The Jury hear some very disturbing information about some of Claire's behaviour, The Jury are encouraged to believe that Lawson not only facilitated, but encouraged. Kate suggests Nathan Spears is questioned. Detective Sam Chedid takes to the stand.
It's a good second episode, for my shame I haven't picked this series up for over two months, busy Christmas etc, but I was keen to get back into it, and I really enjoyed the continuation.
As with the opener, I am way more interested in the actual case, than I am with the lives of The Jurors, they're all a little bit too much, they've all got fascinating, big back stories, is that what real life is like?
They're showing the older generation as mild mannered and considerate, and the younger lot as angry, temperamental, opinionated squabbles, fair?
Jamie Merrick is repulsive, he's the most appalling character I've seen for some time.
Kate Mulvany is stealing the show for me as Kate Lawson, her and those lips, she's playing the femme fatale part very, very well.
7/10.
It's a good second episode, for my shame I haven't picked this series up for over two months, busy Christmas etc, but I was keen to get back into it, and I really enjoyed the continuation.
As with the opener, I am way more interested in the actual case, than I am with the lives of The Jurors, they're all a little bit too much, they've all got fascinating, big back stories, is that what real life is like?
They're showing the older generation as mild mannered and considerate, and the younger lot as angry, temperamental, opinionated squabbles, fair?
Jamie Merrick is repulsive, he's the most appalling character I've seen for some time.
Kate Mulvany is stealing the show for me as Kate Lawson, her and those lips, she's playing the femme fatale part very, very well.
7/10.
