The Lake at the Bottom of the World (2022) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
For Antarctica science fans it's a decent watch, albeit one with climate-propaganda overtones.
BrodeoWay20 September 2023
This is a documentary about Antarctica field research, so many may find the content rather boring. However, having a fascination for places like Antarctica and an interest in science, I found the documentary fairly insightful and relatively entertaining. This particular field research is unique given the environment. The preparation and execution of this expedition is admirable. Considering the quality of film, it is overall good, but not great.

This film is not without the obligatory climate-change narratives. Some of the featured researchers and ultimate "discoveries" draw conclusions beyond the scope of the experiments, confirming the political motivations. Nonetheless, it didn't completely overshadow the film.

For audiences drawn to Antarctica or those interested in unique field research, it's worth a watch.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
In another life, this would have been a great adventure
Inquisitor201812 December 2023
Interesting to see what they did and how they did it! The climate change theme wasn't as bad as many of these type documentaries, so it is well worth the watch. 10,000 years ago when there was salt water up there would seem to take man out of the equation or at least rank our impact as correlation vs causation. This documentary was actually beautiful to watch and informative on how they had to live to perform their experiments. Like my title says, this would have been a great adventure to collect the samples like they did. It would have been nice to have some summary of any information they collected once the samples were studied, although that may have gone against the man made climate change manta.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Interestingly gratifying
schoolshauna5 October 2023
I feel gratitude just from having been able to watch it. This show was amazing. I think its great work like this is being done. The scientist are amazing. It's easy to admire their intellect & skill. I hope to watch more shows like this in the future. It's always nice to see science advance thru present time. I would like to see the you younger generation move into these phenomenal roles life has to offer. I don't think mentioning anything about climate change is wrong. It's factual. You either hear it, accept & believe it for what it is or Not! Everyone is entitled to their own thoughts & opinions. Just be kind. Stay positive people.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Nice to see good weather in Antartica for once
Erik_Stone1 September 2023
The man made global warming propaganda doesn't start until about an hour in, so it's pretty straight forward until then. The editor was obviously amazingly skilled, by not including the wacko climate religion propaganda for a whole hour, when the whole purpose of most of these "scientists" is to just try to prove how humanity is bad, killing the earth, and then lobby governments to kill humans instead.

Expecting to go to Antartica and not meet religious climate wackos, is moronic. Somehow, this movie pulls it off for an hour and makes it seem like all the people are just normal people and not part of a religious climate cult intent on the destruction of humanity.

It was entertaining to watch. The "discoveries" at the end are pretty common sense except for the first one, which is outright stupid, and proves that most of these people doing "research" down there are just tyrants.
17 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The first bit was tolerable.
revernd_bill28 April 2024
As others have stated the church of climate didn't start till about half way in. That ruined it for me. It's great to debate climate change, disruption or what ever they wish to title it but do not use failed examples as proof.

The following is just filler as there seems to be some idiotic reason that there is a minimum of characters necessary for a review. I mean if a movie just plain sucks that should be the review no need to expand on the lack of creativity, character development, cinema graphic quality and content. No, a simple this movie sucks should suffice.

Well I have about come to my minimum allotment of characters so have a great day and happy movie viewing!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed