Do you like to watch a patch of fog on a Scottish shoreline gradually clear away, in real time, for like five minutes?
Do you like watching a woman drive a van, and park a van, and sit in a van, and then repeat all those things, for seemingly hours on end?
Do you like watching the film's main character look at herself in mirrors for way, way, way too long, multiple times?
Do you like movies that throw a bunch of loosely connected "cool tidbits" at the wall and just see what sticks, forcing the audience to find meaning - and even the story - on their own? Do you also like iw when the filmmaker then acts like: "Yeah, dude, I'm not coming right out and SAYING what my movie's all about cuz I'd rather just put the pieces there and let YOU interpret them, cuz I'm very much like Stanley Kubrick! And making ART!", which somehow effectively leads to critical acclaim for a film that actually brings next to nothing to the table when you step back and really take a look at it?
There's seriously so many pointless (though often nice looking) and much, much too long shots of the Scottish highlands, and shots of Johansson driving around/sitting in a van, and shots of motorcyclists driving around, and shots of people walking around, and Johansson LITERALLY JUST STARING INTO A MIRROR or examining her own body... it's as though qualifying for their government film assistance funding had a runtime stipulation and they had to include everything they shot to get to that 1:45:00 mark.
Under the Skin is a pretentious pile of unnecessary time-consuming shots and people-looking-at-stuff scenes, posing as a sci-fi masterpiece with depth.
Being different and slow and unclear and just throwing a few "cool ideas" at us and leaving us to sort out why it's an awesome work of art doesn't cut it. I don't care if it took the filmmaker 10 years to make this, they haven't actually delivered anything other than boredom and frustration at how arrogant and pretentious they are.
3/10 because Johansson's performance is very good, though she has almost literally nothing to work with, and because there are some really pretty shots of Scottish scenery.
Interesting premise. Some decent ideas and computer effects. Could have been something, but sadly, not so.
Do you like watching a woman drive a van, and park a van, and sit in a van, and then repeat all those things, for seemingly hours on end?
Do you like watching the film's main character look at herself in mirrors for way, way, way too long, multiple times?
Do you like movies that throw a bunch of loosely connected "cool tidbits" at the wall and just see what sticks, forcing the audience to find meaning - and even the story - on their own? Do you also like iw when the filmmaker then acts like: "Yeah, dude, I'm not coming right out and SAYING what my movie's all about cuz I'd rather just put the pieces there and let YOU interpret them, cuz I'm very much like Stanley Kubrick! And making ART!", which somehow effectively leads to critical acclaim for a film that actually brings next to nothing to the table when you step back and really take a look at it?
There's seriously so many pointless (though often nice looking) and much, much too long shots of the Scottish highlands, and shots of Johansson driving around/sitting in a van, and shots of motorcyclists driving around, and shots of people walking around, and Johansson LITERALLY JUST STARING INTO A MIRROR or examining her own body... it's as though qualifying for their government film assistance funding had a runtime stipulation and they had to include everything they shot to get to that 1:45:00 mark.
Under the Skin is a pretentious pile of unnecessary time-consuming shots and people-looking-at-stuff scenes, posing as a sci-fi masterpiece with depth.
Being different and slow and unclear and just throwing a few "cool ideas" at us and leaving us to sort out why it's an awesome work of art doesn't cut it. I don't care if it took the filmmaker 10 years to make this, they haven't actually delivered anything other than boredom and frustration at how arrogant and pretentious they are.
3/10 because Johansson's performance is very good, though she has almost literally nothing to work with, and because there are some really pretty shots of Scottish scenery.
Interesting premise. Some decent ideas and computer effects. Could have been something, but sadly, not so.
Tell Your Friends