Austrian director Michael Haneke came up with the idea of making this film after his trilogy about alienation (Der Siebente Kontinent, Benny's Video and 71 Fragmente...). It is a self-reflexive film about violence in the media, and it clearly points to its own factitiousness on several occations, which makes it really difficult to accept that people do not like the film, or that they were frightened by it. This is not a frightening film, but it is frightening that people are frightened by it. You must be stupid to be scared during "Funny Games", I believe people are more likely to be repulsed than scared. Repulsed by themselves because they are to blame for the violence in this film. Haneke pulls out a number of Bertolt Brecht- inspired asides to the camera that makes this film a reflexive masterpiece, a film that offers its viewers a clear argumentation of why film violence is not consumable, why it never can or should be entertaining to watch violence. "Funny Games" is almost anti-film, it is obviously not a classic film, and it is closer to the work of Jean-Luc Godard than any violence-obsessed Hollywood director. "Funny Games'" false mask is removed several times when the sadistic, violent young man Paul (or Beavis or even Jerry) stops the film time and steps into a conversation with the audience. "Is it enough? Really? Don't you want a plausible development?" he says coolly and disturbingly to the audience, who by now should know this is an experiment and not a thriller.
The violence in this film, in contrast to American genre films such as thrillers, action films and horror films, is invisible. The consequences of the violence, though, are visible and feels painstakingly real. This is not an exciting film either, because Haneke either leaves out or totally turns around all the "rules" of a horror film. The message in this film is what I believe viewers who do not like it reacts strongly to. The film clearly is an attempt to make the audience expose themselves and their wish to see people killed on film. Its meaning is that the audience understands their role as the initiators of the killings and violence, and that they never want to see violence on film again. The violence in the media gives us a wrong impression of what violence is, because violence is real and it should not feel good to see fictional violence. It should hurt, and because it's your fault that it happens, it should hurt to watch it, too. The French director Gaspar Noé seems to have understood this when making "Irréversible", which is the best film about violence since "Funny Games". With this film, Michael Haneke wanted his audience to never indulge in visual, violent pleasures again. Unfortunately, it left many people so cold they never want to see a film by Haneke again. That is a shame: He is a director with a conscience.
The violence in this film, in contrast to American genre films such as thrillers, action films and horror films, is invisible. The consequences of the violence, though, are visible and feels painstakingly real. This is not an exciting film either, because Haneke either leaves out or totally turns around all the "rules" of a horror film. The message in this film is what I believe viewers who do not like it reacts strongly to. The film clearly is an attempt to make the audience expose themselves and their wish to see people killed on film. Its meaning is that the audience understands their role as the initiators of the killings and violence, and that they never want to see violence on film again. The violence in the media gives us a wrong impression of what violence is, because violence is real and it should not feel good to see fictional violence. It should hurt, and because it's your fault that it happens, it should hurt to watch it, too. The French director Gaspar Noé seems to have understood this when making "Irréversible", which is the best film about violence since "Funny Games". With this film, Michael Haneke wanted his audience to never indulge in visual, violent pleasures again. Unfortunately, it left many people so cold they never want to see a film by Haneke again. That is a shame: He is a director with a conscience.
Tell Your Friends