SHOP CRONOCR...
Amazon.com Amazon.ca Amazon.co.uk Amazon.de Amazon.fr
IMDb > Cronocrímenes, Los (2007) > IMDb user comments

IMDb user comments for
Cronocrímenes, Los (2007)

advertisement
Filter: Hide Spoilers:
Index 9 comments in total 

10 out of 14 people found the following comment useful :-
The sleeper hit at Fantastic Fest 2007!!!!, 30 septembre 2007
9/10
Author: BottleRocket de San Antonio, TX

"Timecrimes" was a movie I almost didn't see. It seemed interesting, but since "Primer" I wasn't sure if I wanted to wrap my mind around another time travel movie. The director, Nacho Vigalondo told us this was his world premiere and he was very nervous giving his introduction. After about 90 minutes, I realized my second movie at Fantastic Fest 2007 may be the best one I see all week. "Timecrimes" was an engaging movie that is easy to follow, despite it's complex plot. I would hate to give away even the smallest of details, the title says everything you need to know. Even though I felt like I was in the driver's seat the whole movie, there were still surprises throughout that kept things interesting until the closing credits. The journey taken by Hector (Karra Elejalde) develops his character beautifully, and he is complimented by a small and effective cast. It would be a crime if this movie doesn't get the distribution it deserves. The Q&A afterward revealed some interesting behind the scenes stories and some info that made me want to see the movie again. Fortunately the buzz from our half full screening was enough to sell out the second screening at the festival. The film won Best Picture at Fantastic Fest 2007, was the Silver Medal winner for Audience Favorite, and was the highest rated film at the festival. If you get a chance to see this movie, DO IT!!

***UPDATE*** "Timecrimes" has been picked up by Magnolia Pictures.

Was the above comment useful to you?

7 out of 10 people found the following comment useful :-
It leaves asking for more.., 26 octobre 2007
8/10
Author: Tanhausser_Gates de Spain

One of the common issues with time-travel movies is that they are filled with holes in the story, things that you never get to know how happened or why they did happened in the first place.

This movie is perfect in that sense, the plot is squared and every small detail has a meaningful reason to exist so in a way is mathematically perfect.. Which leaves you with a rewarding feeling but on the other hand if you understand the plot you can solve the mystery 3/4 down the movie and the last minutes are just obvious.

But this is a great movie.. Thats why it leaves you wondering what would it had been if the plot were more ambitious and more factors had been involved in the equation. Perhaps more characters and more interaction between them.. Who knows! You just want more!

Was the above comment useful to you?

6 out of 9 people found the following comment useful :-
Proof that Time-Travel doesn't have to be ridicule and complex, 3 avril 2008
8/10
Author: Coventry de the Draconian Swamp of Unholy Souls

It's really not that obvious for a young and still aspiring writer/director to revolve his long-feature film debut on the hugely complex topic of time traveling, as a failure could immediately affect your credibility as a director and maybe even ruin your further career before it properly started. True, Nacho Vigalondo already received an Oscar nomination in 2005 for one of his short films, so you know he must somehow be talented, but still, to take on subjects like paradoxes and time loops in your first film displays a lot of courage and ambition. But Vigalondo was right to feel confident, as his script is intelligent, engaging and not nearly as implausible as you'd expect from a Sci-Fi film. When thinking of films about time traveling, you promptly imagine there to be giant laboratories full of machinery with thousands of little buttons and colorful lights (or maybe a DeLorean), macho men in futuristic costumes and endless overlong speeches about scientific theories. The last things you expect to see are normal, identifiable characters in their everyday environments and how they're suddenly and involuntarily involved in Science-Fictionesque situations. "Timecrimes" introduces Héctor, a middle aged house father with a slight voyeuristic habit. When Héctor spots a naked girl in the woods through his binoculars, he decides to look for her (who wouldn't?) but suddenly he finds himself chased by a madman with an uncanny bandage wrapped around his head and waving around a pair of scissors. Héctor finds shelter in a nearby lab and the technician advises him to hide in a peculiar device filled with liquid. The real problems only just begin when Héctor emerges again. Realizing he traveled back a few hours in time, Héctor witnesses himself running through the woods and painfully also comes to realize who exactly he was running away from… The plot grows increasingly convoluted with each minute, but strangely enough the film always remains easy to follow and fast-paced. When the whole script is one giant paradox, you also prepare to encounter a lot of plot holes and improbabilities, but the film actually makes sense all the time. There's a more than fair amount of suspense, beautiful photography and atmospheric musical guidance. Karra Elejalde is simply superb in his difficult and unconventional role as Héctor the anti-hero and Barbara Goenaga is – apart from a really great actress – a stunningly ravishing woman. Terrific film.

Was the above comment useful to you?

1 out of 2 people found the following comment useful :-
Supremely intelligent, 21 juillet 2008
9/10
Author: crappydoo de New Zealand

Wow, this one took me by surprise. As a matter of fact I had no idea how this film would develop even when I was half-way done watching it, but then the real story kicks off and its exciting and hilarious thereafter. The premise is fairly simple about a guy who keeps landing in exponentially ridiculous situations. You'll know what I mean when you watch it. And each situation has a sense of deja vu to it and is great fun to watch. Can't say much about the acting and direction, which were very, very good nevertheless. However the script is supremely intelligent and ensures that every loose thread is perfectly, and I mean, perfectly tied up.

Time travel can be real head bender. Frequency and The Butterfly Effect are good examples of comparable movies of this genre (and the Back To The Future sequels are terrible ones) and Timecrimes sits comfortably in that group.

I'll be glad to recommend it to all my friends who have the patience to read subtitles.

Was the above comment useful to you?

1 out of 2 people found the following comment useful :-
great flick, 8 juillet 2008
10/10
Author: beneaththemassacre1 de Canada

I saw Time Crimes at Montreals fantasia film festival. I was expecting something interesting but nothing to this extend. This film was original, complex yet simple. Beautifully shot, well thought out and entertaining the entire way through. I've was extremely inspired by the film which shows that all you need is a good script, and not necessarily a whole lot of cash to create something really great. IF you get a chance to check it out definitely do so. This is the kind of film that makes film festivals.

I know you all wondering about the violence. In terms of violence it doesn't get graphic at all, minor acts of violence but nothing to worry about not brining the women too.

check out time crimes you wont regret it

Was the above comment useful to you?

1 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :-
Effective Temporal Tale, 19 juin 2008
8/10
Author: destru-1 de United Kingdom

*** This comment may contain spoilers ***

Time travel films come in two categories. The ones that try to stay internally consistent and the ones that don't (either by bad scripting, direction, editing or not caring).

Time Crimes (Los Cronocrimenes) is thankfully one of the former and kept this writer thoroughly gripped even given the late night showing.

Direction is good throughout but nothing to particularly write home about. Those who have seen numerous films of this type will know what to expect and not be so surprised by some of the paths the film takes. However the cinematography is clear and concise and the pace is well controlled to ensure the viewer is along for the ride.

Time Crimes biggest boon is its script which has been considered carefully to ensure it maintains its consistency. Whereas other films of this type tend to throw too much on the fire the Director/Writer concludes the story in three parts and where questions can be asked about why Hector (an admirable lead) is acting in a certain way these questions are answered as the film goes on keeping the viewers attention.

This isn't an all action film though and I'd suggest that anyone who prefers their films simple rather than cerebral might be best to stay away.

One problem for the subtitled version is that the subtitles were often badly placed (or seemingly running out of ink) making the viewer often have to strain to read what was being said rather than watch the reactions on screen.

This is a minor point though to what was an enjoyable watch.

Was the above comment useful to you?

1 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :-
A Must See film., 6 avril 2008
10/10
Author: drdark de United States

This movie proves what Hollywood does not practice. A great movie (like this one) does not need: famous name actors, good-looking/sexy protagonists, stupendous sets, expensive special effects, gratuitous violence, & violent shocks to be a successful, entertaining, and provocative movie, which this is in every respect. All it needs is good writing, capable direction, plausibility in terms of premises and plot turns, and decent acting. This has it all. And it's a great movie. The actors are all average looking. The sets look like a normal environment. The special effects are nothing special at all. And yet, there is not a dull moment in this extraordinarily good film. Saw it at the Cleveland International Film Festival this year. It stood out from the crowd as an exceptional film

Was the above comment useful to you?

3 out of 8 people found the following comment useful :-
Doesn't really work, 4 avril 2008
1/10
Author: shes_dead de Manchester, UK

*** This comment may contain spoilers ***

My initial feeling about Los Cronocrimenes was that it sounded interesting and quirky and featured time travel. Therefore I thought I would love it, and the mysterious promo photo of a guy with what looked like a pink towel wrapped around his head just intrigued me more.

For the first 15 minutes or so it seemed like this was going to develop in to a really good movie. But then you quickly figure out what is going on, and then elements of it become quite predictable! This was unfortunate in that the next half hour or so was really boring to watch because it was obvious how things would happen. It's after this initial predictable bit that things start to get more complex, and the story also begins to fall apart (as you will see in the poll I have started on this page titled 'some things didn't seem to add up') .

It really wouldn't make for an interesting read if I was to simply type out all the loose ends and random actions that the characters take in the film that seem to have no explanation at all. I will just say that it had even more inconsistencies than Primer – a film which Los Cronocrimenes is almost identical to. Primer was also a poor film; out of the two I couldn't decide which was worse so I guess that means they were equally as bad.

Now, I'm quite sure I've upset a lot of people with my negative comments about this film so far. People always seem to get tetchy over negative reviews of films that for some reason they see as untouchable. Believe me, I wanted dearly to like this film, but I left very disappointed, bored, feeling I had just watched 'Primer 2', wandering why Hollywood have already bought the rights to make this film and more importantly wondering why so many good reviews when it is quite blatantly contrived, predictable and full of loose ends!

Hector, the main character, does so many unexplained things it leaves you feeling frustrated and, as another reviewer has stated, there are many moments of unbelievably in this movie that requires the audience to leave reason at the door on the way in. Although the other reviewer did state these moments were made acceptable via humour, I did not find much humour in this movie myself.

If a film maker is going to take on a time travel movie then they should at least have the integrity to make sure it all 'works'. However, as usual all this seems to have been looked over by people who insist on giving this film a great review. There only seems to be a minority of people who can see that there are too many loose ends and all in all it's not really any different to Primer.

Was the above comment useful to you?

3 out of 9 people found the following comment useful :-
Fun (but a little cheesy) Time Travel Movie, 19 janvier 2008
6/10
Author: wmjaho de Park City

While introducing the movie, director Nacho Vigalondo said that he thought this was the first ever Spanish time-travel movie. More accurately, this was the first Spanish bigger-budget variation of Sundance 2005's Primer.

Hector appears to be living a happy and contented life in their new house with his pretty and affectionate wife Clara, when one day he spies through his binoculars a woman in the woods in the act of undressing. When Clara leaves, Hector goes off to investigate. And there the fun begins, as Hector's quest thrusts him into an adventure that includes the discovery of a time machine, and a dogged quest to unravel its effects.

If you like mind game movies like Memento, Proof or the even harder to follow Primer, then Time Crimes will have some appeal. And while the movie does have some time-twisting inconsistencies, it generally ties the loose ends into a knotty, if not absurd conclusion. The story moves along briskly, requiring intellectual energy to keep up and a forgiving attitude to a few ridiculous devices. Fortunately, there is an occasional and welcome infusion of humor that makes some of the cheesier elements a little easier to swallow. But somehow, the whole thing felt more like a Twilight Zone episode stretched into a feature-length film. Fortunately, like most Twilight Zone episodes, this one had a great ending. I just loved the final shot, which is quaintly ironic, although it will leave some viewers unsatisfied, I am sure.

Sundance Moment: In the post-movie Q&A, Vigalondo said that after shooting his film, he realized what it really was—a love triangle story. My reaction was "Huh? Did I watch the right movie?"

Was the above comment useful to you?


Add another comment


Related Links

Plot summary Plot synopsis Ratings
Awards External reviews Official site
Plot keywords Principaux Détails Your user comments
Your vote history