Stan (TV Movie 2006) Poster

(2006 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
This is my friend - Mr Hardy
old-bolingbroke9 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This play had all the virtues of a small budget. It was concise, focused and small-scale; the actors did not try to do impersonations, just occasionally reminded you of little quirks of speech or mannerism, and conveyed perfectly the characters of the two leads as men and actors.

It was called 'Stan' and it was Stan who had the lines, who told the story, but I want to concentrate on the portrait of Ollie. We all know that Stan considered himself the brains of the team and was so considered by the studio and also by Ollie. Because Ollie was easy-going and unambitious, because he knew there was more to life than work, he is often seen as the fat fool who was happy to fall on his arse for enough money to fund his golf habit.

The play corrects this impression.

Stan pays tribute to Ollie's comic skills: his timing, his milking of laughs, his inventiveness.

We see Ollie persuading the disgruntled Stan of the virtues of the team they could become. He is a man who is not just a natural comic (something that I could argue Stan was not to the same extent), but someone who has comic intelligence.

It is Ollie who recognises the importance of humour even in hard times - especially in hard times and about hard times - when Stan is going through one of his periodic depressive bouts. Was it really Ollie who had the idea for 'Their first mistake'? This idea is neatly used to make a little joke out of Ollie's incapacity.

Just a word or two about their comic abilities. There is no doubt that they would have got nowhere without each other, but I believe that Ollie was an instinctively funny man, while Stan would work out how he could be funny. A bit like Steve Martin or Robin Williams today. Ollie is more like the late British comic Tommy Cooper. But that is a debate for another time.

Towards the end it is Ollie who recognises that the work has become poor. Personally, I won't watch their last films. While the ever dissatisfied Stan can't leave it, Ollie has the wisdom to walk away, in the knowledge that the best work is preserved for ever, and will be forever loved. As one who who never knew them until after their death/retirement, I can vouch for that. My own children are fans too.

The play's end is all the more moving for the touch of humour injected into it. Stan, portrayed sympathetically, for all his frustrated, over-achieving self-obsession, has to admit to himself the depth of his friendship and the debt he owes to his partner.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
What they were...to us and each other
sno-smari-m5 January 2009
Warning: Spoilers
It is the late summer of 1957, and Stan Laurel has been hiding for months. He's screening one of his very first films on a home projector when his wife appears, telling him that he must talk to Oliver Hardy's wife immediately. "Yes! Yes! I know! She called because I haven't been talking to Babe! Doesn't she know I haven't been talking to anybody!?" he responds, quite frustrated. Quitely, his wife confides: "She called to tell that 'Babe' won't be here tomorrow." I'd be surprised if this wasn't the first time a movie made me cry after less than five minutes. It's also one of the very few TV movies to ever make me cry at all; in fact, I wept more or less throughout the viewing. In this hour-long, frank but respectful dramatization of the men behind Laurel & Hardy, we are offered touching insights into what the one man meant to the other, both in a professional and personal way.

First of all, don't expect STAN to be a biography; not a detailed one, anyway. While it depends on few significant inaccuracies, it is how our heroes are brought to life, through some incredible characterizations and a well narrated, heartfelt script that are the main forces of the film. The performance that impressed me the most, I think, was Jim Norton's portrayal of the elder Stan. He not only physically resembles the comedian quite a bit, but he also manages to capture the complexity and mannerisms that one expects from such a partly troubled comic genius. While his difficult traits are covered by all means, he does in the end come off as a really nice guy who simply didn't always know how to handle certain problems in life; in other words, he was pretty much like everybody else, with his amazing comic gift being the exception. Although that gift was most evident in his active years, it is put beyond any doubt that it always remained with him; at one point, the elder Stan improvises an hilarious sketch to the dying Hardy, involving the boys going off to outer space by accident! But even though Stan was the major gag-man, Laurel & Hardy would never have hit without the other half, which thankfully is made every bit as clear. Hardy had as much of acting talent as his pal, which the elder Stan here expresses beautifully. However, as he didn't spend much time at the studio after working hours, in contrast to Stan, his contributions have to a large degree been overshadowed, and, I say it a last time now, so very undeservedly so. You may not have considered it before, but the bewildered, utterly ridiculous gestures of Laurel wouldn't have been so exasperatedly funny without Hardy's unpredictable temper, with his long, quietly frustrated staring into the camera.

Trevor Cooper isn't given much to say as the dying Hardy, but his performance as a man beware of his critical situation whilst unable to fight it is flawless. I often expected him to burst out one of his trademark lines, even though I knew it wouldn't happen. Likewise, Mike Goodenough was superb as the younger "Babe," especially on the few instances when he impersonated him as seen on screen. Nik Howden has got the most praise for his portrayal of the younger Stan, and he is very good indeed, although I think he occasionally tended to fall into a trap all too common for anyone playing full-blooded, proud English-men, and exaggerate a bit. But that is only a minor complaint.

Even though it really wasn't necessary, what STAN did to me was reminding me how highly I regard the boys and how much their comedy has meant to me, indifferent what mood I'm in. I warmly recommend it to any fan of the boys, and wish it would see a release on DVD soon.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Artfully moving and though provoking.
philw114 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I'm not a great lover of fictionalised history (and any drama that purports to show the private meeting of two men many years ago is just that) but 'Stan' was so well written that it won me over completely. It doesn't matter that the meeting is speculative because the general theme (love, loss and the constructive and destructive power of memories) is universal. There's enough obvious truth in what Stan is saying to Ollie to transcend any historical inaccuracy and for that I am impressed. The play (for that is what it is) concerns the final meeting of a melancholic Stan Laurel and a dying Oliver Hardy. Stan is not at all happy to be asked to visit Ollie because he can barely face the emotional trauma of having to face the loss of his friend and business partner. This runs deep because Stan knows that the instant Ollie dies then a part of himself dies too because they are inseparable as a comedy unit. Much of the production is flashback that illuminates the reasons for Stan's depression and attitude to other people in the context of his (almost) one sided conversation with the seriously ill Mr Hardy. There's a magnificent moment when Stan, referring to his 3rd (and most troublesome) wife says "Without her it'd be just me and the darkness". Heavy stuff. I really enjoyed 'Stan' and watched it for the second time tonight which was interesting because there's a semi-hidden running joke that is fun to watch developing once you understand the punchline to come (it involves Ollie's water and a misinterpretation by Stan and fulfills the eternal maxim of 'leave the audience laughing').
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A brilliant, moving and poignant account of the final meeting between Laurel and Hardy, the great comedy duo.
adrianconlonjones2 June 2006
I loved this film. It's exactly what's missing on British TV at the moment: drama of the highest quality. There was no ludicrous plot, smoke, mirrors, explosions or some ridiculous high concept. The drama simply relied on brilliant acting, a wonderful script and superb direction.

Oliver Hardy (the fat one, for those who get the two mixed up) lies ill in bed, hanging on to life after a major stroke. Stan Laurel (not the fat one) is a man suffering under the weight of his own demons. Reluctantly, he comes to visit his ailing best friend - knowing it to be the last time he will ever do so. Together they broach the highs and lows of their shared history and reveal the fascinating story of their friendship and career together.

Jim Norton, playing the older Stan, was a revelation - why is an actor of this quality not doing more leads in more films????? There was also a seamless movement between the two time periods that was not only visually effective but emotionally effective. Neil Brand fills the film with superb detail but it is his handle on the emotional journey that proves the most successful aspect of his writing. By the final scene, this isn't Laurel and Hardy saying farewell, this is simply two best friends saying goodbye. As their final moment together arrives, I even had a tear in my eye - and that's a rare thing for me and TV drama.

True - I could have done with more exteriors and it is odd that Hardy lives in the same house all his life - but I suspect this was a budget thing (I could be wrong, who knows but I'll give them the benefit of the doubt) - and their device of keeping all the memories 'in a studio' and was a brilliant way of making a silk purse out of a sow's ear.

BBC4 have recently come up trumps with this kind of drama - the Kenneth William's biopic was the last thing I saw on this channel which was also good - and long may they continue to do so. Just why aren't the people who make this kind of film not making more for the terrestrial wing of the BBC whose dramas often lack the inventiveness and originality of this kind of work?
26 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Never meet your heroes
pdmb8 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I approached this with trepidation, knowing that it painted a fairly unflattering portrayal of Stan Laurel. However, it has to be said that it was a very moving piece that captured the obvious affection between the two men, even if Laurel in real (younger) life was a very difficult man who made life hell for many of those around him.

All were superb (particularly the young Laurel) although the younger Hardy's accent came and went. Hardy was a Georgian and yet his accent here seemed a mix of English and Noo-Yawk. This might seem a tad picky but there was none of that 'Southern Gentleman' that we know and love him for. The elder Hardy, however, bore an uncanny resemblance (although he never spoke). The elder Laurel, played by the always excellent Jim Norton, was also an inspired piece of casting in terms of resemblance. Perhaps the writers tried (and I'm quoting 'The Independent' of 7/6/06 here) to shoehorn too many L&H references into the hour but overall this was a very well written and performed piece.

However, if you've grown up idolising them as the finest comedy duo of all time, you could probably have done without being force-fed the younger Stan's less endearing side and instead remember him as the comic genius he was.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The real Laurel and Hardy story told at last...
dash-wortley6 June 2006
A drama we have been waiting for, for so many years. A drama about the "real" Laurel and Hardy. As a fan of the comic duo for many years, I have waited with baited breath for a Hollywood movie of their lives-without any satisfaction. Not one. But then along comes a television drama to set the ball rolling, and hopefully, soon, Hollywood may just listen. This excellent drama, shown on the BBC in the UK, tells the story of Stan Laurel, visiting his friend Oliver Hardy in 1957, sadly on his death bed, having suffered a stroke some months previous. The story follows Stan and Ollie through flashbacks of their career highlights, and shows us the real duo-the ambitious Stan, an opposite of his screen persona, and Ollie, very close to the screen version we all love, eager at the end of the working day for his round of golf. All in all an absolute must for Laurel and Hardy fans worldwide-and Hollywood-we are waiting for the the big screen biopic.
18 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
excellent
dwf7 June 2006
I have just finished watching the repeat on BBC4 and I finished with a mixture of tears and laughter. Jim Norton (Bishop Len Brennan from the wonderful Father Ted) was very convincing as Stan although I did notice his Irish accent. The actor playing the younger Stan was just about perfect.

I have been a fan for more years than I care to remember and the whole thing rang very true, even the last scene with someone ringing him up and being invited over. How many great stars kept their entry in the phone book.

I heard some of it on Radio 4 last year and was delighted to see that it would be redone for TV and I was not disappointed.

Please don't let Hollywood anywhere near this, just show this little Gem
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worst depiction of two of the best comics in history.
mikeeboy2 July 2019
I was genuinely excited to watch this, but as soon as old Stan opened his mouth, I knew it was doomed. Why wouldn't the actor at least get close to Stan's accent. At the very least, get young Stan and old Stan to have the same accent. To paint Stan Laurel as an angry man, and to suggest that there was ill feeling towards each other is such a wasted opportunity. Do not watch this if you are a Laurel and Hardy fan, as I am. Watch Stan and Ollie instead, a far better portrayal of the comic legends.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
every now and then.......
amandaholdenkiss19 July 2006
every now and then on British TV we still get the occasional perfect drama that reminds you how good writing and acting can click together so well. 'Conspiracy' was a classic example and watching Stan tonight has confirmed it. In fact, I only saw the last 20 minutes, from the scene in Hal Roache's office, but I knew instantly that I was watching something special. That economical dialogue in just one scene told me so much about the two main characters. The final scene was laughter and tears and a true analysis of a brotherly-friendship that can last a lifetime, literally to death. I'm going to wait up till 2am in the morning to watch the whole production. Only thing I don't understand - why isn't the actor who played 'young Stan' mentioned in the credits?
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Worth watching for the End scene
stevenmcglinchey19 June 2021
It may be no masterpiece, but this poignant biopic is quite moving. In the recent wake of the Stan & Ollie movie, this take on the story of these two extraordinary gentlemen stands up pretty well. The final scene had me in stitches and tears. Watch it and then stick on some Laurel & Hardy.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Exceptional Entertainment
Michael_Elliott27 November 2017
Stan (2006)

*** 1/2 (out of 4)

Stan Laurel (Jim Norton) is at home watching some of his old movies when he gets a phone call that his former partner Oliver Hardy (Trevor Cooper) is on his death bed. Stan pays him a visit in this adaptation of the Neil Brand play.

STAN really is a very good little gem that fans of Laurel and Hardy should enjoy. I think some people might be disappointed to see how Laurel was but I guess we're at a point in time when we shouldn't expect our screen heroes to be perfect angles. With that being said, this is an extremely entertaining and touching look at the two legends.

I wasn't familiar with the play before watching this television movie but I did find it to be extremely moving and especially the final few moments. I really thought there was some nice humor throughout the picture and there's no question that both actors really nailed their parts. This was especially true for Norton. That role was a lot more challenging and there's no doubt that he nailed the human qualities of the role.

If you're a fan of Laurel and Hardy then you certainly need to watch this film. It clocks in just under a hour but it'll certainly make you want to watch the duo's films again.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
unsatisfied
oscar-3522 April 2013
Warning: Spoilers
*Spoiler/plot- Stan, 2006. A fictional film about the friendship and conflicts of the comedy team of Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy through the years.

*Special Stars- Jim Norton, Trevor Cooper, Nik howden, Mike Goodenough.

*Theme- Comedy isn't easy, it's hard.

*Trivia/location/goofs- British. TV movie. Older Stan has no English accent, where the younger Stan does.

*Emotion- As a long-time fan of this comedy team, I was interested in seeing this film because it might shed some light on their private lives dynamic between these stars. I found this film to be too uninteresting, static, and un-entertaining due to it's simple production errors. The important personal speaking accents come and go. There was a lack of location shooting makes the plot boringly static. There were little insights other than showing Oliver Hardy's personality as being less manic and more personable than his on film character with dealing with Stan Laurel. I found this film missing what I was seeking and so I was unsatisfied as a viewer Laurel & Hardy fan.

*Based On- Neil Brand play
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed