More Wild Wild West (TV Movie 1980) Poster

(1980 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Mildly Amusing Sequel
theowinthrop8 July 2005
In the late 1970s Robert Conrad and Ross Martin reappeared as James West and Artemis Gordon, their roles from THE WILD WILD WEST (a.k.a. THE WILD WEST), a fun send up of the James Bond type of spy stories in the 1960s. THE WILD WILD WEST was set in the Grant Administration (1869 - 1877) and most of the villains were ego-maniacal types who were determined to take over a territory or the country or the world (or just make money) with some 1870 style devices that would possibly change the world. The leading villain was Michael Dunn, the sharp dwarf actor . He played Dr. Miguelito Lovelace. Originally Lovelace wanted to have only the state of California but as he kept reappearing he wound seek the whole country, or the whole world as his goal. Another villain on several episodes was Victor Buono as Count Mazeppi (Mazeppi was more pragmatic - he just sought money ), but while Lovelace was usually captured Mazeppi usually got away (once in a balloon). It was a pretty good show actually.

Michael Dunn was dead when the first "reunion" movie was made. Instead Paul Williams played his son. The first television movie took place in Grover Cleveland's first administration (1885 - 1889). Wilfrid Brimley played Cleveland (who with other 1880 leaders has been replaced by duplicates by Miguelito Jr. The head of the Secret Service was Harry Morgan (Robert T. "Skinny" Malone). The obnoxious English diplomat and spy was Rene Auberjonois (Sir David Edney). It was a pleasant ninety minute diversion.

It was so successful a second film was made within a year, again with Conrad and Martin, but bringing in Morgan and Auberjonois as well. This time the villain was Jonathan Winters as Albert Paradine II, who bumps off his four twin brothers with bombs in the beginning of the movie (one I recall is blown up when he starts to cut a knock-wurst he is eating - a ripoff of a similar joke assassination in the film THE ASSASSINATION BUREAU, LTD). Paradine plans to use his inventions to take over the U.S., but first he plans to demolish an international peace conference in Washington.

It is supposed to be the Presidency of Benjamin Harrison (Cleveland's successor, 1889 - 1893). Harrison is never shown, but we see Morgan conferring with Harrison's Secretary of State, Dr. Henry Messinger (Victor Buono). It, of course, was a spoof of Dr. Henry Kissinger, Nixon's and Ford"s Secretary of State. It was not the only spoof of modern diplomatic problems in the movie.

What makes the "Messinger/Kissinger" spoof interesting is that Harrison's Secretary of State was a significant figure - it was former Speaker of the House, Senator from Maine, and Presidential Candidate James Gillispie Blaine. He had been Secretary of State in the brief Garfield Administration (1881), but Harrison reappointed him. An extremely capable and energetic Secretary of State, Blaine kept defending American interests abroad in Samoa, the Behring Straits, and Latin America. He successfully avoided war with Chile in 1891, and also resolved (with President Harrison) an embarrassing diplomatic crisis with Italy in 1890). But in 1889 he did call a major diplomatic conference - the Pan American Conference, where representatives of all of the nations of the hemisphere were invited to confer about common issues and problems. One wonders if this achievement (the first time an American Secretary of State ever tried to bring together foreign nations for such a conference) was heard of by the script writers, who used it as a peg for their plot.

As an entertainment, MORE WILD, WILD WEST is mildly fun to watch - specifically because of Conrad and Martin working so well together together (as always) despite weak material, and the humor of Winters, Buono, Morgan, and (in one sequence only) Dave Madden and Avery Schrieber. The latter was an event in the peace conference that happens that helps (momentarily) to disrupt it. It involves the German Ambassador (Madden), the Russian Ambassador (Schreiber), and the Spanish Ambassador. It has come to the attention of the Secretary of State that Cuba (a Spanish colony at the time) has just gotten a reinforcement of German troops which does not make sense. Why are the Germans there? Madden, caught off guard, starts explaining that the Cubans asked them to assist them in Cuba. But it suddenly becomes known that the Germans were shipped to Cuba by the Russians. Schreiber tries to deny this, but the three diplomats (in protesting too much) manage to reveal some unknown type of skulduggery going on. Schreiber and Madden end up having a physical fight.

Now the thing that a viewer of this television film might not understand in 2005 is how this was a reference to a Carter Administration incident that was on the minds of the script writers. After the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, while the U.S. Government was perfectly willing to work out their deal to avoid nuclear war with Russia, we naturally kept an eye on Cuba to see that the Russians did take down their missiles as they promised. Russia did comply (as we did with Turkey, where we had missiles). But in late 1979 the U.S. intelligence discovered a build-up of troops in Cuba, mostly from East Germany. The Russians had tried to disguise their current attempt to rearm Castro with men from another client state. This incident (Russia eventually had to remove the German troops - Carter's relative success here was hidden in the disaster of the Iran Hostage Affair)is what is spoofed in the film.
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A painful finale to a great show
Bpaxson00226 June 2023
This is a made for TV movie attempting to cash in on one of the more violent 60s series. With westerns being somewhat blaze', the writers and production company decided to go the way of slapstick comedy.

To that end, they bring in Jonathan Winters as a Loveless substitute, only less intertaining. I'm not sure who I feel worse for: Conrad and Martin for being sucked into this mess or Winters for trying to adapt his talent to get this boat to float.

The best of this is watching Ross Martin in one of his final roles. A man of impeccable talent, he gives his best while everyone else seems to be phoning it in. The only real reason to watch this film is to complete the set.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
uninspired
cherold10 August 2004
I only watched about a half hour of this, but since no one else has commented I might as well say something.

I had high hopes. The original series was excellent and I recognized the director as the guy who did the very funny Support Your Local Sheriff, but the movie immediately felt a little off. The series was a clever, light-hearted action show with a weird sense of humor, but the movie went for very broad, not especially funny comedy. Martin was in pretty good form but Conrad seemed a little worn out, as though he had become an organic farmer lured back to reprise a role he was no longer too comfortable with. There was also a really dumb British spy.

The best thing was Jonathan Winters, who seems to have watched the series and understands that the villains are not comedic buffoons but rather clever, forceful madmen. Unfortunately he wasn't on screen enough in the first half hour to keep me watching.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
West and Gordon still deliver!
solar1216 April 2010
The classic espionage TV series The Wild Wild West, which ran from 1965 to 1969 on CBS, was followed by two TV movie sequels: The Wild Wild West Revisited (1979) and More Wild Wild West (1980). The original series episodes ranged from thrilling espionage episodes to more comedic and campy ones, but the follow-up TV movies continued only in the campy and comedic vein. That was considered a let down by some fans of the series who were hoping for something closer to the more serious episodes of the show. I can understand their viewpoint, but I found both movies entertaining for what they were: a fun bit of escapism featuring the reunion of two favorite characters and the actors who played them. The chemistry between these guys can't be beat. Both movies have their weak points, but Conrad and Martin, reunited as an older West and Gordon, make for fun viewing.
16 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
An Insult to the Wild Wild West Franchise, Bad Really Really Bad
FloridaFred27 June 2023
Warning: Spoilers
What an insult to the Wild Wild West franchise. This attempt at comedy is an absolute mess. The only film more insulting and condescending is the 1999 movie with the black James West.

You find yourself fast-forwarding through large parts of this comedy, hoping for something to happen.

For starters, it is obvious that Robert Conrad doesn't have his heart in this one. Other reviewers correctly opined that Conrad appears tired of playing the role. And, he doesn't look good in the part; he is sporting a year 1980 hairstyle that is totally out of character.

In several scenes, James West is chased around (and dragged on the ground) by some screeching Mexican woman and her brothers. They show up again. And again. When West finally catches up with her, she speaks of herself in the third person. The whole thing is a needless distraction from the plot (whatever the plot is).

Much of the show revolves around actor Victor Buono doing a Henry Kissinger impersonation (political humor of the time?). Buono was outstanding in his other appearances on the 1960's airings of the Wild Wild West. But here? It gets tedious and boring.

There are two "Incredible Hulk" imitators, who serve as the henchmen for the villain. The green skin, the torn pants... it just comes across as silly.

The British secret agent (who appeared in the previous WWW made-for-TV movie, "Wild Wild West Revisited) is simply not entertaining. And his lovely assistant appears for only one scene, then she is gone.

An obvious goof: Winters disappears in front of West and Gordon, then makes an invisible and obnoxious exit through the saloon, throwing a saloon girl into some guy's lap. A few minutes later, the exact same scene is repeated (after Winters disappears in front of the British agent and his assistant). Couldn't the producers have filmed a different second exit, instead of the obvious re-showing of a previous clip?

The "Peace Conference" is farcical, slapstick nonsense. A complete waste of time. The scene with West and Gordon throwing themselves at the invisible villain, and then wrestling each other, is also hard to watch.

For eye candy, the producers bring in an actress named Candi, and her twin sister, Randi. They are the stunning Brough Twins. How tacky that Jonathan Winters is constantly grabbing their rear ends, and they squeal out, "Oh Professor". Of course, by the end of the show the beautiful twins are in the arms of James West and Artemus Gordon.

The ending is the same as the previous made-for-TV movie. We are shifted in time to 1980, a story is told about the files of the Secret Service, and then it ends with a silly gag.

I rated the Wild Wild West TV show (the original series from the 1960's) 10 Stars. This horrible show should get a ZERO. So one Star is my rating.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Wild wild wild and well just fun
sadie_m_lady13 February 2021
These two had amaz8ng chemistry together this was the most fun you could have after school and before supper at my house as a kid Again so much crap on tv put on some of the good stuff that we enjoyed
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Weak Final Entry in the Series
mrb198018 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
"More Wild Wild West" had the two original stars, some really good guest stars, the director of the first TV movie, a promising plot line...but someone let this one get away from them.

In this final film Jim (Robert Conrad) and Artie (Ross Martin) again reprise their roles as 19th-century Secret Service agents. Albert Paradine II (Jonathan Winters) wants (as usual) to take over the world, so he does battle with West and Gordon. Several familiar faces appear, including Harry Morgan as the Secret Service chief, plus Avery Schreiber and Victor Buono. The film meanders to an inconclusive and unsatisfying ending with Paradine finally being brought to justice (sort of).

Like "The Wild Wild West Revisited", the film is played mostly for camp, with lots of silly situations and dialog. Conrad looks as though he's tired of playing his role, although Martin is good as always. When compared to "The Wild Wild West Revisited" on the CBS DVD, this film seems of much lower visual quality, with the colors muddy and the film scratched in places.

The movie is still fairly entertaining for fans, but the death of Ross Martin the following year ended any hopes of another reunion. That's unfortunate since this final "Wild Wild West" production is pretty forgettable.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
More a coda than a conclusion
aramis-112-8048804 March 2024
West and Gordon are back in action, after a little comic arm-twisting. This time, they're trying to thwart an evil genius who wants to spark a world war (an over-the-top Jonathan Winters).

Like "The Wild Wild West Revisited" this entry is directed by Burt Kennedy, most famous for the "Support Your Local . . ." movies with James Garner. He's turned a subtly tongue-in-cheek television series into out-and-out comedies.

West and Gordon (Robert Conrad, Ross Martin) are still good together. But this time around West seems to have a burr in his saddle.

Harry Morgan is back as their boss. Also, for this final act of WWW, is Victor Buono, who was in the very first broadcast episode of the original series.

The first reunion movie, "The Wild Wild West Revisited," was heavy on the comedy but was sad only because of the loss of Michael Dunn, replaced by the less adequate Paul Williams. Ross Martin's loss shortly after this movie was also sad. But this was clearly West and Gordon's swan song. Our stars are still game, but the story is tired.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Continuity
djanb121526 March 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Continuity is ESSENTIAL for any sequel and/or remake! This is why-except for the terrific music video, the remake of Wild Wild West failed(no offense to Mr Branaugh( terribly miscast as a descendant of Dr Miguelito Loveless)Mr Smith and Mr Kline,who didn't even try to capture the character traits that made James West and Artemus Gordon so iconic-one GLARING ERROR-they NEVER referred to each other by their LAST NAMES-it was always Jim/James or Artie/Artemus! ThatThat's what made the first TV- movie Wild Wild West Revisited so good!Their characters were "enjoying" the type of retirement you would have expected and their reintroduction into the Secret Service was also completely accurate! And while there will always be only ONE Dr Miguelito Q Loveless (his duets with Antoinette as well as his verbal eloquent duels with James West were priceless(it was obvious though never spoken(James almost did in the Night Loveless Died when he thought he was talking to his "uncle") that they mutually respected each other)but no one could have been better cast as his son than Paul Williams(who hinted at his father's heart but as many children's perspective only saw the pain that he suffered and blamed them)! That's why this 2nd TV-movie, while the characters of James and Artemus are still true to form, I spent much of the movie trying to figure out who Professor Paradine's father was?! I kept going over in my mind the list of all the villains until I finally realized that for some inexplicable reason the writers had chosen to create a "new former "villain! Then, when I saw Victor Buono as Dr Messenger(clearly and an admirably done spoof of Kissenger)I thought that the "Paradine" character was a McGuffin and kept waiting for the moment when Dr Messenger pulls off the disguise and reveals that he is in fact the inimitable Count Manzeppi! But it never happened! So that's why I only gave it an 8-no fault of the actors Robert Conrad Ross Martin Victor Buono and Jonathan Winters(who I truly liked but would have been better had his character had substance), but of the writers forgetting the key-Continuity!
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed