69 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Me Before You (2016)
10/10
Brother really needs some weed
29 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
As a straight male I can stare at Sam Claflin all day. Jesus Christ man!! PERFECT ending. Not sure how much of a "British movie" this is but u can bet if it was another Hollywood ending they'd tie his feet with a rope, drag his arse to an helicopter and make him bungee jump with Tony Robbins cheering him along. Or forcefully marry him for a smaltzy happy ending for a distorted meaning of what it means "to live".

My mom was watching this along with me in plane in silent mode without headphones and I can tell she was even touched by the ending.

Loved the father's assurance "your heart is as big as the castle".

Sam Cleflin gives a very stoic and solid performance and Jesus Christ man, wear a hijab.

Turns out at the ended our bro on signa grindset really needed some good ol fashioned dab and not just love.

As Alan Watts once quoth Camus: Ultimately it's about wondering if the game is worth the candle.

Perfect movie 10/10.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ride Along (2014)
1/10
The writers must be smoking really strong stuff...
17 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Or else why would the entire group of bad guys get obliterated in a blast only to appear at his girlfriend's house next second? Wtf. No explanation, nothing whatsoever.

Filled with juvenile humor with that annoying Kevin Hart who thinks he is being "funny". Lazy deus ex machina of cops being corrupt and laden with unnecessary sexual references in the booty calls. While Ice Cube was solid at times, it couldn't be saved by a generic, paper thin plot.

I would avoid it. Loose writing and corny action scenes.... worse than a budget of a B movie.

It looks like a kindergarten or Chat-GPT must have wrote the script. Will be avoiding all Kevin Hart movies from now on.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tetris (2023)
1/10
Too Hollywood for me.... gave up after 30 minutes
15 February 2024
Style over substance. What shallow script that is cannot be outweighed by retro techno music and digital graphics for suspense.

Found it all about business deals and no hint at thd origins or creativity or coding behind it.

There just HAD to be an interracial marriage huh?

The Japanese wife HAD to be assertive character who called the shots when arcade funding was cut off huh?

But what annoyed me was Sasha's character. Ironically Hollywood wants to empower women and make the most tripe cardboard stereotypical character.

First couldn't parse what Sasha was saying but what ennervened me was the fact without even knowing thd history of the strange man and his Tetris she seemed to be bought in hook, line and sinker just like the execs want us to.

I can already hear the dude at the board meeting brainstorming pitch: Picture this. Our protagonist is in a supersecret goverment building and is getting rejected at every second. But his translator Sasha? She is rooting for him. She is rooting for him to win. She is rooting for Tetris.

And hence she doesn't translate. I might be seeing too much into it but that is exactly the impression I got.

Or else why she wouldn't translate what he needs to hear? She just met him for 5 minutes.

So cringe and pukeworthy. As if execs think everyone should be onboard with them.

Reminded me of the garbage Houdini.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Beekeeper (2024)
1/10
Absolute cringefest!
9 February 2024
Nonstop gratuitous action.

No coherent story or plot.

No build up.

Wooden dialogue.

Agent Cringe easily one of the worst characters ever.

Waste of time.

So Ludacris even Luda be changing.

I seriously question the taste and state of mind people voting it higher. No offense.

Absolute ridiculous scenes riddled with f bomb at every corner.

John Wick plagiarized.

Then again perhaps misunderstood genius masterpiece akin to Impressionists.... but we shall never know.

Basically the movie is an inversely proportional downward slope from get go.

Typical Hollywood garbage.

Is there no concept of quality control or gatekeeping nowadays?

And th ed whole beekeeping thing is like forcing something completely unrelated in something completely unrelated.

It should be blasphemy to compare it to Equalizer.
22 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What seems to be the hype about it?
24 January 2024
Problem with Hollywood filmmakers is that they think of some niche, obscure topic and go: "Oh maybe we should make a film about it"

Why should I care?

Why is this a movie that everone needs to see?

Just like Barbenheimer these are nothing but marketing hype with A-list celebrities.

LOVE Matt Damon but he doesn't do well in these type of roles.

Christian Bale rocks, but perhaps this is not the right role for him.

As I said. The arrogance of Hollywood to think just because someone made a story about Truman Capote, John Malkovich or say a fictional account of a female Gucci member.... or some weird obscure niche topic and they think people should all sign up en masse.

Boring premise to begin with.

(To be fair I watched most of the movie from the back of a plane with subtitles on. But still it is not a premise to get excited about.)
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Another rollicking "Hollywood-ization" of yet another classic!
21 January 2024
I am guessing the ones who are giving rave reviews can't be bothered to read the 1200 page tome. And that's cool. As a stand-alone piece when I first watched it I loved it. Especially Jim Caviezel would later go on to rock Person of Interest.

However, upon slow reading the magnum opus of Dumas I realize how garbage this is. This is an absolute disservive to the Dumas brand and novel.

Corny dialogue. Scenes that producers and directors wanted to put. Swashbuckling nonsense for the big screen which completely misses the ESSENCE of this classic - wow.

Please do yourself a favor. Instead of renting it, kindly go to your local library and check out the book.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
What an excellent initiative and a refreshing documentary!
30 December 2023
Sure glowing praises for the documentary. I do believe Jeremy Stuart did a good job and the worldwide awakening of unschooling and self-directed learning phenomenon is a phenomenal initiative.

Reason I am giving it 8/10 is because as a 40 year old college dropout autodidact I was more interested in their learning style and thought processes. Like how they learn? What happens if they are overwhelmed when tackling something new? What are their learning strategies?

At first the documentator make it seem like Emily et al. Just pick up their craft by sheer force of curiosity and drive effortlessly. Like not everyone can just open up a garage.

But the pace does pick up when it comes to Northern Star and World School (forgive me if I forget the actual term). These are sort of Montessoiri approaches for adults. All hands-on learning a la Finnish model. Still it only gives glimpse as how they just pick up their craft effotlessly such as building hut, paving, grape press etc....

It is great for high schoolers and similar demographics. And it is filled with nuggets of wisdom and information such as what is really meant by education, how the whole world is a great learning environment, and even radical ideas as schools must be done away with. Dr. Peter Gray was delight to listen to!

The greatest takeaway is this: almost all the case studies had positive, supportive, loving encouraging environment and parental support.

This really goes on to show when the community is supportive we can really create geniuses a la Renaissance Men like Leonardo da Vinci.

It shows that we humans are souls on earth who perform best when given no reign or leash on creativity and wonder and full autonomy is given.

These are high level spiritual thoughts and such unconditional love and support is not seen much really elsewhere for a bouncing baby to flourish in this world in a loving nurturing away that was been usurped by the rot of captilastic competition, greed and social media hyperdrive of treadmill.

All in all good, positive, refreshing upbeat documetary. These are the things I wanna watch and I paid for it. Another great short docu was on YouTube about playground for geniuses in Santa Fe institute.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Not a political movie. I stand humbled.
2 December 2023
I once watched a YouTube short documentary how the origianl Top Gun was a propaganda piece after Lockerbie and related events to hire recruits.

So I held deep seated biases and blinkered opinions it must be another 'Muslims/Russians are bad' pro-America, conservative propaganda film.

Boy was I wrong.

Each shot progressively gets better. As Chris Stuckman said some of the shots are worth more than the budget of his entire channel.

The spectular landing views of figher pilot on ship within first 10 minutes really won me over.

But even though the plot is nil and worth a low score, the reason I am giving it a perfect 10 is because of the nostalgia.

It is a typical and solid Jerry Buckheimer film. These guys know what they are doing and how to give a A+ movie experience. Part of the movie reminded me of Michael Bay-esque sig and just like his Armagaddon and The Rock it will stand the test of time because these are the movies you can watch again and again and again with family. (Albeit, Armagaddon was cheesy.)

And mild spoiler... there are no enemies - which is quite a novel way to present things and in this case worked out.

Bravo Hollywood!
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Why should I care?
2 December 2023
I live on welfare with my mother as a 40 year old single guy. Although I find myself to be grateful for a modest living, in the eyes of rich America, I am at the bottom of the barrel. Why is it relevant? Elite Hollywood and snotty Brits need to earn my respect when they create such drivel. The implications are as if 'Throw everything at the hoi polloi, at the mass will eat the cak--- errr watch it.'

Now I shouldn't be complaning since I got to watch part of the movie for free. (Legally man.) But I turned off after 10 minutes. Perhaps not all Bond movies are for everyone and I still decided to give it a shot. At one scene, Bond is surrounded by Italian gangsters with infinite round of bullets aimed at his (Aston Martin?) and the such is the sheer power of the bulletproof glass that it withstend a heavy pounding of the Spanish artillery itself. But that is not where I turned it off. Then Bond - in a rather cheesy manner I say with Madeleine begging pretty please- he retaliated with a hidden cannon in his headlights and swiveled around and put down the bad guys.

Are you kidding me?

You are telling me to marry fantasy. Might as well have had a secret compartmen with lateral 9 by 9 sawblade taht juts out of the car and at the flick of a remote a giant pterodactyl swoops in and flies away the bad guys. I mean come'on. Hence, my question: Why should I care? Just because it is some elitist big budget movie with big budget stars?

Also, it is not about being harsh. Contrast this with Tom Gun:Maverick I just saw. I knew nothing of the original and went in with heavy political bias. But the movie won me over with spectular shots. You know why? Because even though it is far-fetched it is still thousand times more realistic than any cheesy Bond sequence of frames.

I might make 100$ a month, but I will not give a dime of my attention if this is what Hollywood and 'Royal Family' -esque folks have to offer.

Signed

-A groundling

And Billie Eilish. Eww.
3 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Locksmith (I) (2023)
1/10
Just another B movie
20 September 2023
Solid acting by Ryan Phillipe (whom I loved in Shooter and Breach and Antitrust) as well as by Kate Bosworth and Ving Rhames. But other than that just another B movie.

No respect for the profession. No signs of intellect or nuance... just another template movie. They probably used some locksmith consultants and that's about it I think. I doubt anyone ever delved deep into the profession.

If you want a better movie that does justice to this type of genre watch Escape from Pretoria with Daniel Radcliffe. Or heck even better read the book The Locksmith by Mahmud.

Hollywood has lost all signs of ingenuity. Teaching the kid some lockpicking trick was a nice touch.

All three actors killed it but this movie is one which is better off locked in the dungeon with keys thrown away deep in the sea.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Plane (2023)
4/10
Pointless action flick. The Rock rehashed.
19 September 2023
A convict hostage, former special forces, helping out other hostages get out with a lead character... where have I seen this before? That's right. It's like taking script of The Rock and entering a competition on "How far can we mess this up in a typical Hollywood fashion?"

There were no memorable dialogues. There was no tension. We know bad guys will lose and good will triumph over evil. The action scenes were good and so was the character of the convict played by whom-I-am-too-lazy-to-look-up. He played the calm "Sean Connery" character from The Rock whilst Gerard Butler saved the day with some Bessie Coleman wizardry of aircraft.

One of the scenes that was especially touching was - and no spoiler intended- was Gerard Butler reflecting back on his "Journey" on the steps of the plane in the final scene - very reminiscent of the career and body of work he left behind - for which we salute him.

Other than that another generic forgettable Hollywood direct-by-the-number action flick.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Twilight Zone: A Kind of a Stopwatch (1963)
Season 5, Episode 4
7/10
It doesn't have to be that magical stopwatch...
17 September 2023
...in modern day and age when we can have everything we want, this magical stopwatch could be substituted for 1. Wishful thinking law of attraction; 2. Marijuana and psychedelics; 3. Or even food or junk food; 4. If not to keep the modern theme in mind, AI like ChatGPT.

Although I gave it a weak 7, but the message still remains intact. Human folly is such that the moment it gets some magical gift, its greed instantly spoils it - be it medicinal plants or impending from artificial intelligence in the future. We don't know moderation and overindulge in junk food or for that matter people who do ayahuasca use it to as a money making hack if not those law of attraction manipulators.

That was my main takeaway. As far as the story itself, I mainly watch these for the side-characters. Whether it be a charismatic angel or an omniscient omnipotent devil or a street swindler with special gifts - I love how those deus-ex-machina type of fourth-dimensional characters make brief appearance. Probably my own wish fulfilment to live lives like that...

Here we have a barfly who is raving mad. This was different twist than other characters with god-like powers such as the old guy with long flowing beard who also granted all wishes.

Back to the main topic, give an inch to humanity and we want to take a mile. This episode is the pat example.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
K-PAX (2001)
7/10
Good movie except for Hollywood far-fetchedness
11 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Watched it again after 20 years. Thank God for forgetfulness as I forgot many, many portions of the movie. It still packs a punch and Kevin Spacey delivers.

If it was my earlier days, I would have given it 10/10. However, now I am more mature having seen far more quality movies and thus the score.

Several "Hollywoodness" bothered me:

-no one randomly arrests someone and sends them to mental hospital like the opening scene... there has be many, many different factors like threat of violence against others or suicidal ideation

-in the scene where there seemed to be a mass hysteria.. well it is completely unrealistic... suddenly four storey full of people started chanting "bluebird" "bluebird"? So Hollywoody...

-there are many, many patient-doctor privileges... a doctor just don't whip out a recorder and start recording nor take the recorder home

-typical overzealous Hollywood doctor... NO doctors pursue, ponder such patients days after days as if solving some puzzle... (they always need to portray some overzealous character whether it be a FBI agent or a doctor or a lawyer who fights tooth and nail and can't seem to sleep...)

-oh speaking of which... that scene of waking up at 2am to 'solve the puzzle'

-the unrealistic hypnosis scene

-NO ONE says "We should regress him.." or "We need to pull him back..." so cliche

-NO doctor takes a patient home to connect or what not... completely unrealistic...there is very, very rare case of bond forming and generally strong boundary between doctor and patient

-NO DOCTOR will drive up to some distant farm to investigate... totally unrealistic

Other than that love the philosophical undertones.

Constructive criticism aside, two of the most powerful scenes lasted for microseconds

1. Kevin Spacey describing the two sun to the other patient where once in a 200 year old event is a 'sight to behold'

as well as:

2. "I know who you are... you are the bluebird"

Loved these in-between short scenes that packed so much punch.

See it! Recommended.

It is a good film by the director Iain Softley. Too bad we haven't heard much of him like Robert Zemeckis or someone.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Twilight Zone: Eye of the Beholder (1960)
Season 2, Episode 6
10/10
Absolutely brilliant!! Classic Twilight Zone as we know it.
9 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Loved it even though I "found out" about the ending from YouTube video. This is sure to be a classic and timeless. Even though I could tell what is coming the ending was chilling and creepy.

Reminded me of my own short-story "Cyclops" I penned earlier in January 18 of this year. Except my one dealt with disability where in future the disabled people are the leaders and able-bodied folks are the minority.

This particular episode can also help one riff on to other ideas as to the nature of mental illness and psychiatry. Whom we deem as unnatural or irrational or 'lost' or insane might actually be attuned to higher consciousness.

Everything was on point and perfect. Only negative was that the suspense was lingering on when it came to removing the bandages.

10/10.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Twilight Zone: I Dream of Genie (1963)
Season 4, Episode 12
3/10
Not fan of these 1-hour episodes. Unnecessarily dragging along...
9 July 2023
Started TZ with 20 minute classic episodes. Ended up several seasons later browsing content which are an hour in length. I understand back then TV was 'new' and people wanted more entertainment. But dragging along a plot unnecessarily and spelling everything out just to lengthen does not work when the same point could be made in 20 minutes. Same happens in modern times where producers feel like entertainment "has to" stick to a template or time frame.

Also as others pointed out genie gimmick became repetitive. I think by this time after producing so many episodes the creators were running out of ideas.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Twilight Zone: The Silence (1961)
Season 2, Episode 25
9/10
Absolutely hated the ending!!!
8 July 2023
I am still giving it a 9 but taking off the point. I know it's "Twilight Zone" and people want their twists and what not, but I found the ending completely unnecessary.

The story unmistakably reminded me of Chekov's The Bet. Although it could have been a stand-alone showpiece, the fact that it has to tie to the 'theme' of Twilight Zone, they added an ending which can best be described as splashing a bucket of paint on Van Gogh.

Of course there were some 'off moments'. A human needs much more than living in a fishbowl to survive. Air, fresh oxygen... the suffocation can itself be damning.

But even if we overlook these salient factors (and the fact he had the leeway to write) it still packs a punch. The writing and the dialogue is topnotch.

I know if there was no 'special' twist it would be predictable and bland. But sometimes you need to just leave a sketch be sketch to stand out as an art.

If it was a case of honor, it would be an illustration. Unfortunately, the sensational ending defeats the whole purpose and acts as a sloppy deus ex machina.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Twilight Zone: A Nice Place to Visit (1960)
Season 1, Episode 28
10/10
Another favorite episode of mine!! Love Pip!
7 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Alan Watts again and again pointed out: What would you do if you were in heaven? Write a 10-page essay of your version of heaven. What would God do if He ever got bored? What if everything in life was predetermined including game of chance and you got everything you wanted?

As Alan mentions:

"Let's suppose that you were able every night to dream any dream that you wanted to dream. And that you could, for example, have the power within one night to dream 75 years of time. Or any length of time you wanted to have." (Alan Watts, Dream of Life)

And in Game Theory of Ethics, he points out:

"So we get optimal games in the middle-like bridge, or poker, or checkers, or chess-where there is this interplay of skill and chance. So we look for this optimal point where there is a risk-there must be a risk, there must be chance, it mustn't all be predetermined-because any game where the result is known is not worth playing. That's to say, when, in chess, the players suddenly realize that white is going to mate in five moves, they abandon the game and say, "Let's begin again." And so in life. That's why a lot of people don't like going to fortune tellers. They don't want to know the future. If I know exactly what's going to happen to me, in a very real sense I've had it. So let's finish it up and begin again; turn in the check. You see, the whole fun of the situation of a game is that you don't know the outcome, and that's why it's worth playing. This is one characteristic of a viable game: a certain combination of skill and chance."

Far too often in life we get disillusioned and frustrated that things are not going our way. We muse what would happen if only we were given a fair end of the bargain.

Well this episode highlights and answers the question. I know everyone is saying that they could sense the ending and how predictable it is... well I couldn't. And that's not the point of it after all folks.

As the quotes above show, the far more bigger philosophical problem is assuming a concept of Heaven exist would it really be Heaven or Hell? Or for that matter the fact that we live here on Earth and sometimes consider this humdrum, mundane drone of life an utter terror, hell and nightmare - does it really mean so or is it perfect as it is?

This very episode hits the mark. I am absolutely in love with the character of Pip. (Yes the ending showed his true colors, but I just love the concept of a "paid-off-VIP-service-and-five-star-treatment" with a loving, understanding concierge as portrayed by Pip at first.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Twilight Zone: What You Need (1959)
Season 1, Episode 12
10/10
The old seer peddler would be my dream job!
6 July 2023
Imagine being this sweet looking short unassuming non-intimidating diminutive person with super godly powers living the dream of his life by supplanting people with the perfect appliances which they need at the right time. Sign me up! It would be my dream job. Loved all the characters portrayed and also a bit puzzled by the side-character of the strange man who was silently but glaringly observing everything including the old seer.

In the span of 20 minutes, they even managed to sneak in a little romantic story as well! Except the petulant man is too blind to seize all his wealth!

All the story arcs involving the items are gold. Top class writing and acting... probably my favorite Twilight Zone episode so far!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Twilight Zone (1959–1964)
10/10
I would marry this show if it were human!
4 July 2023
If Twilight Zone manifested itself in human form, I would have only two words for it: MARRY ME.

And I am not the type to settle down. Absolute masterpiece. Minimal. Simplistic. Shows you don't need tetrabillion dollar theater to create intrigue and suspense. Love the 'meta' characters such as the Dealer in Everything, Death, Devil, etc with that 1920s je ne sais quois suave with perfect hair gel and comboever in dapper suits!!

It hits the spot in all levels. Modern film making and cinema will do well to learn from this. It ignited my love to read short stories again if not pen some myself.

Very reminiscent of Satyajit Ray-esque type of universe!! 10/10.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hypnotic (2023)
1/10
Fails to hypnotize me! Probably WORST film of the last 10 years.
1 July 2023
Someone really smokin' the good gan-ja at Hollywood huh? I can easily picture someone having just found out Derren Brown went to type at the prompt of Chat GPT: Computer write me a script about a bank heist by a Dr X/X Men type of ability with some Inception thrown in.

I mean sweet Jesus. Just goes on to show if you have billions of dollars to spend and have well connections in Hollywood anyone can produce a pile of dung for entire Scarabaeinae family.

Only reason this film gets a pass is because of it "looks Hollywood". Horrible acting, horrible story, horrible dialogue, horrible pacing, horrible 'twists' and worst of all complete insult to audience intelligence.

Looks like Ben Affleck hasn't hit his low since Gigli. This is probably the worst film of the decade and I need to badly find out what Darren Arnofsky has been upto lately to cleanse my palette.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Unthinkable (2010)
10/10
Michael Sheen gives a life time mind blowing performance of that of a psychopath!
28 June 2023
Warning: Spoilers
For that alone is 10.

Especially that wink! Almost reminded me of Heath Ledger's Joker. And.... when thick snot came off his nose from THAT scene.

Jesus. I have never heard of this actor - almost confused him with the old Michael Sheen lol...- but boy oh boy! What a mind blowing performance of that a villain!

I tuned in for Samuel L. Jackson - and for those who think he couldn't surpass his Negotiator "role" with Kevin Spacey in a 2.0 film, then he did... - and stayed for the villain.

My only qualm. They could make it more gritty by making him a REAL Muslim instead of a convert. I understand had they done that they would tick off an entire community. (I personally was born Muslim and left the religion and thus won't mind... but a film shouldn't confiscate its integrity.)

Also minor quibble:

-they could make it more philosophical -when he wrote down the note, Helen asked him why he made the video... that was incongruent

Also after a massive explosion, people seemingly carried on as if nothing has happened.

Other than that a brilliant riddle to ponder in this morality tale and it is a movie that will grow on you after time has elapsed.

Kudos Michael Sheen! Look forward to more of your work.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Mark Hamill steals the show. It exalts the animation to that of an art.
24 June 2023
Mark Hamill steals the show. The Batman is perfect. This series exalts the animation to that of an art.

I am not an animation buff. I couldn't finish Rick & Morty, Inside Job and Duncan Trusell's animated series even if my life depended on it. I was very skeptical and feeling guilty when I spent 20 bucks on YouTube to watch this show. 2 episodes in and I am already hooked.

The art direction, the dialogue, 90s nostalgia, Batman's stoic demeanor and deep-set voice who seems to be beyond reproach, the villains, the laugh, ah yes the maniacal laugh, the seemingly endless creativity of cornucopia of Joker's gadgets and villains - all these were all on point.

And as much as I love the Joker character and the villains, for the first time we get to see a PERFECT Batman. No. Batman doesn't need no vulnerabilities. He doesn't need "more humanness". He needs no gloss like the gilding the lily. Create a wooden, Spartan character devoid of emotions and minimal talk - voila! You got the perfect hero. But that's just my opinion. (Too many times in Hollywood we didn't see the character Batman rather the actors Ben Affleck, Christian Bale, George Clooney.)

It hit the spot for me and certainly takes the cake of one of the best animated series of all time.

This is an animation that needs to be cozied up with a hot mug of coffee under a blanket during Christmas snow with perfect comfy fluffy rugs on floor and fresh smell of crayons - all of which got triggered like nostalgic whiff of Proust.

It is a privilege to live in California and savor this show.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Vertigo (1958)
6/10
I am unsure as to whether this is a masterpiece or a trainwreck
24 June 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I am unsure as to whether this is a masterpiece or a trainwreck. As one reviewer pointed out: "The whole plot is the hole." Problem with this movie is it doesn't know what genre it should be pigeonholed in and thus ends up a chimeric mess as a platypus with dactyls misplaced or a fingerprint of a genius!

First of all, I am not a snotty reviewer who thinks The Birdman was a straight-out-of-the-world arthouse masterpiece or some bull dung like that. It isn't. Trust me. And also during the pre-internet era when certain movies were shoved down our throat by Jay Leno and Tonight Show and limited array of resources, we used to consider certain classics as de facto, unshakable verdict of true criticism that stands still and cannot be iconoclastically shoved aside. Such movies include.. ah yes Schindler's List, Godfather (yes I said it), Traffic, Citizen Kane, It's a Wonderful Life, Kill Bill, Pulp Fiction and loads of other plethoras which were considered gold standard. As if these will always stand test of time and cannot be touched.

Nay sir. As someone born in 1982 or 1983 I forget, I am slowly getting into the Boomers Section. Thus these 'old' films are curated very, very selectively to cater to worth my time since like a true, hardened Gen Z of social media my attention span is that of a gnat.

Thus, I thoroughly enjoyed The Bishop's Wife, 12 Angry Men, Miracle on 34th Street (1947), To Kill a Mockingbird which I watched with my momma and This Birds.

While The Birds was a true, gem of a minimalist masterpiece, Vertigo was all over the place.

It starts off with a simple theme of a phobia that debilitates each of us at one form or another.

Then it moves on to something of The Exorcist - creepy AF.

Suddenly it becomes Romance and very soon a minor study of cataonia at hospital where his friendzoned chick like a true loyal fatih comes to pay him a visit -which by the way... what the heck happened to her? What an unresolved drama!

It also gives a flicker of surrealism and psychedelia with the nightmare scene.

And finally ends on a psychological mystery thriller detective note.

With a final flourish and grand finale of classic Hitchcockian signature.

How'vur there are lot of plotholes. As I already pointed out, where is the closure of his lady friend? Why would the person want to murder his wife? At first I thought Madeline was his wife and they dropped a dummy from the roof and Madeline and her husband in the act - not an ACTUAL wife.

Thus, the deus ex machina was extremely lazy.

As much as the 1950s San Francisco backdrop was mesmerizing, these odd little plot points was just too bothersome. Sure I can overlook someone not being aware of being followed at close and what not, but it just doesn't flow smoothly for me given the bar I set after watching The Birds. (Kinda like Shymalanesque "Sixth Sense" expectation).

However, one thing that DID do it for me was the final scene. I would have given this movie a straight up 4 if it wasn't for the final scene which is:

TICK OFF A MAN ENOUGH, HE WILL WALK THROUGH HIS WORST FEAR BE IT COBRAS, FIRE OR HEIGHTS.

And that's why folks, it could be hailed as a masterpiece!
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cocaine Bear (2023)
4/10
Helluva fizzes out!
29 March 2023
Warning: Spoilers
If you are watching it in theaters or even renting it you are paying around 20-30 bucks. And it just doesn't hold water and the pay off is terrible.

This will contain heavy spoilers.

Of course, it leaves many things unanswered and makes one wonder as the context unravels if things could be stranger and truer than fiction such as the ambulance gore scene, shot off skull in front of door, jason-bourne like taking down 3 assailants, what would happen if kids indeed tried coke or as detail as if you speak 'bear' on stethoscope does it really sound loud, what would happen if a bear really did coke and why did it pass out etc.... Yes, it do raises these 'Did it really happen?' question as to how much has been blurred from fact to fiction.

I am not familiar with Elizabeth Banks' oeuvre but it seemed like a rookie direction. The execution could have been helluva better...

Over all the arching plot reminded me of the masterpiece The Weekend where several thread of events spin around a central tenet.

Some of the little touches were nice such as revealing how she is a nurse when differentiating from paint from blood or the girl being clever to leave clues.

The natural scene could have been even more artistically done but the CGI overshadows the cinematography.

Characters are unintersting except for the protoganist family ie single mother and her daughter and her friend.

I just didn't get the bang for my buck. Falls falt, underwhelmed and the choice of music wasn't doing it for me. Then again not a 70s guy.

It felt like a Scream meets a botched up gory version of Planet of The Apes.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Plandemic (2020– )
10/10
'When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say.'
25 March 2023
Excellent documentary!

Most of the reviewers already waxed praises and I have nothing further to add. Sans subject matter - solely on the merit of the film making - it gets 10 out of 10 stars. Also it seems like the film maker tried to be as neutral as possible and was non-partisan. For instance, the CBS reporter Norah's interrogation was given a spotlight and when all the installed puppet leaders were shown for some reason they even added The Big Dawg DJT in it. I personally think that was a mistake just like Bill Maher shouldn't have been included in the litany of those late night actors and propaganda mouth piece.

Now this video is fairly accessible. But to what cost? Just like Iraq war and 9/11 and after millions and millions of lives lost and what not... we are too late to the party. But Truth... yes, the veridical truth will surface no matter what be it 20 months from now or 20,000 years from now.

I am not religious, but God is not awake, but She is not dead.

Finally, I have scrolled for 2 minutes all the featured as well as recent reviews and other than scant 1 stars from people who luvvv to willingly give up their rights brainwashed with a singular memetic of "Qanon" (as if that's slamdunk) all I saw were 10 stars reviews.

Yet... yet for some reason the overall rating is 6 stars. Something doesn't add up.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed