I would like to curb the defenders of the film who criticize certain fans of the book (including me) for not liking the film due to sordid details that are not adapted. I remind you that it is not enough to have a pleasant atmosphere, nice gags, and beautiful images to make a good film.
Certainly, visually it is very beautiful, enough to overshadow the previous film. But we need a good adaptation of the scenario, and here I remind everyone: What is the scenario of this 6th HP? Students dominated by their romantic and pivotal impulses, and a darky teenager who spends his school year (and the film) on a cupboard (Oh, an apple! Oh, a bird!).
Without forgetting the quest for Horcruxes, reduced to two memories to show that the attractive Tom Riddle already had an exaggeratedly evil look. Damn, where is the psychology of one of the scariest villains of the 21st century (in books)?
Don't come and talk to me about the time constraints, because as far as toast is concerned, Yates is the king, between the pointless destruction of a bridge (out of respect for 2 unfortunate lines in the book where this attack is mentioned ) and the destruction of the burrow (well, a lot of destruction), which in addition to lacking coherence, is probably the most poorly constructed action scene of the entire saga.
What remains in all this is the humor (respectful of the book, or not) which makes the 6th year of Harry Potter not so unpleasant, a final battle omitted to leave room for that of the last film. Well, it's pleasant but disappointing, and what's certain is that it's far from preparing the ground for the final confrontation. 4/10.
Certainly, visually it is very beautiful, enough to overshadow the previous film. But we need a good adaptation of the scenario, and here I remind everyone: What is the scenario of this 6th HP? Students dominated by their romantic and pivotal impulses, and a darky teenager who spends his school year (and the film) on a cupboard (Oh, an apple! Oh, a bird!).
Without forgetting the quest for Horcruxes, reduced to two memories to show that the attractive Tom Riddle already had an exaggeratedly evil look. Damn, where is the psychology of one of the scariest villains of the 21st century (in books)?
Don't come and talk to me about the time constraints, because as far as toast is concerned, Yates is the king, between the pointless destruction of a bridge (out of respect for 2 unfortunate lines in the book where this attack is mentioned ) and the destruction of the burrow (well, a lot of destruction), which in addition to lacking coherence, is probably the most poorly constructed action scene of the entire saga.
What remains in all this is the humor (respectful of the book, or not) which makes the 6th year of Harry Potter not so unpleasant, a final battle omitted to leave room for that of the last film. Well, it's pleasant but disappointing, and what's certain is that it's far from preparing the ground for the final confrontation. 4/10.
Tell Your Friends