The Domain of the Moment (1977) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Brakhage observes animals
framptonhollis31 July 2017
...and he does so only as THE great Stan Brakhage could. In a flashy, vibrant style, "The Domain of the Moments" shows a cast of varying species at their cutest as well as their cruelest. At this point in his career, Brakhage had already mastered many of the revolutionary filmmaking techniques he is now most known for, but that does not mean that there still wasn't some room left for experimentation. Brakhage plays around with the idea of superimposing frames atop one another, and he also edits his signature "painting-directly- on-film" type imagery in between the actual footage.

The ending of the film is rather shocking, particularly if you find mice to be "cute" or "charming" in some way (personally, animals eating other animals doesn't bother me all too much, it's just a simple fact of life in the animal kingdom, although it is quite barbaric when you needlessly think about it for an extensive period of time). It shows a mouse being consumed by a classically predatory snake. Brakhage's editing is hectic throughout the film, but in these final moments of pain this style is much more noticeable, especially when Brakhage finally let's the footage relax and calms the editing down, putting strong emphasis on the final, haunting visuals of pain. It is an arguably exploitive sequence; one that provides Brakhage's mythic beauty and unflinching, explicit cruelty perfectly.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The failure of the moment Warning: Spoilers
"The Domain of the Moment" is an 14-18-minute short film from 1977, so this one is already almost 40 years old. American filmmaker Stan Brakhage made this during the summer of his career age-wise. It is neither among his shortest nor longest works and he actually tries something new here: animal documentary. Of course, the fact that this is silent and there are no intertitle shows us how he fails entirely in this field again as well. One of many. not even a cute raccoon can save this movie. The final sequences are all about a snake killing and devouring a mouse. Shock value perhaps, cinematic value zero. This is another failure in the long line of failure by Brakhage. Watch something else instead.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Animal perspective
Polaris_DiB27 March 2008
Warning: Spoilers
If Brakhage's work is mostly about the de-privatization of privileged "viewing" (I say "if" because honestly, I'm only speaking of what I get out of these films, not necessarily about what he intended), then this is his film about animalistic "sight." Most of it is from the "perspective" of animals, low to the ground, moving jerkily among familiarized environments unusual to human eyes, and lovingly tracing the movements of animals. There is a duck, there is a dog, there is a raccoon, there is a snake. The dog and the raccoon interact, but one of the things Brakhage is hinting at is that this interaction and experience is being done olfactorily: the two only really smell each other's presence, even if literally the two are in frame together (through superimposition and direct interaction). The snake is similarly visually de-emphasized, as his skin is the experience through which we "feel" how he "feels".

--PolarisDiB
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed