This movie has so much going for it, people speaking their native languages (or at least creating the impression of), wonderful scenery, attention to daily life detail (teeth, hair, roughness of cloth) and some great visual shots. The story, well loved by many, well know by most is compelling.
However,the choices Mel Gibson makes in dishing out an orthodox view on 'the Passion' detract from the overall experience. The way Christ is bullied, beaten and humiliated might be correct, but the amount of blood he looses in the process is unrealistic. Nobody of human flesh could sustain that amount of injury and still walk, let alone carry a cross. Unless Mr Gibson's point is to show that Christ wasn't from human flesh most of the gore was over the top and detracted from the movie.
In regards to the question of the portrayal of the jews in this movie, I think that Mr Gibson portrayed an establishment vs renegade point of view and therefore places the blame squarely at the feet of the establishment. That the establishment is Jewish is a fact of the story, but the actions are those of men with a vested interest in keeping the balance of power. I saw no derogatory portrayal of the jews as a people. The best analogy I can give is to compare the portrayal of the council members with the Spanish inquisition. Their actions reflect poorly on them as men, but should not be used to judge a religion.
All in all, I feel that if Mr Gibson had chosen to listen to modern day church scholars on the life and death of Jesus of Nazareth, he would have made an equally powerful movie, without the firestorm of religious fervour surrounding it.
8/10 overall impression, points subtracted for excessive use of repetition and visual theatrics.
1 out of 2 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tell Your Friends