User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Vampires Suck Blood, Muffy Sucks...
porn_guy24 November 1999
I voted 5 on Muffy.

The story was stupid. The sets and special effects (which they made such a big deal about) sucked. I think the castle, which must have been a filmed book cover, was the best of the fx. The actors/actresses had typical porno abilities - and were not that hot. They all looked way too old for their parts too. Of course, I can see not using real teens - that would be illegal - but these dudes were too old.

The only sex scenes I thought were decent were when Muffy buffed her boyfriend at the start and when she met up with the vampire queen at the end. Everything in-between was fast forward-able.

The story involved Muffy and her air head cheerleader pals searching out the neighborhood castle for vampires. Of course these undeads don't suck only blood...

There are better vampire porns out there.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
a cute adult spoof of the original "Buffy" film
Thalor-220 June 1999
The movie starts off with Muffy and two girls she is friends with deciding to investigate the "haunted" house nearby. They do and encounter several men - and women - who try to change their lives.

At some points it is ambiguous as to whether the vamps in the mansion are really vampires or not.

The movie is intentionally camp and never tries to build a serious feeling of suspense. The girls are cute, and the "valley girl" accents passable.

The end of the film is a bit of a surprise but also a more-than-familiar cliche.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed