this movie sucks, but for some reason i can't seem to stop watching it!! well the whole camera angles and lighting are all messed up!! some parts were scary but i mean it sucks!!! watch it if you want to maybe for a laugh or 2
4 Reviews
Hmm!
BandSAboutMovies5 May 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Alright, I started this movie because I thought it was shot on video, only to learn that over the seven years it took to make (1984 to 1991), it went from 8mm to 16mm, giving it a distorted feeling as stock doesn't always match. This actually took so long that there's a BLOOD SYMBOL 1984-1991 REST IN PEACE credit at the end. The sound isn't synched either, as it was shot without audio and the script changes were never tracked, so they had to guess what everyone was saying. It only adds to how strange this all appears, along with the fact that creative differences caused lead actress Micheline Richard to leave in the middle of filming, leaving all of her remaining scenes to be shot far away with a double whose face is never clear.
This Canadian microbudget film by co-directors and writers Maurice Devereaux and Tony Morello (who went on to make Slashers), this has a simple story: an undead monk named Olam (Richard Labelle) can remain immortal if he drinks the blood of college student Tracy Walker (Micheline Richard).
Where it gets beyond expectations is in the way it was shot: strobing moments, strong and confident handheld camera work, point of view stalking right out of Carpenter and incredible editing. It's beyond a movie started in high school and sure, the plot is thin, but the work to make it happen is rich. There's even a hint of giallo as Olam stalks his prey complete with black gloves, overcoat and fedora.
There's also tons of footage of Tracy just doing things like going to class and playing softball, yet that "you are there" style of shooting makes this feel so much different than any other slasher. Sure, it's creators were learning as they go, but they were definitely on to something.
This Canadian microbudget film by co-directors and writers Maurice Devereaux and Tony Morello (who went on to make Slashers), this has a simple story: an undead monk named Olam (Richard Labelle) can remain immortal if he drinks the blood of college student Tracy Walker (Micheline Richard).
Where it gets beyond expectations is in the way it was shot: strobing moments, strong and confident handheld camera work, point of view stalking right out of Carpenter and incredible editing. It's beyond a movie started in high school and sure, the plot is thin, but the work to make it happen is rich. There's even a hint of giallo as Olam stalks his prey complete with black gloves, overcoat and fedora.
There's also tons of footage of Tracy just doing things like going to class and playing softball, yet that "you are there" style of shooting makes this feel so much different than any other slasher. Sure, it's creators were learning as they go, but they were definitely on to something.
A slasher movie that took SEVEN YEARS to finish?......
LuisitoJoaquinGonzalez19 February 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Maurice Devereux's Blood Symbol took no less than seven years to finally acquire a release. Production began in mid 1984 and due to financial restraints plus a few cast-related problems, the movie stayed on the shelves until 1991! When you consider the changes that you as a person have been through in the past eighty-four months, you must admit that its amazing really that this wasn't just left to gather cobwebs in a small dark cupboard. The hack and slash cycle was still fairly hot property in the mid-eighties. Unfortunately by the time that this had finally snuck onto shelves, the genre had pretty much sung its last swan song, which couldn't have made it easy for Devereux to find a sizeable audience. That's a real shame, because Blood Symbol boasts an intriguing premise that combines elements from the abysmal Blood Cult and the cheese feast that is Hack-O-Lantern with a few directorial flourishes that could allow it to secure a place amongst the independent slasher elite.
The opening scene sees two young females being pursued through the woods by a group of hooded torch-wielding cult members. Devereux uses some pacey hand-held camera shots to make the chase scenes feel as pulse-rising as possible. The youngsters cannot out run the sadistic worshippers and when they're finally caught, their harrowing screams shatter the murky night sky. After a great credit sequence, we skip a century or so to what we presume is the midst of the eighties and we're introduced to our hapless heroine. Tracy Walker (Micheline Richard) has been having strange nightmares, which involve a creepy scar faced figure and a bizarre satanic symbol. When she is stalked at school by a similar black-gloved spectre, Tracy decides to look up the origins of the symbol at her college library. She uncovers a book that details the history of the motif, which involves a Satan worshipping cult that possessed a history of sacrificial slaughter throughout the late nineteenth century. Before long the nightmares become a reality as one of Tracy's student friends disappears and the psychopathic stalker begins closing in on the petrified female.
As I said earlier, people change drastically over seven years. I myself must admit that when I was seventeen, I certainly didn't have as many wear and tear marks to my ruggedly handsome face as I do at the still tender age of twenty-four! It's interesting then to see how leading lady Micheline Richard seems to swap waist measurements prolifically from one scene to another. She kicks off the movie playing baseball and looking the part as a fresh-faced teenager, but every now and then she ages dramatically as one shot swaps with the next. It probably didn't help matters that she had a bust up with the director three quarters of the way through production and a few later parts had to be filmed using a body double.
Despite these obvious discrepancies between the actors, Blood Symbol manages to create a few decent shocks and scares throughout the runtime. Many of the nightmare sequences are shot in black and white and Devereux shows imagination behind the lenses with some energetic photography and intriguing set pieces. There's a terrific stalking sequence, which sees the director imitate John Carpenter's flair for building suspense in the background behind the screen's focal point. The first murder is equally creditable, as some squirm-inducing blood gushing is again mixed with panache photography. The killer himself looks like a cross between Cropsy and the psychopath from City of Panic in a fedora, dark rain coat and 'psycho's only' gloves. To be honest it would have been nice to see him perhaps slaughter a few more teenagers. Unfortunately Blood Symbol contains a little too much stalking and not enough slashing, which seems a shame considering the potential that we witnessed on the occasions when he was called to stain his trident with blood.
As with all B-grade slasher obscurities, the performances in Blood Symbol are as vomit inducing as you might expect. It's perhaps unjust to the original actors however as the movie was dubbed to cover their French-Canadian accents. It was shot on both 8mm and 16mm film, and the differences in quality are obvious throughout. But I guess that's to be expected from a feature that was produced over such a lengthy time period. A few reviews that I've read elsewhere have criticised the choice for the ending, which to be fair does pop up from out of the blue and leave a few unanswered questions. In all honesty I didn't really feel that the final scene was too far out of place, and it made a refreshing change from the typical clichéd sequences that have been re-used continuously throughout the slasher genre since 1978.
Blood Symbol is certainly worth a look and has just enough potential to make it rank highly amongst the dross level of B movie plop that usually litters the slasher cycle. A few unpleasant gore scenes and some energetic Carpenter-inspired cinematography make this an above average thriller with a few redeeming features. It has become extremely rare on VHS, but the recent success of Maurice Devereux's latest title (Slashers) means that this could soon acquire a DVD release
The opening scene sees two young females being pursued through the woods by a group of hooded torch-wielding cult members. Devereux uses some pacey hand-held camera shots to make the chase scenes feel as pulse-rising as possible. The youngsters cannot out run the sadistic worshippers and when they're finally caught, their harrowing screams shatter the murky night sky. After a great credit sequence, we skip a century or so to what we presume is the midst of the eighties and we're introduced to our hapless heroine. Tracy Walker (Micheline Richard) has been having strange nightmares, which involve a creepy scar faced figure and a bizarre satanic symbol. When she is stalked at school by a similar black-gloved spectre, Tracy decides to look up the origins of the symbol at her college library. She uncovers a book that details the history of the motif, which involves a Satan worshipping cult that possessed a history of sacrificial slaughter throughout the late nineteenth century. Before long the nightmares become a reality as one of Tracy's student friends disappears and the psychopathic stalker begins closing in on the petrified female.
As I said earlier, people change drastically over seven years. I myself must admit that when I was seventeen, I certainly didn't have as many wear and tear marks to my ruggedly handsome face as I do at the still tender age of twenty-four! It's interesting then to see how leading lady Micheline Richard seems to swap waist measurements prolifically from one scene to another. She kicks off the movie playing baseball and looking the part as a fresh-faced teenager, but every now and then she ages dramatically as one shot swaps with the next. It probably didn't help matters that she had a bust up with the director three quarters of the way through production and a few later parts had to be filmed using a body double.
Despite these obvious discrepancies between the actors, Blood Symbol manages to create a few decent shocks and scares throughout the runtime. Many of the nightmare sequences are shot in black and white and Devereux shows imagination behind the lenses with some energetic photography and intriguing set pieces. There's a terrific stalking sequence, which sees the director imitate John Carpenter's flair for building suspense in the background behind the screen's focal point. The first murder is equally creditable, as some squirm-inducing blood gushing is again mixed with panache photography. The killer himself looks like a cross between Cropsy and the psychopath from City of Panic in a fedora, dark rain coat and 'psycho's only' gloves. To be honest it would have been nice to see him perhaps slaughter a few more teenagers. Unfortunately Blood Symbol contains a little too much stalking and not enough slashing, which seems a shame considering the potential that we witnessed on the occasions when he was called to stain his trident with blood.
As with all B-grade slasher obscurities, the performances in Blood Symbol are as vomit inducing as you might expect. It's perhaps unjust to the original actors however as the movie was dubbed to cover their French-Canadian accents. It was shot on both 8mm and 16mm film, and the differences in quality are obvious throughout. But I guess that's to be expected from a feature that was produced over such a lengthy time period. A few reviews that I've read elsewhere have criticised the choice for the ending, which to be fair does pop up from out of the blue and leave a few unanswered questions. In all honesty I didn't really feel that the final scene was too far out of place, and it made a refreshing change from the typical clichéd sequences that have been re-used continuously throughout the slasher genre since 1978.
Blood Symbol is certainly worth a look and has just enough potential to make it rank highly amongst the dross level of B movie plop that usually litters the slasher cycle. A few unpleasant gore scenes and some energetic Carpenter-inspired cinematography make this an above average thriller with a few redeeming features. It has become extremely rare on VHS, but the recent success of Maurice Devereux's latest title (Slashers) means that this could soon acquire a DVD release
mesmerizing
luizer4u14 November 2002
i have seen this film when it was available on video the plot was wonderful i loved the section of the film when the young womens throat was slashed and the blood was taken from it i dont remember much of anything else i was wasted love the video cover though
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
