In early 1945, 10000 Japanese Marines, fearing execution if they surrendered, took refuge within Manila's Intramuros ("walled city"), a fortress erected by the Spanish in the late 16th century, with 20 foot thickness all about, and during an eight day siege and artillery bombardment by American Army and Philippine freedom fighters, all 10000 of the Japanese Naval troops perished, along with 90000 others, civilians in the main whose home was the narrow passaged fort. This film, generally marketed in the U.S. as THE WALLS OF HELL, features sturdy Jock Mahoney as an American lieutenant in charge of a task force composed primarily of Philippine soldiers ensconced within the outskirts of Intramuros, who do battle continuously with the besieged, the incessant action interspersed with extraneous sub-plots and weakened by less than fine direction, production values and camerawork.
6 Reviews
Incessant action but no real narrative
Leofwine_draca2 June 2014
In the early '60s, Filipino producers decided to tap the American appetite for war stories with a series of lurid, low budget black-and-white battle flicks that depicted various events from the Second World War. THE WALLS OF HELL (original title: INTRAMUROS) tackles a true-life tale in which 10,000 fanatical Japanese troops, walled up within Manila, refuse to give up in the face of overwhelming odds.
Despite the exciting premise, THE WALLS OF HELL turns out to be a disappointing movie and that's down to the indifferent direction and the lack of a real storyline. The film offers plenty of action, including a final third which is an all-out and incessant assault on the enemy, but too much of it is repetitive and undistinguished. The lack of real characters hurts it too; the imported American star is one-time Tarzan Jock Mahoney and Filipino film regular Fernando Poe Jr. shows up, but they're given little to do other than appear for face value alone.
I can't help but feel that directors Gerardo de Leon and Eddie Romero worked better when they went for all-out exploitation fare instead, such as the BLOOD ISLAND films. The results might have been equally shoddy, but at least they were more memorable than this bland and generic piece of filmmaking.
Despite the exciting premise, THE WALLS OF HELL turns out to be a disappointing movie and that's down to the indifferent direction and the lack of a real storyline. The film offers plenty of action, including a final third which is an all-out and incessant assault on the enemy, but too much of it is repetitive and undistinguished. The lack of real characters hurts it too; the imported American star is one-time Tarzan Jock Mahoney and Filipino film regular Fernando Poe Jr. shows up, but they're given little to do other than appear for face value alone.
I can't help but feel that directors Gerardo de Leon and Eddie Romero worked better when they went for all-out exploitation fare instead, such as the BLOOD ISLAND films. The results might have been equally shoddy, but at least they were more memorable than this bland and generic piece of filmmaking.
Underneath the Arches
richardchatten6 October 2019
Hollywood depictions of the war in the Pacific were usually in Technicolor ('Salute to the Marines', 'American Guerilla in the Philippines') in acknowledgement of the verdant beauty of the Philippine Islands; as were more recent Hollywood productions shot in the Philippines like 'The Steel Claw' (1961) by director/star George Montgomery.
Eddie Romero's home-grown productions however - because black & white was still a lot cheaper (and made it a whole lot easier to find actual wartime footage to furnish some of its bigger bangs) - tended instead to be shot in very stark monochrome; instead exploiting the battle-scarred fortifications then still standing outside Manila (and which gave this film it's US release title) to provide an atmospheric backdrop to the action and talk (of which there's plenty).
It all gets a bit monotonous after a while, but lingers in the memory...
Eddie Romero's home-grown productions however - because black & white was still a lot cheaper (and made it a whole lot easier to find actual wartime footage to furnish some of its bigger bangs) - tended instead to be shot in very stark monochrome; instead exploiting the battle-scarred fortifications then still standing outside Manila (and which gave this film it's US release title) to provide an atmospheric backdrop to the action and talk (of which there's plenty).
It all gets a bit monotonous after a while, but lingers in the memory...
The bullets fly as they prepare to die.
mark.waltz1 May 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Even after World War II ended, there were still dozens of war movies made each year, and while most of them are not classics, they are either entertaining, insightful or educational even if they have ended up in obscurity. Jock Mahoney leads a huge cast International actors and many extras, trapped in a building with war going on around them as the building shakes, the ceiling begins to fall apart, and arguments ensue over how to handle the situation as well as who is responsible for the hellish situation of the world outside. This is Japan during the last desperate days so tensions are very high with the multiple cultures trapped inside.
Filled with a lot of action but not enough time for much character development, there are still some very well written conversations which lead into fights among the people trapped, but it's unfortunate that outside of two or three characters, not many people get to reveal their story. Still, even if the war only lasted 6 years, it can take up an entire world, and in that world, there are many stories that needed to be told. I can't determine how much fact and section are utilized in this, but it's pretty convincing for a low budget movie. Definitely worth seeing for film students who study how the war has been portrayed on screen, and with the grittiness of everything going on, the viewer certainly won't be bored.
Filled with a lot of action but not enough time for much character development, there are still some very well written conversations which lead into fights among the people trapped, but it's unfortunate that outside of two or three characters, not many people get to reveal their story. Still, even if the war only lasted 6 years, it can take up an entire world, and in that world, there are many stories that needed to be told. I can't determine how much fact and section are utilized in this, but it's pretty convincing for a low budget movie. Definitely worth seeing for film students who study how the war has been portrayed on screen, and with the grittiness of everything going on, the viewer certainly won't be bored.
Free on YouTube
dukeb0y15 December 2023
Although this is really not the best movie, it has some good points. First is filmed on location. In the Philippines so that's a nice touch instead of being filmed on some Backlot in Hollywood. So we have the actual Fort it seems called Intramonus or something like that in the Philippines.
The second nice feature is actual American equipment used. For example they have a BAE, which is a Browning Automatic Rifle.
Blasting away at the enemy. Unfortunately the copy I saw on YouTube was kind of unrestored if you know what I mean. If this movie had been restored and maybe a different director it could have been very much better. Even though it's worth a watch just for the accurate equipment. And filmed in the Philippines.
The second nice feature is actual American equipment used. For example they have a BAE, which is a Browning Automatic Rifle.
Blasting away at the enemy. Unfortunately the copy I saw on YouTube was kind of unrestored if you know what I mean. If this movie had been restored and maybe a different director it could have been very much better. Even though it's worth a watch just for the accurate equipment. And filmed in the Philippines.
Good war film made better by great action, a great supporting cast and a unique location
dbborroughs8 November 2005
As the Japanese retreated in the Philippines some ten thousand Japanese soldiers feared execution if they were to surrender, so they barricaded them selves in Manila's Intramuros, or walled city, vowing to fight until the last man(something they did do). The city was a fort built by the Spanish and had twenty foot thick stone walls and was practically impregnable from the ground. Unable to bomb the city from the air because of an open city agreement about Manila, the Intramuros would have to be taken using brute force.
The plot of the movie concerns an attempt by American lead Filipino soldiers to get into the city and rescue a group of hostages before the final attack. I'm not too sure as to how historically accurate the film is, but its a decent war film with pretty constant action. Indeed much of the final third of the film is one prolonged battle to rescue the hostages and once it starts it never lets up. I especially liked that the tunnels in and around the Intramuros added something to the battle scenes and made it something unique
The Americans are fronted by Jock Mahoney as a tough as nails soldier who has had to live with himself after attacking a Japanese convoy that was transporting his pregnant wife to the hospital. Frankly its a bland performance and it falls to the rest of the cast to carry the weight of the film. This is a good thing since they are all able actors and create a nice bunch of soldiers to root for (even if they are a tad clichéd).
I liked this movie a great deal. Its not perfect but it does what it does with out any real attempts to be anything more than a big war story. Certainly there are occasional drifts into clichéd territory, but the uniqueness of the story's setting makes it okay. If you're in the mood for a World War Two style film that you haven't seen before (literally since notes on the DVD say this film was largely unavailable for the better part of the last 30 years) I would certainly give this a try. As a friend of mine is fond of saying- definitely worth a box of popcorn.
The plot of the movie concerns an attempt by American lead Filipino soldiers to get into the city and rescue a group of hostages before the final attack. I'm not too sure as to how historically accurate the film is, but its a decent war film with pretty constant action. Indeed much of the final third of the film is one prolonged battle to rescue the hostages and once it starts it never lets up. I especially liked that the tunnels in and around the Intramuros added something to the battle scenes and made it something unique
The Americans are fronted by Jock Mahoney as a tough as nails soldier who has had to live with himself after attacking a Japanese convoy that was transporting his pregnant wife to the hospital. Frankly its a bland performance and it falls to the rest of the cast to carry the weight of the film. This is a good thing since they are all able actors and create a nice bunch of soldiers to root for (even if they are a tad clichéd).
I liked this movie a great deal. Its not perfect but it does what it does with out any real attempts to be anything more than a big war story. Certainly there are occasional drifts into clichéd territory, but the uniqueness of the story's setting makes it okay. If you're in the mood for a World War Two style film that you haven't seen before (literally since notes on the DVD say this film was largely unavailable for the better part of the last 30 years) I would certainly give this a try. As a friend of mine is fond of saying- definitely worth a box of popcorn.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
