"Law & Order" Blood Libel (TV Episode 1996) Poster

(TV Series)

(1996)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
The Jewish conspiracy
lastliberal12 September 2008
Oscar-winner Chris Cooper (Adaptation) is featured in this episode where it appears a teacher was killed for ending a grade-buying scam.

Things get heated when Jews are found under every bed by Cooper, who is trying to make a name for himself on the Klan lecture circuit.

Even Detective Lennie Briscoe (Jerry Orbach) is accused of orchestrating the conspiracy because he is a Jew. The fact that he wasn't and was raised Catholic didn't matter, it was enough to get that one juror to hold out.

This episode shows why out system is flawed compared to other countries. It only take one bigot to screw things up.
21 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"Who'd want to murder an art teacher, who'd she ever hurt?"
bkoganbing21 February 2013
That question is asked by Benjamin Bratt as he and Jerry Orbach catch a homicide involving an art teacher who was staying late and was found murdered in her classroom by the custodian.

That question is soon answered as the investigation leads to the fact that another teacher was selling grades and she was going to rat him out. The perpetrator turns out to be Jack Vinson who with his buddies had been writing some covert anti-Semitic messages in places like the Yearbook, etc.

Vinson's parents retain for a hefty fee Chris Cooper who is a lawyer for white supremacists. But he's good at what he does as he gets some forensic evidence thrown out which would have nailed Vinson to the wall. And he spreads enough manure around to suggest that there is some great Jewish conspiracy at work to frame his fine upstanding white client. Even Jerry Orbach comes in for it.

You'd think in New York City, in Manhattan of all places such things could not happen. But all Cooper has to do is get one juror to hold out and the the DA has to do it all over again.

I have no doubt that Sam Waterston will do it until it comes out right.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Accusation in blood
TheLittleSongbird10 February 2021
Even for 'Law and Order', "Blood Libel's" topic is incredibly bold and makes one feel a mix of emotions between anger and upset. Anti-semitism has been such a major problem for decades, especially so in the Second World War but sadly it is little better now. It takes guts for any show or film to tackle it and do so sensitively, any show or film that tries to do so deserves some kind of credit. 'Law and Order', no stranger to controversial subjects, is no exception.

The show however did much better before and since with exploring heavy and controversial subjects, doing so with more tact and balance elsewhere with "Blood Libel". It is not at all bad, but by early season 'Law and Order' standards it is somewhat disappointing. More those appreciated it for what it tried to do sort of episodes than one of the love it ones. As far as Season 6 goes, "Blood Libel" is one of those well intended efforts but a lesser outing. A lot of good things here, but falls short.

"Blood Libel" has more good things than not so good. As always, it's a slickly made episode, the editing especially having come on quite a bit from when the show first started (never was it a problem but it got more fluid with each episode up to this stage). The music is sparingly used and never seemed melodramatic, the theme tune easy to remember as usual. The direction is sympathetic enough without being too low key on the whole. The script is literate and tight with some interesting questions and handles the subject boldly enough. The story succeeds in having a suitably uncompromising tone with the tension being almost frightening.

Much is it is down to the perpetrator being a truly reprehensible character, one of the most chilling bigoted perpetrators perhaps of the show. Briscoe and Curtis work really well together, some of their banter lightens the mood without jarring and intrigues. Curtis has an aforementioned line that sums up the puzzlement of the case very well. The policing intrigues and doesn't become predictable too early. Curtis is becoming more interesting. All the regulars are excellent.

However, the episode had drawbacks despite appreciating its good intentions. There were too many times in the second half where the subject could have been handled with more tact and nuance, it was like at times the writers were trying too hard to make its points and it was like being beaten around the head. Anti-semitism absolutely is beyond the pale wrong, but that didn't need to be emphasised quite that heavily.

It did at times feel over the top and could have done better at exploring it from all sides. Chris Cooper for my tastes overdoes it in his role and his character is too much of a too dominant caricature with a truly bizarre and not particularly realistic defense argument.

Concluding, has a lot of good things and well intended but didn't completely click with me. 6/10
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed