SHOP SHOPGIRL
IMDb >
Shopgirl (2005)
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosinterprètes et équipe techniqueanecdotesofficial sitesphrases célèbresOverview
infos principalesinfos complètesinterprètes et équipe techniquesociétés de productiontv scheduleRécompenses et critiques
avis des utilisateurscritiques externescritiques des forumsawardsnotes des utilisateursparents guidedans la lignéemessage boardSynopsis et citations
résuméplot synopsismots-clésrésumé du Amazon.comphrases célèbresCuriosités
anecdotesbêtisierinfos B.O.F.clins d'œil dans génériqueinfos sur d'autres versionsliens avec d'autres uvresfoire aux questionsAutres infos
en ventebox office/businessdates de sortielieux de tournagecaractéristiques techniquesinfos laserdiscinfos DVDbibliographieNewsDeskMatériel publicitaire
accrochestrailers and videosaffichesphoto galleryLiens externes
horaires dans les sallesofficial sitesdiversphotossound clipsvideo clipsShopgirl (2005)
advertisement
| Photos (see all 34 | slideshow) | Videos (see all 2 videos ) |
Overview
Release Date:
21 octobre 2005 (USA) suiteAccroche:
Relationships don't always fit like a glove.Plot:
A film adaptation of Steve Martin's novel about a complex love triangle between a bored salesgirl, a wealthy businessman and an aimless young man. full summary | add synopsisAwards:
5 nominations suiteAvis des utilisateurs:
Sometimes faith in Steve Martin IS justified suiteEnsemble
(Cast overview, first billed only)| Steve Martin | ... | Ray Porter | |
| Claire Danes | ... | Mirabelle | |
| Jason Schwartzman | ... | Jeremy | |
| Bridgette Wilson | ... | Lisa Cramer (as Bridgette Wilson-Sampras) | |
| Sam Bottoms | ... | Dan Buttersfield | |
| Frances Conroy | ... | Catherine Butterfield | |
| Rebecca Pidgeon | ... | Christie Richards | |
| Samantha Shelton | ... | Loki | |
| Gina Doctor | ... | Del Rey | |
| Clyde Kusatsu | ... | Mr. Agasa | |
| Romy Rosemont | ... | Loan Officer | |
| Joshua Snyder | ... | Trey Bryan | |
| Rachel Nichols | ... | Trey's Girlfriend | |
| Shane Edelman | ... | Chet | |
| Emily Kuroda | ... | Japanese Woman |
Additional Details
MPAA:
Rated R for some sexual content and brief language.Parents Guide:
Add content advisory for parentsDurée:
104 minPays:
USACouleur:
CouleurAspect Ratio:
2.35 : 1 suiteClassification:
Australia:M | Finland:K-15 | Germany:o.Al. | Ireland:15A | Brazil:12 | Singapore:NC-16 | Argentina:13 | South Korea:15 | Canada:PG (Alberta/British Columbia/Manitoba/Nova Scotia/Ontario) | USA:R | UK:15MOVIEmeter: 
Curiosités
Anecdotes:
For the scene in Mirabelle's bedroom where the cat jumps on the bed and watches her and Jeremy, there were actually two cats used. The director explains in his commentary that one could jump but never watched, and the other was good at watching but couldn't jump. suiteGoofs:
Continuity: Early in the movie when Jeremy goes over to Mirabelle's place for the first time, Mirabelle says, "Do you want to just talk?", and leans back. However, in the next shot you can see her reflection in the mirror where she is sitting upright. suiteSoundtrack:
Somewhere In My Heart suitefoire aux questions
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.suite
Message Boards
Discuss this title with other users on IMDb message board for Shopgirl (2005) suiteRecommendations
If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
Show more recommendations
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Single White Female | Sideways | Lie with Me | Trust the Man | Slaves to the Underground |
|
IMDb Note des utilisateurs:
|
IMDb Note des utilisateurs:
|
IMDb Note des utilisateurs:
|
IMDb Note des utilisateurs:
|
IMDb Note des utilisateurs:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| News articles | IMDb Drame section | IMDb USA section |
| Add this title to MyMovies |



















It's no real secret that through his writing, Steve Martin has depth and sentimentality that Hollywood doesn't always let him show. He has shown signs of a longing to grow old gracefully (as his almost gimmick-free gigs as Oscar host have shown) and let his acerbic wit and insight drive projects more than the over-the-top slapstick antics of the 1970s Steve Martin.
It's also no real secret that many of his recent films have been far from great.
So, still having faith in the man, and having loved the novel on which this film is based, I went in to the cinema desperately wanting to like it, but expecting to be disappointed. Largely, I was pleasantly surprised that the novel did transfer well to the screen.
Some of the credit for this belongs to director Anand Tucker, who has created some powerful images of the hustle and bustle of the LA that Martin describes in the novel, and contrasts it well with the characters who lead shallow lives, trying to be something meaningful amongst all the chaos.
Credit also goes to the actors who show that longing that drives the situation: Claire Daines as Mirabelle clearly WANTS to be social, artistic, loved; Jason Schwartzman as Jeremy WANTS to be sensitive, witty, lovable; Martin as Ray Porter clearly WANTS to be suave and considerate. Without having many jokes in the script, audiences can still appreciate the humour by seeing these pathetic struggles. When I saw it there was plenty of laughter at all the right moments.
I will, however, hasten to add that there are parts of the book that never would have translated well to the Hollywood screen, and the praise that some give the movie for serving its purpose will contain the same reasons that others wish to knock it. The book's strength is that one can feel for the characters because they are portrayed as superficial people and their lives and conversations are so shallow in comparison to the narrative that sets them up. The reasons why it works so well as a book could well be the very things that cause it to not work on the screen. Then there's the matter of a book that's so rooted in "LA sux" sentiment being made into a Hollywood movie. So maybe the musical overkill reeked of "excuse me, we're trying to tell you something". Maybe the spots of narration felt out of place and indicated that Martin is not yet over his desire to spend his life as the 'star' of his projects (him getting top billing for the movie was also a bit much, in my opinion).
Ultimately, maybe the audience members who were longing for a film with more 'depth' and 'substance' were in actuality sharing the characters' longings for the same in their own lives. Maybe the 'criticisms' are in fact backhanded compliments that the film is largely doing just what it's meant to do.