I noticed a lot of people defending this movie and talking about "understanding" Superman Returns. First of all, what's that supposed to mean? Superman Returns isn't such a complex movie, so "understanding" it is just an excuse, an attempt to find interpretations and dig out things that aren't really there. Some people say "you shouldn't compare it to the classic Superman movies, because it's new, it's different". The hell you shouldn't. The first two Superman movies were iconic and always will be. And I'm not being subjective about this. If Returns would have raised up to our expectations, I would accept it as it is and say "yes, another damn good Superman movie". But that's not the case. The fact is, the magic is just gone, it seems that the more technology advances, the lamer the movie story lines become, while CGI effects continue to take over. The only well casted actors are Kevin Spacey and Brandon Routh. Brandon could deliver a good Superman in a few years. Right now, he's just an OK compromise. However, I appreciate his performance and I can't think of a better choice for a new Superman. However, the rest of the cast, especially Lois Lane, was just terrible. There's no chemistry between Lois and Clark whatsoever. Just a terrible pure commercial decision, that almost turns Superman Returns in a teenage movie. The story is also pretty lame. And the most intriguing sequence is having Superman thrown and kicked around by Lex Luthor and his goons. Was that cheap violence really necessary? I mean, I remember watching the first Superman movie on the big screen, my father took me to the theater when I was five years old. It had such a great, positive impact on me, and as far as I've heard, on every kid, teenager or adult that watched it. The story was superb, the acting was solid, the dialogs warm and humorous at times, it was magic overall. However, Superman Returns manages to shock us with a violent sequence that would leave any kid or teenager frustrated for a very long time. Superhero movies should leave you with a feeling of satisfaction when they're over. Not frustration. The goons get squashed by a falling rock, and Lex Luthor gets away, while Superman doesn't really get his revenge, instead he suddenly manages to lift the entire fortress in the air, when 10 minutes ago he was lying around, waiting for more kicks in the ribs, because his powers were drown out by the same Kryptonite he now managed to carry in enormous quantity. So the big showdown was lifting the fortress in the air and throwing it into space. Wow. Can it get more lame than this? Don't think so. And while some of you may think that good doesn't always defeat evil that easily, I stick to the opinion that a Superman movie shouldn't follow this path. Let's have good win over evil, at least on the big screen, shall we? The first Superman movies accomplished that. They were perfect in that matter. All fighting or battle scenes were decent, and the story and character development managed to impress the viewer without the use of violence. These were perfect fantasy movies. Superman Returns just leaves you with the feeling of another 100% commercial sequel. Not sure if people will still talk about it in 30 years. But if they will, this will be only because they will always connect it to its predecessors, which are far more impressive and solid. As far as the viewing pleasure goes, the dark tone was another disappointment. It would do well for an upcoming Batman movie, but it just doesn't fit in the Superman universe. I don't want to keep bashing this movie though. It's a pretty decent one, compared to most superhero movies made in the last years. I just wish the script would have been better. Because it could have. We all expected it to be. There are tons of Superman stories printed out there, and the producers could have thought about something much more spectacular and innovative.
1 out of 4 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tell Your Friends