Four (2011) Poster

(III) (2011)

User Reviews

Review this title
13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Chucklevision
bobbybits12 March 2012
Warning: Spoilers
The chuckle brothers do a kidnapping, I honestly waited for them to throw pie at each others faces by the end of this film. It possibly the stupidest film I have ever seen. The dialogue is: to me, to you, type of lingo. Which is funny but in the wrong way and for all the wrong reasons. Unlike the movie the Village this film really fails as tries. The plot twists are quite predictable as they cover up all the obvious plot holes. This movie should come with a warning don't try this at home. Quite a low budget production entirely at one location. The actors we have seen before mainly from the soaps.

4 out of 10 for the humour
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Don't bother
andyhall66627 July 2012
I probably shouldn't have watched this. I'd skimmed through some of the bad reviews but thought maybe it would still be OK. After all, I'm a sucker for a four-hander play, set in one location. Anyway, as you can guess from the title of this review, I should have heeded the message. It is a poor film. Funnily enough it seems clear that the makers have genuinely tried hard to make something good. It just isn't.

The dialogue is poor and unrealistic, the writer constantly betrays his characters, scenarios are derivative and the movie just feels too contrived. In addition, although a useful premise to start with, the ending is far too weak. Less is more might have made for a more effective film. A better writer would've done too.
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Bad casting.
tracey_space17 March 2012
Some good things about this. The production design, the directing, the acting from most of the cast. The general movement of the story is interesting and compelling, but some detail in the dialog is clumsy and comes across as not clever and a bit cliché. On paper it may work, but the film has been ruined by one miscast actor. This actor in the business man. He may be a fine actor for a different script, but here he delivers the lines in a very unbelievable way. He has not crafted a character who we can connect with because his characters personality is never nailed. They needed a different actor to play this main protagonist. Unfortunately he is the weakest link when he is supposed to be the strongest. It might not be his fault. It is likely a casting and/or directing issue. He may be very good in other scripts.

So film makers out there, take this as a lesson - casting is the next most important thing after script - without question.
12 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Don't bother
Leofwine_draca16 February 2016
FOUR is a film that's far too low budget to work properly. The entire movie literally consists of four actors in a grungy old warehouse, with no lighting and seemingly no script given the constant, expletive-laden, and repetitive nature of the dialogue.

The best thing about this film is a monologue by guest star Sean Pertwee early on, when he talks about other, better films like RESERVOIR DOGS which was a clear inspiration. After that we get the usual guy-strapped-to-a-chair nonsense, with lots of brutality and slight veers into torture porn territory.

Sadly the direction is absolutely pedestrian, the script brings nothing new to the table, and acting from the likes of Martin Compston and Craig Conway isn't enough to tune in for. For a much better version of a similar story, check out the American B-flick SUSHI GIRL.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
some things right, but more wrong
LetsReviewThat2612 August 2022
This film did actually do someone things well. Limited cast films that are just set in one location are always interesting. Theres enough here to keep you watching to the end and even a kind of twist in a way. I don't like the characters not having names, despite it being easier to remember them. But looking at what happens in the film there is a reason for that. Pertween and compton do good in this. But it would be better if they were in a much better movie. The other cast members did an ok job to. Really it was an alright movie. It could have just done with being a bit longer and maybe a bit more aciton happening.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Don't be put off by the staggeringly low score - it isn't that bad.
perkypops31 October 2012
Although this film has a very theatrical feel and could, perhaps, be better performed on a stage, it has a script full of very black humour and some very strong language. At times the script mocks itself as four people go through a tangled web of deception and counter deception. It is a film for which you need to have an open mind right from the "go" or otherwise you'll miss its razor sharp patches of dialogue delivered by a cracking cast (especially Pertwee).

The action is largely confined to an appropriately dark, derelict and isolated warehouse and is very script driven. There is much violence but it is, thankfully, never overdone. It doesn't need to be for the faces of the actors tell us all we need to know, and that is why I cannot believe the low score this film has accumulated. I just think cinema audiences have never much liked stagy films as many directors have found to their cost no matter how good the material has been.

Although much of the writing is first class there are some patchy moments and it is arguable that one or two scenes didn't quite add what they were supposed to give to the drama. Put another way they were wasted because of a lack of sharpness.

But this is much better than three or four out of ten, and is certainly much better than a whole series of some crime capers.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Funny and horrifying in equal measure.
emw1022 October 2011
Possibly the best low budget film I have seen to date. The director uses the desolate location and some amazing acting talent to bring to life a clever, intricate and often funny script. The language is shocking, as is the level of violence, but this created for me an almost morbid, edge of seat fascination, wondering what would come next. The ending was unexpected and not for the faint hearted! Interestingly, it was difficult to like any of the four characters, and the audience were left knowing little more about them than we did at the start of the film. Definitely a film to watch, perhaps more than once to really appreciate the subtle inferences of the script and direction.
26 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Have you got my lighter?....
FlashCallahan13 September 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Oh it's one of those twisty turny thrillers where the husband kidnaps his wife's boyfriend, scares him a little then Sean Pertwee tells the husband that he should tell his wife, but then, Surprise! hes already kidnapped his wife and shes in the other room.

But, it's not his wife, and it turns out to be, Surprise! Pertwees wife and she is sleeping with the bloke in the other room, so their is really no need for the husband to be there in the first place type movie.

With a little sub plot involving a serial killer.

It sound tosh, complete tosh, and for the most part it is, but thanks to Pertwee, the film is at least watchable. and it never out stays its welcome, thanks to the bonkers plot, and the ridiculous twists it keeps sending us.

My only problem is with he guy who plays 'Husband'. he gets really annoying very quickly and on several occasions I was willing Pertwees character to give him a smack.

So the film is nothing new, and offers nothing revelatory, but it's short, entertaining in all the wrong ways, and like I said, Pertwee is great, if you like Pertwee.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An intriguing, stylishly shot film featuring great performances and a few obvious flaws.
eem-439-22958530 January 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Four is an excellent film until about two-thirds of the way through, and still a pretty good film after that. It is well worth a watch—and a re-watch--for its brilliant acting and cinematography, gorgeous setting, and darkly humorous dialogue. It crackles with mood, energy, and anticipation. This is director John Langridge's first feature film and his gritty visual style complements the subject well. Writer Paul Chronnell's background as a comedy writer also suits the film, with its particularly British combination of the morbid and the hilarious. The bad guys here are not the killers and gangsters of the Hollywood movies or of the newspaper stories to which the characters refer, but are mostly average, if seedy, men who attempt to imitate these larger-than-life villains and find that it's not as easy as it looks.

About an hour in, it starts to go a bit south. The dialogue and plot initiated by the supposedly strong female character becomes slightly ridiculous and unrealistic, as is The Husband's reaction to her. This man paid a detective to kidnap and tie up his wife and her lover but he won't even go into the woman's pocket to get a lighter, he's so scared of her. Considering how insecure The Husband clearly is, though, this abrupt turnabout might be believable until The Detective returns, but not then. The Detective has spent the entire film to this point proving how calmly ruthless and clever he is, but we're supposed to believe that he just stands there, deflated, in the face of The Wife. How did he ever get her to the warehouse in the first place? Although the twist is meant to represent a feminist break from the typical woman-as-victim scenario, it doesn't quite work. There are some plot holes, such as the fact that the blood spatter that covers a murderer would be quite enough to alert the police to who really did the killing.

Until this last third, however, the film is quite engrossing and artistically shot. Sean Pertwee shines in the role of The Detective. He is alternately violently sinister and affably comical. Although he could have been a one-dimensional tough guy beating a restrained man, his face is subtle when showing hints of his manipulative ability or his frustration with The Husband's lack of understanding. This layering of multiple emotions into one character creates a complexity that makes The Detective the most interesting one to watch. Martin Compston is perfectly in character as the scared young lover (whom The Detective refers to as his "irritating, squealing, moaning Scottish problem") and Craig Conway comes across exactly as he's meant to—as an impotently vengeful, spiteful man who tries to elevate himself in his own eyes by establishing power over those who have wronged him, and who mostly fails to do so. He also works beautifully as the straight man in Pertwee's comedy routine. Kierston Wareing as The Wife suffers from a few bad script and direction choices, but she is believable for what she's supposed to be. Perhaps none of the characters is particularly likable, but the audience still wants to know what they're going to do, and most end up doing precisely the opposite of what you'd expect in a typical film of this sort.

This film needs to be watched twice, maybe to catch the plot points about "The Family Man" that you didn't get the first time round, but definitely to appreciate the acting, the jokes, the shots, and the score. With only four actors, one location, and one plot, the film is not really about plot or action. It is a character study, and the atmosphere of the setting is one of the characters. Overall, considering the small budget and time spent, Four is far more of a success than not, and the critics who gave it low reviews should watch it again and reconsider.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
More twists than a game of twister
jpalmer-924 October 2011
I must admit, when I heard that this film had been made for £100k all in, and shot on one location in 17 days straight, I lowered my expectations accordingly. I needn't have, the script is taught, the dialogue is genuinely amusing with plenty of humour and for the most part the editing is sharp; while the plot unfolds revealing a different layer with each twist... The ending delivers a great pay off too.

Pertwee brings real menace to the roll of the sinister detective and all of the characters are well observed.

The broadsheets were hard on this film, I recommend you watch it and decide for yourself. It's a low budget British film, that may be reason enough for many support it, but I want to be entertained as well, and Four delivered on that score. Hence my 8 out of 10.

Watch it. And Watch out for debut film maker John Langridge, if that's hist first effort I can't wait to see what comes next!
17 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An unexpected Little Pleasure.
dogontour9 April 2012
Having not heard a great deal about this movie I assumed that it would be passable at best. WRONG. It's a thoroughly entertaining and tightly made piece, with tight directorial pace and sharp dialogue. It is undeniably and unashamedly a film made on a lower budget than Hollywood fare but this is to the films credit rather than it's detriment. A lack of extraneous whistles and bells leaves a script which is economic and witty, delivered very competently by the cast. The location (which incidentally is beautifully lit)acts as the fifth member of this ensemble cast. The direction is stylish without being intrusive. There are a couple of lines of Dialogue I found clumsy but they are few and far between and given the nature of a dialogue and character driven piece not entirely unexpected. Bottom line, It is defiantly a film worth a look.
12 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Wee Cracker - Don't take it too seriously
lloyd1506 October 2012
I watched this late as I could not sleep. Yes it did have a little Chuckle Brother humour - but it did lighten it up. I knew it was not going to be too serious the way Sean Pertwee was knocking the crap out of the kidnapped man and the man was able to respond in a tone which you would use to order a pizza - although he did get better. The premise was a good one but the film could have been different and a lot darker, but for light entertainment it was good.

Sean is always a pleasure to watch and the Welsh lead was a bit wishy washy however the female character was brilliant. She certainly took control of the situation - which the viewer could see from a distance.

Worth a watch but don't expect social or ethical undertones.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
WHO ARE YOU?
nogodnomasters16 July 2018
Warning: Spoilers
This is an interesting movie that could also be a 4 man (3 men, 1 woman) play. A businessman (Craig Conway) hires a detective (Sean Pertwee) to kidnap his wife's lover (Martin Compston) and bring him to the proverbial warehouse so he can rough him up.

He also kidnaps his wife (Kierston Wareing) for good measure. The movie then takes a number of twists as the four interact. Who is really in charge?

Good acting. Good dialogue.

Parental Guide: F-bomb, no sex or nudity. Sex talk. C-word.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed