The One Man Jury (1978) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Dirty Harry Palance!
Coventry28 March 2023
You know, I know, everybody knows that Jack Palance is at his very best when depicting bona-fide evil villains, or - at the bare minimum - chauvinist scumbag characters with utmost nasty personalities. So, when you read the premise of a 70s exploitation/thriller in which Palance stars as a tough and frustrated LAPD homicide officer, you can rest assured that he'll be the type who resolve cases in the most unorthodox ways imaginable. Heck, he'll probably use more violence than the murderers, rapists, and armed robbers that he chases! That's our Jack!

And indeed, Lieutenant Wade is much more of a Paul Kersey (from "Death Wish") than a Harry Callahan (from "Dirty Harry"). Excessively enraged because the criminals he brings in are repeatedly acquitted due to insignificant procedural errors, Lt. Wade gradually turns into judge, jury, and executioner in one. Notably for his latest case, a vicious rapist and serial killer known in the media as The Slasher, Wade will not permit the culprit lives long enough to see the inside of the courtroom. Of course, this forces him to make deals with the dangerous criminals he's normally supposed to arrest and cover up bloody vigilante-acts from his own colleagues.

There were dozens of movies like "One Man Jury" during the seventies, and personally I love watching every single one of them! Most of these movies were modeled after the above-mentioned milestones, so please don't expect any original storylines, or deeply elaborated character portraits here. What you may certainly expect, however, is Jack Palance in top-shape! He shoots sleazy thugs in the face at close range, laughs at his girlfriend's pleas for reintegrating criminals into society, and drinks cheap wine with Los Angeles' biggest hustler. There's plenty of extreme and gratuitous violence on display, as well nudity and crazy stunt work. It's a very woman-unfriendly movie, but sadly this was more rule than exception during the late 70s. Marvelous supportive cast also, including Christopher Mitchum, Pamela Susan Shoop, Alexandra Hay, Angel Tompkins, and the almighty Joe Spinell from "Maniac".
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The over used seventies topic
searchanddestroy-12 October 2022
It may be the two thoudsandth movie from the seventies to speak of vigilante justice, after DEATH WISH and DIRTY HARRY Callahan have opened the road. The directing looks more than a William Lustig - and not only because of the presence of Joe MANIAC Spinell - or a Lewis Teague and why not James Glickenhaus's feature than a film made by the director of DEATH OF A SCOUNDREL, with George Sanders, made twenty years earlier, and with no films in between...I know, Charles Martin is more known as a producer than a director. Like for instance Carl Foreman, who gave only THE VICTORS as a director. But admit that the link between a drama starring George Sanders in the late fifties and this one, is more than implausible, unlikely. This one is a good time waster but for seventies films fans only. And Jack Palance hit by a bullet in the belly and continuing to jump,run, fight.... Rubbish. Insulting to audiences. Lousy ending, I hate it. And as in PEUR SUR LA VILLE, Henri Verneuil's film starring Jean Paul Belmondo, the lead cop has to deal with several cases and criminals, with nothing in common: a gang mobster and a serial killer, I repeat, like PEUR SUR LA VILLE. And I also liked the handkerschief detail used by the criminal and later by his hunter. Very unusual.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Very old fashioned crime drama with 70's vigilante twist
Serpent-53 March 2000
This film plays very much like a old B & W serial type crime drama from the 50's, and even the dialogue is VERY old fashioned, as I had trouble believing these people talk like this in the late 70's. It also has like two different plots going on at the same time, involving like 3 different baddies, and many colourful characters all somehow involved in one story or another. In the end, it all revolves around Jack Palance's character. Lots of great character actors, great music score, poor photography, and isnt really a "R" rating movie, as it can play on TV as a crime show pilot! But still it is one of the better Palance films from the 70's. It could have used a good 10 minutes editing to make it more tighter though.
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Surprising ending.
gridoon20 July 2002
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILERS*** SPOILERS*** Jack Palance plays a tough cop, modelled on Dirty Harry. He's so frustrated about the leniency of the judicial system that he decides to take the law into his own hands and become what the title implies.

As these things go, this film is not bad at all. The action sequences are well-handled, the ending is surprising, and there is one small but subtle and insightful touch (Minor Spoiler): when Palance kills the first villain, in cold blood, he covers his face with a handkerchief before going down the stairs, just as his victim had previously done after HE had killed a woman in cold blood. Interesting. (**1/2)
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Has moments...
Flixer195723 August 2002
Warning: Spoilers
**Possible Spoilers Ahead**

Intended as a DIRTY HARRY rip-off, this West Coast crime melodrama is closer in tone to one of Nelson DeMille's Ryker or Keller novels, as an aging cop breaks the law in order to bust the lawbreakers. One can hardly blame him since he's working on two cases at once: gangland crimes orchestrated by late great slimeball Joe Spinell and a murder spree carried out by a necrophiliac rapist. Despite a good cast, outbursts of violence and numerous exploitation elements this movie pulls too many punches and needs more payoff at the end. It has its moments, however, and the "I'm holding court–right here and now" scene is a real gem.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Strong Acting buffs up weak script
mjfcoins10 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I viewed this movie via You Tube. It was clearly uploaded from an old vhs tape so picture quality was not the sharpest. Sound quality was good.

Firstly it is my opinion that Pamela Shoop stole the award for best actor in this film.

So much so I investigated her filmography, I was keen to see more of her but was met with disappointment. This was her only major role.

Every actor in this movie is strong and gave flawless performances.

The only thing hammy are the fight scenes.

Ok. Jack plays Jack. This time in "detective mode" .

It is a fairly linear script. I dare say rushed out on the coat tails of similar such succesful efforts as stated on this page in other reviews.

Shame not much more of an effort was made to get a bit more in depth background, especially on the main character who is a vetran. A bit more gritty. Alas.

We come into the story following a beautiful lady who gets pulses racing immediatly by undressing and changing into evening attire. She is a pro card player at night. Yup. She gets killed.

Which cuts with (pardon the pun) Jack losing a high profile trial involving a mob hoodlum because he failed to follow process. This is where the script is weak. It gets kicked out by the judge immediatly the bad guy says he wasnt given his rights when asked by his attorney. No objection from the prosecution. Hmmmm. Hence the start of one man jury.

Jack now has it in for the bad guy.

This revenge becomes interupted by a serial killer on the loose who it seems that Jack is lead detective on.

This is when we discover she is the latest in a number of similar slayings aptly named the Slasher murders.

Nothing else gets mentioned here other than merely alluded to.

Jack (A Superintenden(!!!) and his sidekick Sergeant do their thing which does not really involve an awful lot of graft.

The movie plays out in a much vaunted vein.

Mob criminal has to come to justice.

Slasher has to be found, and come to Justice. Jacks justice.

It is worth watching the tale unfold because the actors are excellent and the fight scenes laughable.

It is of its time.

But as a history lesson it is a nostalgic trip viewing old run down America, vehicles with rocking horse shock absorbers, how casinos were run and overall some decent photography.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
He's no Dirty Harry. This isn't Magnum Force. He is The Punisher with a badge!
GOWBTW-5STARreviewer6 December 2022
Dirty Harry always love to lay down the law.

Lt. Wade(Jack Palance) is a cop who has serious issues with the judicial system. He arrested the criminals, but they get let off on technicalities. He goes over the edge, and would punish the criminals, his way. There's a killer known as The Slasher. He would cut a lock of the victim's hair, and steals the bras of his victims. This is sick. Wade would hunt down the criminals that the courts let off, and kill them.

In my opinion, he's worse than Callahan.

The girlfriend of The Slasher is really a gullible victim of his deceit. But who is to say? Wade isn't the law in his right. He's just The Punisher with a badge. He makes Dirty Harry look like a saint.

A fine movie, but it's Alexandra Hay final film in the 70's.

A cute flick, for a rainy day.

2.5 out of 5 stars.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed