In the Shadow of Women (2015) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
In the shadow of Clotilde Courau
ayoreinf20 July 2017
There's one reason to see this film - an amazing performance of Clotilde Courau. The rest of the film is paled in comparison. The story itself has nothing special to offer. Philippe Garrel's direction is very professional but offers very little character. His special requirement of single take for every scene seems to have inspired the extraordinary performance of Clotilde Courau, so he does deserve credit for it, but nothing else stands out here. And I did find his use of narration, point less and annoying. All other aspects of the film are professional too but falling out flat.

On the other hand, it's worth seeing if only for the superlative performance of Clotilde Courau, which I already mentioned.

One last point, has to do with the name of the movie. In French it's called L'ombre des Femmes, which translates simply as The Shadow of Women. It's a very small difference from In the Shadow of Women, but it's an unnacessary difference that shouldn't have been there.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Life as it happens
Horst_In_Translation7 February 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Certainly nobody's perfect in the newest film by director Philippe Garrel. He also wrote the script together with 3 other people including Academy award winner Jean-Claude Carrière. For that collection of writers, it is a fairly short film, does not even reach the 75-minute mark. Needless to say it is French language from start to finish, so you may need subtitles, and it is also entirely shot in black-and-white. To me personally, this is an appealing feature. I like new films in black-and-white à la "The Artist". And with the French dialogs, the film certainly gets a touch of François Truffaut, for example his "Antoine et Colette". The narration helps a lot too. This part comes from actor Louis Garrel, son of the director.

I must say this film was definitely an interesting watch. There is nothing big happening at any point, but it's a realistic depiction of life, love and interactions between the characters. Who stays together, who breaks up? Occasionally, I was even tempted to give this film a ****/*****, not much was missing for such a rating. And even if I did not give it in the end, I still very much enjoyed the film. The writing and performances from the characters are all really really good and totally make sense. The female lead reminded me of a mix between Julie Delpy and Joely Richardson. Courau and Merhar prove why they have been very reliable for decades in the business and Paugam (stunning Rebecca Hall lookalike) shows that she will hopefully have a bright future ahead.

Like I said earlier, this film is a great watch for everybody who loves French black-and-white films like Truffaut's for example. But it is certainly also worth seeing for everybody who just likes good character studies or French films in general. As usual, I can only give the recommendation to watch this in the French original with subtitles perhaps and no dubbed version. The language adds a whole lot to the atmosphere of the films. I had a really good time watching this and if any of the above descriptions fits you, I am positive that you will also find this an enriching experience. Very much recommended and it made me curious about digging deeper into Garrel's impressive body of work. And finally a few words on the resistance fighter. My guess is that the director wanted to show us how we, the audience, are just as naive as the male protagonist when he says his wife would never cheat on him. We see the resistance fighter as some kind of saint the way he is depicted early on until we find out the ugly truth at the end. Trust nobody.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fun finding out how clueless men are.
JohnDeSando27 February 2016
In the Shadow of Women reacquaints us with the quaint realism of the nouvelle vague, that province of Godard, Truffaut, and other great French directors who strip down their mise en scene to just the essentials of two characters falling in and out of love, mostly through bright dialogue in ordinary settings without fancy camera work.

Only a French director like Philippe Garrel can take a formulaic French infidelity involving a husband and wife and their lovers and make it fresh while supporting verities that will live forever: If both husband and wife are unfaithful, then even the French know something is amiss and bound to be righted with some accompanying pain.

If the husband fails to recognize his sin while he rails against his wife's infidelity, then so be it in the comic stupidity of French men and men in general. Revealing his self-centered chauvinism, Pierre (Stanislas Merhar) tells his wife, Manon (Clotilde Courau), "I thought you were different." Manon and Pierre are struggling documentary makers who are also married with him being restless and her still much in love. But the young intern, Elisabeth (Lena Paugam), turns his head while the handsome colleague turns Manon's, and while they both admit their infidelities it's not certain the turn has come about because of lust or reaction to their spouse's indifference.

If this story sounds trite, it is, but it remains one of the best romances in recent memory just because it is authentic and displayed by superior acting and directing. It is, after all, a European film, and as such it will be slower and chattier than most American romances. It has the old New Wave energy that offers youthful glamour and foolishness. It's magical old-fashioned romance showing exactly why men are in women's shadow.
19 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A sharp, compelling romantic drama
I_Ailurophile22 June 2023
I wasn't particularly impressed with Philippe Garrel's previous film, 'La jalousie'; there was nothing specifically bad about it, but it wasn't special at all, and it was so flat in its drama that it had no vitality. It's safe to say that I approached this with only middling expectations, not least as the premise is broadly unremarkable and conventional, but one can always hope. As 'L'ombre des femmes' begins it certainly seems to march in step with its predecessor, as we're introduced to a husband who doesn't entirely appreciate his wife, a wife who lives in her husband's shadow to her mother's chagrin, and the young paramour who introduces a fresh spark of new love into the husband's life. All this is fine, but again, one can hope for more to come - and gladly, it does. As it turns out, I'm very happy to say that this 2015 picture really is a notable improvement on its forebear, and distinctly deserving on its own merits. It still may not altogether be a lightning bolt of brilliance, but this is a fantastic, rich romantic drama that strikes just the right chords to be meaningful and impactful, and actively engaging, in a way that not all others (including Garrel's previous effort) can. Moreover, it only gets better as it goes along, all the way through to the end. I think this is great!

I appreciate Renato Berta's cinematography, at once soft and crisp in its black and white presentation and lending a sense of intimacy. I like the cast, especially Lena Paugam as lovesick mistress Elisabeth and Clotilde Courau as devoted but put-upon Manon; it's more difficult to admire Stanislas Merhar as distant and underhandedly cruel Pierre, but he unquestionably sells the part very well. More so than I think was true than in 'La jalousie' I'm inclined to think Garrel illustrates strong direction, showing a keen eye in orchestrating shots and scenes and making them both artful and important. More than that, between Garrel's direction and Francois Gédigier's shrewd sequencing, there's definite air of increasing tension as the story unfolds. Of course this stems as well from a capable screenplay; interestingly, the only difference in the writing team is the substitution of Marc Cholodenko with prolific screenwriter Jean-Claude Carrière, but whether it's Carrière's involvement and/or a more robust concept we have to thank, I quite believe 'L'ombre des femmes' is just swell. Tension between husband and wife, imperfect relations between husband and mistress, secrets kept, a new secret discovered, secrets revealed - there's a more discrete narrative here, and it's a hardy, compelling one. The dialogue, scene writing, and characters are all more complicated, more fleshed out, and more believable. Even Louis Garrel's narration is used in a way that's more profitable than has been true in other films; true, it may sit at a divide of being insightful and plainly imparting what other features would leave for the viewer to discern, yet as a matter of being a creative choice here, overall I think it was a good one. The end result of all this is a movie that's unexpectedly absorbing, and which demonstrates unmistakable intelligence and finesse in its craftsmanship.

Jean-Louis Aubert's score is employed relatively sparingly, yet where it does crop up it's flavorful as it catches our ears, and lends to the somber tone and the underlying tension. There's a measure of electricity bristling about the proceedings as themes swirl of love, jealousy, domestic troubles, hypocrisy, trust and the corrosion thereof, emotional availability, and more. And it should be said, too, that all those contributions from behind the scenes are terrific, of course including costume design, hair, and makeup. Incidentally, I think it's the production design and art direction that are most commendable here, not because the sets (adjoining excellent filming locations) are outwardly stunning but because of their shrewd subtlety. This goes for Pierre and Manon's flat above all, for what we see and hear of it reflects an indifference, carelessness, and possible transience that echoes the developing plot. With that said, it strikes me that 'L'ombre des femmes' comes across in no small part as a movie that could surely be adapted into a stage play, or that could have been adapted from one. The limited number of characters, with terse interactions, in a scant few major settings, and not least the very personal nature of the tale all recall drama that could just as readily play out live in a theater. And in my mind, this only confirms the strength that Garrel's picture has to offer.

I wouldn't go so far as to say it utterly demands viewership, yet the progression of the narrative, the character arcs, the bigger ideas on hand, and the overarching skill and quality seen herein together forge a work of cinema that's genuinely much more earnest, substantive, and worthwhile than I thought it would be. It doesn't sound like much from the outside looking in, 'La jalousie' sets lukewarm anticipation, and the first scenes to greet us are not immediately encouraging. I'm as surprised as anyone, however, that as the runtime advances Garrel, Carrière, Caroline Deruas-Garrel, and Arlette Langmann give us storytelling that in my opinion proves to be rather inspired, and this is borne out by the cast and crew. I'm downright pleased at just how good 'L'ombre des femmes' is, and to be honest I rather think it earns a blanket recommendation. As a matter of personal preference it won't appeal to everyone, but as far as I'm concerned these are seventy-five minutes very well spent, and a fantastic credit to everyone who had a hand in its creation. Kudos!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Another (mucus) film that lauds itself for male bashing
Sheldonshells6 September 2016
Effusing from the bottom of a toilet reeks another braindead simplistic dichotomy of woman=good/man=bad gender feminist nonsense, which at this point is fast getting stale.

The male and female characters are simply poured into a pre-made mold and are scraped out without any trimming along the edges (though this movie and its lame characters have no edge whatsoever). The male protagonist is, of course, depicted as an insensitive and egotistical boar, while the female characters are, of course, (almost) flawless and infallible little angels, keeping with the now 30-some year long tradition in movies of presenting this mindnumbingly dumb, and destructive, false dichotomy. Apparently though, this dichotomy flies over the empty heads of the director, writers, and probably most of the (gracefully) few viewers of this movie. If the people who watched this actually knew better, they'd be insulted by this assault on their intelligence and dignity, especially male viewers but any female viewer too who dislikes mindlessly simplistic reductions of who she is as a woman, or maybe just maybe might have an ounce of respect for the men and boys in her life and what the culture is telling them (to hate themselves and regard women as better).

Ironic that a movie thinking it's fighting sexism and doing a good thing to, yet again, prioritize women over men and show the poor little ladies as both the victims and victors of the of big bad men, utterly and miserably fails to see its own sexism in presenting this peabrained sexist duelism of man=bad/woman=good. It also fails utterly and miserably in its own total lack of creative bravery, intelligence, and invention.

Truly great movies of the present and in the future will end this misandric outlook, and movies will not have to be either anti-woman or anti-man.
12 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Strands of relationships...
ThurstonHunger25 June 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Um spoilers coming, but the short take : honestly I'd skip this film.

If this were a silent film, maybe the affair the wife partakes in would be seen as the one with trace elements of joy. Of course in the film even with the sound on, theirs is nearly silent, as her lover rarely speaks. And perhaps that is the key to a successful union.

Strange film, strange in that it looks like a film from 40 years ago (I assume intentional; and no, not just the black and white footage). Strange as it's a French film with a scolding take on infidelity, which I thought from other such films was seen like baguettes, omnipresent and at least tasty for a little bit?

Don't get me wrong, I would welcome a message reinforcing matrimony, but aside from the wife's dedication to the husband's art, the relationship at the heart of this film has very little actual heart to it. Perhaps that scene with the landlord intends to indict poverty as a threat to their bliss, but there is zero rallying together against that.

I walk away at the end as if I'd spent an evening with two friends whom I cannot help but sense should not be together. Maybe it is just me, but then does the subplot of the deluded resistance hero set us up to question the happy reunion at the end.

Maybe too much verite ruins the recipe of love, I'd really rather not feel that. As complex as relationships are, as thread-bare as they can get, I feel like a strand of hope somehow is woven between partners.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Simple, yet very effective
Red_Identity4 June 2016
There's something so inherently simple about this film, something that may even come across as detrimental if one was to explain the entire plot summary to someone who was interested. They might think that it sounds really contrived and kind of like a ridiculous soap opera, but the key in making a film is always in its execution. In that respect, this film succeeds admirably. The screenplay is simple, but very nuanced and realistic, and the performances and the quiet, delicate direction only help add to that realism. Before you know it, you realize you've become really enthralled in these characters' lives. Very well done in all respects, and definitely recommended for fans of realism cinema.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed