The Mark of Dracula (1997 Video) User Reviews

Very poor

[kimble_bobby · 1/10 · 24 April 2002]

Roxanne Coyne is gorgeous and there are a couple of funny one liners. Other than that, this was the longest 85 minutes I've spent in a very long time.

Someone reviewed this movie and called it a great "anthology". This is not an anthology. It's only one story. One very dull story.

That's ok though. After viewing this movie (for FREE thank god!) I do feel a bit disoriented, so I can certainly understand why someone would choose the wrong words in describing this horrible movie. Especially since the reviewer claimed to be a fan of Ron Ford and a repeat viewer of Ron Ford films (and I use the term "films" loosely since they're technically videos). I recommend avoiding this movie at all costs. Grade Z.

Horror film for real horror film fans.

[mightpenman · 4 October 2002]

Bravo to the filmmakers. Rarely does a lo-budge video feature attempt to tackle such a fully developed and smartly penned script. Obviously Mr. Ford is influenced by Hammer films.

Mr. Ford achieves a smooth blend of real suspense and deft humor.

It goes to show that a good imagination never did require money.

Egad, What Garbage!

[dancziraky · 13 October 2002]

Oh, man, but this is truly an atrocity for fans of Bram Stoker's nefarious Count! The idea of cloning Dracula from blood on the stake that killed him is intriguing, but Ron Ford and his gang of idiots manage to bungle the idea from the first few seconds. The sad, scary thing is, this was INTENDED to celebrate the 100th anniversary of Stoker's novel. Instead, it urinates all over it! Avoid, avoid, AVOID this loathsome mess at all costs!