I was hoping for a neutral and objective take on the story hoping to gain insight in Serena's outburst. But the journalist's conclusion was bizarre. It is about justice according to him.
The chair umpire did nothing wrong. Sure he was strict but not unjust. It is the same way as a police officer letting you go for speeding or not. I would not argue with one if I was driving only 1 km over limit and he/she would fine me. I wouldn't argue that men or white people don't get fines driving 50 km over etc etc. It is better to shut up and take the fine.
Serena could have apologised instead or calmed down and prevented any other controversies. She is more experienced and should have known how to handle a situation like this in a better way even if umpire is wrong which in this case he wasn't. She resorted to name calling and accusing an umpire of being a thief, cheat and a liar.
I blame her coach as well. He was aware of rules and still took a risk knowing Carlos Ramos. He should have been smarter about it and prepared Serena better for communicating with him. The journalist doesn't confront him with the question: why would you risk it in such an important match knowing Ramos? Coach probably thought Ramos would let it slide since Serena is champion.
The loser in the whole situation was Naomi who is also a black woman and Asian. The journalist doesn't bother to mention the injustice to her at all. She kept her head down and played calm and disciplined. He mentions she got a point and game as a gift. Doesn't mention how inappropriate the crowd's behaviour was.
Osaka would have probably won it anyway.
The chair umpire did nothing wrong. Sure he was strict but not unjust. It is the same way as a police officer letting you go for speeding or not. I would not argue with one if I was driving only 1 km over limit and he/she would fine me. I wouldn't argue that men or white people don't get fines driving 50 km over etc etc. It is better to shut up and take the fine.
Serena could have apologised instead or calmed down and prevented any other controversies. She is more experienced and should have known how to handle a situation like this in a better way even if umpire is wrong which in this case he wasn't. She resorted to name calling and accusing an umpire of being a thief, cheat and a liar.
I blame her coach as well. He was aware of rules and still took a risk knowing Carlos Ramos. He should have been smarter about it and prepared Serena better for communicating with him. The journalist doesn't confront him with the question: why would you risk it in such an important match knowing Ramos? Coach probably thought Ramos would let it slide since Serena is champion.
The loser in the whole situation was Naomi who is also a black woman and Asian. The journalist doesn't bother to mention the injustice to her at all. She kept her head down and played calm and disciplined. He mentions she got a point and game as a gift. Doesn't mention how inappropriate the crowd's behaviour was.
Osaka would have probably won it anyway.
Tell Your Friends