Here's an underappreciated gem from the early 60s. Apparently a labour of love for co-producers James Mason and Leslie Stevens (who also wrote and directed), Hero's Island details the scramble for survival in the newly settled colony of Carolina. It raises interesting issues of ownership and propriety without sacrificing an exciting and realistic story. The cast is simply outstanding, particularly Warren Oates and (Harry) Dean Stanton in one of his earliest roles. Neville Brand is second billed but actually has quite a small role; future Andy Sidaris 'star' Darby Hinton gets a bigger chunk of screen time as a settler's son. The Panavision photography is uniformly outstanding, and frequently ravishingly beautiful as lensed by Ted McCord (Sound of Music, East of Eden, and many others).
14 Reviews
Weak film with strong character actors ....
merklekranz23 February 2017
Obviously somebody thought they had a good idea for a film, where religious beliefs could get in the way of common sense, and "Hero's Island"is that film. Shot entirely in one location, Catalina Island, the story lacks excitement, and quite frankly is pretty boring. The only saving grace is seeing the great character actors in 1962, and what a wonderful cast it is. Rip Torn, Harry Dean Stanton, Neville Brand, James Mason, and Warren Oates. Kate Manx is the Bible thumping woman, who's religion rules her every decision. My thought is that it's just not worth wading through all the uninteresting scenes to finally arrive at the swashbuckling conclusion. For fans of the actors only, unless you need something guaranteed to be sleep inducing. - MERK
Help comes from the sea
bkoganbing24 August 2015
With Catalina standing in for an island off the South Carolina coast in the early 18th century Hero Island according to the Films Of James Mason was shot within three weeks. No sets involved as it was all outdoors and more than likely the weather was cooperative.
Hero's Island finds Brendan Dillon, Kate Manx and their two small boys Morgan Mason and Darby Hinton and friend Warren Oates are there to settle the island as a condition of having worked off their indentured servitude. But three nasty fisherman are already there Rip Torn, Harry Dean Stanton and Robert Sampson and they mean to keep their island with no strangers. Dillon is killed right off and the others have to fend for their survival.
Help does come the sea in the form of James Mason whose been cast adrift by members of his crew. He proves to be their salvation especially after the fisherman go for help from Neville Brand who is a plantation overseer on the mainland.
Hero's Island is a tale of survival and a study of the character of all involved. The mixture of accents is rather weird with only Mason sounding like he truly belonged in the film. Kate Manx is interesting as she is a pious religious woman, but when her family is in danger, mother love overcomes all.
James Mason said that the producers had high hopes for the film. But the film did not do well at the box office.
Still it's an interesting work.
Hero's Island finds Brendan Dillon, Kate Manx and their two small boys Morgan Mason and Darby Hinton and friend Warren Oates are there to settle the island as a condition of having worked off their indentured servitude. But three nasty fisherman are already there Rip Torn, Harry Dean Stanton and Robert Sampson and they mean to keep their island with no strangers. Dillon is killed right off and the others have to fend for their survival.
Help does come the sea in the form of James Mason whose been cast adrift by members of his crew. He proves to be their salvation especially after the fisherman go for help from Neville Brand who is a plantation overseer on the mainland.
Hero's Island is a tale of survival and a study of the character of all involved. The mixture of accents is rather weird with only Mason sounding like he truly belonged in the film. Kate Manx is interesting as she is a pious religious woman, but when her family is in danger, mother love overcomes all.
James Mason said that the producers had high hopes for the film. But the film did not do well at the box office.
Still it's an interesting work.
Major Stede Bonnet
schweinhundt19675 November 2003
There really was a Stede Bonnet,and,yes,indeed,he was a retired British Army major.Infantry,I believe.
This was in the days when officers bought their commissions,and,the second son of a wealthy merchant could rise through the ranks easily and quickly.Consequently,one could achieve status with a minimal degree of competance,and,in his case,ability.
Bonnet was described as a short,plump,pudgy,and rather epicene man,Certainly,he was nobody's physical ideal of a pirate.He had retired at a rather early age,married a woman of vicious temper,and became a planter in the West Indies.
The marriage was unhappy,and,as divorce was almost impossible during that period,Bonnet decided to run away from home,piracy being the most logical option,given the location and the period.Unfortunatly,he had NO idea as to how to sail or navigate,knew nothing about commanding a gang of psychopaths,and went so far as to buy his own ship(the usual practice was to STEAL one),outfit it via the usual legal channels,and advertise for a crew,openl stating that they were going to be pirates.They then set sail.
Needing advice,he fell into league with Edward Teach,the notorious Blackbeard.Teach invited Bonnet aboard,ostensibly for a sociable drink and to impart some fatherly advice.No sooner was Bonnet on deck,however,when Blackbeard placed him under house arrest,had his own men take over Bonnet's ship,and sailed off for further adventures.
Needless to say,Bonnet was humiliated.However,he took advantage of this period,nad became proficient as a sailor and navigator.Blackbeard,eventually tiring of his joke,released the hapless Major.Bonnet started his own career as a pirate,and,while lacking Teach's ferocity,had his own streak of viciousness.Consequently,he became a noted crininal in his own right.It seems,by the way,that he was the only pirate who is reocorded as using the legendary from of execution "Walking the Plank."
In 1716,Bonnet,along with many of his cohorts,received a pardon,but,after returning to piracy,was eventually captured and hanged.
This was in the days when officers bought their commissions,and,the second son of a wealthy merchant could rise through the ranks easily and quickly.Consequently,one could achieve status with a minimal degree of competance,and,in his case,ability.
Bonnet was described as a short,plump,pudgy,and rather epicene man,Certainly,he was nobody's physical ideal of a pirate.He had retired at a rather early age,married a woman of vicious temper,and became a planter in the West Indies.
The marriage was unhappy,and,as divorce was almost impossible during that period,Bonnet decided to run away from home,piracy being the most logical option,given the location and the period.Unfortunatly,he had NO idea as to how to sail or navigate,knew nothing about commanding a gang of psychopaths,and went so far as to buy his own ship(the usual practice was to STEAL one),outfit it via the usual legal channels,and advertise for a crew,openl stating that they were going to be pirates.They then set sail.
Needing advice,he fell into league with Edward Teach,the notorious Blackbeard.Teach invited Bonnet aboard,ostensibly for a sociable drink and to impart some fatherly advice.No sooner was Bonnet on deck,however,when Blackbeard placed him under house arrest,had his own men take over Bonnet's ship,and sailed off for further adventures.
Needless to say,Bonnet was humiliated.However,he took advantage of this period,nad became proficient as a sailor and navigator.Blackbeard,eventually tiring of his joke,released the hapless Major.Bonnet started his own career as a pirate,and,while lacking Teach's ferocity,had his own streak of viciousness.Consequently,he became a noted crininal in his own right.It seems,by the way,that he was the only pirate who is reocorded as using the legendary from of execution "Walking the Plank."
In 1716,Bonnet,along with many of his cohorts,received a pardon,but,after returning to piracy,was eventually captured and hanged.
Difficult-to-believe storyline and inaudible dialog
aerovian6 October 2007
Warning: Spoilers
With a more realistic storyline this movie would have been only about ten minutes long, as the marauding and obviously very lawless Gates brothers would almost certainly have murdered the entire group of newly arrived intruders during one of their earliest encounters. The idea that they would even allow -- let alone ask -- ask Mrs. Mainwaring, her children, and a family friend to depart peaceably for the mainland after murdering her husband in cold blood is utterly ludicrous, particularly given the remote and isolated offshore setting in early-1700s Carolina. The other factor that prompted me to hit the "Stop" button on my PVR about fifteen minutes in was poor sound. With the exception of Brand, who delivers his lines with relatively forceful clarity, the male cast members largely mutter their lines; as a result I found that following the dialog was nearly impossible, even after trying to compensate with every possible adjustment to my audio system's equalizer and noise reduction settings. This is one utterly forgettable B-grader best left in the vault.
Awfully dull and very derivative...and with a silly twist.
planktonrules1 November 2011
Warning: Spoilers
In 1960, Disney released "Swiss Family Robinson" and they made a HUGE fortune. In today's money, it would earn $350,000,000+---and that makes it a very, very successful film. So, it's not surprising that only a short time later they'd make "Hero's Island"--a film that bears much more than a superficial resemblance to the Disney film. But, although "Hero's Island" is similar, it's not at all enjoyable like this earlier film...and towards the end it gets pretty dumb.
A particularly dumb family moves to a crappy island off the coast of the Carolinas in the 18th century. I say crappy because all sorts of pirate-types keep arriving and making their lives miserable. Heck, soon after they first arrive, one of the thugs kills the husband--leaving the wife and servants to try to survive with two young boys. Common sense would say to leave...but these folks don't seem to have a lot of that! Here is where it gets REALLLLLLY stupid. A guy (James Mason) washes up on the island and when the chips are down, you learn that he is NOT who he originally claimed to be but is Stede Bonnet--one of the infamous members of Blackbeard's gang. However, IMDb says that Mason is Blackbeard himself--he is NOT! And, after the pirates attack, he is ticked off and goes to deliver a well-earned butt-kicking.
Despite the fact that this SHOULD have been an exciting adventure film, it was not. It's actually amazingly slow-paced and very low energy. And, on top of that, you really don't care much about the family. Plus, if Mason was playing a pirate, he played one of the dullest ones in film history. Not terrible...but not at all good either.
A particularly dumb family moves to a crappy island off the coast of the Carolinas in the 18th century. I say crappy because all sorts of pirate-types keep arriving and making their lives miserable. Heck, soon after they first arrive, one of the thugs kills the husband--leaving the wife and servants to try to survive with two young boys. Common sense would say to leave...but these folks don't seem to have a lot of that! Here is where it gets REALLLLLLY stupid. A guy (James Mason) washes up on the island and when the chips are down, you learn that he is NOT who he originally claimed to be but is Stede Bonnet--one of the infamous members of Blackbeard's gang. However, IMDb says that Mason is Blackbeard himself--he is NOT! And, after the pirates attack, he is ticked off and goes to deliver a well-earned butt-kicking.
Despite the fact that this SHOULD have been an exciting adventure film, it was not. It's actually amazingly slow-paced and very low energy. And, on top of that, you really don't care much about the family. Plus, if Mason was playing a pirate, he played one of the dullest ones in film history. Not terrible...but not at all good either.
What Island?
howdymax26 July 2002
My primary comment on this movie has to do with the geography. It supposedly takes place in the "Crown Colony of the Carolinas". There is a scene early on where the husband points to the four points of the compass and declares: greenwood (west), ocean (east), Carolina (south), Cape Fear (north). They identify this place as Bull Island but by his description it is really Oak Island. I lived on Oak Island just south of the Cape Fear River and take my word for it - there ain't no rocks there. The terrain must be Hollywood's vision of what this part of the east coast looks like. It is in what is called the Coastal Plain. There are no cliffs, there are no boulders, there are no rocks. There are sand dunes, salt marshes, and swamps. What's more the beaches face south, not east. James Mason's character is identified as Major Bonnett. There was a local pirate named Stede Bonnett whose exploits are well documented in this area, but to my knowledge no one ever referred to him as "Major".
Apart from the geographic inaccuracies, the acting is really disappointing. Despite notable performances from James Mason and a promising cast, the amateur, high school performance of Kate Manx (Kate Who?) the female "star" puts a damper on whatever promise this movie might have had. She must have thanked her lucky stars she was married to the director.
Apart from the geographic inaccuracies, the acting is really disappointing. Despite notable performances from James Mason and a promising cast, the amateur, high school performance of Kate Manx (Kate Who?) the female "star" puts a damper on whatever promise this movie might have had. She must have thanked her lucky stars she was married to the director.
Best Said! OK
rymndmxwll8-861-9631073 December 2013
Well, this movie seeing the title and description gave me the impression that is was here in NC. And well! Not so much, I like the story! The acting, well the star shines every one else not so much. He makes a good swashbuckler though! Though I feel bad for most of the population enduring that crazed Christian lady. Though I like the period clothing and the campy killings. Now that that's said, this movie is in every way historical-fiction. I worked in the provost where he was held before he was hanged until dead. This in no part reflects in any way his life! He lived a young life! He was 38, This character looks 50. But all in all its not a bad classic film.
I Am The Devil
blacknorth29 December 2008
Warning: Spoilers
James Mason & Leslie Stevens' beautiful and obscure rendering of one family's escape from indentured slavery through the entreprenurial violence of pirate Major Steed Bonnett, AKA Sailormaster to Captain Teach (Blackbeard), AKA The Devil.
Manx, upon gaining her freedom, is granted title to Bull Island, off the coast of Carolina. Upon arrival with her husband she finds a family of fisherman in residence who claim the island for their own - in the ensuing struggle her husband is killed and she is ordered to leave under threat of death. By sheer providence, stranger James Mason is washed up on shore unconscious, a floater reading 'Dead Man' around his neck. The mysterious Mason joins her struggle...
The morality of the film is fine, tracking a passage from the sureties of slavery in the old Empire to the anarchy of a land-grab in the new World - Manx has the deeds to the island, but none of the fishermen can read worth a damn. The script is refracted through sunlight into blood, most violence happening in superb colour, and mixing colour into those insane words...
-He knows how to use that axe. Would you fight a man with a axe?
-You tore up her books, killed her birds.
-My father told me he was the king of the moon. He was the king of the moon.
In one extraordinary scene, film in a ten minute take with no cuts of any kind, Manx explains the mechanics of slavery to Mason, shows him her indenture and the two parts of paper representing her whole person - the reason why the scene was filmed without cuts, its narrative integrity intact.
-One person, undivided and whole.
Nicolas (Rip Torn) is tempted into the New World, wanting to learn to read, and deserts his fisherman brothers to throw his lot in with Manx. The remaining fishermen send to the mainland for help from the brutal Kingstree (Neville Brand) and the scene is set for a confrontation between land and sea, life and death...
Only Cimino's Heaven's Gate shares the same canvas as Hero's Island, both showing an interior landscape, a projected journey, an intellectual sword-fight. The sheer physicality of the final clash between Mason & Brand birthing the notion of everything we have seen and heard.
A stunning, stunning film, a masterpiece, and probably the finest film of the 60's. There is a letterboxed print which occasionally shows on TCM - see Hero's Island in all its glory and all its obscure and forgotten pain.
Manx, upon gaining her freedom, is granted title to Bull Island, off the coast of Carolina. Upon arrival with her husband she finds a family of fisherman in residence who claim the island for their own - in the ensuing struggle her husband is killed and she is ordered to leave under threat of death. By sheer providence, stranger James Mason is washed up on shore unconscious, a floater reading 'Dead Man' around his neck. The mysterious Mason joins her struggle...
The morality of the film is fine, tracking a passage from the sureties of slavery in the old Empire to the anarchy of a land-grab in the new World - Manx has the deeds to the island, but none of the fishermen can read worth a damn. The script is refracted through sunlight into blood, most violence happening in superb colour, and mixing colour into those insane words...
-He knows how to use that axe. Would you fight a man with a axe?
-You tore up her books, killed her birds.
-My father told me he was the king of the moon. He was the king of the moon.
In one extraordinary scene, film in a ten minute take with no cuts of any kind, Manx explains the mechanics of slavery to Mason, shows him her indenture and the two parts of paper representing her whole person - the reason why the scene was filmed without cuts, its narrative integrity intact.
-One person, undivided and whole.
Nicolas (Rip Torn) is tempted into the New World, wanting to learn to read, and deserts his fisherman brothers to throw his lot in with Manx. The remaining fishermen send to the mainland for help from the brutal Kingstree (Neville Brand) and the scene is set for a confrontation between land and sea, life and death...
Only Cimino's Heaven's Gate shares the same canvas as Hero's Island, both showing an interior landscape, a projected journey, an intellectual sword-fight. The sheer physicality of the final clash between Mason & Brand birthing the notion of everything we have seen and heard.
A stunning, stunning film, a masterpiece, and probably the finest film of the 60's. There is a letterboxed print which occasionally shows on TCM - see Hero's Island in all its glory and all its obscure and forgotten pain.
Strange Bit of History
gilchristtartan18 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Following up someone claiming this is a notable film of the 60s and not trying to sound oppositional, it is a struggle getting through the early part of this production and when you reach the end, you wonder if it was worth it. This could have been a exciting film with incredible opportunities to feature the life of indentured servitude and lawlessness of that age, plus the beauty of what was supposed to be the location but instead it's more in line with going to a high school play to see James Mason, who alone can't make this work. The casting and acting is as mundane as imaginable. Kate Manx overacts in an outfit and glamourous appearance which is more sci-fi than someone who has just become free from indentured servitude. Her lines are the quintessential Christianity talking points that make people who are even faithful Christians run away. None of the characters offer any depth or interest except Mason in parts, along with Neville Brand who outacts the rest of the cast by simply sitting in a chair and looking threatening. You can't relate or get behind anyone emotionally. The fight scene employs some of the worst fencing routines, and seems to go on forever. Somehow Mason and Brand are sword wrestling in the water and then wind up dueling on a boat with no idea how something that improbable could have happened. The story line is a cut and paste job with people making major decisions or switching loyalties with no in depth reasons. All in all, possibly the only film centered around a fascinating time in history, but somehow coming away weak and disconnected.
Forget Captain Jack Sparrow and watch a more accurate depiction of the pirate life
phillip_hrdy22 December 2011
This offbeat film plays like an early indie movie; but is well acted and entertaining. The film move largely shot on Catalina Island in 1961 and benefits from California sunshine while avoiding the phony appearance of the studio back lot. James Mason is excellent in the role of Blackbeard the Pirate's ex-first mate Major Stede Bonnett, managing an understated cool machismo throughout the story. Kate Manx is earnest and lovely in the leading lady role, while talent like Warren Oates, Rip Torn and Harry Dean Stanton demonstrated early in their careers why they all became stellar character players. The regional dialect is authentic to early 18th century New England with a solid script to match.
Unsung gem!
ronevickers15 July 2010
It's difficult to fathom the minority negative reviews submitted for this film, as it really is a fine effort, which is certainly different from the run of the mill films of this type. The dialogue suits the period, and definitely lends an authentic touch to the proceedings. The ensemble cast is uniformly excellent, with particularly fine performances from James Mason, Warren Oates, and the ill-fated Kate Manx. The pace of the film is just right, and it proves to be an absorbing tale that retains the viewers attention throughout. Despite the fact that it is rarely seen, these days, it is well worth seeking out. An excellent and underrated film.
Hero's Island--vintage 1960s
jespersc26 April 2016
Is blacknorth right in his review; is this "probably the finest film of the 60's"? In retrospect, that was a golden age, and Stevens' film was close in time to, for example, Dr. Strangelove, Psycho, Chimes at Midnight, Viridiana, or Jules and Jim. Even so, I agree, Hero's Island is superlatively accomplished. I would like to comment on just one aspect of the film that has been ignored by others: its formal perfection. The story of settlers with legal right to an island, versus fishermen claiming squatter's right, is told with utmost clarity and effect, partly due to the logic of its dramatic construction that takes the form of a series of moves across a shoreline, back and forth, according to the phases of the struggle. In brief:
--First, the settlers land on the island, unload their goods and raise a large cross to seal their ownership.
--Then, a drunk fisherman kills the settler, who falls out into the water, only his feet on land. He is, however, properly buried in his own soil.
--A pirate on a raft is washed ashore. Out of self-interest he helps chase the fishermen back to their boat.
--The younger fisherman opposes continued fighting and is thrown overboard. The settlers bring him to land.
--With money stolen from the settlers, the fishermen brings a brutal officer and bounty hunter from the mainland. With two soldiers, he takes up position on the beach. Here a sword fight eventually resolves the conflict. The fight carries on, from the sand into the water, and onto a boat; as the officer dies here, evil is exorcised from the island.
--The pirate flees the scene in a boat, leaving the widow of the settler and one fisherman as the owners of the land. This elementary scheme may not be noticed by the viewer, but the optimal use of minimal means, nevertheless, contributes to the film's strong impact.
--First, the settlers land on the island, unload their goods and raise a large cross to seal their ownership.
--Then, a drunk fisherman kills the settler, who falls out into the water, only his feet on land. He is, however, properly buried in his own soil.
--A pirate on a raft is washed ashore. Out of self-interest he helps chase the fishermen back to their boat.
--The younger fisherman opposes continued fighting and is thrown overboard. The settlers bring him to land.
--With money stolen from the settlers, the fishermen brings a brutal officer and bounty hunter from the mainland. With two soldiers, he takes up position on the beach. Here a sword fight eventually resolves the conflict. The fight carries on, from the sand into the water, and onto a boat; as the officer dies here, evil is exorcised from the island.
--The pirate flees the scene in a boat, leaving the widow of the settler and one fisherman as the owners of the land. This elementary scheme may not be noticed by the viewer, but the optimal use of minimal means, nevertheless, contributes to the film's strong impact.
Friendly persuasion on an island.
dbdumonteil17 February 2002
Offbeat work which pits a pious family against a bench of violent weirdoes on an Island .The main problem for the virtuous ones is that they shall not kill or hurt anyone.In 1956,the Quakers in William Wyler's wonderful classic "Friendly persuasion " had the same problems.The best part is the first one,with the family's arrival,the father's death and the omnipresence of biblical references.But as soon as James Mason 's character shows himself a fierce pirate,but a big-hearted one,the plot peters out,and it's nothing but routine action movie.The mother is akin to Grace Kelly's character in Fred Zinneman's "high moon"(1952),and like her,she will have to do what she 's very loath to.The main characters have backgrounds that could have provided many other movies with a subject.All this does not hang together well and ,all in all, it remains a poor man's "friendly persuasion"
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
