Na shi hua kai (2002) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Price for love
kevin14226 October 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Gao Ju and Zhang Yang were good friends in the university. One day there came a beautiful new student called Huanzi. Gao and Zhang fell in love with her at the same time. So they made a rule. Zhang would accompany Huanzi from Monday to Friday. Saturday was for Gao. Everybody was not satisfied with the rule. But they had nothing to do but abide the rule. On graduation day they made a promise that changed their lives totally. Never meet again (even if encountered, pretended as stranger) or die.

However Gao could not stop missing Huanzi. He left his cell phone number on public place in order to receive the call from her. One day Huanzi noticed the phone number and dialed it. Unavoidable painful conflict inside their hearts commenced.

The romantic movie was starred by Xun Zhou (The little Chinese seamstress) and Yu Xia (In the heat of sun). In addition to that, famous singers Lao Lang, Zheng Jun and Pu Shu sang the lively songs appeared in the movie. Just the songs are a good reason to watch the movie.

A Chinese movie that brimmed with youthful vigor. 7/10
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Nice experimental flick
Bigprisc5 January 2004
This is not a movie if you are looking for perfection. Whether in the story, or technically. Instead, watch it only for the experimentalism that the director boldly explored.

There are many technical faults of the movie. Mainly those of the minimal basics. I cringed a couple of times at the jumps and the continuity of the shots.

The story was simple. Gao Ju (Xia Yu) and Zhang Yang (Pu Shu) were best of friends, but they fall in love with Huanzi (Zhou Xun). Huanzi loves both of them and thus they formed an unbalanced trinity. A simple promise not to meet ever again after college ended up in disaster when Gao cannot resist wooing Huanzi again. The subplots of the story, linking the three in a cycle was refreshing, but could have been dealt with alot better. In fact, the whole story could have been dealt with alot better.

What saved the movie was the way the thought put in to the style of the film. Firstly, it is a non-linear story, from the start to the end of the movie, you would not know when in time it was. Though confusing right to the end, it was very well done, because i believe that time was not an important factor in the equation anyway. The other thing that impressed me was the use of mannequins. I was stunned at first when i saw the mannequins and the actors acted alongside them as if they were real people, then i realise that the mannequins were stand-ins for the extras. I thought it was such an innovative way to make a statement. That people surrounding us that were unimportant were as good as mannequins because they don mean much to us anyway. The other scene that strucks me is the house of Huanzi is situated in an open meadow with only a bed, a door, and a decorated tree. It is up to the individual to comprehend why this is so, but from what i see, i believe it was to provide us with a glimpse of Huanzi's personal life, but not showing anything at all.

Zhou did a great job as Huanzi, innocence-a-plenty during the before, and nonchalance with a tinct of longing in the after, thus providing us with a great contrast of time. Xia was very entertaining, basically is the comic relief of the movie. He brings a smile to your lips without being the clown. Pu on the other hand, is convincing as the solemn one, the punk, the bad boy that all girls love.

Overall, this is a very amateurish production, with a strong cast and interesting experimental effects to save it. I would suggest watching it, not for the movie itself, but for what the director is trying to express in it.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Film school detritus
thaiftg26 March 2007
Poor on every level. Like a class from a provincial film school watched too much Bunuel and didn't get the point. There is a phase in youth, in one's early twenties, when you still have the delusions of a child and the conviction that your type of talent is rare. Badly written, poorly acted and amateurishly photographed. Watch Bunuel, go to the source. Life is short and there are many good Asian films, to watch, this isn't one. Sorry to be harsh but this is not one of those honourable failures, it's just a very poor piece of film-making. The music is doof doof dull as well. Of course there is always the chance that one or more of those involved will go on to a spectacular career. It's happened before.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed