comes over people's car radios. We see a Japanese-American family listen to the radio together as President Roosevelt addresses the nation and announces a state of war with Japan. We hear a young Japanese-American man describe his unsuccessful effort to enlist in the armed forces. We see Japanese-Americans being forced to leave their homes and possessions and get trucked off to relocation centers. We visit a cabin at the Manzanar internment camp in California. This must have been powerful material in 1960 and, I daresay, remains so today.

The movie pulls the viewer in emotionally right from the start as we see a troubled white youth, Guy Gabaldon (who was Mexican-American in real life), get into fights at school and go home to a decrepit shack, only to find his mother gone, taken to a hospital where she will soon die. He is taken in by the family of his Japanese classmate and is reared by them, experiencing genuine familial love for the first time. He even learns Japanese and we see him practicing words. The youth is played by Richard Eyer (the young genie in THE SEVENTH VOYAGE OF SINBAD), a young actor who sure knew how to pull our heart strings. Nine years later in the narrative, in 1941, Guy is played by Jeffrey Hunter and his Japanese brother, George, is played by George Takei. There are scenes between Guy and his Japanese mother that are quite touching, a profound and dramatic illustration of a mother-son bond that transcends language, cultural and racial barriers. (The mother is played by Tsuru Aoki Hayakawa, wife of Sessue Hayakawa, who appears in the film as General Matsui, the Japanese commander on the island of Saipan.) It's the exchange with his mother at Manzanar that convinces Guy to try and enlist in the Marines. (Hunter's portrayal of an orphan raised by a family of different race recalls his role as Martin Pawley, a part-Indian raised by the Edwards family in Texas in John Ford's THE SEARCHERS, 1956.)

After such advanced racial politics, there's a bizarre scene about midway through the film showing Guy and two of his marine buddies (David Janssen and Vic Damone) on liberty in Hawaii, where they wind up at the apartment of Sono, a Japanese bar hostess (Michi Kobi) and Famika, her Japanese roommate, a stripper from San Francisco (Reiko Sato). The third woman with them is an uptight white lady reporter, Sheila (Patricia Owens, from THE FLY), who's jealous of the attention paid by the men to the Japanese women and sits there sullenly knocking back one drink after another. Famika does her striptease act in the living room with appropriate music playing on the phonograph and gets the marines very excited indeed. While this action veered dangerously close to yet another case of Asian women being treated as exotic sex objects, the sexual and racial politics take a turn into much trickier territory. When she's finally drunk enough, Sheila, the proper lady reporter nicknamed "the Iron Petticoat," feels sufficiently emboldened to get up and do a striptease herself, much to the amusement of everyone there. Her act is even more revealing than that of the Japanese stripper. Eventually everyone's paired up and, as Guy starts grappling with Sheila's bra strap, there's a quick cut and---BOOM!--the big guns go off in the naval bombardment of Saipan, where the rest of the movie takes place.

The scene with the women is a long one and has no bearing on the rest of the narrative. (The women are never seen or referred to again.) I'm not quite sure what the point of it all was, but it's a fascinating footnote in the history of World War II combat movies and certainly pushed the envelope pretty far for 1960. Also, David Janssen's character is crazy drunk in this scene and the actor goes completely wild portraying this state. It's a remarkable display and I guarantee you've never seen him like this in anything he did for TV.

After intense and bloody combat on Saipan (filmed on Okinawa), the final stage of the film involves Guy's attempts to get the Japanese holdouts to surrender. Eventually, he confronts the English-speaking General Matsui (Hayakawa), who is planning one last suicidal "banzai" attack by the wounded, weary, and starving remnants of his force and the many Japanese civilians still with them. We hear about the Japanese code of war--no surrender and fight to the last man. And we'd earlier seen Japanese civilians throw themselves off a cliff to avoid capture, having been brainwashed by Japanese propaganda into believing they'd be raped and murdered by the Americans. This represents a much more honest look at Japan's conduct of the war than we were used to seeing in postwar Hollywood films about the war in the Pacific. Contrast this with Japan's own entry in the genre that year, I BOMBED PEARL HARBOR (1960), which I've also reviewed on IMDb. While HELL TO ETERNITY is about 25 minutes too long, it's still a powerful treatment of its subject, despite the unfortunate Hollywood compromise of hiding Gabaldon's true racial background.

Jeffrey Hunter and David Janssen would re-team the following year in MAN-TRAP (1961), which opens with a scene of Korean War combat featuring the two and also shows Janssen as a very different kind of character than we normally saw him play. I've also reviewed that one here. Hunter would go on to star in "Star Trek"'s pilot episode, while George Takei would gain fame playing Sulu, a regular character on that show. (As a boy, Takei spent the war years in internment camps.)
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A true World War II story of tremendous emotional impact
reelguy29 September 2003
World War II hero Guy Gabaldon's story could hardly have been entrusted to a more suitable director than Phil Karlson. Karlson brings a tough masculine style, as well as an emotional impact that would have eluded many a director of action films. Operating as usual on a less-than-A budget, Karlson nonetheless makes the most out of every scene and elicits excellent performances from his cast.

Hell to Eternity is by far the most violent war film made up to that time. But Karlson's outbursts of violence are always tied to a strong emotional response, making the violence anything but gratuitous.

The film is also notable for a surprisingly provocative striptease by Patricia Owens and and an equally provocative kiss between her and Jeffrey Hunter. In terms of its violence and sexual content, Hell to Eternity probably went as far as the censors would allow in 1960.

As Gabaldon, Jeffrey Hunter gives a performance of great sympathy, but also one of considerable edge in his battle scenes. It's a difficult role, because he has to express the moral dilemma of a man raised by a Japanese-American family who is tasked with fighting the Japanese during WW2. The fact that Hunter made King of Kings only one year after this film and also offered diverse characterizations in Key Witness and Sergeant Rutledge the same year as Hell to Eternity is a testament to his versatility as an actor.

Leith Stevens provides an outstanding dramatic score, which unfortunately was poorly represented by the soundtrack album, which contained mainly his jazz-oriented incidental music.

The lower-than-A budget for this film more than likely accounts for it not being better known. But make no mistake about it - it's one of the most powerful war films ever made.
43 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
a different war story
SnoopyStyle9 December 2018
It's depression era Los Angeles. Guy Gabaldon is a troubled kid at school. His father is dead and his mother is in the hospital. He steals to eat. He is taken in by his classmate George Uni's family. He learns Japanese and gets adopted by them. After Pearl Habor, George and Kaz are eager to join the fight but the family is sent to internment camp. With mama-san's approval, Guy joins the Marines to fight the Japanese empire. He is first sent to Hawaii and then his unit is sent into the Battle of Saipan.

A Star Trek fan may notice George Takei as older George and Jeffrey Hunter as older Guy. The childhood section is fascinating and war's opening has some important scenes. The Hawaii section could be cut. It serves no plot development other than some female gyrating. The last half is the battle itself. There are stock war footage. The battle charge has a good amount of extras although it is not quite authentic. The background does suffer due to its greenness. One can't expect the charred remains of landscape that comes with a real battle. There are some tanks but they're not authentic to the era. After an initial big battle, the movie peters out into smaller action. It's not until he comes face to face with Gen. Matsui that the movie gets different. It's an interesting ending to a war movie but it could have something much deeper. The writing isn't there in the end. It needs more mano a mano debate with Matsui.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Hell to Eternity
texohio7 October 2006
I remember seeing this movie many times in the 60's and 70's at the theater, on television, and on VHS. I grew up watching WWII movies and remember this as one that had a special appeal to me. I guess because I lived in Japan in the 1950's and visited some of the locales from the movie. The acting was well done and the story was well told and realistic. It is interesting to view the cast when they were relatively new to movies. David Janssen and Vic Damone stand out in my memory and Jeffrey Hunter was always a class act in films. I highly recommend seeing it if possible. I do find it hard to believe that it is called a "lost classic" and runs so high for a copy. Anyone know where I could get a cheaper copy, I would like to hear from you.
19 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A missed opportunity that could have been a classic.
mark.waltz8 December 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Today, we can fast-forward through the 20 minutes in the center of the film that shows Jeffrey Hunter, David Jensen and Vic Damone sitting in a room with two Japanese women and American Patricia Owens, and all of a sudden a jazzy dance sequence begins. It's World War II, and Hunter, playing a Mexican-American who has been raised by a Japanese family, and his buddies, are on break from active duty. This segment goes on pointlessly, and after the first dance, I decided to fast forward since this segment had become annoying and pointless. It goes right into a a battle sequence which should be the most important points of this movie, followed by the aspect that Hunters character was raised by Japanese Americans.

Playing the real life war hero Guy Gabaldon, Hunter certainly is handsome but he doesn't look Hispanic at all and is thus miscast. At least the Greek George Chakaris looked Puerto Rican in "West Side Story". Outside of the opening scene where guy as a child is identified by his teacher as being Hispanic, that is barely even dealt with in this film. He is fine acting-wise and I don't begrudge him a job, but it's very jarring after reading the true story even if the script does allow his big heart to shine through when he comes across a wounded little Japanese girl, a scene that is very hard to take. The presence of George Takei in the small role gives authentication to the true life historical aspects of Japanese-Americans. I think a good 20 minutes could have been trimmed from the film, particularly at that unnecessary club sequence.

That being said, I can't recall any other films made prior to "Come See the Paradise" that dealt with the issue of the Japanese internment camps, and this does at least bring the subject up when his adoptive family has to go to one. This family is not presented as too good to be true but you can't help but want to hug his surrogate mother who calls him her son as she heads off to the camps. His surrogate siblings are typical American youth, feisty and interested in things that twenty somethings in the early 40's would be interested in. It's ironic that I randomly chose to watch this movie on the 80th anniversary of Pearl Harbor, and while it does not show the attacks (only heard being talked about on radio), the battle sequences that it does show are realistic and not without blood. Perhaps it should have been made in color to have had more of an impact. But as an introduction to Guy's life, it is a good film although I would like to see more of the true story and a more realistic presentation.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Hell to Eternity Comments
junobuggo4 September 2006
I have had the privilege of viewing this movie on numerous occasions. Back when I was growing up, war movies, such as this, were shown on TV quite often. This movie was one of the many small bits and pieces of how I view certain events and human behaviors that make up my personality (in a positive way). Fortunately, even thought the movie takes some liberties with the truth about the life of Guy and his life, the more important moral messages about war, human emotions, race relations and the Japanese Internment controversies more than make up for these inaccuracies. For whatever reasons, this movie, I believe, has allowed me to become a more accepting/open human being of other cultures and races. It taught me family values and the frailty of the human condition (not to mention the horrors of war). Given this was a "war movie", it is a credit to the director, actors and writers that I was affected in other more important areas of my makeup than that of just history and/or war. I salute this endeavor. I highly rate it. Particularly for those who have problems with the issues I mentioned above. May Guy rest in peace (1926 - 2006)
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Unique War Story.
AaronCapenBanner10 November 2013
Phil Karlson directed this true story about Guy Gabaldon(played by Jeffrey Hunter) a young boy with absent parents who is adopted into a Japanese foster family in the 1930's, and later has to deal with their internment during the outbreak of WWII. He is quick to fight anyone who mocks his family, but is in a tough spot fighting his own government, though both he and his brothers enlist anyway. Guy joins the marines, where his fluent Japanese proves vital in dealing with the enemy, and he later distinguishes himself by capturing 800 prisoners in Saipan after the general commits ritual suicide. David Janssen costars as his fellow soldier and best friend. Interesting film with some good action scenes, though there is too much padding and comic relief spent in an extended party sequence.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Shabby Treatment of Important Issue.
rmax30482322 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Jeffrey Hunter is Guy Gabaldon, a real person, in this "based on a true story" film. Gabaldon was an orphan in the Great Depression, adopted as a child into a Japanese family in California. He comes to love his adoptive family, learns to speak Japanese, and values Japanese customs.

Then -- Pearl Harbor. His brothers enlist in the Army and are sent to Italy to be part of the highly decorated 442nd. Hunter enlists, with Mama-san's permission, in the Marine Corps as a translator. The movie demonstrates, without making the point overtly, that in the Marines, everyone is a rifleman first, and a cook, a clerk, or a translator second.

After a long stop in Honolulu, Hunter finds himself in combat on Saipan where two of his buddies (David Janssen and Vic Damone) are killed by the Japanese. Thereafter he turns into a one-man firing squad -- blowing everybody and everything up, or shooting them indiscriminately.

Saipan was a Japanese home territory, not a conquered island. The civilian population had been told that there would be no surrender on the part of anybody, and that captives would be tortured and then killed. This led to some famous footage of Japanese civilians throwing their babies off cliffs and then jumping down to join the heap of bodies on the rocky ocean shore. One of the civilians reminds Hunter of his Mama-san and brings him to his senses, so that he's able to use his skills to negotiate surrenders and save untold lives.

Good story. Crummy screenplay, acting, and directing. Nobody gives a particularly good performance. When the direction isn't simply functional it seems almost insanely unbalanced. Phil Karlson, who has done some good nasty work elsewhere, is to directing what Grandma Moses is to painting. And the writing should have been shelved until something half-way decent came along. I'll give one example to illustrate the point. The Japanese general, Sesue Hayakawa, has ordered an all-out, self-sacrificial attack on the Americans. As the men and civilians assemble, Hunter captures Hayakawa and orders him at gunpoint to address this rag-tag army and call off the suicidal charge. Hunter and Hayakawa argue before an anguished Hayakawa complies, telling Hunter, "This is not an easy thing to see." Hunter replies bitterly, "Neither was Pearl Harbor." Hunter's line is right out of a World War II flag waver. He's familiar with Japanese customs and the concept of honor. A more appropriate response would have been a compassionate, "I know."

Mama-san and Papa-san are sent to an isolated detention camp along with other Japanese families. It's hardly commented on, though everyone looks a little sad. Hunter seems to forget about them for a long time after their forced move, and we see nothing of the camp itself, just a brief, corny meeting between Mama-san and Hunter. A disgraceful chapter in American history, and it's taken for granted as a matter-of-fact part of war-time life. Angry at a savage attack against our forces at Pearl Harbor, the US, led by Earl Warren, took their rage out on a population that was innocent but readily available. The Japanese detainees later received reparations but as a nation we seemed to have learned nothing from the experience, given that we displaced our aggression all over again a few years ago.

Well, that's an ethical issue which I won't bother with further. Getting back to the movie, there is a loooooooong middle section that takes place in a hot apartment in Honolulu with some girls around for recreational purposes. Our boys (except Hunter) get wildly drunk, as boys are want to do, and everyone dances around to discordant 1960s jazz -- not 1940s pop tunes or Hawaiian music. It goes on pointlessly for about twenty minutes of screen time that might have been spent valuably getting a little bit into Hunter's conflicted head. But, no. If there's any reason for the inclusion of this lengthy scene, it's only to give Patricia Owens (a beautiful woman with pale skin and anthracite irises) a chance to get drunk and do an incomplete strip tease. Maybe it gave David Janssen and Vic Damone a chance to endear themselves to the audience too. If that was one of its goals, it failed.

Well, it's not worth carrying on about. I saw this many years ago and was positively impressed with it. Must have been very young, because now that I know a little more about human nature I found it a little banal.
12 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Too much Hollywood in order to promote this movie
tcroldan23 March 2015
Gabaldon was born and raised in Boyle Heights and attended Roosevelt High School with my brother-in-law Edwardo. He was not rejected by the Marines because of his ethnicity (Mexican-American) but because at 5'4" tall he did not meet Marine standards. It should be noted that the Marines were not adverse to recruiting in predominately Chicano communities. Guy was not "raised" by a Japanese family, but he did spend a couple of his teen year's with a Japanese family where he learned some basic Japanese. He was far from fluent in Japanese. However, the Marine Corps recruited him because they believed his knowledge of Japanese would be useful. The movie went to great lengths to hide Guy's true ethnicity. First, he was portrayed by Jeffrey Hunter, whose most notable role was playing 6'tall, blond blue eyed Jesus Christ. Guy described himself as "swarthy." In addition, there is a scene where the mamasan, in order to distinguish him from her Japanese grandchildren, refers to Guy as her "All American son." I once saw the movie on the History Channel. After the movie there was a panel discussion by historians. The final obligatory question was why the movie never mentioned that Guy was Mexican-American. The historian briefly answered that the movie was focused on the treatment of Japanese Americans during WW II and that Guy's ethnicity would have distracted from that. REALLY! Seems to me it would have made the story even more interesting. Typical Hollywood. Part of selling a movie means you have to make a white guy the central character and hero. More Hollywood is the David Jansen part and the party in Hawaii.
29 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Decent war-drama
tim-764-29185625 January 2013
This rarely shown film was on UK commercial TV channel '5 USA'.

Though Hell to Eternity fans out to being a fairly standard WWII war drama, for me it was the opening scenes and background circumstances that make this one stand out above many others.

'Yanks vs Japs' movies do tend to be two-a-penny, it seems but lead character Guy Gabaldon (a very good, determined Jefrey Hunter) was brought up from a young age by a Japanese family after his mother dies, in his California community. By the time of Pearl Harbour, and as a young adult, he sees his Japanese siblings as his brothers and of the same blood and race - therefore you can see and appreciate his heartbreak and dilemma on conscription and he is sent out to the Pacific.

His knowledge of the Japanese language becomes a huge asset and he becomes a war hero when he uses this talent to get an enemy battalion to surrender and the film is essentially a biopic of him and his story.

Fortunately, despite much that could be over-sentimentalised, it never gets too cloying and the dialogue remains pretty much matter of fact, i.e. realistic. It's in quite a flat, grey black & white and it's quite long, but worth sitting through. It doesn't say anything that new and the action won't have you shell-shocked but quite a decent movie, if you can catch it.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A decent if bizarrely overlong film
rdoyle293 October 2022
Young Guy Gabaldon (Richard Eyer, best known as the djinn in "The 7th Voyage of Sinbad") is orphaned and taken in by the family of his friend George Matsui. Guy grows up to be Jeffrey Hunter, still living with George's family, now George Takei, when WWII breaks out. His adopted family is sent to Manzanar, but Hunter enlists and his Japanese language skills lead to him convincing hundreds of defeated Japanese soldiers to surrender during the Battle of Saipan.

This is a strange film. The first act plays out like a fairly sentimental family drama. The second act, after Hunter enlists, has Hunter, David Janssen and Vic Damone getting drunk and picking up women in Hawaii. There's an extremely long and raucous striptease sequence involving Patricia Owens, who promptly disappears from the film. The third act depicts the Battle of Saipan. It's long and startlingly brutal, and is the best part of the film. It's a decent film that would be greatly improved by dropping the fairly irrelevant middle act and bringing the run time down to an hour and a half.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
hell to eternity
mossgrymk1 January 2023
Notable for its attempt to make Japanese soldiers in WW2, to mention nothing of Japanese Americans at the same time period, resemble human beings played by Asian actors rather than screaming, laughing banshees and coolies played by Caucasians, a la Micky Rooney in "Tiffanys" and Brando in "August Moon", this well intentioned film from Phil Karlson, alas, succumbs in its second half to Stanley Krameritis, an occupational disease common among 50s and early 60s action directors* who, not content to tell fast moving, hard hitting stories about criminals and psycopaths, decide they want to make a movie that "says something important" about "the human condition". Symptoms include excessive length, and repetitive scenes of soul searching, breast beating and debating of Great Moral Questions such as, and especially if it is a war film like this one, When To Surrender and What/Who Am I Fighting For? And Against? Eventually, terminal boredom ensues. The antidote for Stanley Krameritis, especially if it manifests itself in a war movie, is to take some "Steel Helmet" and "Hell Is For Heroes" and consult Dr. Fuller or Dr. Siegel in the morning. Unfortunately, Karlson seems to have ignored this sound advice. Oh well. At least we have the wonderful sex party/double striptease section in the middle to remind us that this particular director is capable of much better stuff. Give it a C plus.

*Other prominent victims include Otto Preminger with the insufferable "Exodus" and Nicholas Ray with the execrable "55 Days At Peking".
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Sadly Guy Gabaldon has past away
roscian-16 September 2006
Guy Gabaldon died Thursday August 31, 2006 at his home in Old Town, Fla. He was 80. The cause was a heart attack.

From an L.A. Times Article:

The actions that earned Gabaldon the nickname "the Pied Piper of Saipan" took place in June 1944 on the 25-mile-long island in the Northern Marianas in the western Pacific Ocean. Marine Pvt. Gabaldon killed 33 Japanese soldiers on his first day of combat, he said. Later he changed tactics.

Disobeying orders, Gabaldon went behind enemy lines by himself looking for Japanese. He "daringly entered enemy caves, pillboxes, buildings and jungle brush, frequently in the face of hostile fire," reads the citation that went along with his Navy Cross. The goal was to get the Japanese to surrender.

Years later, Gabaldon called his actions foolish, but back then he had reasons to believe he would succeed.

Many years before, in Boyle Heights (Los Angeles, CA), a Japanese American family had taken in Gabaldon — a wayward boy, prone to trouble — and raised him. He experienced Japanese language, food and culture firsthand.

During the war years the family was sent to an internment camp and Gabaldon joined the Marines. He used his limited Japanese language skills in his contacts with Japanese soldiers and civilians.
17 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Needed a ruthless editor
atrpm2 June 2021
This movie could have been quite good. As it is, however, the music is often quite out of place for 1941 and the story doesn't get moving until well after an hour has gone by. That said, it is an important film because not many American films have ever mentioned the violation of Japanese-Americans' civil rights during the war years.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Tribute to an American hero
Richard-12211 June 1999
"Hell to Eternity" represents a true story of spiritual development in an individual involved in a spiritual conflict from the beginning of the film to it's conclusion. It depicts a real person, Guy Gabaldon, who was raised in California by a Japanese family and his reluctance to kill the Japanese enemy in WWII, a hardening of his heart and a means of reconciliation that borders on miraculous. The movie is able to capture the full impact of this part of a man's life. This is a great war film without the impact of Audie Murphy's story in "To Hell and Back" (1955) only because that film starred the hero that wrote the book about his personal exploits. The movie "Hell to Eternity" still stands out as a great biography of an American hero, Guy Gabaldon!
20 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Solid WW 2 Actioner - Hell to Eternity
arthur_tafero12 November 2022
Jeffrey Hunter does a good job in this film, but the movie has a few weaknesses. The story of a boy brought up by Japanese foster parents is quite moving, and is the best part of the film. However, there are some unlikely combat situations once WW 2 breaks out on what is supposedly the Saipan campaign. Trust me, this is not what happened on Saipan, although many of the combat scenes are well done. The Thin Red Line was more in line with the reality of combat in Saipan. One major problem of making a WW 2 movie several years after the event, is the ability to convey atmosphere and believability. The Thin Red Line, although made decades after Hell to Eternity, was a bit better at capturing that atmosphere. Also, David Jansen as a marine drill sergeant? Not likely. It might have been more interesting if Jansen was the Japanese adoptee and Hunter was the drill sergeant. Still watchable as a decent action film, however.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
great movie
nancy-2146 November 2005
My father recommended this movie and I found a copy that I had privilege to watch. It was a great movie that was touching and moving to watch. I never heard of this Hispanic man who was a hero and I think that it should be updated and played today for the newer generation today. This movie starts from the beginning to the end on what the main character went through and why he did what he did. It has much family value no matter what race or color a person is. The war scenes were magnificent even considering the year that the movie was made. I think that if this movie were remade for this day and age with all of the facts in order, that it would be better than some of the war movies that are out now because it is in fact a true story. If you have a chance to see this movie, I rate it a "10".
24 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
WAR MOVIE TRUNCATED...!
masonfisk16 December 2021
A film that wears its good intentions on its chest but nowhere else from 1961. This is the true story of Guy Gabaldon, played by Jeffrey Hunter, an orphaned boy who was raised by a Japanese family prior to the attack on Pearl Harbor. Since his immediate family suffered the indignities of being interned (a sequence which is far too truncated) his fluency w/the Japanese language makes him a cinch to be a valuable combat officer so off he goes to Saipan w/his fellow recruits played by Vic Damone & David Jannsen (TV's The Fugitive) to engage the enemy which he does in droves as we see him go through fear (during the initial bloody landing), brutality toward his foes (after both his comrades are killed) & eventual understanding & reconciliation (the island inhabitants were brainwashed by the Japanese to kill themselves rather than end up in American hands) where he single-handedly orchestrates the liberation of many locals & the capture of the surrendering army at the closing of the war. A stronger director may've accentuated the important milestones in this hero's life to a better result but Phil Karlson (a veteran of film noirs & who I remembered being the director of the original Walking Tall) seems out of his element giving a Cliff's Notes treatment of the material rather than something substantive or relevant. Look for George Takei (Sulu from TV's Star Trek) as Hunter's adopted brother which is ironic since he played Captain Pike in the original Star Trek pilot.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A true story that is drama filled and heartbreaking
mpdeaton20 January 2004
I saw the movie many years ago and would love to have this movie on DVD. Jeffrey Hunter looses his best friend, David Janson, to the enemy and after that develops a deep hatred for the Japeneese. At times risking his own life to flush them out of their hiding places and kill them. At one point where he is watching the japeneese women and children hurl themselves off of the cliffs rather then be captured, he sees his own adopted Japenese family back in the states. An excellent movie that I would go the the movies to see again.
22 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed