"Law & Order" Executioner (TV Episode 2008) Poster

(TV Series)

(2008)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Not at all a botched episode
TheLittleSongbird13 October 2022
Quite the opposite. Already knew from reading the synopsis that "Executioner" would be an at least intriguing episode, with one of the most powerful yet controversial subject matters of the season and of the post-Briscoe seasons. One of those that is easy to feel sadness and anger all at once and easy to be left in deep thought, when executed well one knows it's a good episode and that it's all what the 'Law and Order' franchise is all about.

"Executioner" to me was a great episode and one of the best of the season. After a shaky start, Season 18 hit its stride with "Quit Claim" and the rest of the episodes were solid and more (the one disappointment being "Boogeyman"). Really liked its handling of the difficult subject matter and it did have an early seasons 'Law and Order' feel to it, which was great as not enough of the post-Briscoe episodes gave off that sensation (or at least to this extent).

It begins on the ever so slightly routine and formulaic side.

Once things become more complex, the episode is anything but either adjective. The production values are suitably slick and gritty, with photography that is reliant on close ups that have an intimacy without being too claustrophobic. The music is didn't come over as too melodramatic or like it was emphasising the emotion too much. The direction is sympathetic while still giving momentum.

The script is tight and intelligent, the tone is a typically serious one but to me it didn't become melodramatic or dreary. It is particularly thought provoking in the different points of view of the defendant's character and what it has to say about botched executions fascinates. The story is continually compelling, especially in the legal scenes, the standard of which here and the previous two episodes being completely different to when the season first started. Loved the pull no punches yet sensitive and thought probing handling of the subject.

As well as that McCoy (criminally understand pre-"Quit Claim" has more to do with a meaty role in the second half, which generates a good deal of tension. The regulars are all on strong form, especially Sam Waterston and Linus Roache and while James Rebhorn effectively makes the skin crawl it's the powerful performance of Michael Rooker that shines most. As others have said, the defendant is not the character that is hated by the end.

Summing up, excellent. 9/10.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
I had to watch Hartigan turn into some kind of victim. Messed me up.
Mrpalli778 March 2018
After a medical conference, a doctor was ready for a date. The morning after he was found by police dead, hit by a bottle of champagne several times. He was married with two daughters but he cheated on her with a girl who blackmailed him with a camera recorder: 800 hundred dollars. Anyway detectives realized the perp killed the wrong doctor because he switched room shortly before the murder. The other doctor (James Rebhorn) had problems with his junkie daughter who accused him to set her up: she was arrested years before because of him, but detectives were off track. Later on, Green figured out the doctor performed lethal injections in South Carolina and someone with southern accent held a grudge against him, because of an execution went bad. The doctor didn't want to point out the killer, but luckily McCoy forced him to do so by arresting him (once he performed his duty before the supreme court said so).

Great performance for McCoy, he compelled the doctor to testify in court against his will. I can't believe in some States there's still death penalty right now. Rubirosa and Cutter had different views over the defendant, more symphatetic than the doctor.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Hanging in a netherworld
bkoganbing21 December 2015
This episode of Law And Order is guaranteed to put you in deep freeze. For one thing the perpetrator in this case is more sympathetic than his intended victim.

Michael Rooker from South Carolina comes up to New York City to confront Dr. James Rebhorn at a medical conference. Things get out of hand and he winds up killing the wrong doctor. What makes matters worse is that Rebhorn, suspecting someone was stalking him gave his room to that other doctor who wound up beaten to death. Right there you lose a lot of sympathy for him.

What's the cause of Rooker's anger. Even in South Carolina there's some opposition to the death penalty and with lethal injection as the preferred method of execution you need medical professionals. Rebhorn who plays golf with the warden at Hilton Head, when he's down there he assists.

Only Rooker's cousin, a really bad dude everyone admits, had his execution botched and left the man hanging in a netherworld of a permanent vegetative state. Proving that even in this 'humane' method of execution there are problems.

One to think about.
8 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed