Is Marriage the Bunk? (1925) User Reviews

Not great, but the final gag makes it worth seeing

[planktonrules · 6/10 · 10 October 2011]

"Is Marriage the Bunk" is not one of Charley Chase's better shorts. In fact, if it weren't for the ending, I wouldn't even bother recommending it. Fortunately, however, it ends well.

Charley has in-laws that look down on him because he's not rich. So, to try to keep up, he rushes out to buy a car--but no matter, they still think he's a drip--as does his wife. Later, when he's given a simple job to do by his boss, he screws it up--and loses face once again with his family. However, at the end, it looks like his moment to shine is here....or is it? The biggest problem with this one is that it just isn't very funny. Because of that and the rather mean-spirited nature of the film, I found myself a bit bored. Not terrible but not all that great.

Not the bunk

[hte-trasme · 7/10 · 2 January 2010]

Hal Roach's in-house master of the title cards, H. M. Walker, seemed to have quite a propensity towards naming shorts with questions that involve marriage. The one only has one film separating it in Charley Chase's filmography from "Should Husbands Be Watched?" "Is Marriage the Bunk?" does involve Charley Chase put in an uncomfortable situation because he is much poorer than the husband of his wife's sister, but beyond that marriage isn't such a narrow focus of this short. (As an aside, Charley always seems to work from a middle class perspective -- always trying to remain a gentleman despite circumstances. We might be told that he is poor --sometimes even as a reveal gag as in "Young Ironsides--", but it is always something that we need to be told in order to find it out).

One of the earliest gags here involves Chase, established here as an unsuccessful entertainer, promising "something new" in a Charlie Chaplin imitation. It's actually a pretty good one, but this use makes Chase -- who himself had directed blatant Chaplin imitator Billy West -- into something of an iconoclast. Instead of trying to reflect glory from the comedian everyone considers the greatest, he gets laughs by mocking everyone else's unoriginal fixation with imitating him.

Overall, though, while "Is Marriage the Bunk?" is probably structurally great compared with other one-reelers of its day, it is more formless than Chase had already prove he could be in this format. He gets into his trademarked embarrassing situations, but there's not a strong unifying idea linking them.

On the plus side, this does afford the opportunity for some excellent gags, with probably the piece de resistance revolving around Charley, distracted from an urgent courier's mission (which is time-sensitive for reasons too unimportant to explain), ends up holding a block of ice in the street blindfolded for a mountebank the police have chased away. He's threatened with firing if he makes a display of himself again -- then accidentally ends up the guinea pig in a podiatrist's demonstration.

This was one of the last ten-minute one-reel comedies Chase filmed before moving to a format twice as long. It proves both how funny he could be, and how the complicated structure of his is signature style could sit a little uneasily with the shorter format.

Sorry, Charley

[F Gwynplaine MacIntyre · 2/10 · 19 April 2008]

Charley Chase has some immensely loyal fans who will tolerate no criticism of their idol. Yet his work is highly variable, and I hardly ever laugh at Chase's work. In his very best movies, such as 'Mighty Like a Moose' or 'His Wooden Wedding', I find myself impressed with Chase's professionalism rather than inspired to laughter. And Chase's worst comedies are, let's face it, very bad indeed.

I had high hopes for 'Is Marriage the Bunk?', not because of the outdated slang in its title but because of the directorial credit for the great Leo McCarey. He must have helmed this movie on an off day. Quite a few silent two-reel comedies -- not usually Chase's, though -- were effectively structured like a pair of one-reelers: two completely unrelated plots in the first and second halves, linked by some glib title cards and some pick-up shots. This two-reeler has that feel: it starts out being about one thing, then suddenly becomes about something else.

Mrs Romaine Dressing (is she from the Thousand Islands?) has two daughters, Sapho (oh, dear) and Sappie. Sapho has married a wealthy successful husband who's just bought a new car. Sappie is married to Charley. A title card identifies him as 'an entertainer', but his act apparently consists of imitating Charlie Chaplin ... a piece of business which was very hokey indeed by 1925. Right; I realise that Charley's character here is meant to be a BAD entertainer. Still, it's deeply depressing to see Chase -- a talented comedian in his own right, but one very unlike Chaplin -- attempting an inept imitation of the Little Tramp. Chase and Chaplin had worked together at Keystone in 1914 -- you can see Chase in Chaplin's 'The Masquerader' -- so it saddened and maddened me to see Chase reduced to doing bad Tramp imitations.

There's potentially a funny plot here, with feckless Chase constantly being shown up by his wealthier and un-feckless (fecked?) brother-in-law. Just when we think this is going somewhere, the plot changes. Turns out that Charley has a job after all: something to do with an office, and his boss MUST deliver some cash to the bank in a few minutes. Charley offers to save the day. We have here some potential for a thrill comedy in the style of Harold Lloyd; in fact, Lloyd's 'Feet First' used a similar premise. Speaking of feet: that must be why Chase interrupts his race against time for some unfunny business getting his corns treated by a podiatrist. Why is he doing this when he's aware of his boss's situation?

It looks like Charley is going to be the hero after all, until his flivver breaks down. Will his brother-in-law help him? Damned if I know. This low-budget comedy seems to be cobbled together from several unrelated fragments. I didn't laugh once.

I was pleasantly surprised to see Marie Mosquini's name in the opening credits -- she usually worked with Snub Pollard, not Chase -- so I was disappointed that she played neither of Mrs Dressing's daughters. She shows up very briefly in Charley's boss's office. The brunette Mosquini had dark exotic looks which were very unusual for her time; unlike many other pretty actresses of the 1920s, Mosquini still looks quite pretty (sexy, even) by the tastes of modern audiences. Interestingly, silent-film actress Mosquini married electrical engineer Lee De Forrest, who was actively involved in the development of talking pictures.

It's too bad that Mosquini appears for only a few seconds in this movie. I regretfully rate this one only 2 out of 10. Chase, McCarey and all concerned have done better elsewhere.

Becoming Charley Chase

[Michael_Elliott · 17 March 2010]

Is Marriage the Bunk? (1925)

** 1/2 (out of 4)

Charley Chase plays a husband who is happily married to the woman (Katherine Grant) he loves but her family hates him. Chase's sister-in-law is married to a rich man and the family thinks that's what his wife deserves so he sets out to prove that he can provide his wife with nice things. I've read several reviews that stated this was among Chase's worst films but I wouldn't go that far. There really aren't enough laughs here to keep the film moving but there are a few good things. The highlight of the film happens at the start when Chase is doing various impersonations for his family. These impersonations includes one of Chaplin, which is pretty hilarious as Chase nails the Tramp walk and famous cigarette kick. This sequence alone makes this film worth checking out but everything that follows pales in comparison. One problem is that the supporting cast really doesn't add anything to the film as the relatives are all rather boring and routine. Chase himself really doesn't get to do anything overly impressive outside the Chaplin act and even Grant comes off appearing bored here.