No. It is very short sighed and emotional thinking to call for towers to be rebuilt tit for tat.
First of all, in 2001 they were technologically outdated. They had no robust fire sprinklers.
Secondly, rebuilding them would only attract another terrorist attack. Which would cause another tragedy and outcry in america.
Thirdly, thousands of people perished there and it's sacred place. So nothing should be build on sacred place, and I'm glad it was done this way.
Anyway, it is clear for everyone that these towers simply lacked any efficient air protection against suicide attacks. If there was anti-aircraft gin on one of the towers with a radar, it would have shot down these aircrafts and albeit some losses would have incurred, towers would have been saved and would still be standing.
First of all, in 2001 they were technologically outdated. They had no robust fire sprinklers.
Secondly, rebuilding them would only attract another terrorist attack. Which would cause another tragedy and outcry in america.
Thirdly, thousands of people perished there and it's sacred place. So nothing should be build on sacred place, and I'm glad it was done this way.
Anyway, it is clear for everyone that these towers simply lacked any efficient air protection against suicide attacks. If there was anti-aircraft gin on one of the towers with a radar, it would have shot down these aircrafts and albeit some losses would have incurred, towers would have been saved and would still be standing.
Tell Your Friends