Don't Tempt the Devil (1963) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Justice versus Imposture
brogmiller3 July 2020
The subject matter of this film of Christian-Jaque could not be in greater contrast to his 'Madame' which came before and 'Le Tulipe Noir' which came after and although not such an obvious crowd pleaser as those two was a notable box-office success.

Briefly it concerns a brilliant but morally ambiguous criminal lawyer Charles Cassidi who prosecutes a nurse for murder knowing that she is innocent. Juge d'instruction Gaudet comes to believe in her innocence but is powerless to prevent her being found guilty. Although cynical and pessimistic in tone the clever twist at the end leads us to believe that justice might prevail........ It has been adapted from the novel by Jean Laborde who had been a reporter for France Soir specialising in judicial affairs and who certainly knew whereof he wrote.

The four leads are perfectly cast. As befits his character's profession Pierre Brasseur plays to the gallery as Cassidi and the scene where he makes a witness look like an idiot is masterful. The presence of Virna Lisi here reflects that this is a Franco-Italian production. Her casting as the accused nurse is surprising but extremely effective and proves once more that she is so much more than just a pretty face. The same might apply to Marina Vlady who plays the murdered mans wife. Her character has the face of an angel and the heart of a demon. The most interesting character by far is Gaudet in a beautifully subtle and understated performance by Bourvil.

Good writing of course makes good actors even better and the cast is served well by the pungent dialogue of Henri Jeanson. It is shot in razor sharp black and white by veteran Armand Thirard.

This might not have the same crusading zeal as the films of the admirable and well-intentioned André Cayatte but it gets the point across just as effectively that Justice and the Law are distant cousins.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Witnesses for the prosecution.
dbdumonteil15 October 2005
French critics compare "les bonnes causes" to "winess for the prosecution" and of course they say it cannot hold a candle to it.They are wrong.Not that it might be better than Wilder's work,but it's downright different.Henri Jeanson's lines have not lost their bite ,particularly when he thrashes the légion d'honneur -it was not the first time- this award it's such a honor to get .

The main difference between Wilder's "witness" and Christian-Jaque 's "les bonnes causes lies in the fact that in the former,Wilder (and A.Christie,the writer) saved the biggest twist for the end whereas in the latter we know from the start (or almost) who the villains are(Pierre Brasseur at his most cynical,Marina Vlady at her bitchiest).Virna Lisi portrays a nurse,unfairly accused of murdering Vlady's husband.Bourvil ,in one of his rare dramatic parts is the good loyal judge and Umberto Orsini the dedicated lawyer.It seems that in his last worthwhile (and sadly) overlooked works (this film and "le repas des fauves" ) Christian-Jaque regained his bite and his pessimism which he had displayed before in "Boule de Suif" and "un revenant" ."Les bonnes causes" ,which displays black humor too could also be a spoof on André Cayatte's causes célèbres.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A treat
sobot9 August 2014
Warning: Spoilers
I must say I really enjoyed this movie, in many ways. I'll have to include several spoilers to explain how.

First, the story is engaging. Although we know "who did it" almost from the beginning, it makes it even more interesting to follow the investigation.

Even more I enjoyed the actors and their characters. Marina Vlady's is extremely repulsive, but she carries it in such way that you keep wondering: could you resist her charms yourself? Virna Lisi shows another kind of beauty, fragile but just as irresistible. Bourvil's character is actually two persons: until the last half hour he is a Columbo-type investigator, full of self-confidence, playing with the criminal; then he breaks down as he realizes that he is powerless to resolve the case. And Pierre Brasseur is so annoying as the lawyer, omnipotent when in charge of the case, but a toy in his lover's hands.

The ending I like the best, not leaving us with any illusion about the possibility of reaching the justice. Even if the court changes the decision, it will be just a consequence of the lawyer's moves in his immoral game...
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Static and aesthetic
tony_le_stephanois2 June 2015
In this film Bourvil plays a judge applied to research a murder case (difficult to explain the French judicial system, one should watch the series Engranages to get an idea). There are two possible culprits: the widow and the nurse (and mistress) of the victim. Bourvil is positive that the widow is lying, and that they are sending an innocent woman to jail.

Don't Tempt the Devil is about 'the perfect murder', which was also the subject of a couple of films of Hitchcock, and of course, Witness for the Prosecution by Billy Wilder, made six years earlier. Just like in Hitchcock's Rope we learn immediately who did the crime.

In this film you'll see people talking, rather static. Bourvil who talks to Pierre Brasseur, who talks to Marina Vlady, while Virna Lisi talks to Umberto Orsini, who talks with Pierre Brasseur, and sometimes Bourvil talks to all of them. While the dialogues are good in itself, it would have been great if there had been some more variety. As this film is directed by a director with a background as well as a writer (Christian-Jacque) it might not be such a surprise this story is rather talkative.

Nevertheless, it's still a great film. What I enjoyed were the aesthetics of the film. The beautiful black and white shots, the carefully positioning of the characters at the foreground and background, the choosing between close-ups and medium shots. It is absolutely worth the time of the viewer and in my opinion even more enjoyable if you forget the story and start watching the actors. Especially Bourvil and Pierre Brasseur (with a hoarse voice, while his voice was so splendid in Enfants du Paradis) are great. In many modern films this sense of aesthetics is gone. There's hardly any logic in choosing shots, it is all about nonsensical close-ups and raw editing. Therefore I rate this 7/10.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
outstanding thriller
myriamlenys17 July 2020
Warning: Spoilers
A rich woman murders her unfaithful husband, while shifting the suspicion unto his mistress. Meanwhile she's having an affair with a fearsomely efficient barrister who slips her useful tips on how to play the system. Will the wrong woman be accused and convicted, or will justice prevail ?

As you can tell from the first paragraph, this is a hugely enjoyable thriller with a clever plot. It features not one but two memorable villains : the first one is a deeply amoral femme fatale, the second is an equally cynical barrister who knows the criminal law like the back of his hand. Do watch the scenes where the barrister provides his client/lover with a suitable outfit - the aim, here, is to breathe a quiet and respectable elegance - and coaches her on how to behave and what to say before the "juge d'instruction". They're at once over-the-top cynical and deeply, uncomfortably plausible...

Many people know and appreciate Bourvil primarily as a comic, but in fact he was equally capable of tackling serious or even tragic roles. Here he's quite good as a fair-minded "juge d'instruction" who realizes someone's trying to play him like a fiddle. A superbly beautiful Marina Vlady is a femme fatale to die for, while Pierre Brasseur exudes exactly the right mix of self-confidence, brutality and cunning.

Recommended.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed