Claire Dolan (1998) Poster

(1998)

User Reviews

Review this title
37 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Sexuality without love or tenderness
DennisLittrell19 August 2001
(Note: Over 500 of my movie reviews are now available in my book "Cut to the Chaise Lounge or I Can't Believe I Swallowed the Remote!" Get it at Amazon.)

For those of you who have seen this and are looking for a message, I can say that the brutal facts of life, that is to say, an animal existence, will out. Whether we are talking about sexual desire and sexual release, or about reproduction--especially that--it is the fundamental animal drives that control our lives and dictate our actions.

This movie offers nothing beyond that, and it shouldn't. It is perfect as it is. There is no phony sentimentality to entice us to delusion, or any sort of Hollywood ending. There is no redemption here. There is no spirituality. There is only desire and fulfillment; desire and frustration; desire and the end of desire which comes with... The movie doesn't say.

I don't know if this makes my top ten of the nineties--I have seen a lot of movies--but it makes my most memorable. I will not forget this stark performance by Katrin Cartlidge, who plays Claire Dolan. She does not have the charisma of a great actress, and the range of what is required here is limited, but within that range she is stunning. A good part of the credit surely goes to director Lodge Kerrigan, who emphasizes the tight, washed out lines of desperation on her face, along with her intense sexual desire and the stark, rapacious environment of the urban jungle in which she plies her trade. This is a movie that might well be viewed following Pretty Woman (1990). I wonder how many people who allowed themselves to identify with Julia Roberts as a whore, would like to identify with the high class prostitute of this film. Could they even watch it?

I was mesmerized by the sharp cuts and the film verité editing, the effective use of line and shadow, sound and silence, the clean, focused camera work. Our modern cities in all their indifference--the hard concrete and steel, the harsh lighting and intrusive sounds--are captured brilliantly. The script, cut lean and without comment, surprises us by turns, and keeps us on the edge of our seat throughout. The sex scenes are raw, intense and numerous. This is not a film for the kiddies. And that is an understatement.

Vincent D'Onofrio, who is an actor of suburb balance, plays the cabby who loves women, especially perhaps those in great need of his love, and he plays his part with subtlety and control. Colm Meaney plays the psychopathic pimp, a brutal man without conscience who uses force when necessary and a kind of cheap charm when it isn't. He has the type of the animal trainer, who plies the whip and the carrot, which he uses on women. Note well how Kerrigan has ironically emphasized this despicable man's ability to reproduce himself, making him the father of four children.

If I could sum up the life that Claire Dolan leads, I would say she lives among the wolves with a burden...her sexuality. She has a flat affect, strangely bereft of normal human expression. She is a kind of woman seldom seen on the silver scene, presented without an ounce of sentimentality. She feels life most strongly through sexuality, and only smiles at the result of sexual behavior, children. There is something profound in the realization that she is only really freed from her almost maniacal desire when she is with child. Meaney's character says he has known her since she was twelve and she has always been and always will be a whore. She will die a whore, he says. If true--and again, the movie lets us decide for ourselves--the question is, how did she become that way? The implication is that she was led or forced into prostitution at twelve. That is why she cannot feel about sex the way others feel, and that is why she finds it so difficult to feel affection for others. Hers has been an animal existence. She is always on her guard, and she shies away from a world that seems always about to hurt her brutally.
22 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A well crafted psychodrama too unpleasant to be popular.
=G=10 March 2001
Warning: Spoilers
"Claire Dolan" is the kind of film which will have very limited appeal. It's tells of a call girl's struggle to build a new, more conventional life for herself. The drama is so bleak it will likely bore those who cannot tune into the compelling psychodramatic undercurrents. It's an austere but artful shoot as well with an emphasis on geometry and deemphasis on color. Even the script is minimalistic as the characters speak in direct, abbreviated, and clipped dialogue. With no "feel good" ending to be found, the film is likely to be a turn off for most. However, there's no denying it's an excellent piece of work.
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Epitomizes the suppressed urges of life
jeffr-41 April 2001
One's first impression might be that the characters and scenes in this movie are simply too cold and emotionless. However, a careful study reveals the "seething" emotions going on in each player; from the pimp Cain who "seethes" with a misogynistic disdain of the women working for him to Elton (played with excellence by Vincent D'Onofrio) who seethes with longing to fulfill something greater in life than just being a cab driver (the attempted mugging scene whereafter he breaks down is just superb!). I think that the final two scenes of the movie--one between a "converted", pregnant Claire being approached by a former john, the other between the Cain and Elton with his wife -- excellently display the tormented, soulful emotions of the characters involved in this story.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
wonderful katrin cartlidge
harryinmunich4 December 2002
i usually am not the sentimental type but when i heard of katrin cartlidges death, believe me, i burst into tears. we lost one of the most charismatic, talented and intense actresses ever and this film proves it. her enigmatic, scene-stealing presence can´t be matched. this film is as haunting as kerrigans debut CLEAN SHAVEN. that´s all there is to say about this original piece of work. and i can´t wait to see kerrigan´s new film IN GOD´S HANDS which is still in the making.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A chilling hall of mirrors. (possible spoiler)
alice liddell22 May 2000
Warning: Spoilers
CLAIRE DOLAN's credits open like a thrilling experimental film. Over an anxious score (the soundtrack is stunningly pointed throughout), a montage of skyscrapers reveals itself, a beautiful study in geometry, symmetry, grids, angles. It's like looking at some futuristic colony, a metallic beehive, or the slots of some kind of museum, as in LA JETEE, an empty space exhibiting dead life. This shadowshow of surface, sheen, reflection, this perfect uniformity, is contrasted with the windows that dot these mirror walls, impermeable frames reflecting outside surfaces, distorting them, but revealing nothing inside.

It is possible to watch the unfolding 'human' drama in the same terms, in which all humanity is squeezed out in the expression of formal perfection. Rather like de Oliveira's LA LETTRE, each scene is meticulously framed, the left hand and its objects corresponding exactly to the right, the actors placed precisely in the middle. Sometimes there is no pretence at humanity, and the lines are literally on display, fetishised. The actual drama itself is rigidly formal, with plot points, correspondances, repetitions, characters, all following a pre-ordained, lifeless grid pattern.

All this is fascinating as it goes, but is it really enough to sustain a whole film? Although CLAIRE DOLAN is very American (especially Michael Mann) in look, its minimalist austerity, its unrealisitic shearing of all inessentials, owe much to French culture, the Melville-like grey/blue monochrome colours, the Bressonian story of a passive woman who is a literal slave to a brutally articulate pimp (the cat scene is hilarious), trapped in her chillingly airbrushed environment, prostituting herself to pay off a huge debt (for what? Surely not just her mother's medical fees?). She tries to escape, but her bind is inextricable. Even when she manages to pay off her debt, she has difficulty in finding a job, and we wonder if she'll be forced to return back to her imprisonment.

Another French influence is Camus' L'Etranger - both works open with the death of the protagonist's mother, like Meursault. Claire, a stranger to her own self, seems to have all emotion, responses, conventional ties sieved from her. But Meursault's passivity was a freedom that Claire does not have. Instead of the constantly glaring, blinding sun, Claire lives in a world of cold reflections. Claire's path, though, is perhaps more hopeful than Meursault's - the opening death does not lead to further death and self-destruction, but its opposite, life, hope, the future, and the angelic white that seeps the screen may not be ironic, although the film has taught us a lot of things about different kinds of families, so we may mistrust redemption.

Into this chill world comes Elton Garrett, whose slightly dim presence brings a lot of hard sexual truths to bear. He seems to genuinely love Claire, but is his paying her debt, looking out for her, another form of control? Whereas the sex scenes with her clients are ruthlessly, clinically exposed, bored, cliched, onanistic rites, there is a corporeal dialogue between Claire and Elton that suggests a kind of hope, although the minute he pays off her debt she dumps him.

But, even if feelings are never uttered or articulated in this film, there is some haunting need in Elton as seen in the enigmatic scene with the Hungarian - is he prostituting himself, or is he getting a sexual relief he doesn't get with Claire? The harrowing hold-up, where his masculine protecting policy is left utterly bereft, is a rare moment of heartbreak in a heartless (compliment!) film.

In the 1960s, Godard often used the figure of the prostitute as a metaphor for the citizen under Western capitalism, pimping and degrading ourselves for money of keep the repressive system going. We see a lot of nasty, violent, menacing, selfish, doubletalking men in this film, but there isn't quite enough here to construct a full-blown allegory about modern society, and the things we must do to survive in it.

More fascinating still, in a film of so little warmth, is the mystery of Claire's character, the contradictory hints about her Irish background, her relationship with Roland Cain (religious allusion?), her father, the way she is squeezed out of the narrative's second half, and the men take over, the minute Elton discovers her different identities in her medicine cabinet, and she doesn't seem to exist as a whole person anymore.

Kerrigan also reveals the prescience of directors like Sirk and Ray in using their techniques of framing - Claire's helplessness is shown in how she is framed, in mirrors, doorways, windows, corridors. In many brilliant shots, Claire is ironised in this manner - as she tries to see what's going on, what's threatening her, we can see, reflected in a window. We become party to that threat.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An evocative movie despite its cool distance
allyjack25 August 1999
Warning: Spoilers
(WARNING - CONTAINS MILD SPOILER) In the last scene, after the two men talk, they leave and the camera watches the empty street; there's a kind of order established here that excludes Claire altogether - in her presence the two men could only be enemies; in her absence, they reach an accommodation (one in which the role of the woman is much more traditional and untroubling). The object lessons aren't clear, but the movie is quite strongly evocative despite its cool, angular approach. Claire is held at a distance (the movie carefully cultivates ambiguity as to her motives, her emotional investment in her profession etc.), and we have no choice but to respect that - the movie demands that we not try to get any closer, but knowing that we have no instinctive option BUT to try, simply snatches her away in the end and imposes an alternate stability. Cleverly avoiding stereotypes and easy enigmas, Kerrigan strongly conveys her hankering for family; a quality that she ultimately internalizes (via the baby inside her - which is a boy) - whether she can make it work externally is unknown. It's an interesting film, but never quite shakes off the sense of a male director undergoing a rather halting excursion into the classic territory of feminist criticism.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very Real, Very Sad
claudio_carvalho24 July 2005
In New York, the Irish expensive prostitute Claire Dolan (Katrin Cartlidge) owes a huge amount to her pimp Roland Cain (Colm Meaney). When her mother dies, Claire moves to Newark, and tries to work honestly as a beautician. She meets the taxi driver Elton Garrett (Vincent D'Onofrio) and they have an affair. Elton falls in love for her and later, when he becomes aware of the situation, he tries to help her to pay her enormous debt to get rid off Roland, while Claire wants to have a baby.

"Claire Dolan" is an excellent independent erotic movie that presents a touching and very real story. The performance of Katrin Cartlidge is stunning, and she deserved a nominations for the Oscar for her acting as Claire Dolan. I could never imagine that Katrin Cartlidge has such a beautiful body. The excellent Vincent D'Onofrio and Colm Meaney have also great performances. The scene where Roland tells Elton that "a whore is always a whore" is very sad and the inconclusive open end is wonderful for such a good story. My vote is eight.

Title (Brazil): "Claire Dolan"
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
moving and deflating
pyamada30 July 2002
After seeing this film I was immediately struck by its similarities to Chantal Akerman's Jeanne Dielman. Certainly, they are very different films, but there is a significant overlap, not just in subject matter and character--Jeanne and Claire--but also in approach. So much of Claire's life passes in silence or repetition that the parallels to Jeanne are fairly strong. Also, viewing Claire in the context of Jeanne at least suggests that having a child will not at all be the answer and solution that Claire is looking for, as motherhood did not make Jeanne Dielman's life wonderful. This film never looks as stark or as imagistic or as metaphorically thought through as Akerman's film, but as it moves along, and despite prosaic and occasionally clumsy scenes, it does attain a visual presence, and aspires to some imagistic displays. When her pimp asserts ruthlessly deterministic views of Claire, they cast a huge shadow on the events left unresolved, and few viewers can come away from this film with anything approaching an upbeat reading; but as a reminder that humans are fragile, frustrating, frustrated and often just aimlessly pathetic, this can stand alone, a stones throw away from a brilliant experiment like Akerman's Jeanne Dielman.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Really such a powerful film. Sex without love.
RatedVforVinny1 December 2019
A powerful performance from Katrin Cartlidge who plays an Irish, high-end escort operating out of manhattan. Must have a record amount of sex scenes but shown here in the most non-erotic way (obviously a deliberate plot ploy). A great sadness the actress (who played the part) died at the tender age of 41. She was such a talent, especially brave in her depictions of abused women both in 'Naked' and the lesser known (but same may argue), the equally good 'Claire Dolan'.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Elton Garrett
SteveSkafte4 November 2010
"Claire Dolan" isn't normally my kind of film - sex and betrayal and self-hate and the like - but it has a few things going for it. Vincent D'Onofrio gives a typically good performance, with the kind of subtlety that he does so well. Colm Meaney is also good, extremely unlikable here. Katrin Cartlidge, in the title role, is a bit of a mystery. She's excellent, but tough to identify with.

I watched the film mainly for Lodge Kerrigan. I'd previously seen his other two films in a similar vein. Which is, to say, stories of loners emotionally cut off from the world around them. But in this case, I found myself thinking that a little more distance would be appreciated. In his first and second films, "Clean, Shaven" and "Keane", the characters are so distant that they're practically on another planet. That is an approach that Kerrigan is much more successful at. Here, the relationships drag down and unfocus things a bit too much. Which brings me back to D'Onofrio. He is the best part of "Claire Dolan". All scenes with him are the best, the most intense.

The cinematography is good. Clean, crisp, and harsh. Teodoro Maniaci does great work here. He shot Kerrigan's first film, "Clean, Shaven", and he brings out the same sense of alienation here. In the end, this is a pretty good film. Not nearly as good as it might have been, but there's something to be gained from the experience.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
I wish I could say it was better
sfuss3 March 2000
I had high hopes for this film, because I thought CLEAN, SHAVEN (Kerrigan's first feature) was absolutely terrific, the most assuredly cinematic low budget film I'd ever seen.

But much of CLAIRE DOLAN is utterly pointless and flat. Scene after scene seems randomly tossed into the mix, without much thought for narrative or character.

Is Claire trying to escape being a prostitute or not? Hard to tell. Why does she pick up the trick at the airport if she wants to escape that life? Why does she then not pick up tricks when she needs money in Seattle? Why do we have to see her dye her hair to what is virtually the exact same color? Why does Claire accept some johns and not others? The filmmaker doesn't seem to know.

It feels as if everything is improvised (though I understand this wasn't the case) and the filmmakers just held a camera on it as if they were making a verite documentary.

After the screening I saw, Kerrigan defended his lack of narrative choices by condemning film narrative as politically conservative. It sounded like learned rhetoric. I think it was a cop-out.

I am saddened that the maker of a film as exciting as CLEAN, SHAVEN would go on to make such a lame film as this one and then defend it with tired old "political" cliches.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A glass prison
DUBOSTg9 January 1999
The film begins with a series of views of NYC buildings, their windows reflecting like mirrors. A beautiful opening scene which let us feel beauty yet hostility. The same feelings as with Lcy, or should I say Claire (Katrin Cartlidge), a deluxe prostitute, working for a pimp she says she has a debt to. And Claire is really trapped in this glass prison, her world is full of mirrors which sometimes let us see the pimp's face and the scenes show the faces caught in close-ups. With the death of her mother, her meeting of a loving man and perhaps God's bless (given to her at the funerals), she will finally get to redemption.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Tis A Pity She's A Whore.
rmax30482319 March 2014
Warning: Spoilers
As Claire Dolan, Katrin Cartlidge is neither stunning nor glamorized. She looks like a rather attractive but otherwise ordinary, thirtyish woman. The whole film is like that. Seeing it is less like watching a film than like watching the comings and goings in a Safeway.

Cartlidge, a hooker, is tall, graceful, elegant even. She has thin lips and dark, staring eyes. Her features, her voice, her entire demeanor, is that of a firm algebra teacher, maybe covering up a psychosis. If she lost some weight it wouldn't take much to turn her into one of Moses Soyer's dark-eyed haunted wraiths.

When the endoskeleton is revealed, the narrative looks more familiar. A lonely woman with no friends is desolate after her mother's death. She has no family to turn to. Her cousin in Newark is indifferent. She's exploited by all the men she meets except one, D'Onofrio. We've seen the D'Onofrio character before. He's the guy who succors her for a while and is in and out of her life. Sam Shepherd did it more obviously in "Frances." Cartlidge wants to have a child by D'Onofrio, build a home.

But he's hesitant. We're not sure exactly why. Maybe it's because she's humped a thousand men before him. Maybe it's because when she orgasms there's no way of telling. Possibly it's because D'Onofrio can visualize what marriage to her would look like. She'd love him to death but she wouldn't make a good conversationalist, she has no wit, and she's demanding. He might spend the rest of his life driving a cab, hanging around, suffering from a bottomless boredom and watching her dote on the kid. If he thought about it, he might even wonder if he's been instrumentalized. After all, pregnancy may be one way to get out of the life.

D'Onofrio himself is a beefy, gnarled presence with a high, gentle voice, but my God, he needs a shave an a haircut. He looks like a bum, but then living in Newark can do that to you. It certainly did for my old man. But D'Onofrio doesn't turn out to be very important anyway. After he impregnates her, he and Cartlidge say they love one another but she decides to cut herself off from her previous life and find a legitimate job in Seattle and she winds up glowing with happiness when she sees the fetus on ultrasound.

The acting is okay, although it's all so low key that nobody gets to be very galvanic. Colm Meaney comes off best in some ways. All the characters are complex but his is the most difficult to unravel, not to mention that that pinched face is unforgettable. Other comments have ragged the director, Kerrigan, but he struck me as having done a fine job, even if a little artsy. He might do better if he lightened up a bit. After watching this, I had to bleed myself with leeches to relieve the depression.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A bad, bad, bad, bad movie
wjfickling16 February 2004
I saw this atrocious film recently on the Sundance channel and unfortunately didn't follow my first instinct, which was to turn it off after 10 minutes. Instead, I watched it through to the end. Big mistake; the boredom only intensifies.

The film begins, as background while the credits are running, with silent views of modern glass and steel Manhattan high rises; although this lasts only a few minutes, it seems interminable. Shots of the high rises reappear throughout the film. I guess the director was trying to say something about the soullessness of modern urban alienation. This is the film's first cliche; Antonioni and other European directors were using the same images to say the same thing 35 years earlier. The next cliche, which I'm sure the director intended to be revelatory, is that hookers lie to their johns, tell them they're special, etc., because it's good business. The last film I remember doing this is Klute in 1971. Oh yes, another original insight: pimps can be mean and vicious.

With the exception of Vincent D'Onofrio, the acting is uniformly atrocious. Katrin Cartlidge has to be the most wooden, inexpressive actress in recent memory. She makes Clint Eastwood in his spaghetti westerns look expressive. Moreover, throughout the film her johns repeatedly refer to her as beautiful, when actually Cartlidge is quite plain. This appears to be a low budget film. Perhaps they couldn't afford a truly beautiful actress for the part. Equally likely, no self-respecting actress would touch such a dud. Colm Meaney was equally wooden, but then again he wasn't given a whole lot to do. Vincent D'Onofrio at least brought some life to his character. One redeeming feature: if you're a dirty old man like me, at least the tedium is punctuated by frequent glimpses of Cartlidge's rather lovely breasts.

All in all, one to miss. 4/10
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good, and a Bit Disturbing
chthon214 April 2003
Claire Dolan (Katrin Cartlidge) is a prostitute. Like many of them, she really doesn't like sex at all, or even most men, and sees it as a job. She's in debt to her pimp, Roland Cain (Colm Meaney) after he helps pay the medical bills of Claire's dying mother. When her mother passes on, Claire runs off and starts working in a salon, and meets a nice cabby named Elton (Vincent D'Onofrio). But Cain finds her, and he wants his money.

Lodge H. Kerrigan has not directed many films, but if they are as good as this one, I would like to see them. He captures how sterile the sex Claire has is, and shows how she really doesn't enjoy it. I was a bit shocked by how many of the men spoke to Claire. I was taught not to talk to women that way, but then again, guys going to prostitutes probably aren't exactly classy people anyway. Kerrigan does great work with reflections throughout this film, and the ending with Roland and Elton talking on the street gives closure in it's own way.

The acting was awesome. I didn't know Kartlidge could be so prickly, and I would never have imagined Meaney playing a guy who could yell like that. D'Onofrio is a good actor who wasn't given much to work with, although in his last scene with Claire he is far more disturbing than I think any other actor could be, which was what Kerrigan needed. Good, but not for the squeamish, as the movie is about a prostitute and is graphic.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Inconclusive film
rosscinema17 March 2003
This is one of those independent films that has an ambiguous ending and I don't mind those types of endings as long as the story leading to it is interesting and rewarding (400 Blows) but this one just doesn't have the coherency. Very cold and dark look at an Irish prostitute who wants to get out of the business and have a child to change her life. The characters in this film are distant, jaded and have a "Business as usual" attitude. The late and great Katrin Cartlidge stars and she once again proves what a tragedy her death is at an early age. She had the potential for real greatness. This film does showcase her natural screen presence and how strong her personality is without saying a word or saying very little. I loved her in Mike Leighs "Career Girls" and thats a must viewing for all! But this film never really develops any real style or rhythm. Rather it shows this woman in an almost docu-drama style and the coldness of the characters is the style. Colm Meaney is her pimp and while at times it looks like he's ready to strike her, he never does. But he does strike her boyfriend Vincent D'Onofrio when he meets him for the first time. After that he speaks his peace and then its "Business as usual", which reminds us of what he really is. A businessman. When the film ends its Cartlidges presence that stays in our minds. The wrong actress would have made this film totally forgettable. Instead, Cartlidge made her character interesting to watch and the shortcomings come from the script. Cartlidge leaves another indelible impression.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Art Of Whore - Very Good, but flawed drama
ninjaalexs30 November 2021
Katrin Cartlidge stars as Claire Dolan a high-class, but jaded Irish call-girl, turning tricks for her pimp, a menacing Colm Meaney (as Roland Cain) after her mother dies Claire wants to become a mother and meets a good-natured if slightly stalker-ish cab driver, Elton Garrett (an emotionally complex Vincent D'Onofrio).

I've seen Lodge Kerrigan's earlier film Clean, Shaven. Arguably one of the best obscure films of the 90s. Claire Dolan has a similar style in that it is social-realist and filmed almost like a documentary. It also has a clinical, sterile approach with minimal lighting,set design and even dialogue. In all honesty this is the film's biggest fault; it feels soulless. The scenes were I should feel more for the characters involved, I just didn't. That's not to say the film isn't engaging. There's enough drama to keep it interesting and with a runtime of just over 90 minutes it moves along at a fair pace. It also doesn't scrimp on the sex scenes with some fairly explicit scenes.

The film is believable in terms of story. I couldn't connect with any of the characters. That's not a slight on the acting, everyone is excellent; I just didn't feel for them. Colm Meaney is good in everything, but it is rare for him to play malicious characters. His roles are often reduced to Irish gangsters, priests or fatherly guys. It's nice to see him being cast against type. Katrin Cartlidge is an excellent and an underrated actress. I first saw her in Naked (1993) and despite having the chops she never really became an A-lister. She is a bit cold and austere in this role, which I'm sure is intentional, but not really convincing as a call-girl. Compare and contrast with "Secret Diaries Of A Call Girl" while a total fantasy much like the book itself in omitting the more sinister aspects; Billie Piper had the look and glamour of a stereotypical call girl.

It's a difficult film to see which is a shame. While not a brilliant film I preferred almost lost British drama, Prostitute (1980), Import/Export (2007) and Call Girl (2012). Claire Dolan does everything right, but it just didn't click with me.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
a film about life's deficiency.
komajasi16 December 2005
It's a movie about the impossibility to be near to someone. It is also about the emptiness of (modern) life, the mechanical way sex has entered our world and the human deficiency. Claire is victim of a obviously broken family and a lonely mother (no one at the funeral except the daughter) and she (Claire) is likely to repeat this way of life. The last frame , alone, in a dark room softly singing for her fetus. (it's heartbreaking) Probably did she lend the money for her mother from a member of the soprano family. The sex with well to do "gentlemen" is depressing to see. It lingers in your mind. The taxi driver is a nice guy but has not the stamina to do the right thing en can't cope with what he suspects Claire is doing. Also a deficiency and he has to hire a call girl to understand. It is a pessimistic view the director made us aware of in his film. But what a masterly filmed movie. every still is right at the point en he shocks you, see the way the money collector disposes of the cat! And what a nice family man he is. It is all very depressing and very of our time and very very good indeed.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Engrossing Inde about Prostitute
vitaleralphlouis27 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Sad to read (just after seeing this film) that star Katlin Cartlidge lived only 4 years after this movie was made.

The first impression about this story of a prostitute was the immediate and intense sexual attraction to the actress playing Claire Dolan. Tall and slender, small breasted, straight auburn hair, reserved, intense. I thought about having sex with her for all 90 minutes. Whether partly nude or fully clothed her sex appeal never quit.

BUT... but... how truthful is the script that when Claire's mother dies (early in the story) and she has a "job" to do, she does not tell her John that she just learned of her mother's death. The most natural thing in the world would be to tell him. Ah, well; movie hookers are seldom like real ones, and neither are their customers. Also this nonsense about "I'll do anything you like..." A call girl isn't likely to be open to just anything for money. That's movie nonsense.

But not bad enough to spoil the movie. Not when her boyfriend/lover turns out to be Vincent D'Onofrio, one of the best actors in films these days. Despite the above flaws, the film keeps one's interest very easily. Recommended!
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Brilliant, cold and extremely moving.
sczopek7 January 1999
Brilliant acting, astonishing directing, I can't understand why "Claire Dolan" got such a small mark in the users' vote. Where were you people when this movie and I needed you ???
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
quiet desperation
SnoopyStyle23 May 2015
Claire Dolan (Katrin Cartlidge) is a Manhattan call girl. She is still in debt to her pimp Roland Cain (Colm Meaney) who has been paying for her mother's care. After her mother dies, she runs off to Newark to her cousin without telling Cain. She starts working at a hair salon and dating cab driver Elton Garrett (Vincent D'Onofrio). She wants to start a family but then Cain finds her. He takes her back to Manhattan to work off her debt.

Katrin Cartlidge delivers a powerful quiet performance. Colm Meaney is able to bring a threatening menace. Writer/director Lodge Kerrigan brings a quiet desperation to this movie. The quietness is non-traditional but effective for what this movie is about.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Terrible...
atu28 December 1998
Probably the worst film I've ever seen, the acting and story were terrible and I almost fell asleep. The only good actor was Colm Meaney. I had the impression to see the same scenes again and again until the end, no emotion, no charisma...nothing !
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An unsettling film. Worth seeing, by all means.
Barnaby-216 February 1999
I was really impressed by Kerrigan's first film, Clean, Shaven. The tension and altered world view presented in that movie stuck with me for a long time. So, I was excited to see a new film from Kerrigan.

Claire Dolan is definitely worth seeing. Once again, that same sense of tension is present--some feeling that all is not right in the world, that was first expressed in Clean, Shaven. This time, though, instead of seeing the world through the eyes of a schizophrenic man, we look in on the world of a high-priced prostitute. The death of her mother, and her advancing age have brought her to a crossroads in her life. Can she quit the business?

Catlidge is really good as the title character, a jaded, professional woman. And Vincent d'Onofrio and Colm Meaney are really excellent in the two supporting roles.

Overall, this film reminded me a lot of some of the Cronenberg output, minus the horror/gore. A cold, detached, and very cynical character study.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Acting? Where? Not Here......
mcjensen-0592412 August 2021
Claire is a beautiful prostitute who is not beautiful, and demands a price she's certainly not worth. She's definitely pretty, but the script just doesn't give her diddly poo to work with. The multiple close ups of her expressionless face and her monotone talking don't add a thing. I can't think of a more uncompelling acting job by a lead woman. The sex scenes are so weak and unerotic I almost laughted. I don't expect passion with hooker sex but at least some sort of heightened emotion would be nice. Oh, and who in their right mind would want to perform oral on a prostitute? I rolled my eyes at that one, my waning interest turned to indifference at that scene. Lifeless monotone dialogue delivery by everybody with the exception of some abrasive yelling, which at least served the purpose of jarring the viewer out of their coma. The lines are so cliche and dull that after 10 minutes I had had my fill. I watched it once a long time ago and don't remember being impressed much, and the 2nd time through confirmed that in a monumental way. I don't understand why a film maker would be content with such wooden and unemotional performances from his cast. It's amazing how awful it really is. Simply rotten. So the plot. I suppose it could have worked with some sort of direction and a cast that showed some hint of talent or interest in what they were doing and saying, but it all just comes across as moronic uninspired mundane drivel. It's on about the same level as the disastrous and Idiotic Keane, which also had a decent premise that failed miserably due to horrendous acting and inane dialogue. It's almost impossible to believe that Lodge had anything to do with the brilliant and stirring Clean, Shaven. To me that was a cinematic milestone in the portrayal of mental decline. But this one was a complete waste of time and effort. Unbelievable scene after riduclous situation gets tedious, and eventually I got the feeling I was going around in circles and was never going to get anywhere. I cannot stress how simple minded the dialogue is and how inept the delivery was. It's amazing that anyone in this movie went on to any kind of successful career. I guess it's about paying dues, and a lifetime of dues would be paid by appearing in this. Rank stink beyond any sort of credibility. One of the worst viewing experiences you're likely to endure. The only positive I can point to here is the shots of the city. The buildings and cars certainly had more charisma than any of the people associated with this bomb. The turns this plot takes are so insanely unlikey that is hurt, and the fact that the writers of this travesty asked the viewer to swallow it was insulting. A disgusting movie, not for the content but for how it was all thrown together. A snooze fest of unimagineable proportions. The whole love bit with Vincent D's character is absurd, the their scenes in bed were not only necessary but kind of gross in a way. At that point in his career Vincent was doing strong work, and while his performance in this was stellar compared to the rest of the sub-standard cast, it was sill pretty sad. Colm Meaney was neither bad nor good just a puzzle piece insert to play the pimp. I really like him and don't understand him getting involved with an overrated hack like Lodge, who is the cinematic director's equivalent of a one hit wonder.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
very thorough and subtle film
marcopoloni4 March 2000
i would like to add one comment to this film, the only one that is presently listed being a negative comment. this is among the three best films i have seen in recent years. clearly lodge kerrigan has a good grasp on what cinematography is, and this film shows his personal interpretation of that very substance. kathleen kartlidge is wonderful and vincent d'onofrio very touching. i do not know if anyone has paid good attention to the soundtrack. it is very subtly constructed to indicate the actresses' mindstates, and it is a very unique way of using sound to add meaning.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed