Reviews

14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Liberty belle (1983)
2/10
Lots of style, but no substance
29 July 2005
"Liberty belle" is probably most recognized as Juliette Binoche's first film, however fans will be disappointed as the actress makes only a tiny appearance with one line of dialog.

The film itself is a rather dull affair weakened by a rambling narrative and weak central performance.

The film follows young Juian Berg as he becomes involved in the movement against the French led war in Algeria in 1960. However rather than re-create the many marches and sense of exuberant and idealistic youth synonymous with that time, the film instead creates dark scenes of people discussing France's involvement in the conflict and their actions against it.

As Berg, Jerome Zucca is flat, uninspired and his lack of experience shows. Since the film walks or falls on this performance, it flounders due to Zucca's weak acting.

In supporting roles Dominique Lavanant and Andre Dussollier are fine but not in any way exciting... The concept of Pascal Kané's film is one worth exploring, however this film fails to do that.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
O Fantasma (2000)
Reduced to nothing...
10 April 2003
Some of the finest European filmakers from Godard to Kieslowski

to Haneke have all understood the art of reductionism. That is

through a process of editing and re-editing their screenplays and

actual films these men have been able creature a 'pure' cinematic

expereince. However this cannot be at the expense of either

character or sense. This is where O Fantasma goes wrong.

There is no motivation or explanation of the main characters

feelings or actions. We are asked to just accept the way he is. Yet

we are all products of circumstance.

By combining hard core porn in the film we are further alienated.

When Haneke did this in la Pianiste, it was a character who

watched the porn. Here the actors are the porn stars, but the sex is

episodic and not actually necessary or fierce as I believe it was

intended to be.

To say that the central character is meant to be mysterious is fine.

But he is not that well defined. In the end he is just non-descript

and ultimatly not worth the effort. As the film is about this character,

it too ultimately becomes flat and worthless

1/4
15 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lucie Aubrac (1997)
Was average, could have been great!
26 March 2003
Claude Berri began filming this movie in 1996 with Daniel Auteuil

and Juliette Binoche. Berri and the headstrong Binoche came to

(creative) blows over script changes. He wanted to make it more of

a love story, she wanted it to remain more factual and so in a move

unheard of in French cinema he fired his leading actress, who

also happened to be the biggest French star in the world. A few

monthe later she won an Oscar for The English Patient and berri

recast his movie with Carole Bouquet in the lead.

Bouquet is a talented actress, but not in the same league as the

extremely gifted Binoche. Auteuil as usual gives a fine

performance, but the whole excersise seems leaden down by

romanticism.

Binoche and Auteuil went on to star together in Leconte's

altogether better La Veuve de Saint-Pierre
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Chocolat (2000)
10/10
Some do... Some don't
18 February 2003
Chocolat is one of those films that divides people into two distict

camps. Those who are utterly turned off by it's fairytale quality and

those who are caught up in it's fable like sensibilities. That of

course is fair enough.

However those who claim that Miramax & Harvey Weinstein bought

a nomination for Best Picture are being utterly ridiculous. Chocolat

took out 108 trade adverts coming up to the awards, while Erin

brokovich took out 110. No one said Erin Brokovich had bought

nominations, and that film was in general release. Maybe the

Academy genuinely liked Chocolat?!

There is much to like. Juliette Binoche, although not her finest

performance, is soothing, beautiful and serene. Alfred Molina

creates a brilliant "baddie" while supporting turns from Dench, olin

and Depp are all good. The film may be 'safe' and pedestrian but it

is always highly entertaining and worthwhile.

Give the Academy credit for not being bought - what would they

gain? Chocolat was nominated for Best Picture because it was

deemed worthy
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Beautiful but Flawed
10 January 2003
Diane Kury's oppulent film is a mixed bag. In it's favour it features

real life lovers Juliette Binoche and Benoît Magimel on excellent

form. As Alfred de Musset Magimel gives us a young man

completely out of his mind on a cocktail of opium and absinthe. A

man deeply creative and talented, but unable to function as a

human being. Binoche's George Sand is a strong a determined

woman. The scene where she finds that Musset may die after

overdosing is wonderfully performed with passion and grandeur.

The film comes alive in her eyes. As filmed by Vilko Filac and

dressed by Christian La Croix, Binoche has never looked more

beautiful or sensual.

However Kurys' direction and her screenplay, co-written by

Francois Olivier Rousseau and Murray Head, lacks direction and

understanding of her period. The brothel scenes are particularly

over the top. Yet her direction of her actor is magnificent.

What is missing from Kurys' film most of all however is Sand and

Musset as writers, as creative masters. There is no sense of their

value in the film beyond their doomed love affair.

Les Enfants du Siecle is a mixed bag, but certainly worth a look.
21 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Code Unknown (2000)
10/10
Conscience and Consequence
31 October 2002
As per my review on Amazon.co.uk

Haneke's masterful look at a modern European city examines

exactly what it is like to 'exist' in western society. The multilayered

story has many protagonists and follows their lives after they are

linked by a single event. Anne (Binoche) is an actress, her

boyfriend Georges is a war photographer, his brother Jean has

run away from home, their father struggles to manage his farm

and keep his emotions supressed. Amidou is a first generation

african imigrant, who teaches deaf children music, his father is a

taxi driver. Maria, from Romania, has been deported from France

for begging but must make the humiliating journey back to provide

for her family.

The film is complex, yet simple. It essentially asks wheather we

can ever really communicate, wheather we are ever aware of the

significance of our actions and most devastatingly wheather we

have a duty to help even if we are not asked for help. Do we have a

responsibility.

Haneke's film is a technical tour-de-force, with perfectly sublime

performances. Binoche has not been better since her days with

Kieslowski. Her performance as the dispossessed actress is raw

and real. The final scenes devastating in their effectiveness and

simplicity.

To answer/comment on other reviews here - The drumming is symbolic - obviously of the beat of a city and of

course of a heartbeat, but also the (interesting) idea of deaf people

giving sound to other people, they are generously giving pleasure

they will not experience. The music is also one of the many

languages of the film.

The use of a fragmented narrative and loose "story" is a way of

showing the fluid nature of all our lives - reality is never neat like a

conventional film scenario.

This is a film that is hard to decipher. It will take numerous

viewings, but is certainly worth it. Do yourself a favour and stick

with it. Supreme!
34 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Téchiné's most assured film - Contains Spoiler
31 October 2002
Warning: Spoilers
When "Alice et Martin" was released in France in November 1998, one of the more positive comments was in relation to its unorthodox narrative structure.

In Dec 1999, upon it UK release the film was again highly praised for its structure, editing technique and bravura score.

In Jul 2000 when "Alice et Martin" was released in the US it was heavily criticised for its narrative structure, which may critics labelled confusing and non-sensical.

Are we at a point that even critics need to be spoon feed a 123 narrative. The flashback in "Alice et martin" is admittedly disjointed at first - it's meant to be as it reflects Martin's psycological state.

"Alice et Martin" is a simple story which breaks up into two distinguishable parts. We are introduced to Martin (Alexis Loret) in a prologue which sketches his troubled childhood relationship with his father. We then see Martin flee from his home and live rough in the countryside before landing on his brother Benjamin's (Mathieu Amalric) door. Benjamin share a flat with musician Alice (Juliette Binoche). initially Alice is a brittle presence and resents Martin for disturbing the equilibrium she has found in a sexless relationship with the gay Benjamin. Martin quickly become infatuated with Alice and eventually she gives in and allows herself to fall in love. this first section of the film is episodic and set over a year, although on screen it is approximately 45 minutes long. The changing seasons are reflected by scenes showing summer, autumn and winter views of Paris.

The second part of the film begins when Martin is taken ill in Spain at the news that Alice is pregnant. We soon learn that he killed his father and cannot function as a human being or become a father until justice takes it's course, and he is punished. His stepmother was the only witness and Alice travells to Martins old home to convince her to testify at Martin's trial.

Techiné's film is unorthodox in many ways. The relationship between Alice et Martin is un-even from the beginning with her taking the lead. It is also shown as a deepky sexual relationship. Alice's strength again come to the fore when she is fighting Martin's family. however it is the issues of law and punishment, as well as family hurt which again haunt Techine in his work. As well as the law of the land we are presented with a family law. Indeed all the characters are shown to construct families of their own - ala Benjamin and Alice'e "Zoro - Zero" relationship.

The performances in the film are great. Amalric, Carmen Maura as Martin's mother and Marthe Villalonga as his stepmother are great. Alexis Loret in his first screen role is blank and his performance has been criticised for this. Yet I think this is exactly how he should be. His entire life is stunted by his guilt. In her first role since winning an Oscar, Juliette Binoche does what she does best - underplays the drama and steals the film, coming into her own in the second section. Caroline Champetier's cinematography of Paris, Granada and South West France is ace, while Philip Sarde's score is assured and complimentary.

Alice et Martin is not perfect. The final act labours a little too much on Martin's guilt rather than portraying how it affects his relationship with the pregnant Alice. He is also shown at the end in prison, a step to far, we dont need to know that - we only need to know that he is taking responsibility for his actions and being allowed to do so by his family. Interestingly while all of Martin's brothers all have major issues with their father, who is described as cold, distant and hard, Téchiné does not present him as a monster - instead the relationship between father and sons is a lot more ambiguous and interesting.

All in all one of the best French movies of 1998. Téchiné's most mature film and a terrific turn from Juliette Binoche.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Amélie (2001)
5/10
Over rated, But not without Merit
27 October 2002
To call Amelie the 'Best French Film Ever!' is not an infomed comment. Why? The movie is enjoyable certainly, but it is not revolutionary or even particularly original - bar the fabulous digital shots. The story is quite pedestrian and is similar to lots of other films, notably Pleasantville. The dialogues are often laborious and the acting is not outstanding. Sure Ms Tautou is beguiling - but as a performance it is nothing memorable - hence she lost out on the Cesar (French Oscar) to Emmanuelle Devos much more deserving performance in Sur Mes Levres.

The films many suporters at this time will no doubt be calling me a cynic and a nit picker - but someone has to. I liked the film but I am pointing out the films short comings merely because it is not being fairly criticised on this site - there are far to many cloying reviews that say little about the actual film.

In the end all this is going to work against Amelie. Like Titanic before it this film is going to suffer from huge backlash in years to come and I don't believe will be in the IMDB top 250 in 10 years. It shouldnt be - its not important enough!
8 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jet Lag (2002)
10/10
A delightful, excentric and funny comedy about falling in love
19 September 2002
"Décalage Horaire" or "Jet Lag" premiered at the Toronto Film Festival in September 2002.

Danielle Thompson's "Decalage Horaire" is a simple, yet not necessarily simplistic, ode to love. The story concerns two opposites who meet at Charles de Gaulle Airport during a strike. They are constantly thrown together by fate ending up spending a night together (sex does not enter the equation) and during the course of their wait realising they have more in common than they thought.

Félix (Jean Reno) is a French man living in the US. He is chasing after a woman he belives he still loves. Rose (Juliette Binoche) is a Beautician who has a one-way ticket to Mexico, she is desperately running away from a man she no longer loves.

As Félix, Reno gives a sullen performance as a man on the edge, caught between the chronic boredom of his life and the disappointment of a failed romance. His chemistry with Binoche is magnetic, and surprising, it's so much stronger than the Binoche-Depp pairing of Chocolat.

The revelation of the film however is Juliette Binoche' terrific turn as Rose. The beautician who hides behind a mask of colouful makeup and only becomes truly beautiful the day she removes it.

Binoche in her first successful comic role (in Chocolat afterall she was a more tragic figure) succeeds in creating a wonderfully funny and charming young woman, with an endearingly vunerable side. Time after time Reno feeds her the lines and she returns with the best moments of the film. Two parts which stand out are when Felix assumes Rose is a prostitute and when she discusses her make-up routine with him. Binoche will probably be César nominated for her role, and because this is such a change in direction for her she may even win.

The best thing about "Décalage Horaire" is that it is not merely sentimental, it's ironic tone is winning and much more interesting. Thompson's assured directon shows signs of maturity since "La buche", while her writing is as astute as ever.

The ending in mexico to the strains of Macy Gray's redoubtable "I try" is a memorable ending, for it's immediacy and it's pure sheer pleasure.

Viva la Binoche!
18 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Come Undone (2000)
A character study. Emotional and evocative...
27 March 2002
Presque Rien, correctly translated as "Almost Nothing", is an

emotionally dense portrayal of love that happens to be gay, rather than

being merely defined by this fact. The film is obviously inspired by some of André Téchiné's better work

such as "Les Roseaux Sauvage", "Les Voleurs" and "Alice et Martin", not

just by it casting of Rideau (who appeared in Téchines "Les Roseaux

Sauvage" and "Loin") but by its accutely observed performance,

situations and narrative. Closely resembling "Alice et Martin" in its unorthadox narrative

structure and its almost Bressonian study of a disaffected and

profoundly hurt young man. Mathieu played by Elkiam as somewhat of an

enigma, holds attention on screen, without ever resorting to over

interpreting his character. Wheather in his uneasy relationships with

Cédric or his sister, Mathieu is full of very human contradictions. The

film is modest and honest and in its best moments deeply affecting. Its

unordered structure makes the audience think more deeply about the

situations by forcing us to figure them out. The film has been criticised here for its challenging structure, however

it is not necessarily a fair comment, as many of the criticisms dont

seem to acknowledge the difference between this type of European cinema

and mainstream US cinema. The former is concerned with character study,

this is specific character study and not human emotion as a 'whole',

while US mainstream film deals in narrative development over

observation. One is not necessarily better than the other, but 'Presque

Rien' and it's ilk should not be criticised blanky for being exactly

what they mean to be. 'Presque Rien' is a modest masterpiece, with finely tempered

performances and a very promisin
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Under developed, badly written "comedy"
15 March 2002
"Juliette Binoche cannot act", according to 'anonnymous' below. That is

a ridiculous assertion. As is to link this film with Kieslowski's

'Blue'. The problem with this movie is that neither Binoche nor Hurt are

given the material in the form of a good screenplay nor the direction to

make the film work. It seems to me that Akerman, who is an excellent

director, see La Captive, does not have a good enough command of English

to write a screenplay in the language.

The film, which starts out nicely quickly gets bogged down in the

psychoanalyitical. Endless "yes" and "mmmmm"s loose their amusement

value quickly. The romance angle is badly developed, just why has

Beatrice fallen for John Wire aka Henry? It doesnt work.

But Juliette Binoche can act. In fact in Europe she is regarded with

Isabelle Huppert to be the finest actress working today. But she can

only produce the goods when she is given the material and the careful

direction necessary. Go rent "Rendez-Vous", "The Unbearable Lightness of

Being", "Les Amants du Pont-Neuf", "Three Colours Blue", "Alice &

Martin", "The Widow of Saint-Pierre" and especially "Code Innconnu" and

try arguing otherwise.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Coronation Street (1960– )
A great institution, destroyed by over production
10 January 2002
I suppose it had to happen, but it is so sad to see that great British institution "Coronation Street" die. The reason is simple - It used to be screened twice a week, allowing for high quality acting writing, directing, acting etc. The output has been doubled at the cost of the above. Now the plots are predictible - every marriage ends when a spouse has an affair, someone dies 'tragically' every six months. Even the Rovers is not what it was. 5 land lords in 5 years only 4 in the preeceding 35 years. Granada and ITV ought to be brought to task for what they have done. Corrie is slowly going to die and I predict it will be pulled within 10 years. What a pity!
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Les nanas (1985)
9/10
The Women are Chicks!
15 November 2001
Les Nanas is an oddity. A French re-make of a US film. More an updated feminist version really. The original was Cukor's 'The Women'. Les Nanas by Annick Lanoe stars some of 80's French Cinemas leading lights. Marie France Pisier, Odette Laure, Catherine Samie, Dominique Lavanant and a teenage Juliette Binoche. The story follows a group of women or 'chicks' who live and work together. Each of them has their own romantic entanglements but ultimately can only rely on their friends. The romantic part of the film is fresh (for 1984), but the comedy is a bit dated. The women are varying and energetic each with their own concerns and foibles. Fun and easy if not vital or original viewing. Les Nanas was on VHS PAL in the late 80s but has since been deleted.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A comedy of Errors
14 November 2001
I caught this movie on cable last night and was intrigued by the presence of Juliette Binoche in a movie I had never heard of. THis is not the usual Binoche movie. She does not give her usual decorious performance, because it doesn't have the depth. The odd story tells us about Esther Bouloire (Binoche) who believes her sister has been murdered by her brother in law (Hence the title). She enlists two vastlt older professors Etienne and Octave (Serrault & Piccoli) to help her uncover the truth. However these amourous gents are more interested in Esther than in the mystery, which is revealed in a twist at the end. What is good about the movie is its caper like tone. Binoche (then barely 25) is utterly georgeos, viewers understand why the two gents like her so much. The elderly duo are funny as they bumble along and fall over each other literally to help Esther. However Rouffio fails to inject the comedy with enough narrative drive, eventually we want to know who killed her. This film is a curio. Watch it for that alone.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed