Helen (I) (2008) User Reviews

Ironic puzzler or abject failure?

[imdb-7581 · 6/10 · 15 April 2009]

Saw this at the 2008 Sydney Film Festival so apologies if I'm short on detail.

This film does look good, with an all-pervasive dreamy quality. That said, the vocabulary of camera movements is eventually too meagre and repetitive. At times it seems that every shot is a slow dolly.

Like Bloomer wrote in hir comment, the acting and dialog is peculiarly stilted. I initially took this for a deliberate ironic or alienating effect and I read the film as a satire of English New-Labour era 'caring'. The scenes with the teacher, policewoman and social worker all stuck with me for this reason.

But by the end I was forced to conclude that the awkwardness was unintentional and I that I have an overactive imagination. As Alan Donald commented, this film's virtues are simply overwhelmed by bad acting and direction.

A good idea gone wrong

[aland-3 · 5/10 · 28 September 2008]

A college student, Joy, goes missing and the police enlist the aid of another student, Helen, to re-enact Joy's last movements. Helen, an orphan brought up in an institution, lacks everything Joy possessed - family, personality,intelligence, a boy friend. But as her impersonation progresses she starts to hijack Joy's life, including her family and boy friend.

This great idea for a film is sabotaged by poor direction and acting. Apart from the lead actress, the actors are wooden (and occasionally downright bad -- I think I could do better myself!). The direction is amateurish.

Camera work and editing is professional and well done. The script is adequate.

I suspect the producers found themselves financially strapped and had to make do with second rate actors. Helen has the seeds of a good film; seeds that fail to sprout.

Worth seeing if you are studying film

A good idea but a weak delivery

[freemantle_uk · 5/10 · 2 January 2012]

The low budget British/Irish was film divided critics in the UK, some did not like it but others including the highly respected Mark Kermode loved it. But the audience reaction on IMDb has been negative (amidst from a low base) and this is an example of a divide between critics and audiences over some lesser known films.

Set in an unnamed town in England or Ireland a teenage girl disappears and the police plan to conduct a reconstruction for investigation. A girl from the same college, Helen (Annie Townsend) is picked to play Joy. Helen is a girl who has been in care since a young age and she soon compares her life to Joy's and slowly gets to know Joy's love ones as well as being given the opportunity to finally find out about her past on her 18th Birthday.

Helen is an experimental film, it was directed by Joe Lawlor and Christine Molloy, a directing duo who previously worked on short films. Helen is essentially a short film stretched to become a (short) feature length film because of the extremely slow pacing. There short films and Helen are filmed using a special technique that relies on shooting on 35mm cameras, long shots and unprofessional, local actors. The acting is big problem with this feature because of a lot of it stiff, wooden or just down right bad. Townsend was best when she was alone playing a meek, quiet gorl who is actually longing for more and speaks to Joy on the path she would have taken but at times it felt like she had not personality at all and did not have one written for her. An example of bad acting is with the parents who just seems so stiff and no emotion even though their daughter has disappeared: normally they is some sort of reaction to a tragic event like that.

They is a nice, quiet visial to the film, it is not grand or grim and gritty. I personally like long takes, long shots for the most part. I particularly like the visuals in the woods and the park. This gave Helen a more natural feel. But at other times I felt the film needed a cut to break thinks up and see another action/reaction. Maybe it is because the camera was in the wrong place or simply the acting was not good enough, compared to a 10 minute scene in Hunger that was one take and it was really compelling because of the acting. Helen's scene just drag and the film breaks basic screen writing rules like enter late, leave early: it does the opposite.

I was also slightly confused by the setting because the police uniforms looked like they were not from the UK and the accents were all over the place, some of Liverpulian, others Irish and some just general English. The filmmakers should have stuck to a board area of the UK to show that this could happen anywhere. Also elements of the police investigation felt really fault, like getting a local girl to play Joy, wouldn't the police get an actor from outside so family and friends would not have any ties to the person or when the police find the jacket they would have to keep as evidence and keep it in the evidence bag.

There were some really good ideas in Helen but it could have been explored. It starts out well enough showing Joy with her walking with her mates in the park and when she goes off alone it is the last time never to be seen again. It would be a good start to a thriller. The story could have gone in a number of directions, like the parents trying to do what happened to their daughter or the stress seeing some random girl trying to be their daughter, maybe friends of Joy questioning why Helen is trying to be like Joy and take over her live, the parents seeing Helen and confuse her for Joy, the impact of the disappearance on the college and the community or Helen seeing she looks similar to Joy and tries to find one more about the girl and even tries to take her boyfriend. Or it simply could be a girl who lived in care tries to find out more about her own past.

Helen is interesting it does have a good idea behind it but the execution was lacking.

a boring film in scope is still boring

[thetreacleman · 1/10 · 15 January 2010]

The film-making team deserved ten points for having the right connexions to fund this film. Sadly have become so obsessed with shooting in scope they have forgotten any other element that might make the end product interesting. British critics love anything to do with identity. Make a film remotely along the lines of Hitchcock's Vertigo and they will fall over themselves praising it to heaven. Endless shots of tree leaves . A lead actress with the total on screen charisma of a potted plant. Antonioni used spacial dynamics to stunning effect long before this pair turned up. I thought I would go nuts if another shot arrived with a long slow dolly shot. But hey this is the sort of thing lottery funders and arts councils love to cultivate. Dull. Badly acted. It should have stayed as a short.

Helen plays Joy but thats the last thing this will bring you

[trpuk1968 · 3/10 · 4 October 2009]

I agree with jlon and arnold here. This film is really tedious, dull, leaden, plodding, nothing really happens... The comparisons someone made with Antonioni are good ones, somehow his films are riveting. Because they re cinematic. There's such attention paid to each shot, which slowly builds a mood and atmosphere. This isn t cinematic, it feels very limited. Its hard work, for no rewards. Antonioni s films are hard work, but somehow they pay off. This just got on my nerves. One critic calls it 'a resurgence of UK art cinema.' Gawd help us in that case. The acting just isn t, it plays like the characters are reading an autocue. Maybe this was deliberate. I ve decided now to boycott all British and Irish 'art' films excepting the superb Shane Meadows. They re just not worth wasting time with.

Mysterious, weird, beautiful.

[Bloomer · 9/10 · 1 October 2008]

I saw about twenty films at the 2008 Sydney Film Festival, and Helen was probably my favourite feature. Steadfast in mystery, atmosphere, weirdness and emotional bleakness, the film follows the slow-growing obsession of the eponymous heroine with the former life of another girl, Joy, who disappeared in the local park one day, and whom Helen is 'playing' in a police reconstruction of the event.

The film has a beautiful cryptic quality, not in any conventional kind of whodunnit sense, but as regards both the elusive character of Helen and the nature of the film itself. The long, unbroken takes, great silences and restrained, almost self-effacing interactions amongst the characters generate fascination and curiosity. Is it some kind of hyper-naturalism? Or the opposite of naturalism? The players are often facing away from each other, or off the screen, or shot from behind, or just so that you can't see their faces. When a creepily patronising policewoman arrives to brief Joy's schoolmates about the reconstruction of the disappearance, half the scene is viewed via its reflection in a mirror.

Some of the dialogue is bizarre in its expositional nature, enough to prompt amusement, yet at others times it is completely evasive. Helen feels such a great hollow within herself (she has been raised in care, and her past and parentage are shrouded in mystery) that her vocalisation mostly consists of dull murmured statements. The strongest indication that some of the weirdness is in droll taste is an amusing scene in which a morose-looking teacher appears to do the worst job in the world in trying inspire the students with talk of 'blue skies thinking'.

The film is framed by metronomically perfect editing, fades to black, abstraction-making shots of dappled light filtering through park trees and a glacial ambient score. It reminded me at times of David Lynch in its poetic design. It offers a unique vision of a situation which opens onto multiple mysteries, most importantly the mystery of what is inside Helen, played with supernatural understatement by Annie Townsend. And it is emotionally confronting, with some moments that are very difficult to bear. This is beautiful cinema.

Sorry someone not connected to the film has to say this

[andyd-1 · 1/10 · 1 February 2010]

The film is awful! I only saw this because the rental company thinks it is the similarly named film 'Helen', starring Ashley Judd.

In this UK/Irish Helen, the acting is terribly stilted, the film constantly uses the same slowly panning camera technique which just becomes tedious. You can see pauses where the actors are trying to recall dialogue etc.

I've got to be honest, I think all this lottery funding is continuing to lead to hopeless UK films being funded and produced. I don't know why this film would have won an award.

The only think I can say is that technical of film and props etc was good.

Helen: Beautiful and Heartbreaking

[imagiking · 9/10 · 10 March 2010]

A barely funded film, the only reason I even came to know of Helen's existence was under the recommendation of a trusted friend. It is the feature debut of film-making duo Lawlor and Molloy, previously known for a series of rule-dictated shorts; rules to which Helen also abides.

A seemingly uncomplicated story, Helen's eponymous character is a care- home raised college student struggling to get by in a world where she has known neither family nor friends. She is hired to play the part of Joy, a missing girl from her college, in a police reconstruction of her disappearance. As Helen reenacts the life of Joy, she sees a world she has never known, and finds herself considering her own identity.

The film's slow motion credits introduce us to the long takes, harrowing score, and unsettling beauty of what we are soon to see unfold. The eerie music which becomes synonymous with the central theme of identity is simultaneously uncomfortable and entrancing, drawing us into the film whilst giving the sense it may not always be a pleasant experience. Nay-sayers have cited some of the film's less convincing performances as a deterrent, but the central performance is sufficiently strong, and often moving, to hold everything together in the face of the amateur actors. The effect of the long takes is wonderfully gripping, helping us descend with this character to her new role, and drawing us into the splendour of the slow pacing. The cinematography is undoubtedly the film's area of expertise, the effulgence and mastery with which the directors convey that which goes unspoken truly fascinating and endearing. Townsend's performance meshes with the melancholy of her character, crafting a beautiful and heartbreaking impression of a girl lost in life. Her fragility and dark wistfulness is perfectly portrayed, giving us a realistic and relatable character.

A superbly shot piece bearing all the symptoms of genuinely transcendent cinema, Helen is an unforgettable film, and one which explores its ideas in a subtle, moving, and inspirational manner.

Helen and Joy?

[jennifer-alongi-richmond · 1/10 · 5 January 2013]

Bizarre. Bad. I felt that until the last 7 minutes, that Joy and Helen were the same person. I thought Joy/Helen had multiple personality disorder. I think the directors wanted me to think that. It turns out not to be so, but I can't get over the idea that the directors intentionally fooled me into thinking it. It needs more. It felt cut off without closure. The "re-enactment" was never completed. Who ever heard of re-enacting a crime to be filmed anyway? The only time I have heard of that is for a show like Unsolved Mysteries. I have never heard of it happening within the first days of a missing persons investigation. Maybe they conduct police investigations differently in the UK/Ireland than in the U. S. This film is not for a person who didn't get sufficient sleep the night before. It will put you to sleep rather than intrigue you! Or, if it does intrigue you, you will be left with unanswered questions and wondering why you just wasted an hour and twenty minutes of your time.

Interesting story.

[tao902 · 5/10 · 24 July 2015]

A drama about a teenager, Helen, who has been in care for most of her life.

A student at the local school Helen attends has gone missing and Helen volunteers to take the part of the missing girl in a police reconstruction. She gradually immerses herself in the role of the missing student and meets the girl's parents possibly as a way of trying to find what was missing from her own life in care and possibly as a way of finding her own identity.

A nice idea for a story but not big enough for a feature length film. A slow movie which is patchy in places.

Empathising..!

[plawes-98445 · 8/10 · 20 November 2015]

To all those amateur critics out there, (and I am one of them...), not all films need to be acted and directed in the same way.

This was an absorbing, mesmerising film. Beautifully shot, acted, and directed with the intention to empathise with the single character, 'Helen'.

Yes they used stilted narrative and 'wooden' characters around her, but wasn't this intentional? To draw the viewer into Helen's view of the world and people around her.

It may not appeal to everyone but for me it worked.

I would recommend this film to anyone that is willing to look at the world through another persons eyes.