IMDb >
Solaris (2002)
Watch It
Buy it at Amazon
Rent it at
blockbuster.com
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
blockbuster.com
BETA
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosinterprètes et équipe techniqueanecdotesofficial sitesphrases célèbresOverview
infos principalesinfos complètesinterprètes et équipe techniquesociétés de productiontv scheduleRécompenses et critiques
avis des utilisateurscritiques externescritiques des forumsawardsnotes des utilisateursparents guidedans la lignéemessage boardSynopsis et citations
résuméplot synopsismots-clésrésumé du Amazon.comphrases célèbresCuriosités
anecdotesbêtisierinfos B.O.F.clins d'il dans génériqueinfos sur d'autres versionsliens avec d'autres uvresfoire aux questionsAutres infos
en ventebox office/businessdates de sortielieux de tournagecaractéristiques techniquesinfos laserdiscinfos DVDbibliographieNewsDeskMatériel publicitaire
accroches trailers and videos affiches photo galleryLiens externes
horaires dans les sallesofficial sitesdiversphotossound clipsvideo clipsSolaris (2002) More at IMDbPro »
| Photos (see all 84 | slideshow) | Videos (see all 3) |
Overview
Note des utilisateurs:
Release Date:
27 novembre 2002 (USA) suiteAccroche:
There are some places man is not ready to go suitePlot:
A troubled psychologist is sent to investigate the crew of an isolated research station orbiting a bizarre planet. full summary | full synopsisAwards:
1 win & 7 nominations suiteAvis des utilisateurs:
Powerful, thought-provoking metaphysical journey - A great remake. suiteEnsemble
(Complete credited cast)| George Clooney | ... | Chris Kelvin | |
| Natascha McElhone | ... | Rheya | |
| Viola Davis | ... | Gordon | |
| Jeremy Davies | ... | Snow | |
| Ulrich Tukur | ... | Gibarian | |
| John Cho | ... | DBA Emissary #1 | |
| Morgan Rusler | ... | DBA Emissary #2 | |
| Shane Skelton | ... | Gibarian's Son | |
| Donna Kimball | ... | Mrs. Gibarian | |
| Michael Ensign | ... | Friend #1 | |
| Elpidia Carrillo | ... | Friend #2 | |
| Kent Faulcon | ... | Patient #1 (as Kent D. Faulcon) | |
| Lauren Cohn | ... | Patient #2 (as Lauren M. Cohn) |
Additional Details
MPAA:
Rated PG-13 on appeal for sexuality/nudity, brief language and thematic elements.Parents Guide:
Add content advisory for parentsDurée:
99 minPays:
USALangue:
AnglaisCouleur:
CouleurAspect Ratio:
2.35 : 1 suiteClassification:
Brazil:14 | USA:R (original rating) | Finland:K-11 | Portugal:M/12 (DVD rating) | Iceland:12 | Singapore:NC-16 (theatrical release) (cut) | Singapore:NC-16 (re-rating) (2007) | Singapore:PG (cut) (video rating) (2003) | Netherlands:12 | South Africa:13LS | Argentina:13 | Australia:M | Canada:G (Québec) | Canada:PG | France:U | Germany:12 (w) | Ireland:15 | New Zealand:M | Norway:11 | Philippines:R-18 | South Korea:12 | South Korea:15 (special edition) | Spain:13 | Sweden:11 | Switzerland:12 (canton of Geneva) | Switzerland:12 (canton of Vaud) | UK:12A | USA:PG-13 (re-rating on appeal)Curiosités
Anecdotes:
One of the proposed taglines for this film was, "Love never dies". However, this same tagline had already been used for Dracula (1992). suiteGoofs:
Anachronisms: George Clooney is shown traveling in a sleek slightly futuristic rapid transit train but the rear projection/blue screen out the window clearly shows the current day "Merchandise Mart" station of the Chicago CTA Subway. Also during his journey the train he passes going the opposite direction is a present day subway train. suiteGuillemet:
[first lines][Chris's memories, in voiceover]
Rheya Kelvin: Chris, what is it? I love you so much. Don't you love me anymore?
suite
Soundtrack:
Eronel suitefoire aux questions
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.suite
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for Solaris (2002) suiteRecommendations
If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
Show more recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
| Solyaris | Romeo + Juliet | The Fountain | Into the Wild | All Quiet on the Western Front |
|
IMDb Note des utilisateurs:
|
IMDb Note des utilisateurs:
|
IMDb Note des utilisateurs:
|
IMDb Note des utilisateurs:
|
IMDb Note des utilisateurs:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| IMDb Drame section | IMDb USA section | Add this title to MyMovies |















My two favorite examples of Hollywood utterly destroying GREAT foreign films are Vanilla Sky and City of Angels, which were abominations of two of my favorite films - Open Your Eyes and Wings of Desire. If you've seen Tarkovsky's brilliant "Solyaris" this film will seem more like an Americanized tribute than a Hollywoodization of a great piece of Soviet cinema. Some will likely ask why Soderbergh bothered to make this film if he couldn't improve on the original. Personally, I could not care less. This is a great film, and shows that it is possible for Americans to remake classic non-American films sensitively, intelligently and well.
To cut to the chase - if you like sci-fi with a soul,which stretches the boundaries of imagination, explores the uncharted realms of the human condition as much as the unknown realities of the universe, and swims upstream against the currents of ethics, physics, and even metaphysics, you will probably enjoy this moody, slow, multi-leveled and heavily textured film. If you're looking for light entertainment, stay away from this. This is a slow, intense film - dominated by dialog - and there is no action to speak of. Also, you need to let this movie pour into you slowly, so if you're not in the right frame of mind to pay attention and be receptive, you should save it for another occasion.
The cast is exceptionally good. This is unequivocally the best performance I have seen out of George Clooney, but the supporting cast and the female lead all blew me away. Soderbergh does have a talent for making actor's look good, even mediocre actors, but there is nothing mediocre about any of the performances in this film.
Though I recognize his talent, Soderberg's dialogical technique has worn particularly thin with me. The once fresh fast-paced, rapid-fire cuts and close-ups with the low-toned exchange of sentence fragments, and the myriad Soderberg imitators, particularly in television crime drama, have really gotten on my nerves. Solaris, however, is a bit different. There are only a few "Soderbergh moments" in this rich remake of the classic bit of 1970s soviet SciFi "Solyaris". Both films are based on a novella by the brilliant Stanislaw Lem. This film, perhaps even more than Tarkovsky's 1972 edgy, dark, and intense original, will appeal to exactly the sort of movie-goer that Lem's writing appeals to. Neither film captures Lem's quirky sense of humor. I am quite glad that Soderbergh chose to make Solaris with very much the same atmospheric eeriness, plot, and intellectual and emotional depth as the original. It is a tribute to his artistic integrity that he recognizes the brilliance of the original work, and imitates it wherever he can do no better, adding subtle and appropriate nuances and embellishments to make it his own. Some examples are the wonderfully minimalistic soundtrack, and the very Soderbergh symbolic use of lighting and color saturation to shift from the retrospective to the live-action shot. Perhaps the best tribute I can give this film is the fact that I am going to watch the original again in a few days for comparative purposes.
In other words, this isn't going to be for everybody, nor, even, for most. I am hardly surprised by the very low (in my opinion) ratings received by this film here on IMDb. Solaris is a love story, a story of exploring the fringes of sanity, and of questioning the very nature of reality, and much more. Enjoy it!