Koko, le gorille qui parle (1978)

Réalisateur:

Barbet Schroeder

Date de sortie:

4 décembre 1979 (USA)

Genre:

Documentaire

Plot Keywords:

Animal Human Communication | Chimpanzee | Monkey | Talking Gorilla

Avis des utilisateurs:

A candid, thought-provoking, and not always flattering documentary.

Ensemble

Koko	...	Le Gorille
Penny Patterson	...	Herself
Saul Kitchener	...	Directeur du Zoo de San Francisco
Carl Pribram	...	Le professeur de Neuroscience
Roger Fouts	...	Le docteur en psychologie

Autre(s) titre(s):

Koko, a Talking Gorilla (USA)

Durée:

85 min

Pays:

France

Langue:

Français | Anglais

Couleur:

Couleur (Eastmancolor)

Rapport de forme:

1,33 : 1

Son:

Mono

Classification:

USA:Unrated

Lieux de tournage:

San Francisco, California, USA

Société:

Institut National de l'Audiovisuel (INA)

A candid, thought-provoking, and not always flattering documentary.

You've probably heard of Koko over the years. Maybe you're seen a PBS special on the internationally famous gorilla or read an article about her. Once considered a controversial experiment in primate communication, Koko now seems practically human when compared to other gorillas in the wild and that is one of the wry points raised in this candid documentary by Barbet Schroeder, a gifted filmmaker.

The day to day instruction and training you see Koko receiving from Dr. Francis "Penny" Patterson in this intimate portrait is not the kid-friendly portrait you'd expect. You get to see Koko on off days when she doesn't want to sign with Penny, when she seems bored and restless with her daily routine, or when she rebels against Penny's authority by engaging in minor destructive acts within her living area. Her home, basically a bland, institutional space with hardly any natural light, is depressing and there are few scenes with Koko enjoying the outdoors freely. Despite Dr. Patterson's assurances that she is making incredible breakthroughs in communication between humans and apes, viewers may get the feeling that Koko is being brainwashed through repetitious instruction. Her only other exposure to gorillas is Michael, a young ape who is also being trained to communicate using American sign language. Is Dr. Patterson raising a new breed of gorillas who will only be able to sign with each other and research scientists in a private facility of Stanford University? Can Koko, who was once housed in the San Francisco Zoo, communicate with apes in the wild or even zoo apes? The real problem is that Koko may not even think of herself as a gorilla anymore. You have to wonder if she might not have been better off at the San Francisco Zoo where she at least would have enjoyed more outside activity, was able to relate to other gorillas, and was free of scientific experimentation.

The most sobering thought you are left with is the current state of gorillas in the wild. Are they better off in zoos or research facilities instead of running free in the wilds where they are fair game for poachers, hunters, and the increasing crush of human progress?