Dylan Dog: Dead of Night (2010) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
84 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
No Groucho? No problem
paperback_wizard30 April 2011
Okay, so the movie isn't set in London. So there is no Inspector Bloch, Dr. Xabaras, or Groucho Marx. So the zombies are more Shaun of the Dead than Dawn of the Dead. It's still a good movie.

Dylan Dog: Dead of Night stars Brandon Routh (Superman Returns, Scott Pilgrim vs. the World) as the eponymous "nightmare investigator", with Sam Huntington (Being Human) as his undead sidekick, Marcus. When the movie begins, Dylan has retired from keeping tabs on the paranormal beings that walk among us (and they walk all among us), and has settled into a more conventional private detective gig. One day, though, a potential client named Elizabeth (Anita Briem, Journey to the Center of the Earth) tries to hire Dylan to solve the death of her father. He refuses, until he returns to his office that night to discover Marcus has also been killed. The two slayings are just the beginning, as Dylan, his now zombified assistant, and Elizabeth crisscross New Orleans in search of the monsters responsible.

Now, readers of the Italian comic books on which the film is based have blasted the movie for its "unfaithfulness" to the original works by Tiziano Sclavi. While it would have been nice to see Brandon Routh playing the clarinet once or twice, the realities of movie-making must intrude at some point. A low budget, for example, means not being able to film in London, where the comics are set. The American city of New Orleans probably comes closest in old school creepiness, though (apologies to the people of New Orleans; and of London, I guess). The same goes for Groucho Marx, the black-and-white era comedian on whom the comics' Dylan's assistant is based and whose likeness is very expensive to use in the States. While they show pictures of people in Groucho glasses and posters for Marx Brothers movies, the cost for securing the rights to have an imitator was likely quite high. Even the American adaptation of the comics had to "shave" Groucho's mustache and change his name to Felix for similar reasons. Sam Huntington more than fills the role of "comedy sidekick", though, as he struggles to adjust to the fact that he's dead; and he and Routh have excellent chemistry due to their time working together on Superman Returns.

Anita Briem's character seems like a bit of a misfire at times, but she certainly follows the path of most female characters in the comics. Often, Dylan Dog finds himself taking the case of an attractive young woman who has lost a loved one (or several) and needs his help coming to grips with the supernatural world into which she's been thrust. And while the supernatural world of the movie differs noticeably from that of the comics, the atmosphere it presents is almost instantly recognizable. The walk they take through the streets at night as Dylan tries to open her eyes to the presence of the undead as they literally pass in front of her eyes would not have seemed out of place on Sclavi's pages, I feel. Sure, the monsters themselves are different, but again, you've gotta give American moviegoers a bone every now and then, show them something they'll recognize, as well.

And then there's Dylan himself. Brandon Routh is a fine actor; I don't think anyone can deny that. He works very well with what he's given, and in this case, he did an excellent job as Dylan Dog. The movie character shared much in common with the comics character: mistrust of technology (the comics Dylan refuses to use a cell phone, the movie Dylan still uses cameras with film in them); a deep, brooding disinterest in the world at large; drives the same VW Bug, even though the colors have been inverted; and, though some may disagree, he even looks a lot like the Dylan from the comics. Dylan is an old school private investigator, whether he's investigating the living, the dead, or the undead. In the movies, though, he's given an additional role: keeping the creatures of the supernatural world from getting out of line. A pact was formed, presumably to protect the "monsters" from being wiped out entirely by humanity, and as part of that pact, a human was chosen to sort of police the undead; to keep them in check, so to speak. In our day, that's Dylan; or, at least it was until he "retired".

That last part is probably the biggest difference between the comic books and the movie. It turns the character from a sort of Philip Marlowe of the undead world into another version of Keanu Reeve's John Constantine, another movie character who wasn't that closely based on his graphic novel counterpart; and it is probably the part of the movie about which fans of the Dylan Dog comics will be the least forgiving. I'm enough of a purist myself to agree that the movie should have done more to adhere to the source material. That being said, I liked the movie a lot. I think they did a fine job with not that much in the way of resources, and they created a very believable "underground" world that could very well coexist with our own. Brandon Routh has always been a favorite actor of mine, and even if this is the latest in a string of underrated movies in which he starred, he and Sam Huntington did a great job in it.
32 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Nutshell Review: Dylan Dog: Dead of Night
DICK STEEL22 May 2011
Poor Brandon Routh. After snagging the iconic role as the Man of Steel, it's a little bit unfortunate that Bryan Singer's Superman Returns fell short of the studio's expectations, and he no longer plays a part in any future installments, starting with Zack Snyder's reboot. No matter, after all with that build and chiselled good looks, one can waltz into another superhero franchise, isn't it?

Unfortunately, Dylan Dog is an Americanized version of the Italian horror graphic novel character, and as far as adaptations of comics from another culture goes, this one hits the mark in expectations, where the source material got extremely dumbed down, its unique selling points dissolved into mediocrity and bastardized. Save for the trademarked coat and red shirt, director Kevin Munroe's vision of this character became somewhat of a generic monster hunter type of film, though a plus point would be its treatment and narrative style in full detective noir, with Routh's Dylan Dog being reluctantly pulled from retirement by his client Elizabeth (Anita Briem) to investigate the death of her father, as well as that of his assistant Marcus (Sam Huntington).

This investigative trip of course introduces the audience unfamiliar with the Dylan Dog mythos that the undead, from vampires to werewolves to zombies, all have hidden human identities and walk the Earth quite undetected, with a truce in place to keep the peace and Dylan being the only trusted human for the monsters to go to when someone crosses the line or breaks the peace. There's a little backstory here on Dylan's origins and the reasons behind his forced retirement, but nothing truly to wow or build upon any depth to the character, which is potential that's wasted in giving Dylan more meat in background, becoming instead just another human detective on his rounds.

The thrill factor of course is the make up and effects in having the monsters look their nasty part, although they aren't something that hasn't been seen before on screen. Action sequences are ho-hum, with the nagging feeling that the story by Thomas Dean Donnelly and Joshua Oppenheimer can't quite decide how to empower Dylan, making him become as powerful as Routh's previous comic book outing in at least the indestructibility factor, while equipped with some funky weapons that we should see more of. And the trailer while pretty tacky, actually summed up the entire plot, having reveal too much and letting out that the filmmakers aren't quite confident with their end product, and the marketers a little bit clueless on how to sell this film, hence its verbosity.

While Brandon Routh has a limited acting range, his physique actually suited him fine here and basically that was all that mattered, since you aren't going to remember much about his rather bland performance. Perhaps it's also because Sam Huntington, his co-star from Superman Returns as well as he played Jimmy Olsen then, scored much of the flak in this film being the very whiny assistant, whose wisecracks and constant shouting get onto your nerves, and you wonder when his character could shut up if at all for five minutes. The Marcus character doesn't exist in the books simply because of a potential copyright tussle if what was deemed as a Grucho Marx lookalike got interpreted, but this modern replacement was as unfunny as he was unnecessary in a lot of ways.

Don't expect this monster squad outing to be too cerebral. It's filled with corny one liners involving various body parts, and in essence is a poor man's cousin to Men in Black, replacing aliens in our midst with that of monsters roaming around. If only it had stuck more faithfully to its source, then it could have been something quite unique.
29 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Forgettable Adaptation of Italian Graphic Novel Series
brando64712 September 2011
The most aggravating movies, in my opinion, are the ones where the premise sounds like something that could make for a really awesome movie but the actual product falls completely flat. Dylan DOG is not a horrible movie, it's just another movie that might entertain a bit while you watch it...might elicit a chuckle at times...but overall is completely forgettable. It's based off an Italian graphic novel that I'd honestly never heard of, but might be interested in checking out to see if it's better than the movie. Dylan Dog is a private investigator in New Orleans who finds himself confronted by a part of his past that he thought he'd left behind. Before Dog began catering to the city's sleazy human population, he was an investigator for the paranormal citizens of the city: vampires, werewolves, and zombies all living quietly alongside us. When a werewolf appears to have murdered a human, Dog is drawn back in to his old life to investigate and uncovers a plot to unleash an ancient evil that could wreak havoc on the supernatural underworld before ultimately spilling over onto humanity.

I've seen this movie twice now and I can barely remember anything about it. That's not a good sign. I really thought this movie had the potential to be cool, but it feels more like a SyFy original movie. The story wanders and never builds tension. It just sort of meanders from one plot point to another, lazily following the trail of clues until the final confrontation. And the special effects...wow. I realize this film was a lower budget than usual (compared to your average Hollywood effects-heavy film) at $20 million, but come on. I've seen some pretty amazing films created out of budgets this size. DISTRICT 9 was only $30 million and that movie blew my mind with awesomeness. Dylan DOG's got a decent independent budget and the creature effects in this film feel twenty years old! For example, the "tattooed zombie", a major element of the film that couldn't be bothered with an actual identifying name, looks ridiculous. It's mouth barely moves and it's only means of intimidation is waving it's arms around like a weekly villain from the old "Power Rangers" TV show. I love practical special effects and I prefer some real well done practical creature effects over CGI anytime. But if you can't make a creature look like anything more than a bodybuilder in a bad Halloween mask, perhaps you should consider another option.

Dylan DOG is director Kevin Munroe's second film and, seeing as how his first film was the animated TMNT, I really don't know what I should've expected. TMNT was decent, but I suppose it's not hard to look better when the preceding film in the Ninja Turtle series had men in rubber turtle costumes riding horses. I have to wonder if the effects in this film were so poor, where did the budget go? It couldn't have been the cast. The movie is filled with "Hey, I know that guy from somewhere" level actors. Brandon Routh feels as if he should be A-list by now, but his project selections aren't letting him get far. He showed us he could do comedy with some great jobs in ZACK AND MIRI and SCOTT PILGRIM, but he feels flat here. A couple of one-liners, but mostly emotionless. Sam Huntington is the best part of the film as Dog's newly zombified sidekick Marcus. He gets the best parts of the film and I think the filmmakers realized this because he gets more screen-time than his character probably should. Peter Stormare, the actor with the most clout in the film, is wasted as the head of a werewolf clan and Taye Diggs doesn't feel like he's taking this thing seriously.

If I'd known ahead of time the film had given a part to pro wrestler Kurt Angle, at least I would've known what I was walking into. No offense, wrestling fans, but wrestlers suck as actors 99% of the time and Angle is no exception here (made more laugh-worthy when they strap on the lamest werewolf makeup in the last few decades). Dylan DOG feels like a movie where no one was really trying. I'm sure it was just a paycheck to some of those involved, but this has got to annoy fans of the actual graphic novel who might've been excited to see their beloved property brought to film. Dylan DOG is yet another comic property where we just need to hope that, somewhere down the line, a studio decides to reboot the series and...I don't know...try to make an entertaining film.
14 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Lameeeee
chikoglonjo12 March 2011
I'm a big fan of Dylan Dog, by the way, that is comic book, and the writer or writers of this movie haven't read a single page of it.

The story is not even close to this and the characters are all wrong presented. One of the most important character is missing, Dylan's sidekick Groucho Marx, who gives whole new dimension to the comic and is one of the reasons why is this comic so great.

This could be fun for the people who never read Dylan Dog but for us fans, this is desecration of a great comic. I'd rather recommend "Dellamorte Dellamore"(Cemetery Man) with Rupert Everett which was written by Tiziano Sclavi, the author of Dylan Dog.

For fans who like their comics with good stories and not with just "smash-bash", and who like supernatural stuff, i recommend you not to waste time with this move but to try to find comic Dylan Dog, and like me, to wait for someone to make a really good movie about Dylan Dog.
148 out of 241 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
sad sad sad
bojan-vuksanovic13 July 2011
l am a big fan of Dylan Dog comics and this is one of worst adaptation of comics ever.It seems like people who made this movie never read any DD comic, they just got a screenplay and decide to make a horror comedy or something like that. Is it really that hard to investigate, to read, to feel the atmosphere of movie. l guess it is for those moneymakers. l don't know what to think about people who are willing to spit on masterpiece as Dylan Dogs comics are. Whole generation of kids in my country grow reading DD and Alan Ford, Marvel's comics as so many people around a world and You dare to make something stupid and disappointing as this "blockbusterd" is. Shame on You guys
13 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Down, Dylan! ...That's a bad Dog!
Coventry30 April 2012
Maybe – most likely, even – I'm just a fatigue and endlessly grumbling horror fanatic, but personally I'm so sick and tired of allegedly cool & overly energetic comic book adaptations that put all sort of traditional horror themes together through a modern CGI-blender. The outcome of such a mix is hardly ever entertaining or originative, but more like boisterous, pretentious and derivative. For a very short while, I was actually very enthusiast to see "Dylan Dog", as I read that it was based on the work of the Italian comic book artist Tiziano Sclavi. This also just happens to be the inventor of "Dellamorte Dellamore"; one of the top five greatest zombie movies ever made and still one of the most shamefully underrated horror movies in the history of cinema. But then I realized again that comic book adaptations hardly ever make good films, and in most cases they barely reflect even a glimpse of the coolness of the original comic book. Sclavi's eccentric universe offers a whole lot of potential and terrific gimmicks, like first and foremost the New Orleans setting and the rather peculiar story aspect of monsters harmoniously existing together, and director Kevin Munroe ("TMNT") also tries hard to make his film accessible to all kinds of cinematic audiences, but the whole thing is just too damn derivative and reminiscent to other (also inferior) franchises like "Underworld", "Constantine", "Van Helsing", "Watchmen" and who knows what else. Brandon Routh, the new but unsuccessful Superman, depicts a different type of heroic character this time, as he's a supernatural detective and the human guardian of the peace-pact between the New Orleans' opposite monster clans. He's actually retired, as there haven't been any incidents for a while now, but the pact is rudely broken when a rich antique dealer is savagely killed by a lycanthrope of patriarch Gabriel's clan. The murder generates a bloody war with at stake an ancient religious relic holding the power to awaken an invincible demon named Belial. Along the process, Dylan's loyal assistant and comic relief character Marcus reluctantly transforms into a zombie and loses his limbs, and our private eye falls in love with the victim's daughter who clearly has a hidden agenda since the start. It's truly incomprehensible how a movie featuring so many versatile horror themes and monsters eventually results in such a dull and painfully clichéd wholesome. "Dylan Dog" doesn't feature a single highlight or memorable sequence and, on top of it all, director Munroe often reverts to rookie mistakes like the redundant narration and an overuse of comedy interludes at the expense of story coherence and/or atmosphere. The special and make-up effects, albeit plentiful, are too obviously computer engineered and hugely disrespectful towards admirers of old-fashioned horror lovers. I watched this film at the Brussels' Festival of Fantastic Films, during a midnight screening and in a theater chock-full of outrageous and hyperactive genre fanatics. The crowd's reactions were lukewarm and harsh. I guess that says enough about a film whose desperate aim is to be a crowd-pleaser
15 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
go to hell
ardglb19 June 2011
This movie is bad as an American action/comedy/horror flick and downright offensive as a DylanDog transposition.

None of the characters are there, including Dylan, the humor is not there, the sweet sadness that pervades the comic is gone, the story is gone. Instead we have a badass, wisecracking dude punching demons or zombies or whatever.

Like someone else already suggested, watch "Cemetery man" aka "Dellamorte Dellamore" instead. it's weird, not for everyone, but it's the closest thing to a DylanDog movie out there.

Either read the comics first or don't come back with a sequel
58 out of 106 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Enjoyable Flick
Adhogati10 August 2011
The present rating the move has (5.1) while absolutely understandable, is completely undeserved. I have never ever read a Dylan Dog comic. In fact, I did not even know it was a comic series till a search query told me so.

I watched the movie without any expectations and it was enjoyable. Like most movies of this genre, it was predictable in most places, but that does not take anything away from the movie.

It was a nice blend of comedy and horror. In fact, it is more of comedy and very little horror.

For an easy evening watch (like what I needed) this movie is perfect.
37 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Why? Oh why?!
splecas7 April 2011
Who doesn't know, Dylan Dog is one of "Bonelli's" characters (Italian "comic-factory") and, like many others "in-house" characters (Martin Mystere, Nathan Never,...), he is a product of...believe it or not...movies! Any classic and really known horror movie is in Dylan Dog comics - Living Dead (saga), Shining, Terminator, vampires, werewolves,... So, how to make a movie from a comic that is made from a movie(s)? Well, I bet it is possible but .... Did any of guys who were working on this movie actually read any comic of Dylan Dog?! He is detective for supernatural, an English from London, his partner is Groucho, all comics are made in really "horror-mood" so why... a comedy?!? This movie is lousy and completely....wrong! For sure, not for fans of Dylan Dog :( Hope one day somebody will make "a real" Dylan Dog movie!
57 out of 106 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An underdog of a flick, which was made for fans of the genre.
alanrayford2 May 2011
Warning: Spoilers
"Dylan Dog: Dead of Night" is an extreme underdog of a movie. It doesn't have an A-list cast. Its budget is small for a wide-released genre film. It even has the dubious distinction of being badmouthed by the Italian press well before its North American release. But, don't let any of this fool you, it's still an entertaining movie.

First off, this isn't the character created by Tiziano Sclavi. This is an approximated, overly americanized version of his seminal creation. London isn't the backdrop and there is no Groucho. So, if you grew up reading the comics, you might not recognize the character in anything other than name. However, if you never heard of Dylan Dog before, this flick, made purely for fans of the genre, should do you just fine.

Taking place in Louisiana, the story involves an impending war between varying supernatural factions over an object of great power. Some want it to ensure its safekeeping. Others want to use it to overthrow the natural order. In the middle of this is the eponymous character that gets caught in the middle, all while trying to solve a murder.

With a running time of 107 minutes and so much material to cover, it might seem things would become unbearably muddled. Thankfully this is not the case. Following Dog's investigation, we're introduced to many of the supernaturals that call the Big Easy home in a brisk, yet naturally flowing manner.

There are the werewolves headed by Gabriel (Peter Stormare). A lycanthropic man of honor, you could see how, full moon or not, he was literally fighting back the darkness just under the skin. The vampires were led by Vargas (Taye Diggs). A polar opposite of Gabriel, Vargas was gleefully opportunistic and, ultimately, a charming parasite. And then there was Big Al (Dan Braverman). He was an absolute hoot as the ever so humble owner of Zombie Mart—think of an auto supply store, but for body parts. Watching his undead clientele casually peruse the selection of arms, legs and scalps available for purchase was surreal and really conveys the tone of the movie.

Leading us through all of this was Dylan Dog (Brandon Routh). Despite being human, he was the most dangerous and resourceful person in the film. A highlight of this was when he shot his way into the vampire's stronghold in broad daylight. Cornering Vargas in his bedroom with the sunlight directly behind him, Dog used his shadow to shield Vargas from the sun. Every time the vampire lied or refused to answer a question, Dog simply moved and let him burn to force the truth—right awesome. His assistant, Marcus Adams (Sam Huntington), added some much needed comedy as he slowly came to terms with his newfound status as a zombie. He went from refusing to accept his condition, to wanting to die with dignity and, finally, to acceptance. He even gets to be the hero by wielding his own, severed arm as a club. The client, Elizabeth Ryan (Anita Briem) at first seemed to be a typical dame in peril. But, as the story progressed, it became apparent she was hiding a secret—one which provided the best fight scene in the film.

So yeah, some of the creature effects were a bit less than inspired—werewolf designs have been in decline since Landis' 1981 masterpiece. Dog lived through so many hard, bone-rattling and body flying through the air blows, it started to become a little bit too unreal by the film's end. Also, while he's come a very long way since "Superman Returns", I felt Brandon Routh came off as playing himself pretending to be Dylan Dog instead of just being the character. It wasn't a big deal here, but it was noticeable. All he needs to do is completely let go of himself and, between the calls of action and cut, simply be whoever he's signed on to play.

Despite these minor nitpicks, Dylan Dog is a good movie that never once lost sight of what it was or what it was supposed to be. I'm pretty sure it won't do much business in this day and age of animated features, rom-com's and remakes. But that doesn't mean I didn't have a blast watching this in the theater and won't be waiting for this on DVD. If you're a fan of properties like "Men in Black", "Hellboy" and "Ghostbusters", you owe it to yourself to check this out on the big screen—it was tailor made for people like us. No, it's not a flawless film. But, it is still one hell of a fun ride that never once drags.
17 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Didn't meet low expectations
truromanic27 September 2011
"Everybody else will have a better time revisiting Monster Squad or falling asleep." This was a quote from David White from Movies.com....I should have took heed.

Let me preface this by saying I never knew of any comic book by this name.

I like reading users reviews. Critics can be...well very critical. And at times it seems that they take good movies and just rip them apart until there's nothing left but an unstable skeleton missing all ligaments and tendons. BUT, their reviews of this movie are far more on point than many users.

The movie is exhausting and dragging. There has been only 3 movies that I fell asleep on or didn't finish and this is one of them. I did watch enough to critique though...I fell asleep on the last 15 minutes of the movie and I am not captivated enough to finish it. Much of the acting was below average at best and few characters were believable, including the lead. I don't like spoilers so I won't give any examples, but just look at his expressions when he should have been shocked or surprised and he might as well found a penny on the ground. The romantic attraction wasn't built up nor convincing.

Many lines were corny. Most of the costumes, especially the werewolves were lame - I've seen equivalents at Halloween parties. But to give credit the unique zombie had a good costume though. If you can think of movies where people are constantly punched and kicked and walk away with a small bruise on their face (if anything at all) - this is one of those movies. I know a movie about zombies, vampires and werewolves doesn't represent the most realistic plot but come on...at least try to make something believable. I laughed at 2 scenes which is why the movie got 1 star and the sidekick and Tay Diggs (albeit terrible dialogue) were almost enjoyable, giving the 2 star rating. Had this movie been an episode of Outer Limits I would have given it a 4/5 due to the low expectations of a genre series.

My review stops there so you can stop reading if you want...I'm jumping on a soapbox for a moment. People have the tendency to vote reviews as not helpful if they don't agree with you - not if what the reviewer is saying is true. I'm sure that these are the same kind of people that hate personal criticism, even when it's constructive. I have my guilty pleasures that the general public think suck but the reviews on those movies are usually spot on (but for some silly reason I like the movie). People should try that on for size...you don't have to dislike something to admit it's shortcomings.
12 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A really enjoyable movie
gavynhelfyre3 May 2011
Let me first say that 90% of the people who will come to this page should ignore most of the bad reviews for this film. After looking through them, they seem to all have one thing in common - anger that this doesn't seem like a faithful adaptation.

I'm willing to bet that most of the US audience for this film has never read the Dylan Dog comics, and, like me, had never heard of Dylan Dog before hearing the title of this movie.

Now, putting aside the negativity that comes from fans of the source material, I think most fans of the genre will like this movie. It is very in the vein of things like Joss Whedons Buffy & Angel as well as sharing some similarities to things like Constantine and the Dresden Files book series. Let's be honest, this is urban fantasy. Most people know if they enjoy the genre or not.

The film does a decent job of keeping a film noir tone, and using noir tropes to it's advantage. Routh is good as the title character, doing a nice job of trying to be the tired detective without being a weary stereotype. Sam Huntington is great as Marcus, who I think ends up stealing the movie because he really has the lions share of memorable moments.

Yes, chances are you'll figure out the who done it before the movie reveals it, and you'll figure out impending double crosses from the moment characters are introduced. That's the danger of being a genre film, but it doesn't detract from the fact that the movie is really fun, and very funny in quite a few places.

If you like things like Buffy, Constantine or Harry Dresden, give this movie a chance cause I think you will probably end up liking it.
90 out of 145 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The George Lazenby of 'Superman' films stars in yet another comic book adaptation, this time as a supernatural private eye!
Hellmant11 May 2011
'DYLAN DOG: DEAD OF NIGHT': Three and a Half Stars (Out of Five)

The George Lazenby of 'Superman' films Brandon Routh stars in yet another comic book adaptation, in this one he's a private eye who specializes in the supernatural (Routh only played Superman once in 'SUPERMAN RETURNS' before being replaced, like Lazenby only played James Bond once). The film is based on an Italian horror comic titled 'Dylan Dog', which premiered in the 1980's and was created by author Tiziano Sclavi. This film was written by Thomas Dean Donnelly and Joshua Oppenheimer and directed by Kevin Munroe (who's only other feature directing credit is the 2007 animated 'TMNT' film). It co-stars Sam Huntington as Dylan Dog's zombie sidekick (Huntington also played sidekick to Routh in 'SUPERMAN RETURNS' as Jimmy Olsen). The film has gotten horrible reviews from the critics, performed dismally at the box office and p----- off die-hard fans of the comic book (who say it's completely unfaithful to the source material). I happened to like the film though and found it surprisingly entertaining.

Dylan Dog (Routh) is a P.I. who used to specialize in cases involving the supernatural due to his expertise and knowledge in the area. He's long given that up and has taken up normal routine cases involving the likes of catching a cheating spouse on camera in the act. He's pulled back into the world of vampires, werewolves and ghouls when a young woman (Anita Briem) calls looking for the Dylan Dog of yesteryear. He initially rejects the case, wanting nothing to do with that part of his life anymore, but finds himself once again caught up in his old ways when his assistant (Huntington) is killed and turned into a zombie (which in this film are not brain dead but in fact think like everyone else).

The film has been criticized by fans and critics alike for taking far too many creative liberties with the comic book source material (like setting the film in New Orleans rather than London and changing Dog's sidekick from a Groucho Marx impersonator to a friendly zombie) but many of those changes were done due to budget restraints. The movie was made for just $20 million, which is pretty low budget by Hollywood standards, and it's actually surprising that the film was even released in theaters (although it only received a limited release). So the weak box office performance isn't all that surprising, I'm sure it will do much better on video and hopefully live on to be a cult classic. I never read the comic or knew anything about it prior to first hearing about the film so I had no preconceived expectations (in that way) going into the movie, although I did know about it's weak critic and fan rating and poor box office numbers so I actually was expecting very little from the film (which is the best way to go into a movie in my opinion). So due to my expectations I was pretty pleasantly surprised by the film. It is very funny at times as well as thrilling and a nice piece of stylized genre monster film. It's got all of my favorite elements of this type of flick. Routh is adequate in the lead (I actually like Routh and am disappointed he won't be playing 'Superman' again) and Huntington is a scene stealer. The directing is decent and the writing is amusing. It's got a strong 'BUFFY' and 'SUPERNATURAL' feel to it as well, so if you're a fan of either of those TV series you'll probably like the film also. It's just a fun time at the movies so if you're not a big fan of the comic (and therefor not looking for a sincere adaptation) you'll probably enjoy it as well.

Watch our review show 'MOVIE TALK' at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aotBOLCP-Yg
13 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
So much potential gone to waste...
Scholai18 June 2011
To me sometimes it seems that American filmmakers underestimate the American public by making these kind of movies. I'm big fan of the comic book Dylan Dog and it is really shame that the authors did not follow the comics in any essential aspect. I'm not even talking about changing of location or lack of Dylan's assistant Groucho, but a complete lack of any sense for original comic.

Dylan Dog is not suppose to be an action comedy, it is a comic with eerie atmosphere and a small dose of humor. Dylan Dog is an eccentric and a loner who has a very large sexual appetite that manifests in his constant one night stands. Torn between the life we live in where he is the subject of ridicule and the world in which he works where he becomes a hero. Tales of Dylan Dog are not about monsters, vampires or werewolves. Those creatures only serve to subtly explore the stories about great philosophical themes like life, death, loss, monsters in people and people in monsters, grief, happiness, love, etc., leaving the end most of the times incomplete for reader to interpret.

At the end I assume that people who love movies about vampires and werewolves will love this mediocre movie but it is a shame that American filmmakers have not had the courage to take inspiration in uniqueness of this comic and make it something more rather then cheap copy of movies we already saw for like hundreds of times..
14 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Predictable, boring, dumb and with visual's that are bad for the eighties. Well, early nineties.
axismladen28 July 2011
Dylan Dog: Dead Of Night is as far from the actual Dylan Dog as a movie based on it can actually be. I read somewhere that this was not supposed to be a Dylan Dog movie, but that the title was put during the production to get some marketing. If it's true, than it's no surprise. But truth or not, that doesn't change the fact that the movie would suck anyway.

------------

While the comic book's are something of a horror written like movie noir with some elements of comedy, this is just a dumb movie that tries to mix action and horror genre with comedy and fails at all three disastrously. Also, it need's to be mentioned that some of the most important character's from the comic book's are not even in it. In the matter of fact, there is Dylan Dog and that's it. And not to mention that Dylan's character in this film is nothing like Dylan in the comic books. This guy is more like Rambo off steroids with a teenagers personality. And while all those flaws could even somehow be accepted if it wasn't a Dylan Dog movie, the fact that every scene is there for only one purpose and that is to lead to another dumb, action packed sequence, and that the dialog is so stupid that a child can say 'it's obviously written', all of it together just makes it too bad to be bearable. There are plenty of movies out there that are bad adaptations and that are plain simply bad movies, but they at least tend to have something to offer. Something like a brainless entertainment. This one can't offer anything. Not even that. It's boring and dumb, it's trash. And just for the record, werewolves and vampires are not supposed to look the same. And when the entire movie is about someone trying to bring back to life a super powerful monster, make sure that the monster is actually powerful instead of just knowing some karate and having wings and horns.

------------

And the cinematography... Oh God. Let's just say that if i had a son, and if i bought him a cheap indie camera, and if i would give him a set of lights, he'd make it look better. Actually, forget that last part. He wouldn't need a set of lights. And i don't know who directed this, but he should stop directing.

------------

Dylan Dog: Dead Of Night is a predictable, boring and dumb movie with terrible acting all around, that has nothing to do with it's title. No matter what you do, make sure you avoid watching it. Especially if you are a fan of the comic books.
14 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
$20million Budget? are you kidding me, where was the money invested?
saadgkhan24 August 2011
Dylan DOG – TRASH IT ( D ) There are only two which can describe this movie "Load and tacky", it literally gave me a headache. The whole movie is a complete mess with unimpressive characters. Brandon Routh really needs to get some serious acting chops. I've defended him over the years as Superman but not anymore. "table for Three" and now this Brandon Routh was completely dreadful in the movie. He was completely atrocious. Sam Huntington is funny as Undead Zombie. Anita Briem is pretty but her role was very typical. Taye Digg was same as he is 90% of his movie roles. overall, its dreadful, if you've brain don't use on this One.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
If you are a Dylan Dog fan do not watch this.
vedad_durmisevic23 September 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Why do i hate this movie?Simple,I am a big Dylan Dog fan.I understand that people write good reviews for this movie because they don't know the character of Dylan Dog,the comic or any thing else.From a non Dylan fan i would give this movie a 6/10.From a Dylan fan perspective i gave it a 3/10 because it had some mediocre stuff.First thing is that almost all the characters are gone.Second they made Dylan such a pathetic guy,he doesn't want to work with nobody,in the comics he almost always works with hot and sexy women witch in this case she is not that hot AND THEY MADE IT A FREAKING COMEDY,wtf.Dylan dog has a little bit comedy from Groucho.Why do people always wanna change the things we love(Groucho).A little detail i want to say is that in the comic books his license plate says DYD 666,THEY Couldn't EVEN PUT THAT,another thing is when the F did Dylan move to America.They just messed up badly.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What is this crap ????
bikey127727 June 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This isn't Dylan Dog. I've read the comics since I was a kid. This is nothing like the comics. For all that don't already know. Dylan Dog is like a Sherlock Holmes for the supernatural. He always wears the same clothes, he plays the clarinet, lives in London ( not New Orleans ), his assistant looks like Groucho Marx not a zombie, he is a reformed alcoholic and has many many fears and phobias. One of the most notable is claustrophobia, which is ignored by the makers of this movie, as they shot a scene where Dylan is sealed into a crypt with his zombie assistant. He stays cool as ice while the zombie guy freaks out. Thank you, writers and producers, for making him the most uninteresting person in the world. For those, who know the comic and like it, please don't watch the movie. Its not Dylan Dog. It doesn't come even close.

And the movie, if we suppose the title would be John Smith: Dead of Night, is as bad as it gets. New Orleans is apparently littered with zombies, werewolves and vampires. You just have to look closer. Zombies are everywhere. They work in fast food joints, the morgue, walk the streets at night, have zombie support groups...Vampires make their money peddling their own blood as a party drug. And werewolves supply the city with meat. Makes sense. On the whole this movie is only slightly better than the Uwe Boll stuff. The plot is not worth mentioning. The acting? Don't know, really. The zombie assistant did yell a lot. And Routh or whatshisname speaks with the same tone of voice during the entire movie. Doesn't matter where he is and what he is doing. The girl's accent seemed to change for about three times during the whole movie. Even the special effects are horrible. The vampires and werewolves look about the same. The latter just have more hair. Peter Stromare is a good actor and is convincing as an alpha male of the werewolf family. Sadly his part in the movie is small. Taye Diggs is unconvincing as the head of the 'trueblood' vampire family. His portrayal of the bad guy in the movie is useless. I don't know how much of that is his fault because the script is so weak. Most of the action sequences feature Dog fighting vampires or werewolves. Its your basic shootout and fistfight routine. The zombies are there for the laughs. You might get a few at the beginning but all the clichés and Huntington antics combined with a loud high-pitched voice get annoying as the movie progresses. I would have probably left the movie before the ending if the plot would not promise me the reincarnation of Belial, the demon. I was curious to see this beast. Boy, was I wrong. It was a spectacle. They failed spectacularly. It looked like it was made out of plastic. Was there a budget issue? Did they run out of money so they thought they'd save some by using cheap but crappy special effects?

So much potential and such a screw up. The name Dylan Dog is in the title just to get a few dollars more out of the comic fans. I can't think of any other reason. This one makes Constantine and Keanu Reeves look brilliant.
13 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Something lurks in the dead of night...
paul_haakonsen23 August 2011
Well, first of all I should say that I am not familiar with Dylan Dog prior to having seen this movie, so I wasn't sure what I was in for and what it was all about. I do remember having seen the name, Dylan Dog, somewhere in an old computer game, or at least so I believe. And that is all the prior knowledge I had of it before the movie.

Now that I have sat through the movie, I can honestly say that this movie was actually quite nice. It had a fairly decent storyline, and it got you from point A to B in a good pace, and there were some good story plots and twists along the way. Basically, the story is about Dylan Dog, a private investigator who have retired from his job as a watcher of the affairs of the undead. Now that there have been recent killings involving the undead, he is back in business. But all is not what it seems. Werewolves, vampires and zombies are on the loose and someone is endeavoring to unleash something far more sinister.

The people they cast for the movie was actually quite nice. Good acting and good performances here. Brandon Routh (playing Dylan Dog) did a really good job with his character. But he was helped well along by Sam Huntington (playing Marcus), his friend turned into zombie. These two really carried the movie, but of course the other people did good as well.

"Dylan Dog: Dead of Night" got enough mixture of action, drama and comedy to make it work so well. There was a decent amount of fight scenes, and they worked well. What I particularly liked in the movie, was the zombie support group. That idea was hilarious.

The effects and make-up in the movie were good as well. Personally I could have used more decaying zombies, where you get to see some more gross stuff, but it worked well enough, as you weren't in doubt of who were zombies. They really made Belial look cool, especially upon his full transformation with the horns and body spikes. So hats off to the special effects people on this.

"Dylan Dog: Dead of Night" provides good entertainment for an evening, and it is well worth a watch if you like pseudo-horror/comedy movies. I liked the mixture of vampires, werewolves and zombies, because it worked well enough, without being sanctimonious like many other of todays movies in the vampire, werewolf and zombie genre.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
As I unfortunately expected - very, very lame
vaske-yu8517 June 2011
Groucho Marx is missing?! I don't have anything more to say, but since I have to (which is weird) I can tell you that I'm sorry for all those kids who had never been raised up reading this comic and now they'll have the opportunity to see something that has nothing in common with the real master piece of Tiziano Sclavi, Claudio Villa, Angelo Stano, Bruno Brindisi, Giovanni Freghieri ... and others. I also must say that I'm surprised Tiziano even approved this project in the first place. As soon as I've heard the rumors (around 3 years ago) that Brandon Routh is gonna play the main role I knew it's gonna be bad. Pretty face is selling - principle, so sad. So many great stories, it's a miracle how did they even accomplish to spoil it?? As someone said, probably Mr. Kevin Munroe didn't read any of Dylan's comics. For all Dylan Dog fans out there: You can easily skip this one, you won't miss anything apart from disappointment.
13 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Had some potential but really never takes off
Robert_duder26 January 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Dylan Dog might have been outstanding as a TV series...especially on a station like the CW because it had a distinct "Supernatural" "Buffy The Vampire Slayer" feel to it though it never reaches that level of entertainment but they do try and cram a lot into a small movie. The budget on this film was enormous compared to the final product. I can't believe they got a twenty million dollar budget. Everything was just done averagely. At the same time the film also felt like it was almost too ambitious packing in zombies, vampires, werewolves, murder mystery, comedy, action all at once. I know nothing of Dylan Dog and the comic books so I went into this blindly and simply for entertainment value. While it wasn't completely without charm it certainly misses the mark.

I am a fan of Brandon Routh, first as Superman, which I enjoyed despite other opinions, and then on Chuck (which sadly ends tomorrow night for the record.) So I was eager to see him in another leading role. The role suits him for the most part and he does well. The Sam Spade type narration is kind of fun and he certainly pulls off the action scenes well enough but is bogged down by an overwrought script. Sam Huntington plays his sidekick who becomes a zombie. He is entirely meant for comic relief and the chemistry between him and Routh is good but unfortunately Huntington is overused for laughs and becomes the Jar Jar Binks of Dylan Dog. He is silly and never gets any real depth to his character. Anita Briem's character should have been a vital role to the story and she actually gets some really good scenes towards the end but up until then she is underused and underdeveloped like much of the film. Same could be said for Taye Diggs, who is an excellent actor, and really could have been something as the vampire villain but instead is used as almost fodder for Dylan Dog and gets very little good screen time. He's supposed to be the 'big bad' but is reduced to barely supporting character.

I knew almost immediately while watching this that the director was probably very new to the big screen and sure enough Kevin Munroe has one other credit and its animated. He doesn't have the skill or experience to handle the content of this film. It should have a terrific supernatural action flick with a touch of comedy and instead it turns out to be a real mess with no clear direction or experience. As I said it is entertaining and has its moments and some of the special effects are great to look at but unfortunately its immature and poorly made for the most part. 6/10
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
That's not Dylan Dog
kazanian421 March 2011
The previous review looks to be written by the director. Most part of the fans have no decided to suppress the movie before its coming in cinemas. Many fans watched the movie because of the title of the movie, and I can say they are right in defending the one of the most famous comic books in Italy. Our product has been damaged by the director, Brandon Routh and the screenwriters. They probably haven't read one page of the comics. They decided to use the name to sell the movie. It looks a mixture of the bad copy of Buffy and Constantine. At the beginning the movie was to be titled Derek Donovan, I would have been much better if that happened. But it's Bonelli's fault who sold the right of the movie to Americans without any garantee. That's because Italy has no big production companies. You can find the real Dylan Dog in "The Cemetery Man" even though the character is different. Probably the director thought that with the clothes of Dylan Dog, you have Dylan Dog. There isn't the nightmares, the fears, the anxiety, the terror of the comics. Highly not recommended.
35 out of 77 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
This is an enjoyable supernatural action film if you don't read the comic first.
suite9225 September 2013
Warning: Spoilers
In previous years, Dylan Dog was an arbiter of all issues among undead parties; he was respected by all, and he helped keep the peace. Something went badly wrong, though, and now he is a private detective who investigates infidelity for the most part.

A killing by a werewolf draws him back into the fray. The victim is Elizabeth's father, an importer (well, smuggler) of rare items. He is rumored to have an object of rare power which will change the balances among the undead factions.

Elizabeth hires Dylan to find her father's killer, but the movie is about Dylan trying to circumvent an all out war among the undead. Along the way, we meet werewolves, vampires, zombies, and ghouls (humans who mainline on vampire blood for strength and youth).

Much of the action is about finding the Heart of Belial, which is sufficient to bring back Belial himself, a demon of unsurpassed strength. Vargas wants to use Belial to put down all the other undead factions. Then again, so does someone else, which is an interesting twist.

----Scores----

Cinematography: 10/10 Always good.

Sound: 10/10 Fine. The actors were well-miked, and the incidental music was good.

Acting: 7/10 Anita Briem was really weak, but I enjoyed most of the other characters as played by Routh, Stormare, Angle, Huntington.

Screenplay: 8/10 The story has a well-defined beginning, a long middle, and a conclusive ending. Exposition of motivation was fine. I read other reviews after seeing the film, and I'm glad I never looked at the comic of the same name. Most of the negative energy against the film seemed to arise from the fans of the comic.

Special Effects: 8/10 Mostly good.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Criminally Underrated Genre Mash-Up
JackCowart3416 June 2022
I find movies that you can't necessarily categorize into a single genre pretty interesting. Even if sometimes they fall flat, at least they're trying to produce something original. If I had to categorize Dylan Dog: Dead of Night I'd say it's a horror/comedy that incorporates elements of a detective/drama. It's based off of an Italian comic book, but apparently is not very faithful to the source material. That doesn't bother me in the slightest having never read the comic book. The performances are very solid, from the lead characters down to the actors who were only given a scene, with nobody seeming misplaced or miscast. Specifically, Peter Stormare rises above the rest of the talented cast and is electric. The story is interesting enough to hold your attention, and each scene appears to have a purpose. The dialogue can be clunky at times, but at other times rather witty. I'm honestly not sure why this film was so poorly received. I ended up buying the blu-ray, because I couldn't find it on a single streaming service. I'm pleased with the fact that I'll have it from here on out whenever I'm in the mood to indulge in this unique film.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Dylan Dog: Dead of Night
Scarecrow-886 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
How can a movie that has zombies, werewolves, vampires, and a giant demonic creature named Belial be so freakin' boring?!?! Brandon Routh is as dull as the movie, portraying handsome human hero, Dylan, chosen by the monsters to service their need to keep the peace (yes, a human as peace maker for all the monsters, I laughed a lot at this idea) between True Bloods (the vampires) and Gabriel's family (the werewolves), who operate a meat packing plant (yes, you read that correctly). The zombies are not allowed to feast on the living, having to follow the same code of non-violence toward humans as the vampires and werewolves. Humans are called "breathers" by Vargas (Taye Diggs, who seems to lack any type of charisma for a stud vampire), who wants to get his undead hands on a crucifix with the blood of Belial, known as the "Heart of Belial". The crucifix is thrust into a host body and the one who uses the heart as a weapon is master of the beast that will be given birth by the blood of Belial.

Going through the formalities. Elizabeth (Anita Briem) calls on Dylan to find her father's killer, which turns out to be Gabriel's (Peter Stormare) daughter. A vampire who stole the heart from Elizabeth's father has hidden it and so it is desired by both the True Bloods and Gabriel's brood (including his son played by TNA Impact Wrestling's Kurt Angle). Dylan will try to secure the heart before it winds up in the wrong hands. Dylan's best friend, Marcus (Sam Huntington) is attacked by a giant zombie controlled by someone (or something), turning the young man into a zombie himself. Marcus will accompany Dylan as they search for the heart (Marcus and his condition are used as comedy relief; perhaps Marcus is the sole entertainment value this dead horror comedy has going for it). Liz may be more than she appears, adding a twist to the proceedings. Dylan had "retired" from his gig as human peacekeeper of the monsters, due to the murder of his beloved Cassandra, having slaughtered a group of elder vampires, in turn, placing Vargas in a position of power. Who do you really think was responsible for Cassandra's tragic demise? Yeah, it's that obvious—to everyone but the supposed know-it-all investigator.

I could go on and on, but the film isn't worth the extra time. Set in New Orleans, there's no reason this shouldn't be more energetic and fun. It just isn't. A dire lack of juicy bloodshed or visceral thrills only worsens a film loaded with monsters that normally leave plenty of gore in their wake. And when your star is as leaden as Routh, there's really no hope in that regard, either. Just a shame "Dylan Dog: Dead of Night" has such little to offer when the potential for an enjoyable experience is ripe for the pickings. The plot stays busy but doesn't really offer any original ideas that warrant the kind of enthusiasm a monster mash should entail. The story also includes a religious sect of monster hunters, one unveiled and equipped with martial arts and swordfighting skills, but even her fight scenes with Diggs falls flat due to poor editing during the action. Just a flat out misfire. There is a great scene has Dylan going to a "body shop" to get Marcus a new arm (a "loaner"), but it's one too few.
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed