There There (2022) Poster

(2022)

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
COVID cinema
ferguson-617 November 2022
Greetings again from the darkness. It's understandable why we ended up with so many Pandemic-based movies. Writers need to write. Actors need to perform. Filmmakers need to make movies. Even the trickery can be accepted given the unusual circumstances. With his latest, writer-director Andrew Bujalski, the father of Mumblecore, delivers an unusual ensemble piece - one where the actors share scenes, but not the set.

The opening sequence is easily the film's best and most interesting. Lili Taylor and Lennie James awaken in the afterglow of their first hook-up. Things obviously went well ... and plenty far ... and now two grown-ups are trying to figure out the next step. He seems to be upbeat and optimistic about their spending more time together, while she sports her battle wounds by assuming things won't work out ... going so far to 'joke' about him murdering her. With very little effort, it's obvious to see the two actors are not in the same room despite the cleverly edited shots blended to pretend otherwise. The interaction between the two characters says much about 'no-longer-youngsters' and their attitude towards new relationships.

It's in the next scene where we begin to catch on to Bujalski's approach. Lili Taylor meets up with her AA sponsor (Annie LaGanga) for some tough love and some awkward conversation. It happens this quickly ... the film begins to veer off and leave us wondering about the characters we are meeting. Our fears are solidified in the next sequence when Ms. LaGanga confronts her son's teacher (Molly Gordon) in what comes across as an inhumane manner. And Ms. Gordon's reactions are equally unlikely. So through three vignettes, we have met four characters, and now we don't much care for three of them. By the end of the film, we find ourselves not really liking anyone we've come across.

Jason Schwartzman plays sketchy attorney to an equally-sketchy tech guru played by Avi Nash, and Schwartzman's character is later visited in the night by his mentor-ghost (Roy Nathanson). What we have is a series of interconnections that overlap and tie-in the lives of multiple characters. Between each segment, there is a musical interlude where we see Jon Natchez performing the music. It's an odd, experimental, extremely talkative approach to COVID cinema that seems to play on our many insecurities and frustrations. It's difficult to imagine too many finding this entertaining now that so many new features are being released, so it's best to keep in mind that the actors, crew, and filmmakers all continued to work in spite of the many challenges.

Available in theaters and On Demand beginning November 18, 2022.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Bold and experimental but weirdly lacking
bk75321 October 2023
Likely filmed during Covid, this is a bizarre look into the interconnected lives of a handful of characters, their flaws and issues, and the nature of human connection, told in a series of two-person interactions. What's most unusual is that, never at any time, are two people on the screen simultaneously, and I highly doubt any pair of actors was even present together during filming. So, you have a creatively stitched-together tapestry of conversations (including one in bed and one across a lunch table) where very talented actors are carrying the water alone. Highly unusual, somewhat distracting, yet oddly effective at times. So, there's that.

The problem... well, one of them, is that these characters aren't terribly likable (except the bar owner, played nicely by Lennie James, who shines in both his duets) and their interactions aren't terribly worthwhile. I did like Molly Gordon's turn as bad teacher/sloppy drunk, and while there's no denying that Lili Taylor and Jason Schwartzman are top-notch in their roles., the lack of actual interaction, the odd camera angles, and overall weirdness of their paired situations, made this a less-than-stellar watch. Two sequences (the alcoholic and her AA sponsor and the lawyer/client) dragged badly and went on too long. The vignettes are separated by strange, live musical interludes that seem out of place and could be discarded. I've seen this tagged as "drama, comedy, romance," but it wasn't funny at all, and the "romance" part is awkward at best.

So, it's a bold and gallant effort by a talented filmmaker, but it falls flat for me in important ways. I rounded up to a "6" because I appreciated the work and what the actors were able to accomplish here, but feel like it could have been better.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed