May December didn't really do anything memorable or just simply move forward with its plot; I found that the biggest step forward it took in its story was with the assistance of a sex scene somewhere towards the end. This movie makes the tragic mistake of never utilising its talented performers and not transferring from its first act to second. I can enjoy a slow-burn drama centred alone on conversations between its characters, but I want to be able to care enough to feel captivated in the dialogue. Many movies do that extremely well, 12 Angry Men being the first in mind, but I'll forget this Oscar-baiting piece of women talking as soon as I'm done talking about it.
Firstly, you have missed opportunities. Alike almost every other film, May December has a plot synopsis: an actress arrives at the home of a couple whose tabloid romance shocked the nation two decades ago in order to do research on them for a film she's starring in about their past. Unfortunately, this is as far as the premise goes, because the rest of the movie drags out boringly doing pretty much nothing. You've also got the fact that it's basically a character study, but only done by Natalie Portman's character and not the film itself. I think this movie would've actually worked out quite interestingly as a character study, but the acting does overshadow that to an extent. This is where I thought the film really faltered, but there're still a few things I can respect.
Natalie Portman and Julianne Moore are those small shiny glimmers of hope you would see at the end of a dark tunnel, the dark enclosed tunnel being the script. If you continue to read reviews however, you'll find that many admire Charles Melton as the stand-out among the cast. Through his character, themes relating to childhood trauma and the effect it has on a person's life are able to surface, making for the aspect of the film that I found most interesting. Again though, May December could have truly been a masterpiece if it simply did something with its premise, and it would work even better if the characters were more fleshed out for viewers to understand them better.
If you liked this review, check out the full review and other reviews at aussieboyreviews.
Firstly, you have missed opportunities. Alike almost every other film, May December has a plot synopsis: an actress arrives at the home of a couple whose tabloid romance shocked the nation two decades ago in order to do research on them for a film she's starring in about their past. Unfortunately, this is as far as the premise goes, because the rest of the movie drags out boringly doing pretty much nothing. You've also got the fact that it's basically a character study, but only done by Natalie Portman's character and not the film itself. I think this movie would've actually worked out quite interestingly as a character study, but the acting does overshadow that to an extent. This is where I thought the film really faltered, but there're still a few things I can respect.
Natalie Portman and Julianne Moore are those small shiny glimmers of hope you would see at the end of a dark tunnel, the dark enclosed tunnel being the script. If you continue to read reviews however, you'll find that many admire Charles Melton as the stand-out among the cast. Through his character, themes relating to childhood trauma and the effect it has on a person's life are able to surface, making for the aspect of the film that I found most interesting. Again though, May December could have truly been a masterpiece if it simply did something with its premise, and it would work even better if the characters were more fleshed out for viewers to understand them better.
If you liked this review, check out the full review and other reviews at aussieboyreviews.
Tell Your Friends