Reviews

52 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Fabelmans (2022)
9/10
Almost perfect...
25 March 2023
The film starts with a medium long shot. After that, we have some energetic sequences. In this film, Spielberg tells the story in such a way that we really and truly feel that we are dealing with a romantic biography with a lot of concentration, and when we realize that its concentration is not that high, it bursts our bubble. When Mitzi leaves the first house with the baby, why should we have a medium long shot? We have such a sequence in Serious Man 2009, where the director takes a long shot correctly and it is a successful sequence. In all the sequences related to the piano, we still have this ridiculous medium long shot. Maybe Spielberg wanted to show off the objective side of things with these mediums,(even more) , or maybe wanted to stay in a special point.but they only cause inconsistency. We have these mediums for all the scenes related to playing the piano and even the second school filming project... Overall, the movie needed more softness. Of course, Sam's love affair is properly executed. Why is Sam's father willing to help him to such an extent when he knows that his job is entertainment? This movie needed a stronger emotional soul (at least for a few seconds) or maybe more darkness, not in the conclusion, but in the praise of the emotions. But again, it works very well as a tough romantic drama in the face of crossing over the defined realities as much as possible (not in all cases) and while it may not be possible to live it, there are always people who know that perfect.4/75/5.
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hot Seat (2022)
9/10
A cinematic way
18 March 2023
Obviously, it is not as polished as the movie "Fortress 2021" and it does not have the softness of that movie, but this Bressack movie is a compressed and logical version of the series that seeks to add some apparent depth to the core of its superficial subject,.at the same time a Little or no effort has been made to sub-category characters. And we also needed more clues. Why doesn't the hero's wife show his message to the agents in the first encounter? If it seems very natural. Talking about perison was thinkable. And honestly I haven't seen such a performance from Mr Gibson in a long time. There's is really moments in the film that you want to continue . Contrary To some other parts. Not bad at all.( You can ad 1374 and 1579 to my username to access my Instagram accounts)
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Powerful Thriller
14 March 2023
. Live characters are the most important and main feature of this movie. And after that, the film has the power to transform the environment into a character. The only thing that does not fully become a character in the film is absurdity. Absurdity in relation to the First World War and history in general should relate to survival, not condemn it. History is not just the past. History is the moment when an event happened and all the factors that happened through it are connected to create a very thought-provoking image. In my opinion, this can be a very correct definition of history. (Of course, an epic definition) if absurdity condems the survival, it can act as a trigger for war and add value to it. Absurdity must be related to survival. Of course, this issue is less visible in the final parts of the film, but also in the beginning of the film. However, the very correct atmosphere of the film, without wanting to be captured by the music, not only covers this issue, but also becomes one of the most remarkable features of the work.

Also, the film is successful in conveying human emotions in a direct way, but it does not do this entirely in a cinematic way.

Of course I wanted to write this comment few days ago..
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A very bravely action
13 March 2023
In the first days of the release of this movie, I praised and praised it on many critic and and analysis sites. I wrote that this movie is a giant masterpiece in the new millennium. I wrote that this film is like the paintings of Edvard Munch and "Nicolas Poussin ", which have been made into the movie. And I said that mankind has not been able to create such a thing for centuries. And I also praised the perfect script. But after seeing a lot of negative comments, I became doubtful and some questions arose in my mind. Maybe I thought about the vagueness of Tan's story and changed my mind. When the movie won seven Oscars. I watched it for third time and asked myself, what is the definition of a smart story? If we want to logically create and define an intelligent story (I emphasize, logically), what should we do? And can social effects affect my poor understanding of modern art? In both cases, the answer was yes. And must be done in this way.

We adapt ourselves to life, boys. The last night Oscar action is not only very bravely but is so differentt actionin last twenty years. And is a very game changer act for the continues.....
16 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Unfortunately or fortunately, the best film adapted from Robinson Crusoe.
3 March 2023
Unfortunately or fortunately, the best film adapted from Robinson Crusoe. ( A complete film) Unfortunately, because this happens in a movie that, in addition to focusing more on the drama parts, lacks the soul and sense of storytelling. (or is afraid of doing it) but fills this problem with appropriate and calculated humor. Fortunately, because the director has a good understanding of the characters, the chemistry of the stars (especially Tracy Woody Harrelson) and also the society he wants to portray, and achieves a gentle reality . And works better than than the big budget adventure films. I think that this movie is the best and most cinematic work that is very similar to Daniel Defoe's Robinson Coruso.

This Ruben Östlund's film which is made with a relatively small budget, is also the meeting point of a "familiar and slightly soiled kind of realism" with " almost perfect exciting adaptations "which their biggest flaw is the lack of that realism. But it still lacks the soul and sense of storytelling found in few successful blockbusters. And one of its interesting features is the ability to remove many of its parts.5/5.
10 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Maby.... After the first this is the best
27 February 2023
When I think of Jurassic Park film, I remember the cinematography masterpiece of the first part that starts especially in the middle of the movie. Which was the accepted effect of a movie in the 2 previous years . (though not the impression that remains in imitation). In the Jurassic Park 1993, none of the dinosaurs change into form, but the behavior that the characters emit in front of it creates an image of them in the mind. Maybe that's why we hardly feel such a void. . The most powerful sequence of jurassic world 2022 is when one of the dinosaurs looks at the surface of the water,like the most powerful sequence of jurassic park 1993 when looks at the car. Here too, none of the dinosaurs transform into a form. The brilliance of Spielbergto definition the narrative covers the Plot's flaws in Jurassic Park. Of course, I think that after some time, Spielberg himself came to the conclusion to use the sense of humor, but this sense of humor or caricature or darkness or the softness aspect should be done in the form of dinosaurs. Not to make dinosaurs that look too natural and serious while deflecting a sense of humor in a different angle.

The action senses related to the Clare are perfect ; the rest are istereotype. 3/75/5.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Definitely the best Tom Cruise film
24 February 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Kubrick's most perfectionist and at the same time most selfish film. But no, maybe it wasn't that selfish. Maybe by making this film, Kubrick wanted to say: Look, I can make any kind of film. Maybe that's why it was not so selfish. This almost perfect film is definitely one of the best films with the theme of Dr. Caligari (or at least one theme: uncertainty in the conclusion). I read somewhere that Tom Cruise said in an interview that I did not like the character of the doctor and that he was far from my character. But anyway, in my opinion, the character of the doctor was very similar to Tom Cruise and almost became one with his role. And I say again , this is the best Tom cruise film. He was a doctor withmore positive aspect. I wish Kubrick had spent a very small part of this perfectionism in filmmaking on the character of Cruise and a few other characters. Not that at the end of the film, the conclusion is often that it is most likely that It was all the revelers party masked fault...
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Almost perfect but ...
10 February 2023
Mr Sam Mendes is one of the few directors who, despite his great talent in directing, I have not yet seen a complete film from him, or at least an exciting complete film from him.

The creation of space in the movie Emperor of Light is done very correctly, as a person who did not live in that place and time, I cannot accept the historical accuracy of the movie 100%. But I can understand that the Stephen character really existed, considering the setting of the film. (especially in the first half) the acting group is wonderful, Olivia Coleman is also wonderful, she is really wonderful. But how good it would be and how good it would be if she performed according to the seriousness and dynamism that she had by nature and it was necessary for the work. And if that was the case, I would never have allowed myself to say that this movie was like theater or whatever the ..... it was.

And I regret more than anything that the atmosphere of the film really needed such a performance...
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Interstellar (2014)
9/10
The best junk of Nolan
7 January 2023
The story of the film is very touching. If we remove the music from the movie, it will still be a good movie, even a better movie, maybe even a weak point. Well now if we remove the music we see that it is longer. And maybe it will be boring for the audience who likes this big movie several times. The final sequence of the film turns into a package full of long shots. Such a show is repeated in different parts of the film. Even in the views we have from space.

Nolan sprinkles a silver and gold color on these shots. Men in spacesuits look much bigger than normal. Matt Damon is not believable enough. But it is good. The sequences size are too long. Nolan tries to make it bearable with music, but he doesn't succeed. I am not against this. But this work also requires a slower rhythm. The pictures are very beautiful. And they often don't look like promotional teasers...
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Inception (2010)
2/10
Nolan's only garbage one
31 December 2022
In this movie he uses the feature of being repeatable in a hard blockbuster and tricks us. The chase part is completely out of frame. After the insomnia, Batman trilogy, Dunkirk and Tenet , and maybe Interstellar, the rest of his works does not resemble a movie, maybe a promotional teaser. Especially in this movie. A completely anti-human film in praise of violence. I'm not saying it's that bad, but it's weirdly overrated. Except for the main male role, none of the actors match their roles. I hope this movie will get out of it's overrated situation. A very bad shape movie The movie itself is worse than the poster. Watery and cardboard

This movie has very good things for under twenty-two years old of before 2000. For lovers of romantic and ridiculous actions like this movie.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
After Aliens 1986 and terminator 1984 , this is the greatest and hardest of Mr Cameron
29 December 2022
Pandora is created for the first time in this movie. While before this, it was just a beautiful visual idea. Pandora is created for the first time in this film, not because of Cameron's tough filmmaking style. Rather, it is the emotion that create it. Yes, it is the emotion that make Pandora. After Aliens 1986 and Terminator 1984, this movie is Cameron's hardest and toughest movie. This movie is a great work that a tough filmmaker makes up with emotions. The world of Avatar is readable, not too complicated. But it takes form. Avata 2 ' s special effects are not just an invention. Rather, it serves the story.. it serves the characters.. it serves the mise en scene. .... Jake sully and his wife are paid again and are not just big stars of a simple romantic standard level of payment.

It seems that here the filmmaker should not refer his story to a film of the first part, but James Cameron explains everything with the focus he has in filmmaking during short impressions.

This movie is much better than the first part because here we are not going to go through a very long and boring introduction about a multi-line story. This movie starts from the first moments.

The dialogues are not on air. In this film, the director has become an expert in the world of his film and remarkably innovatively creates a very good interaction between action and adventure. It can be very difficult to formalize the plot of a traditional story better than this.

I have a nostalgia with the special effects of the first part of this movie (only with its special effects), but that does not make me want to prefer the first part. The difficulty of this movie is like aliens. And I have never seen its softness in Cameron's films.
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fight Club (1999)
10/10
Very better than Inception
30 September 2022
Is definitely much better than Inception. At the moment, the rating of this movie is higher, but if it comes above Inception, I will no longer appear on IMDb. Because this movie is not science fiction, but it is ten times more effective than a good science fiction. And this is very important. A realistic film is so effective in terms of storytelling. You see, at the same time, there is a lot of complexity in it. And you can enjoy watching it many times. Brad Pitt is completely one with his role. And it doesn matter that the movie is criticizing politics. What is most important is the depiction of modern man, and it is one of the few films that is even better than the original book.

Of course I am fan of Nolan.....
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Game of Thrones (2011–2019)
1/10
Why???
30 September 2022
The type of cinematography is extremely realistic (which only claims to be and often becomes a cartoon) and the main genre of the fantasy series. There is a more specific and clear reason that this series is worthless.

Worthless. Long sieve. Expired. It could really be assembled in thirty minutes. It should be turned into a short film.

Except for Ned Stark and his wife, everyone else plays badly, especially the old and young actors of the film. The serie is moving forward from JRR Martin's writings , step by step. From the way of using dialogue, we understand that it wants to be like a book. But in fact, with the way of choosing the actor, it becomes a pathetic thing. Especially the team of old and young actors of the film.

If you want to just look at the screen and think about other things at the same time, this is a good series because it doesn't involve you in anything. I don't believe in the series at all. It's a waste of time. After Alfred Hitchcock, it's a waste of time. I saw some good mini series. The two works recently made by Marvel, love and Thunder and Doctor Strange, are a hundred thousand steps higher than this, of course, I am not a Marvel fan.

They say that his last season ended very badly, as if they just wanted him to leave. But I say: by the way, the last season was the best season, because it completely revealed all the flaws of the series.
11 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Joker (I) (2019)
1/10
Not Just artificial but only full of boring tallks from batman the killing joke
8 September 2022
Toxic movies that I hate forever I really believe that films like this harm not only the cinema but also our world First of all, it was the only DC movie I've seen that tried its best for the weaving philosophy. I'm sure many people know that this movie is an exaggerated movie, but what's worth noting is that not only the hero of the film does not understand classic comedy movie but chooses a bad movie to get emotional. Because that movie has nothing to do with his world. No matter how hard the movie tries, it can't get anything out of itself, especially by taking the acting from the lead role. A film in which there is no violence, but it tries to use it with fear. A film that is not only artificial but also does not any style...acting??!! And only talks boringly. Apparently, after years of increasing Joker appeal, the no-Batman-no-joke-and-no-even-hope-of--killing-joke pattern has become the norm.
20 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
An exotic film
7 September 2022
Toxic movies that I hate forever I really believe that films like this harm not only the cinema but also our world.

The opening of the movie is very ridiculous. It is one of the few times that I see the Academy giving the best actor award to the worst actor.

The lunatic asylum nurse is stupidly naughty . The secondary characters of the movie are very, very bad. The ending of the movie is more ridiculous than the opening, but the worst part of the movie is when a friend (Of course, it hardly even reaches the style of friend) kills him at the request of another friend. The stage design is awful. Neither realistic, nor surreal, nor minimal, nor anything, and intentionally made into a ridiculous form. None of the people in the asylum even come close to the style. There is nothing in this movie. Even relationships are artificial.
14 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Very artificial and not even close to acceptable
7 September 2022
Toxic movies that I hate forever I really believe that films like this harm not only the cinema but also our world.

The worst Gary Oldman in the history of cinema is in this movie. The young actor of the film will never become a character. The hero of the film does not even become a style. The film does not have a script. But there is nothing else to fill the empty space of the movie. Watching this movie is like sitting down and staring at a spot after getting a massage and enjoying a vulgar trance. And then let's go drink our coffee. There is nothing in the movie, even the movies Leon sees in the cinema are not good.
18 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Gladiator (2000)
1/10
There is nothing in it
7 September 2022
Toxic movies that I hate forever I really believe that films like this harm not only the cinema but also our world.

The script is zero. The mise-en-scènes are the level of a beginner director. The camera movement is similar to the movement of the camera in many promotional teasers (especially the chariot part).

Filming fights is no different from the films that are taken from wrestling, boxing and karate competitions, maybe they are even better. The opening of the movie is inefficient. Ridley Scott tries to combine music with cinematography, but fails. There is nothing good in this movie, everything is made up of ordinary and incomplete sub-narratives that are achieved with a lot of funny trickery. The ups and downs of, for example, the hero of the film have an uncertainty or even false excitement .The family has no definition in the film and is captured by the director's absurd slogans. Of course, I like Ridley Scott's movies.

Although I know who made this movie so enlargement here.
12 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Sir Anthony Hopkins is more suitable for comedy and drama
7 September 2022
Toxic movies that I hate forever I really believe that films like this harm not only the cinema but also our world

The only strong point that seems to be in this movie is the few silences that Jonathan Demme has managed to capture, but it took too long and it didn't turn out well. Everything in the movie is based on a funny but very serious story.the film does not have script .And it is the only film for which the Academy has become emotional for specific reasons. The set design in the movie is awful. There is neither simplicity nor complexity in it. The story of the movie is full of bugs. The knots of the story are neither real nor fantasy, neither believable nor surreal. A film that is basically a deception. In my opinion, it could have been a more successful movie by switching the roles of Hopkins and Jodie Foster. The pleasure that the story of the movie wants to convey is very confusing and deceptive. Everything suffers from an artificial nostalgia. Not only is it unsuccessful and it never deceives the professional cinema audience, but it is so ridiculous and funny that it is unbelievable at a certain time. A movie that not only the character but also the style is not seen in it. Tasteless and, for example, tasty inserts in the movie do not advance anything. The film remains as interesting as the basic idea.
11 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Artificial
7 September 2022
Toxic movies that I hate forever I really believe that films like this harm not only the cinema but also our world

After watching this movie, I had nausea with the noble knowledge of mathematics. Russell Crowe and Jennifer Connelly were the worst choices for these roles. This movie can't even make proper use of its very flawed script. A child's game in the world of politics and scientists. Everything in it seems too artificial.

There is no positive point in this picture except an incomplete explain of a messy story. The ending of the film is awful and tries to deceive the audience. As the opening of the film is more awful and we don't know what kind of person we are facing. In my opinion, if Russell Crowe did not act in the movie and only read the dialogues, the result would be much, much better. At least we saw a human mathematician.

I have seen his American Gangster Phil. It was very good there. Nothing is received from him here. A biographical documentary is even more beautiful...
9 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Brut Force (2022)
9/10
A film that just remains on its story
5 September 2022
The extreme realism of the film reaches the point of being annoying compared to many films that claim to be realistic and philosophical. And this is because maybe we expected to see a film without acting and only with some styles. But trying to play an emotional game makes the film even more realistic. Too much loyalty to the initial plan of the script leads to bugs in the story. We should stick to the original plan when everything goes according to plan. The music is definitely one of the weaknesses of the film. And finally, a complete drama film with a slightly incomplete ending. Even the funny parts of the film have a realism, whether intended or not...
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jurassic Hunt (2021)
9/10
Somethings in this film is really flawless
2 September 2022
Its clear that , even an illustrated book can hardly be so perfect (in terms of frames and editing). The female character of the movie really really looks like she is painted. The actions related to the female actress of the film are extremely unique. The negative actor in the suit was not suitable for this role or does not play his role properly. But he is a good actor. The fictional creature of the film is neglected, maybe not chosen correctly. And these were the problems of the film, but the script has been calculated and has fewer bugs. The ending is stunning. The costume design of the film could have been better. And it was not a movie that wanted to get to the close-up quickly..
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A movie that wants to don't bother us
28 August 2022
I don't know exactly what makes someone nowadays make something that is not just for commercial use. That is at least worth it. But this movie (except for unnecessary slow motion and extra locations and unnecessary types) has exact uniformity, rhythm, almost calculated script, and most importantly, turning its environment into a character. But when making such a film, we should not try to imitate space odyssey. It's really hard to make such a movie with this novice acting team. A very, very small movie that doesn't bother us. The films poster is almost correct but need a very low level of shark. Close ups into the film are almost true but some of them are additional.a good film.
10 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
One of the bests
14 August 2022
Among all the fantasy movies, series and animations that have been made about the four great literary works of China, this movie is one of the best...... Because we can see some of artistic designs , and connected cases with the subject that the film deals with.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Woman in Car (2021)
9/10
Not bad at all but a small end!
9 August 2022
The movie is not bad at all. It just needed a longer ending. Why some filmmakers really don't understand? Such a film should be at least two and a half hours long. See the films of the history of Japanese cinema.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An action film? An adventure film?
18 July 2022
A simple beautiful film, without pretentiousness. It seems that it was not meant to be an action movie, the action scenes that are related to the female actor are better than the male actor, but still not realistic enough. Maybe if the action was at least ten seconds, the result would have been much better. We need to see at least three or four carefully designed images of the events of the film to have a real adventure.
8 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed