Reviews

18 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
Marvelous!
8 May 2002
You will find this movie marvelous, full of mysteries. You will remember it as a very pleasant moment in your life.

I strongly recommend it: 9 of 10.

And what again? Oh yes, overall if your name is Homer Simpson...
0 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Yearning after the past
12 October 1999
Is it possible to make an exceptional film with miserable people?

However, the children of the marsh, ordinary in their surroundings, become extraordinary when one throws them in the midst of civilization, actually in a pretty small French town stuffed with good wealthy "bourgeois".

The children of the marsh live in surroundings which could have been one of men living in middle ages, when sickness permitted only a short longevity.

It is the Utopia of nature's children, but with at hand all the resorts of civilization...and all its dangers, since the action goes between the two World Wars.

It is also the contrast of the solidarity between the children of the marsh and the good-natured selfishness of a prosperous middle class, which at the same time loves and rejects them.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A high class fantasia
7 October 1999
Here is a fine production by Julien Duvivier.

I had the impression to be one of the castle's festivity and the arrival of the "Visiteurs" added a mysterious ingredient that had, at the beginning at least, nothing of the despair that was part of their demoniacal mission.

The enchantment provoked by the satanic couple was a pure wonder. That momentary paralysis of a whole small world between two exciting scenes emphasized Arletty's and Cuny's masterly talent.

Jules Berry's play (the Devil) was so fascinating that it made me longing for a ticket to Hell.

That high class "fantasia" glide far over all those easy big budget "fantastic" productions which flood the film fans since too long.
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A real life's documentary
2 October 1999
In a region devastated by the closing of coal mines, and where one worker out of three is unemployed, Bertrand Tavernier tells us the problems of a nursery school's director who wants to improve the social conditions of those people.

He is the only hope for depressive parents but bureaucrats want him to look only after the easy cases forgetting about the problem children.

The challenge of throwing more than thirty 3 to 6 years old kids in the scramble as been taken up: their natural is convincing... and it goes for the director too.

I took part wholeheartedly with the pains and joys of the characters and lived it as if it was real life.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Outrageously underrated
22 August 1999
The film got one of the worst ratings, from the movie critics and sadly from the public. Certainly it didn't deserve it.

I suspect reasons other than cinematographical to explain such an aberration.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An efficient horror movie
28 July 1999
The last time I was frightened viewing a "horror movie" traces back to my prime childhood.

Till I saw this film.

The recipe thanks to which the film works consists in gradually passing from commonplace situations to more unusual events, and finally concluding with a terrifying climax.

Of course, to really enjoy it, one must display a minimum of patience, as in other situations of life...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Falling Down (1993)
7/10
Dead end
24 July 1999
This movie is not really bad: the actors are good and even more and the action is well driven.

There is something amiss, though: this film is made to go nowhere, like a stream in the desert which ends and dry up.

Actually, the film is like Foster, it has no choice but to end in a dead end, when there is no more roll-film in the camera...
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
This film essentially is a study of characters bet...
3 July 1999
This film essentially is a study of characters between a loser (Jacques Brel) and a hit man (Lino Ventura).

This film, like many French comedies, has a Hollywood counterpart, "Buddy Buddy", with Walther Mathau and Jack Lemmon. Although not bad, the remake is nevertheless deceptive, as we were expecting much more from a movie in which the two principal characters are played by such great actors.
13 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
It's good, once a year!
29 June 1999
This unassuming film gave me a lot of pleasure when I saw it for the first time...and I still have fun to see it! It exactly is the kind of movie we see by a raining Sunday, when we have nothing else to do...

To capsulize, the film essentially is a running gag: Inspector Bideau (a kind of Inspector Clouseau) tries to resolve crimes apparently committed by a serial killer. All of his efforts, reasoning, deductions etc, are based on that false premiss. Actually, the different persons who commit those crimes precisely reckon on Bideau's obtuse gullibility!

Certainly a movie which doesn't spoil a videotheque!
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Marathon Man (1976)
10/10
A double-fugue
13 June 1999
The scenario of this film has the structure of a complex counter-point, more precisely that of a double-fugue (fugue: from Latin fuga=pursuit!)

Indeed, in the first part of the movie, we see two independent stories developing in parallel:

1- A Nazi named Szell (Laurence Olivier), nicknamed "Der weisse Engel=the white angel", hiding in South-America after having committed numerous war crimes as SS-führer of a concentration camp, is forced to quit his refuge and to go in USA in order to recover his fortune in diamonds, which originates from the plundering of Jews. His brother, who manages the fortune in USA, plays, so as to say, Olivier's counter-subject.

2- The young jewish student (Dustin Hoffman), is the "marathon man", a persistent man "who bends but doesn't break", leads his life as he wants, despite the mockeries of his neighbors. His brother (Roy Sheider), a secret agent involved with Szell's business, plays the corresponding Hoffman's counter-subject.

In the second part, we see the two "themes of the fugue" mixing together, Olivier's and Hoffman's worlds interacting; and finally, comes the rousing climax, the concluding "stretto".

Of course, the only scenario, as good as it be, cannot ensure the success of the movie. It requires an corresponding quality of actor's prestation. Sure that Hoffman and Olivier did the job!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I laughed with the audience
9 June 1999
Going to the movies to see living actors playing the characters of beloved cartoon heroes is always a challenge. Good, static images appeal for an active part of imagination. Projected on a screen, living people are to be taken as they are, wether we like them or not.

I was a little fearful about that when I went to see Astérix, Obélix & Co in that movie. I found myself laughing frequently like the greater part of the audience, in a happy tone.

The plot was fair to the original story and I think the majority of the actors did a good job, though, the talented Gérard Depardieu as Obélix, lacked some of that immense naivety and the physical roundness that makes the character unique and lovable.

Not the best movie ever made, but certainly not the worst.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Déjà vu
5 June 1999
Really disappointing movie.

I loved "Jurassic Park 1", I hated this sequel. Manifestly Spielberg wanted make a little money to round off his colossal fortune, so he served us that bad warmed-up movie.

Actually, the story is so bad that I think a software could have made the "scenario".

Déjà vu mieux!
2 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the greatest movies
4 June 1999
I am a little bit reluctant using such adjectives like "greatest". But when an "oeuvre d'art" deserves it, why not?

In this film all is fine tuned, well gauged, perfectly synchronized.

I shall in particular emphasize the unforgettable José Ferrer's play of Cyrano's fathomless sorrow.

If Hollywood could remember that there was a long time ago, in a far away galaxy, that thing named "The American Cinema"...
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Better than Prozac!
3 June 1999
One of the comedies that are typically french, at the same time a farce and a study of characters.

Certainly a well aging movie.
17 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Like a good wine
3 June 1999
This film follows the best tradition of the french comedy, managing outrageous, hilarious, unbelievable situations, yet without succumbing to cheap humour or to any kind of vulgarity.

Always pleasant to view, even after 32 years!
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jurassic Park (1993)
9/10
Excellent, in spite of all
2 June 1999
I really enjoyed this film.

Steven Spielberg knows how to create an appropriate climax, combined with the new (at the time) image processing methods.

Nevertheless, I was a little disappointed that Spielberg have evacuated the most part of scientific content in Michael Crichton's book, succumbing to one of Hollywood's fundamental diktats: "Thou shalt not demand too much of the viewer's intelligence".

Actually the ending was eight years old kid stuff, spoiling the initial fear climax.

In spite of all, I saw the movie twice in succession in the theater, and many times on VCR after.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
I didn't understand
1 June 1999
This film is for me a complete mystery.

Is it a "pastiche", a parody of "good ole time" adventure movies? In this case Lucas & Spielberg missed the target.

Or did they simply make fun of us?
8 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A subtle comedy
30 May 1999
The spicy touch in that film is the way the "con" i.e. the fool of the comedy, takes in the second half, the better part of the episode, though he falls again in his own triumphal moron character at the end of the story.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed