"Maigret" Maigret et les témoins récalcitrants (TV Episode 1993) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Maigret takes the biscuit!
Tony-Holmes4 May 2023
Saw this on the UK Talking Pictures channel, who last year showed all 4 series of Maigret (Rupert Davies), originally early 60s BBC, and quite a cult show back then.

This French version with Bruno Cremer in the lead is a bit of an acquired taste, for those of us used to Davies or Gambon starring, but he's a pretty good interpretation of the book Maigret, sometimes sympathetic to a witness (or a criminal he knows well?!) and likes a little joke too.

This story has a fading family, clinging on to past glories - a biscuit firm started in 1817 - but close to bankruptcy, and needing new money by marriage. One night the head man in the business is shot, and the family say they heard nothing, and there are clues to a burglary.

The family are strangely obstructive, so Maigret gets some clues from a nearby bar - where the biscuit workers have lunch - and from a drunken bargee, says the lights had been on, and there were two shots, not one.

A further clue is the dead man (the MD now) and his limp brother had a sister, cut out of the inheritance, and said to be dead. She's actually alive, his team track her down, and find her in a Lesbian club (THAT part of the plot wasn't included in the Davies version, the BBC must have thought 60s Britain wasn't ready for that sort of excitement, the 60s hadn't been Swinging enough??!).

Gradually he works out what sort of family argument must have happened, and that the dead man hadn't died in his own bed (a monogrammed sheet helps with that). There is a running joke in this episode, he never seems to have matches to light his pipe, but one oddity is that Lucas - his constant assistant in all the books - is yet again missing! The plot is also padded out with an interfering Magistrate (the French system has an investigating magistrate overseeing important cases) who wants to believe the burglary story -- but has to be firmly told that burglars don't carry guns, plus why would a burglar have broken a window to get in, when he could have opened a ground-floor door?
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
"Everyone is quiet here. Too quiet."
garywhalen2 September 2023
A member (a son) of the once wealthy Lachaume family is found murdered in his bed. There is evidence of a burglary. The Lachaume family business (makers of sweet butter biscuits and wafers) has faded as has their house, its furnishings, and (it seems) the family members' vigor. They and the business rely on the wife of one of the Lachaume sons. While it is quickly apparent to Maigret that the "burglary" is not the motive for the murder, the cause is emmeshed in the family's fortunes (or lack thereof) and untying those strands is no small task. Maigret will visit this family who say little, who close their doors, who look with disdain on the world outside. He will tour a tannery. And he will visit a lesbian club where works the sister of the murder victim-a woman who disowns and has been disowned by her family. Eventually a simple clue involving bed linens allows Maigret to work backwards from how the murder must have occurred and thus to who did it and from there the events that led up to that unexpected death.

In some of the Maigret mysteries it's the victim you remember the most, and in others it's the perpetrator, but here I find the most memorable thing to be the Lachaume family home. From the exterior to the corridors to the family rooms to the bedrooms it reeks of the faint musty smell of decay. I applaud the director for capturing it perfectly, because without this the mystery-the murder and its causes-would fall flat.

As for adherence to the novel, this episode remains faithful. Both include an intrusive magistrate, and while the book's ending occurs in the magistrate's office with the magistrate leading the questioning, this film's ending occurs in the family home with Maigret driving the questioning. This doesn't affect the resolution, but it does leave out one last incident in the film that is included in the book-one that doesn't occur at the end of the film but is implied will occur.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed