As always, production and acting are top notch. Where this episodes slides down to a 6 rating for me is the route they take in character and story. While they intended this to be an empowering season finale was anything but. Basically there is no road to recovery and satisfaction without becoming that which you hate. Sorry, but there is enough examples of hate and violence, the response to be the same is an easy way out.
Reviews
134 Reviews
New Hope 2.0
30 December 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The Force Awakens (TFA) returns a major element to the Star Wars franchise; fun.
Daisey Ridley and John Boyega own their characters Rey and Finn respectively. Oscar Isaac's X-Wing pilot Poe is all glorious hero. Adam Driver is absolutely pitch perfect in the role of Kylo Ren. Harrison Ford is more engaged than he has been in a decade. BB8 is the new droid star of the franchise, an absolute marvel of performance and special effects.
The story is very much A New Hope 2.0, which is not a bad thing, but it has been a source of heated debate among fans. There are character and story seeds planted that we do not get to see to fruition by the end credits, or in some cases, require repeated viewings to catch them. This is yet another source of heated debate among fans. I am not sure why it is a bad thing that a movie require you see it multiple times, isn't that the fun of watching movies? This is the first of a trilogy of films and the expectation is those seeds not bloomed will produce fruit in the other two films. It is admittedly a less individually standing film out of all the films in the franchise. However, I have confidence all will be revealed in the coming episodes. John Williams once again adds to the overall experience, though this is the first film that lacks a core musical theme which makes the score rather by the numbers which is a slight disappointment.
A lot of fans have commented there is a sense that the Rey character is a "Mary Sue" of sorts and Finn's character has a turn of conscious that is too quick and without much back-story. Personally I found there is more than enough there that you don't have to be shown every single little thread to justify a character's arc, you should be able to figure out on your own some aspects given what we do know otherwise you are looking at a 3hr bore fest of exposition just because some fans have to have everything spelled out for them. Specific to the Rey character, I find it hypocritical that this character is singled out as too equipped when the fantasy and action genre is filled with beloved MALE characters who are equipped similarly yet accepted without question.
Personally, I really have only two major complaints. The first is that the highly publicized and promoted character Captain Phasma is criminally under utilized in the film, in fact, ultimately reduced to a weak character which is a huge disappointment. My other major issue is how Solo's character arc finale was handled. Solo's arc finale should have been a huge emotional moment, but ends up being rushed through and lacks the emotional gravitas it should have had. The ball was dropped here in a big way.
So, to sum it up, TFA does rely heavily on nostalgia/familiar story elements, it plants some seeds that are yet to bloom, while it does give you enough in some areas you just have to utilize that information to form some of the information on your own. We have one highly promoted character criminally underused and another classic character's arc finale rushed. Still, the fantastic cast, performances, chemistry, action and SFX return the franchise to solid footing and I look forward to the coming episodes.
Daisey Ridley and John Boyega own their characters Rey and Finn respectively. Oscar Isaac's X-Wing pilot Poe is all glorious hero. Adam Driver is absolutely pitch perfect in the role of Kylo Ren. Harrison Ford is more engaged than he has been in a decade. BB8 is the new droid star of the franchise, an absolute marvel of performance and special effects.
The story is very much A New Hope 2.0, which is not a bad thing, but it has been a source of heated debate among fans. There are character and story seeds planted that we do not get to see to fruition by the end credits, or in some cases, require repeated viewings to catch them. This is yet another source of heated debate among fans. I am not sure why it is a bad thing that a movie require you see it multiple times, isn't that the fun of watching movies? This is the first of a trilogy of films and the expectation is those seeds not bloomed will produce fruit in the other two films. It is admittedly a less individually standing film out of all the films in the franchise. However, I have confidence all will be revealed in the coming episodes. John Williams once again adds to the overall experience, though this is the first film that lacks a core musical theme which makes the score rather by the numbers which is a slight disappointment.
A lot of fans have commented there is a sense that the Rey character is a "Mary Sue" of sorts and Finn's character has a turn of conscious that is too quick and without much back-story. Personally I found there is more than enough there that you don't have to be shown every single little thread to justify a character's arc, you should be able to figure out on your own some aspects given what we do know otherwise you are looking at a 3hr bore fest of exposition just because some fans have to have everything spelled out for them. Specific to the Rey character, I find it hypocritical that this character is singled out as too equipped when the fantasy and action genre is filled with beloved MALE characters who are equipped similarly yet accepted without question.
Personally, I really have only two major complaints. The first is that the highly publicized and promoted character Captain Phasma is criminally under utilized in the film, in fact, ultimately reduced to a weak character which is a huge disappointment. My other major issue is how Solo's character arc finale was handled. Solo's arc finale should have been a huge emotional moment, but ends up being rushed through and lacks the emotional gravitas it should have had. The ball was dropped here in a big way.
So, to sum it up, TFA does rely heavily on nostalgia/familiar story elements, it plants some seeds that are yet to bloom, while it does give you enough in some areas you just have to utilize that information to form some of the information on your own. We have one highly promoted character criminally underused and another classic character's arc finale rushed. Still, the fantastic cast, performances, chemistry, action and SFX return the franchise to solid footing and I look forward to the coming episodes.
Welcome back Cap'n Jack
20 May 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I am a fan of the Pirates movies. Since 2003, I have enjoyed watching Capt. Jack and Co. stumble their way through adventures. Like many, I thought the last two sequels had a bit of bloat, none the less, they still entertained me immensely, thus I looked forward with fondness to sitting in a theater again to watch a Pirates adventure. I put on my Capt. Jack jersey, as I have for the last two films, and headed off to have fun.
Stranger Tides finds our good friend Capt. Jack continuing his quest for the Fountain of Youth that he set sail for at the end of At World's End. This time, there are two Jacks at the beginning. There seems to be someone going about England rounding up a crew under the guise of Capt. Jack. It isn't long before we learn who said impostor is, thus the quest ensues.
What I enjoyed most about the film was the return in Capt. Jack as a formidable Pirate. We had lost a little of that in the last two films, but here, Jack is in fine form verbally and physically. Depp pretty much wears Capt. Jack as a second skin and continues to throw layers on him. Rush is once again back as Capt. Barbossa, though this time, more of a "company man" in the beginning. Penelope Cruz is a fine addition as Black Beards daughter Angelica. Then you have Black Beard himself, Ian McShane, who turns in a wonderfully vile performance.
We get some zombies and mermaids this go around and enough action to keep you entertained. I thought Hans Zimmer's soundtrack was the best since the first film, it was continually rousing and fun throughout the film. And I think that is the best thing I can say about the film. It was a rousing fun time, exactly what I expected and like out of my Pirates movies. Yo ho, drink up and enjoy.
Stranger Tides finds our good friend Capt. Jack continuing his quest for the Fountain of Youth that he set sail for at the end of At World's End. This time, there are two Jacks at the beginning. There seems to be someone going about England rounding up a crew under the guise of Capt. Jack. It isn't long before we learn who said impostor is, thus the quest ensues.
What I enjoyed most about the film was the return in Capt. Jack as a formidable Pirate. We had lost a little of that in the last two films, but here, Jack is in fine form verbally and physically. Depp pretty much wears Capt. Jack as a second skin and continues to throw layers on him. Rush is once again back as Capt. Barbossa, though this time, more of a "company man" in the beginning. Penelope Cruz is a fine addition as Black Beards daughter Angelica. Then you have Black Beard himself, Ian McShane, who turns in a wonderfully vile performance.
We get some zombies and mermaids this go around and enough action to keep you entertained. I thought Hans Zimmer's soundtrack was the best since the first film, it was continually rousing and fun throughout the film. And I think that is the best thing I can say about the film. It was a rousing fun time, exactly what I expected and like out of my Pirates movies. Yo ho, drink up and enjoy.
Thor
(2011)
Enough gravitas to make it a good film
7 May 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Thor was a risk to bring to the summer multiplexes. Lets face it, there is a lot to cram into a 2hr film, especially one that is built for the summer crowd. But Branagh is able to mix equal parts Asgard gravitas and earth levity to make a film that is thoroughly enjoyable.
Most of the praise should go to Chris Hemsworth who wields the hammer with all the confidence in the world. He was one of the few actors that was in both "rhelms" and he was able to give Thor the right amount gravitas and levity when it was required. Sir Anthony Hopkins is the perfect Oden. Tom Hiddleston has garnered considerable attention for Loki, and I agree he is good. But the supporting actor/character I was most surprised by was Natalie Portman's Jan Foster. This is probably the first role I have seen her in where I got the sense she was totally at ease and having a blast. I expected her to just kind of walk through this film, but she brought as much to this as she did in Black Swan. Totally different role and character and totally different chops needed, but none the less she takes a possible throw away character and gave her some life.
The film does a lot of jumping from earth, back to Asgard, back to earth, back to Asgard, etc. So the pacing is an important thing. For the most part I thought the pacing was handled well, though I thought the final act did feel a bit rushed. The 2nd act suffers from the origin dead zone that is inherent with these films. But again, Branagh shows why he was the perfect director for this film.
I did not see this in 3D. Mainly because it is a post-production 3D converted film. So I can't attest to how good the 3D is. The effects are good, the sound design is perfect, with the sound of the hammer being a major highlight. When Thor wields it with all his might, you feel it.
Very good performances and capable directing make this a fun movie to watch. Be sure to stay around until the very end of the credits as we are given a peek at what looks like the villain in The Avengers.
Most of the praise should go to Chris Hemsworth who wields the hammer with all the confidence in the world. He was one of the few actors that was in both "rhelms" and he was able to give Thor the right amount gravitas and levity when it was required. Sir Anthony Hopkins is the perfect Oden. Tom Hiddleston has garnered considerable attention for Loki, and I agree he is good. But the supporting actor/character I was most surprised by was Natalie Portman's Jan Foster. This is probably the first role I have seen her in where I got the sense she was totally at ease and having a blast. I expected her to just kind of walk through this film, but she brought as much to this as she did in Black Swan. Totally different role and character and totally different chops needed, but none the less she takes a possible throw away character and gave her some life.
The film does a lot of jumping from earth, back to Asgard, back to earth, back to Asgard, etc. So the pacing is an important thing. For the most part I thought the pacing was handled well, though I thought the final act did feel a bit rushed. The 2nd act suffers from the origin dead zone that is inherent with these films. But again, Branagh shows why he was the perfect director for this film.
I did not see this in 3D. Mainly because it is a post-production 3D converted film. So I can't attest to how good the 3D is. The effects are good, the sound design is perfect, with the sound of the hammer being a major highlight. When Thor wields it with all his might, you feel it.
Very good performances and capable directing make this a fun movie to watch. Be sure to stay around until the very end of the credits as we are given a peek at what looks like the villain in The Avengers.
Fast Five
(2011)
Just keeps getting better
29 April 2011
Warning: Spoilers
You know, it is hard to sustain a franchise today through 3 movies, much less 5. But with the FF franchise, not only have the last two films regained the momentum, they have gotten better! The latest entry, FastFive, is unquestionably the best of the franchise to date.
FastFive takes the franchise beyond the fast cars and lovely girls genre and has turned itself into a bone-fide action/adventure franchise. There are enough of the fast cars and women elements, but the focus is now on character and story. A far cry from the humble beginnings of the series.
We get re-introduced to many friends from the past films and along with that, we get Dewayne Johnson, who comes into the film and chews up the scenery. He and Vin Diesel's confrontation is an action fans dream. And we are not let down.
The story follows Dom and Co. directly after he has been sprung from the prison bus that was taking him to jail. We get caught up with where everyone is and are introduced to Johnson's FBI agent character. From there we are with the gang as they come to the realization that only through a big score can they truly get free of their pursuer and get to a country with no extradition. So they call up some old friends who come in and from minute one, the film switches to another gear and never lets up. Oh by the way, a long with the gang being pursued by the FBI, they have run afoul of the local drug cartel leader. Their plan to escape with loads of cash has Dom and Co. scheming to relief the cartel of their millions through a daring heist. The scenes of the whole gang together remind me of the first film in that there was a sense of family. That was lacking in the last 3 entries and it was a welcome return to see everyone together.
The action is the best of the series yet with the vault through the streets being the highlight of the final act. Rio was a great place to take the series.
Performances are all solid here, Diesel and Walker actually showing some depth to the characters they are all but totally in command of here. Everyone here is just great, the camaraderie is easy to see and feel and you are literally having fun with seeing the gang back together.
By all means, see this in the theater. I did not see the IMAX version, so can't attest to how good it looks there. But by all means, get out and see this. Make sure to stay through the initial credits, there is a MAJOR hint at what Fast Six has in store for us.
FastFive takes the franchise beyond the fast cars and lovely girls genre and has turned itself into a bone-fide action/adventure franchise. There are enough of the fast cars and women elements, but the focus is now on character and story. A far cry from the humble beginnings of the series.
We get re-introduced to many friends from the past films and along with that, we get Dewayne Johnson, who comes into the film and chews up the scenery. He and Vin Diesel's confrontation is an action fans dream. And we are not let down.
The story follows Dom and Co. directly after he has been sprung from the prison bus that was taking him to jail. We get caught up with where everyone is and are introduced to Johnson's FBI agent character. From there we are with the gang as they come to the realization that only through a big score can they truly get free of their pursuer and get to a country with no extradition. So they call up some old friends who come in and from minute one, the film switches to another gear and never lets up. Oh by the way, a long with the gang being pursued by the FBI, they have run afoul of the local drug cartel leader. Their plan to escape with loads of cash has Dom and Co. scheming to relief the cartel of their millions through a daring heist. The scenes of the whole gang together remind me of the first film in that there was a sense of family. That was lacking in the last 3 entries and it was a welcome return to see everyone together.
The action is the best of the series yet with the vault through the streets being the highlight of the final act. Rio was a great place to take the series.
Performances are all solid here, Diesel and Walker actually showing some depth to the characters they are all but totally in command of here. Everyone here is just great, the camaraderie is easy to see and feel and you are literally having fun with seeing the gang back together.
By all means, see this in the theater. I did not see the IMAX version, so can't attest to how good it looks there. But by all means, get out and see this. Make sure to stay through the initial credits, there is a MAJOR hint at what Fast Six has in store for us.
Arthur
(I) (2011)
Not a total disaster, but not anything to run out and see either.
11 April 2011
The latest 80's remake comes to us in the form of "Arthur". Russell Brand is set loose in his first full-on starring vehicle. With ole Russell, you either like him or not. He works best in sparingly and his first lead film will test your tolerance of his shtick.
There a several changes in the story, but the overall plot remains the same; rich, spoiled and lacking any kind of direction man is given an ultimatum; marry a woman hand-picked or loose said fortune.
I will give the creators credit in that they updated the film to play directly to a modern audience. It doesn't follow the exact same blueprint as the 1981 film, it plays mostly to Brand's strengths and that does go a long way in enjoying the film.
Helen Mirren takes the place of Sir John as Hobson, now, a life-long nanny rather than servant. She is good, as expected. Louis Guzman is funny as Brand's chauffeur Bitterman. He and Brand make a fun physical couple given their very distinct height and body type differences. Jennifer Garner is equal parts gorgeous and scary as Arthur's betrothed Susan. Nick Noelte pretty much plays a hyped of characterization of his usual tough-guy persona as Susan's dad. Finally there is Greta Gerwig as Naomi, the object of Arthur's affection. There are times that Greta is absolutely perfect, then times she falls flat. Not sure if it was just how she was playing Naomi or what, but I found her at times to be very amateur in her delivery. Not anything that torpedoes the movie, but I don't know, just something didn't quit click there all the time with her performance.
The dialog in the film is pretty good, I would say even on par or better than the original. Again, much of it plays to Brand's style and if you like him, you will love the banter he engages.
The one place that this film does fall short on compared to the original is the score and soundtrack music. There is really no definable theme to the score, they do throw pieces of the original's in here and there, but nothing discernible or as memorably as the original movie's score. As for the soundtrack, definitely nothing to compare to the title theme of the original, in fact, I can't even remember the songs that did play.
This is lite stuff, nothing to rush out and see, perhaps a matinée at best and then just expect to have a little fun. If you are on the fence, stay there and wait for it to make it on disk and give it a rental.
There a several changes in the story, but the overall plot remains the same; rich, spoiled and lacking any kind of direction man is given an ultimatum; marry a woman hand-picked or loose said fortune.
I will give the creators credit in that they updated the film to play directly to a modern audience. It doesn't follow the exact same blueprint as the 1981 film, it plays mostly to Brand's strengths and that does go a long way in enjoying the film.
Helen Mirren takes the place of Sir John as Hobson, now, a life-long nanny rather than servant. She is good, as expected. Louis Guzman is funny as Brand's chauffeur Bitterman. He and Brand make a fun physical couple given their very distinct height and body type differences. Jennifer Garner is equal parts gorgeous and scary as Arthur's betrothed Susan. Nick Noelte pretty much plays a hyped of characterization of his usual tough-guy persona as Susan's dad. Finally there is Greta Gerwig as Naomi, the object of Arthur's affection. There are times that Greta is absolutely perfect, then times she falls flat. Not sure if it was just how she was playing Naomi or what, but I found her at times to be very amateur in her delivery. Not anything that torpedoes the movie, but I don't know, just something didn't quit click there all the time with her performance.
The dialog in the film is pretty good, I would say even on par or better than the original. Again, much of it plays to Brand's style and if you like him, you will love the banter he engages.
The one place that this film does fall short on compared to the original is the score and soundtrack music. There is really no definable theme to the score, they do throw pieces of the original's in here and there, but nothing discernible or as memorably as the original movie's score. As for the soundtrack, definitely nothing to compare to the title theme of the original, in fact, I can't even remember the songs that did play.
This is lite stuff, nothing to rush out and see, perhaps a matinée at best and then just expect to have a little fun. If you are on the fence, stay there and wait for it to make it on disk and give it a rental.
Sucker Punch
(2011)
There is no middle ground here....
25 March 2011
Warning: Spoilers
You are either going to love this film or hate it. There will be no middle ground with it. I absolutely loved it.
The story is simple; a young girl, Babydoll, is sent to a sanitarium by her uncle to keep her locked away. See, Babydoll and her sister were to inherit their mother's estate. But their uncle ceases control after Babydoll tragically kills her sister trying to defend them from her uncle. Baby doll creates a world within the sanitarium, a bordello, which she and the other girls live. Within that world she has another place she can go, a world for fighting. Each time she goes to the world, the backdrop is different; ancient China, WWII, Medieval and other worldly. Through these worlds, Babydoll and Co. fight their way to freedom.
Warning right up front, the film is chocked full of symbolism. The more you catch, the further into the film you will be. The imagery is absolutely fantastic. Another thing to get out of the way right off, yes, the girls are great looking. But all honesty, you get over that within a few minutes. There is so much going on, you get sucked into the story and their plight so hard, you forget about how they are dressed. For those critics who have spent time admonishing the seeming fetish fantasy overload, totally missed the point. I will let you experience the film and figure out for yourself what the outfits symbolize.
Scott Glenn enters the story at the beginning of each fight. He is there to instruct the girls and impart wisdom. Again, his presence is there for a reason, it is up to you to figure out the intent of his presence. Glenn is fantastic and is far more important to the film than I thought he would be. The continual symbolism makes this film fun because each person can bring something away that others might not have. Snyder obviously has his intentions, but ultimately he gives you just enough so that you can create the world a long with Babydoll.
All of the cast is great, not one person can you say doesn't bring their A-game to the proceedings. Emily Browning shoulders the lion share of time on screen and she is up to the task. Abbie Cornish, Jena Malone, Vanessa Hudgens, Jamie Chung, and Carla Gugino are wonderful. It is a shame many will dismiss their characters because of the clothes and setting. I can't for the life of me understand the criticism I have read from reviewers who say the film lacks soul. These ladies, to each one, bring you into the story and make you care beyond the guns and mayhem.
There is a lot of music that accompanies each scene. A mix of score and soundtrack music really sets the scenes. Snyder does an excellent job picking songs which have lyrical content in step with the scene, many times serving as the narrator.
I can't say enough good things about this film. It was right in my wheel house. It hit all the right beats and surpassed my expectations, which were raised through the trailers. It will not be for everyone, it will be a film that divides friends. That is the best kind of film that can create reactions on both sides. The worse thing that can be said about a film that it elicits no kind of reaction, this is not that kind of film.
The story is simple; a young girl, Babydoll, is sent to a sanitarium by her uncle to keep her locked away. See, Babydoll and her sister were to inherit their mother's estate. But their uncle ceases control after Babydoll tragically kills her sister trying to defend them from her uncle. Baby doll creates a world within the sanitarium, a bordello, which she and the other girls live. Within that world she has another place she can go, a world for fighting. Each time she goes to the world, the backdrop is different; ancient China, WWII, Medieval and other worldly. Through these worlds, Babydoll and Co. fight their way to freedom.
Warning right up front, the film is chocked full of symbolism. The more you catch, the further into the film you will be. The imagery is absolutely fantastic. Another thing to get out of the way right off, yes, the girls are great looking. But all honesty, you get over that within a few minutes. There is so much going on, you get sucked into the story and their plight so hard, you forget about how they are dressed. For those critics who have spent time admonishing the seeming fetish fantasy overload, totally missed the point. I will let you experience the film and figure out for yourself what the outfits symbolize.
Scott Glenn enters the story at the beginning of each fight. He is there to instruct the girls and impart wisdom. Again, his presence is there for a reason, it is up to you to figure out the intent of his presence. Glenn is fantastic and is far more important to the film than I thought he would be. The continual symbolism makes this film fun because each person can bring something away that others might not have. Snyder obviously has his intentions, but ultimately he gives you just enough so that you can create the world a long with Babydoll.
All of the cast is great, not one person can you say doesn't bring their A-game to the proceedings. Emily Browning shoulders the lion share of time on screen and she is up to the task. Abbie Cornish, Jena Malone, Vanessa Hudgens, Jamie Chung, and Carla Gugino are wonderful. It is a shame many will dismiss their characters because of the clothes and setting. I can't for the life of me understand the criticism I have read from reviewers who say the film lacks soul. These ladies, to each one, bring you into the story and make you care beyond the guns and mayhem.
There is a lot of music that accompanies each scene. A mix of score and soundtrack music really sets the scenes. Snyder does an excellent job picking songs which have lyrical content in step with the scene, many times serving as the narrator.
I can't say enough good things about this film. It was right in my wheel house. It hit all the right beats and surpassed my expectations, which were raised through the trailers. It will not be for everyone, it will be a film that divides friends. That is the best kind of film that can create reactions on both sides. The worse thing that can be said about a film that it elicits no kind of reaction, this is not that kind of film.
Red Riding Hood
(2011)
Not horrible, but seems all too familiar
25 March 2011
Warning: Spoilers
There are some great mood moments in Red Riding Hood. At times the film seems like it may break out from the teen soap opera dialog and performances, to become something more. But all too often, the film plays things close to the Twilight formula that Hardwicke is all too familiar with.
This film is going to work best with girls 12 to 16, and yes, into the world of Twilight. There are matching swooping scenes and boy/girl yearning that is all too familiar to fans of the Twilight Saga series. This is not a bad thing and not something I say to knock the film. But it is definitely going for the same crowd that make up the Twilight scene.
Performances here are not horrible, but many times the dialog and performances remind you of a teen soap opera. There are veterans like Billy Burke and Gary Oldman that are present to keep things from going too far into the melodrama. But even their presence isn't able to keep the proceedings from going over the top with the drama. Speaking of Burke and Oldman, they were pretty much the saving grace for the film with me. I am definitely not in the target demographic for the film, so I had to find my happy places where I could. It wasn't too hard, but it isn't something you will find many guys pining to see. Only when dragged by the girl friends mostly.
A village is terrorized by a wolf through the course of many years. There are many years between the town being terrorized, but the wolf looms large over their lives. There is a teenage three-way romance with Red being attracted to the local young woodsman apprentice, while being promised in marriage to the local "rich kid". The wolf comes back and kills Red's sister. Enter the mighty wolf hunter, Gary Oldman. He and his band of protectors put the town under lock down and start to find, within the residence of the town, who the wolf is by day. Of course our Red plays a major roll in the proceedings, as do her suitors. Can they find who the wolf is before they kill again? Will Goldman loose his patience and mind before he is able to find the wolf?
All in all, harmless, but forgettable. I would definitely not pay evening show prices to see, keep this as a discounted matinée at the most.
This film is going to work best with girls 12 to 16, and yes, into the world of Twilight. There are matching swooping scenes and boy/girl yearning that is all too familiar to fans of the Twilight Saga series. This is not a bad thing and not something I say to knock the film. But it is definitely going for the same crowd that make up the Twilight scene.
Performances here are not horrible, but many times the dialog and performances remind you of a teen soap opera. There are veterans like Billy Burke and Gary Oldman that are present to keep things from going too far into the melodrama. But even their presence isn't able to keep the proceedings from going over the top with the drama. Speaking of Burke and Oldman, they were pretty much the saving grace for the film with me. I am definitely not in the target demographic for the film, so I had to find my happy places where I could. It wasn't too hard, but it isn't something you will find many guys pining to see. Only when dragged by the girl friends mostly.
A village is terrorized by a wolf through the course of many years. There are many years between the town being terrorized, but the wolf looms large over their lives. There is a teenage three-way romance with Red being attracted to the local young woodsman apprentice, while being promised in marriage to the local "rich kid". The wolf comes back and kills Red's sister. Enter the mighty wolf hunter, Gary Oldman. He and his band of protectors put the town under lock down and start to find, within the residence of the town, who the wolf is by day. Of course our Red plays a major roll in the proceedings, as do her suitors. Can they find who the wolf is before they kill again? Will Goldman loose his patience and mind before he is able to find the wolf?
All in all, harmless, but forgettable. I would definitely not pay evening show prices to see, keep this as a discounted matinée at the most.
Shutter Island
(2010)
Wow
7 January 2011
I am one who is hot/cold when it comes to Martin Scorsese. More times than not I am on the cold side. However, with Shutter Island, for me, this is one of Scorsese's best ever. Decaprio was in two of the best films that were put out this year. Inception, and this early year gem. Decaprio is absolutely brilliant, as is everyone in this film.
The fun of this film is trying to figure it out as it goes. You think it is going one way and then you are not sure and you start thinking it is going another.The island itself becomes a character in the film. It is almost like it comes alive.
I really don't want to give away too much of the story. Read the synopsis, but stay away from spoiler filled discussions and/or reviews. The less you know about the film, the better. My best piece of advice; don't try too hard to figure the film out. It is really easy to start trying to guess what is going to happen next. You are going to have an inclination of what is going on, but don't try and start guessing what is around the next corner. The fun of Shutter Island is figuring it out on the way to an ending that you may or may not have figured out. Either way, a highly enjoyable thriller.
The fun of this film is trying to figure it out as it goes. You think it is going one way and then you are not sure and you start thinking it is going another.The island itself becomes a character in the film. It is almost like it comes alive.
I really don't want to give away too much of the story. Read the synopsis, but stay away from spoiler filled discussions and/or reviews. The less you know about the film, the better. My best piece of advice; don't try too hard to figure the film out. It is really easy to start trying to guess what is going to happen next. You are going to have an inclination of what is going on, but don't try and start guessing what is around the next corner. The fun of Shutter Island is figuring it out on the way to an ending that you may or may not have figured out. Either way, a highly enjoyable thriller.
Scott Pilgrim vs. the World
(2010)
Appreciation depended on Cerra
1 January 2011
This was the year that we saw several little known comics made into films. Kick-Ass was the first out of the gate and in my opinion, the best. We were then given this film, Scott Pilgrim, directed by Edgar Wright. The biggest difference between the two films is your enjoyment of Scott Pilgrim is far more dependent on your tolerance/enjoyment of several elements.
Firstly, you must be a fan of Michael Cerra. With Scott Pilgrim he continues the same shtick that he has presented in pretty much all of his roles to date. I personally have grown tired of that shtick. He doesn't ruin the film for me, but my weariness of his seemingly limited range kept me from fully appreciating the film.
Second, you need to have a frame of reference when it comes to video games. The film, as is the comic, resides in the world of video game reference. I personally enjoyed the continual video game style of story presentation, however this is not going to be something the general movie audience will appreciate.
Third, you need to be a fan of Edgar Wright's direction and story telling skills. Personally, I love Wright's direction and story telling skills. Were this film directed by anyone else, I don't think I would have enjoyed it as much as I did. Wright's quick cuts that he is known for do overstay their welcome as the film is done almost entirely through quick cuts and that can be jarring.
My biggest issue with the film is Cerra. He is still playing the same character that he has played in previous films. Why that is a problem here is that compared to Ramona's previous ex-boyfriends, you have to scratch your head as to what there is about Cerra's Pilgrim that would attract her to him. This believability is a very high hurdle to get past, especially if you are not a Cerra fan. I don't hate the guy, I just think this film would have been better served with a lead who actually looked the part. What hurts the casting of Cerra in the lead role is he pales in comparison to Ramona's, Mary Elizabeth Winstead, ex-boyfriends. The boyfriends, played by Chris Evans, Brandon Routh, etc, look like they would be someone Ramona would go after. Cerra's Pilgrim has nothing in comparison to offer. Ultimately, I found myself not pulling for Cerra and Winstead to get together, rather, for Cerra and his dumped girlfriend, Knives Chau played by Ellen Wong, to stay together. This is a major issue with the story as we are supposed to be pulling for Scott and Ramona to be together.
All of the supporting characters are wonderfully brought to life. It is the supporting characters, action and Edgar Wrights direction that ultimately pull this up to a 7 for me. It is Cerra's casting that reduces this film's rating. Again, I don't want to come off as a Cerra hater, I just think his continued reliance on the same mannerisms, voice inflection and his overall physical inadequacies, make his Scott Pilgrim not reflective of the Pilgrim from the comic. Or for that matter, a hero lead that is believable.
Firstly, you must be a fan of Michael Cerra. With Scott Pilgrim he continues the same shtick that he has presented in pretty much all of his roles to date. I personally have grown tired of that shtick. He doesn't ruin the film for me, but my weariness of his seemingly limited range kept me from fully appreciating the film.
Second, you need to have a frame of reference when it comes to video games. The film, as is the comic, resides in the world of video game reference. I personally enjoyed the continual video game style of story presentation, however this is not going to be something the general movie audience will appreciate.
Third, you need to be a fan of Edgar Wright's direction and story telling skills. Personally, I love Wright's direction and story telling skills. Were this film directed by anyone else, I don't think I would have enjoyed it as much as I did. Wright's quick cuts that he is known for do overstay their welcome as the film is done almost entirely through quick cuts and that can be jarring.
My biggest issue with the film is Cerra. He is still playing the same character that he has played in previous films. Why that is a problem here is that compared to Ramona's previous ex-boyfriends, you have to scratch your head as to what there is about Cerra's Pilgrim that would attract her to him. This believability is a very high hurdle to get past, especially if you are not a Cerra fan. I don't hate the guy, I just think this film would have been better served with a lead who actually looked the part. What hurts the casting of Cerra in the lead role is he pales in comparison to Ramona's, Mary Elizabeth Winstead, ex-boyfriends. The boyfriends, played by Chris Evans, Brandon Routh, etc, look like they would be someone Ramona would go after. Cerra's Pilgrim has nothing in comparison to offer. Ultimately, I found myself not pulling for Cerra and Winstead to get together, rather, for Cerra and his dumped girlfriend, Knives Chau played by Ellen Wong, to stay together. This is a major issue with the story as we are supposed to be pulling for Scott and Ramona to be together.
All of the supporting characters are wonderfully brought to life. It is the supporting characters, action and Edgar Wrights direction that ultimately pull this up to a 7 for me. It is Cerra's casting that reduces this film's rating. Again, I don't want to come off as a Cerra hater, I just think his continued reliance on the same mannerisms, voice inflection and his overall physical inadequacies, make his Scott Pilgrim not reflective of the Pilgrim from the comic. Or for that matter, a hero lead that is believable.
Kick-Ass
(2010)
One of the best from 2010
1 January 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I held off placing a review of this film out here, mainly because I was lazy. But also because I wanted this film to fully sink into my consciousness. This is one of the few films that I can honestly say saw major rotation in my Blu-ray player. It is one of the gems from 2010.
Many comics are getting the film treatment nowadays. Few however see the transition done this well. Vaughn has taken the comic created by Mark Millar and turned it into a live-action treat.
Young Dave Lizewski, as played by the fantastic Aaron Johnson, just wants to make a difference. He has no super powers, no training to speak of, he just has a costume and a desire to do good. Johnson juggles the character of Lizewski/Kick-ass beautifully. From his dead-on American accent (those that don't know, he is English) to the wholehearted earnest desire to do right, Aaron Johnson has announced himself to the movie audience in a grand way. The film follows Lizewski as he sets about battling wrong in his town, while dealing with the same issues other teens are going through. It is this balance that makes the film fun to watch as you see him stumble through both his desire to right wrong, as well as capture the heart of a girl at school whom he has fallen for. The film follows Lizewski through all the par-ells that being a teen encompasses, with the added wrinkle of trying to be a "hero".
As good as Vaughn's direction is and Johnson's take on Kick-ass, this film is taken to new heights by the team of Big Daddy (Nicolas Cage) and Hitgirl (Chloe Moretz). Cage and Moretz father/daughter relationship is what makes this film work. Cage goes from playing an eerily mousy father to channeling Adam West when he dons the cape and cowl of Big Daddy. Chloe Moretz, what more can I say that hasn't already been said. She, like Johnson, announces herself to the movie audience with one of the best introductory characters in the last decade. Big Daddy and Hit Girl have a very unorthodox relationship, one that is built on the father raising his daughter to fear nothing and give no quarter to those that would do harm. Her violence is equal parts unsettling and invigorating to watch. You will shake your head as you take joy in watching her in action, yet coming to terms that this is a pre-teen committing major acts of violence.
Mark Strong provides a wonderful screen villain for our heroes to battle. He seems to be making a niche in portraying villains, all different. His Frank D'Amico is dangerous, but is able to do this without resorting to camp that many actors go to when portraying comic villains. The person who goes a long way in stepping outside of previous roles is Christopher Mintz-Plasse. He plays Chris D'Amico / Red Mist, the son of Strong's Frank D'Amico, and pseudo partner to our heroes, far and away from the McLov'n characterization that he is most identified with. He goes a long way in putting that character behind him with this role.
This film was heavily marketed, but in the end did not do extremely well in theaters. I think many people who are not familiar with the comic and not informed of the film itself but only knew it from the trailers saw this as a comedy, when in all honesty the comedy comes organically from the situations that our characters find themselves in. It is not played for chuckles, it is played dead on serious. I think maybe some saw this as a comedy and shied away from it.It is a film which contains many elements that are hard for a general audience to accept and appreciate. The biggest being the violence. To Vaughn's credit, he did not pull back on the violence of the comic. A sequel was green-lit before the film hit theaters, I hope the box-office does not keep them from moving forward as it would be a shame not to see these characters mature in further adventures.
Many comics are getting the film treatment nowadays. Few however see the transition done this well. Vaughn has taken the comic created by Mark Millar and turned it into a live-action treat.
Young Dave Lizewski, as played by the fantastic Aaron Johnson, just wants to make a difference. He has no super powers, no training to speak of, he just has a costume and a desire to do good. Johnson juggles the character of Lizewski/Kick-ass beautifully. From his dead-on American accent (those that don't know, he is English) to the wholehearted earnest desire to do right, Aaron Johnson has announced himself to the movie audience in a grand way. The film follows Lizewski as he sets about battling wrong in his town, while dealing with the same issues other teens are going through. It is this balance that makes the film fun to watch as you see him stumble through both his desire to right wrong, as well as capture the heart of a girl at school whom he has fallen for. The film follows Lizewski through all the par-ells that being a teen encompasses, with the added wrinkle of trying to be a "hero".
As good as Vaughn's direction is and Johnson's take on Kick-ass, this film is taken to new heights by the team of Big Daddy (Nicolas Cage) and Hitgirl (Chloe Moretz). Cage and Moretz father/daughter relationship is what makes this film work. Cage goes from playing an eerily mousy father to channeling Adam West when he dons the cape and cowl of Big Daddy. Chloe Moretz, what more can I say that hasn't already been said. She, like Johnson, announces herself to the movie audience with one of the best introductory characters in the last decade. Big Daddy and Hit Girl have a very unorthodox relationship, one that is built on the father raising his daughter to fear nothing and give no quarter to those that would do harm. Her violence is equal parts unsettling and invigorating to watch. You will shake your head as you take joy in watching her in action, yet coming to terms that this is a pre-teen committing major acts of violence.
Mark Strong provides a wonderful screen villain for our heroes to battle. He seems to be making a niche in portraying villains, all different. His Frank D'Amico is dangerous, but is able to do this without resorting to camp that many actors go to when portraying comic villains. The person who goes a long way in stepping outside of previous roles is Christopher Mintz-Plasse. He plays Chris D'Amico / Red Mist, the son of Strong's Frank D'Amico, and pseudo partner to our heroes, far and away from the McLov'n characterization that he is most identified with. He goes a long way in putting that character behind him with this role.
This film was heavily marketed, but in the end did not do extremely well in theaters. I think many people who are not familiar with the comic and not informed of the film itself but only knew it from the trailers saw this as a comedy, when in all honesty the comedy comes organically from the situations that our characters find themselves in. It is not played for chuckles, it is played dead on serious. I think maybe some saw this as a comedy and shied away from it.It is a film which contains many elements that are hard for a general audience to accept and appreciate. The biggest being the violence. To Vaughn's credit, he did not pull back on the violence of the comic. A sequel was green-lit before the film hit theaters, I hope the box-office does not keep them from moving forward as it would be a shame not to see these characters mature in further adventures.
Devil
(2010)
Not bad at all
31 December 2010
I really had no expectations going into this film. I had seen enough of the trailers to be intrigued, but really didn't know what we would get. I have to say this was one of the surprises of 2010 for me.
This film, as I understand, is one of several films that are intended to be created under the Night Chronicles banner. These are films which M. Night has created the initial story and will produce, but the script and directing will be done by others. If this first film is any indication of what to expect, sign me up.
We are given exposition throughout the movie via voice-over by a security guard who witnessed the events that are unfolding in front of us. The story is simple; five people enter an elevator and end up being stuck. During the course of their time in the elevator, each is summarily killed by one of the five in the elevator. All the while, this is unfolding on camera as security guards and the detectives called to the scene watch.
The usual morality play that M.Night is known for unfolds in front of us. The film moves along at a very nice pace, clocking in at 80 minutes, the film never labors too long.
A compact setting with a story that unfolds neatly, I found myself entertained and in the end, enjoyed this first entry in the Night Chronicles. I look forward to more.
This film, as I understand, is one of several films that are intended to be created under the Night Chronicles banner. These are films which M. Night has created the initial story and will produce, but the script and directing will be done by others. If this first film is any indication of what to expect, sign me up.
We are given exposition throughout the movie via voice-over by a security guard who witnessed the events that are unfolding in front of us. The story is simple; five people enter an elevator and end up being stuck. During the course of their time in the elevator, each is summarily killed by one of the five in the elevator. All the while, this is unfolding on camera as security guards and the detectives called to the scene watch.
The usual morality play that M.Night is known for unfolds in front of us. The film moves along at a very nice pace, clocking in at 80 minutes, the film never labors too long.
A compact setting with a story that unfolds neatly, I found myself entertained and in the end, enjoyed this first entry in the Night Chronicles. I look forward to more.
Black Swan
(2010)
Demented
26 December 2010
Warning: Spoilers
The first word that came to mind after watching this film was "demented". An absolutely demented film.
Natalie Portman gives a performance that is equal parts sweet and tragic. She has always shown flourishes, but not since her first break out role in The Professional, has she been this open, this exposed. The story is simple, yet the emotions complex. Portman plays "Nina", a 28 year old woman who still lives with her mom, chasing a dream that her mother had; to have the lead in a major production. But there is a new girl in the troop, "Lily", played by Mila Kunis, who Nina sees as a rival. Kunis is fantastic. Lily is the exact opposite of Nina; open, free, though just as talented, Kunis is wonderful and gives Lily the right amount of edge. The real problem in her life is that Nina's mother dots on her as if she were still a young girl. This has, in many respects stunted Nina emotionally and she is still the 16 year old girl that her mother treats her as. Barbara Hershey plays Nina's mother beautifully. The dynamic between Hershey and Portman is fantastic.
The film hints at a very demented and destructive side to not only ballet, but to the pursuit of excellence. Nina is constantly trying to be perfect. Perfect to the point of being self-destructive. This is manifested in a physical way through self-mutilation. Winning the coveted lead role in Swan Lake is equal parts blessing and curse for Nina. In many respects, the curse side is the most predominate. What ensues is a major demented, genius piece of filmmaking. Aronofsky, ever known as a filmmaker that is not afraid to take chances, gives us his most commercially demented work yet. The way he films and presents the art of ballet is breathtaking.
Bravo to Portman and Aronofsky, a film which intrigued me prior to seeing it, after viewing, left me equal parts happy and sad. Torn, like Portman's Nina, you have to love it when a film goes as deep into the rabbit hole as this one does, and leaves you breathless at the end.
Natalie Portman gives a performance that is equal parts sweet and tragic. She has always shown flourishes, but not since her first break out role in The Professional, has she been this open, this exposed. The story is simple, yet the emotions complex. Portman plays "Nina", a 28 year old woman who still lives with her mom, chasing a dream that her mother had; to have the lead in a major production. But there is a new girl in the troop, "Lily", played by Mila Kunis, who Nina sees as a rival. Kunis is fantastic. Lily is the exact opposite of Nina; open, free, though just as talented, Kunis is wonderful and gives Lily the right amount of edge. The real problem in her life is that Nina's mother dots on her as if she were still a young girl. This has, in many respects stunted Nina emotionally and she is still the 16 year old girl that her mother treats her as. Barbara Hershey plays Nina's mother beautifully. The dynamic between Hershey and Portman is fantastic.
The film hints at a very demented and destructive side to not only ballet, but to the pursuit of excellence. Nina is constantly trying to be perfect. Perfect to the point of being self-destructive. This is manifested in a physical way through self-mutilation. Winning the coveted lead role in Swan Lake is equal parts blessing and curse for Nina. In many respects, the curse side is the most predominate. What ensues is a major demented, genius piece of filmmaking. Aronofsky, ever known as a filmmaker that is not afraid to take chances, gives us his most commercially demented work yet. The way he films and presents the art of ballet is breathtaking.
Bravo to Portman and Aronofsky, a film which intrigued me prior to seeing it, after viewing, left me equal parts happy and sad. Torn, like Portman's Nina, you have to love it when a film goes as deep into the rabbit hole as this one does, and leaves you breathless at the end.
True Grit
(2010)
True to the source
26 December 2010
Taking on a project like True Grit, the Cohen brothers probably met with a lot of people questioning their own "grit" to tackle sacred ground. Bridges had to be equally questioned to take on the role that is already considered a pinnacle of a legend, John Wayne. All mentioned, somehow, some way, pull it off.
Everything from the pitch perfect casting, to the cinematography and score, the Cohen's "True Grit" is a worthy member of the Western genre family.
Bridges take on the iconic role of Rooster Cogburn shows no signs of mimicking John Wayne's portrait of the character. Rather, Bridges puts his own spin on the character and like Wayne, delivers a wonderful performance. Matt Damon's LeBeouf, is fun to watch. Newcomer Hailee Steinfeld gives a wonderful screen debut, which no doubt will earn her several awards nods.
The story is simple; young girl hires a down and out marshal to help her exact revenge upon the man who killed her father. Those unfamiliar with the original should enjoy this solely on its own merit. Those that are familiar with and love the original, your memories will not be trampled upon. This is merely another telling, one that doesn't try at any moment to wink at the audience of the first, rather, tries to present the book, which it is based on, the best way it can.
There really isn't much more detail that I can provide that others haven't already provided. Coming from someone who grew up on John Wayne, that holds his movies with high-regard, to include the original True Grit, I found this latest telling to be honorable, well done and entertaining.
Everything from the pitch perfect casting, to the cinematography and score, the Cohen's "True Grit" is a worthy member of the Western genre family.
Bridges take on the iconic role of Rooster Cogburn shows no signs of mimicking John Wayne's portrait of the character. Rather, Bridges puts his own spin on the character and like Wayne, delivers a wonderful performance. Matt Damon's LeBeouf, is fun to watch. Newcomer Hailee Steinfeld gives a wonderful screen debut, which no doubt will earn her several awards nods.
The story is simple; young girl hires a down and out marshal to help her exact revenge upon the man who killed her father. Those unfamiliar with the original should enjoy this solely on its own merit. Those that are familiar with and love the original, your memories will not be trampled upon. This is merely another telling, one that doesn't try at any moment to wink at the audience of the first, rather, tries to present the book, which it is based on, the best way it can.
There really isn't much more detail that I can provide that others haven't already provided. Coming from someone who grew up on John Wayne, that holds his movies with high-regard, to include the original True Grit, I found this latest telling to be honorable, well done and entertaining.
Tron
(1982)
Way ahead of its time
18 December 2010
When I first saw this film 28 years ago, I honestly did not get all of the technical references in it. I was not part of the early computer crowd that this movie was written for. I was into video games and hanging out at arcades. But all of the character and dialog references to the world of computers was totally lost on me. I loved the arcade game based on the film. The film itself, was an oddity, an interesting one, but nothing I invested much into.
Spring forward to this year, when all the talk of a sequel coming to theaters was in the air, I had to revisit the film that I literally had not watched since 1982. What I found was a lot more than I originally remembered. I think a lot of that has to do with my knowledge of computers being much greater than it was in 1982. Watching the film now I am able to appreciate the characters based on computer references and the dialog which at the time, didn't make much sense to me. What is commendable is that the film was way ahead of its time. The effects, though antiquated by today's standards, set the foundation for the CGI work we have today. Disney was reaching, perhaps a little too far, but none the less, they were trying to push people beyond what they had experienced at the time.
There is no doubt watching this film again today that the Wachowski brothers were inspired to create The Matrix from a love of this film. There is so much about TRON that is echoed and mirrored in The Matrix.
A film that was way ahead of its time and a fun revisit today. I am by no means hardcore devote of the film, but I do recognize the effort and the desire to stretch beyond the borders Disney tried. A fun film to watch, kind of cold, but none the less fun if for nothing else than seeing a studio trying to take the audience on a new ride.
Spring forward to this year, when all the talk of a sequel coming to theaters was in the air, I had to revisit the film that I literally had not watched since 1982. What I found was a lot more than I originally remembered. I think a lot of that has to do with my knowledge of computers being much greater than it was in 1982. Watching the film now I am able to appreciate the characters based on computer references and the dialog which at the time, didn't make much sense to me. What is commendable is that the film was way ahead of its time. The effects, though antiquated by today's standards, set the foundation for the CGI work we have today. Disney was reaching, perhaps a little too far, but none the less, they were trying to push people beyond what they had experienced at the time.
There is no doubt watching this film again today that the Wachowski brothers were inspired to create The Matrix from a love of this film. There is so much about TRON that is echoed and mirrored in The Matrix.
A film that was way ahead of its time and a fun revisit today. I am by no means hardcore devote of the film, but I do recognize the effort and the desire to stretch beyond the borders Disney tried. A fun film to watch, kind of cold, but none the less fun if for nothing else than seeing a studio trying to take the audience on a new ride.
The Tourist
(I) (2010)
Pretty locales, pretty people, pretty average
18 December 2010
Took in this film as a "date night", one of the few, that my wife and I have enjoyed over the last year. It was decent enough as a film to get away, but beyond that, a DVD rental at best.
You would think with Depp and Jolie in the leads, there would be chemistry aplenty. However, there is very little spark between the two leads. They have been excellent with other actors/actresses in the past, but together, it is almost like they are holding back. There are reports Depp's life partner was none too pleased with who his lead actress was and made sure to be a presence. Whether that is true or not, it would be a possible explanation for the restraint. Whatever it was, the lack of chemistry keeps the film from being all it could be.
The story is pretty straight forward, or so you think. It does take some detours here and there. I don't want to give too much away for that do what to take in the film. There is some real intrigue created the first couple of acts. You are giving tidbits here and there to keep you guessing just what really is going on. Jolie ends up being more than what you are led to believe from the first two acts. In what has to be one of his most "normal" roles ever, Depp plays the role of fish out of water excellently. It is a fun film to watch, but the lack of chemistry really affects everything else with this film. It is a decent enough film to catch with nothing else to see in the afternoon, but all in all, beyond some fantastic locales, an interesting enough story and good looking leads, this is a missed opportunity. A good looking one, but none the less, a miss.
You would think with Depp and Jolie in the leads, there would be chemistry aplenty. However, there is very little spark between the two leads. They have been excellent with other actors/actresses in the past, but together, it is almost like they are holding back. There are reports Depp's life partner was none too pleased with who his lead actress was and made sure to be a presence. Whether that is true or not, it would be a possible explanation for the restraint. Whatever it was, the lack of chemistry keeps the film from being all it could be.
The story is pretty straight forward, or so you think. It does take some detours here and there. I don't want to give too much away for that do what to take in the film. There is some real intrigue created the first couple of acts. You are giving tidbits here and there to keep you guessing just what really is going on. Jolie ends up being more than what you are led to believe from the first two acts. In what has to be one of his most "normal" roles ever, Depp plays the role of fish out of water excellently. It is a fun film to watch, but the lack of chemistry really affects everything else with this film. It is a decent enough film to catch with nothing else to see in the afternoon, but all in all, beyond some fantastic locales, an interesting enough story and good looking leads, this is a missed opportunity. A good looking one, but none the less, a miss.
Tron: Legacy
(2010)
A wonderful spectacle
18 December 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I was 16 when the original TRON film came out. It was a oddity at the time for me. I enjoyed the video game inspired by the movie far more. Subsequent viewings of the film, especially recently, have brought about far more appreciation and understanding of the film, especially since for the last 20 years I have worked in the IT arena. Still, the film holds no special nostalgia for me. I think your reaction to this film is going to depend on your nostalgia level of the original. If you have attached high levels of grandeur to it, I think you are going to be setup for disappointment. If you, like me, go in with a leveled expectation and understand this is a spectacle, not the "second-coming", you are going to be far more prepared to enjoy it. This is not to say you have to lower expectations, allow for a dumb film. No, that is not what I am saying. What I am saying is the first film was no Citizen Kane and elevated levels of grandeur based on childhood nostalgia, if allowed to cloud your view, will doom your viewing of this film. It is a far more universal film than the original.
Our new characters, Sam, as played by Hudland and Quorra as played by Wilde help infuse a much needed sense of youth to the proceedings. As with the original film, youth is celebrated as representing progress. I really enjoyed the chemistry between Hudland and Wilde. I especially want to highlight Wilde. There is the obvious physical element she brings to the role. She is beautiful, that is obvious. But her wide-eyed apprentice/guardian persona is what really makes you fall in love with her. There have been complaints about Michael Sheen's "Zuse", but I found him rather enjoyable. Beau Garrett as Gem, like Wilde, draws you in with her physical, but I found her Gem interesting as well as beautiful. Jeff bridges is on his game as Flynn and Clu. Bridges and Boxleitner help remind you this is a TRON movie.
Speaking of Clu, I have read a good many fan reaction that Clu is too CGI, to the point of distracting. I found this not to be the case. In fact, if fans care to look back at the original, not only was Clu represented in an artificial state, Bridges played him totally different. Beyond that, it makes total sense that the program version of the creator is not quite an exact representation of the creator.
Another consistent criticism of the film, both fan and critic, has been the story. As I mentioned earlier, it is less techno babble laden than the first. It is a rather simple story of a son, underachieving and feeling abandoned, drawn into his fathers world and ultimately searching for redemption of his father. Nothing too techno babble there and that could be a problem for the nostalgia clinging fans who were one of the few that enjoyed the original. I personally enjoyed the story and felt it was far more engaging from an emotional standpoint than the original. I have read many reviews saying the film was soulless and I couldn't disagree more. This film is much more of an emotional journey than the original was.
The special effects are outstanding and this is where the film really earns your patronage. I saw the film in IMAX 3D and have to say this is the way to see it. I know people are growing tired of paying extra for the IMAX and 3D experience, but when done well, like here, this is why you go to the theater. We have home-theater systems today that can equal some of the best theaters, but something like this can't be duplicated at home and this is why I go out to see movies. I can stay home and watch dramas and comedy's. When I pay to see a film in a theater, I am doing so because there is a level of experience I can't get at home.
The music by Daft Punk is married perfectly with the film. There has never been a more perfect marriage to music to film. The theater pulsed with the score that Daft Punk laid down.
Spectacle, again, that is what your expectations should be for this film. For those shackled by nostalgia, I say break away from your chains and let this film be exactly what it is intended to be; spectacle with equal parts technology and emotion.
Our new characters, Sam, as played by Hudland and Quorra as played by Wilde help infuse a much needed sense of youth to the proceedings. As with the original film, youth is celebrated as representing progress. I really enjoyed the chemistry between Hudland and Wilde. I especially want to highlight Wilde. There is the obvious physical element she brings to the role. She is beautiful, that is obvious. But her wide-eyed apprentice/guardian persona is what really makes you fall in love with her. There have been complaints about Michael Sheen's "Zuse", but I found him rather enjoyable. Beau Garrett as Gem, like Wilde, draws you in with her physical, but I found her Gem interesting as well as beautiful. Jeff bridges is on his game as Flynn and Clu. Bridges and Boxleitner help remind you this is a TRON movie.
Speaking of Clu, I have read a good many fan reaction that Clu is too CGI, to the point of distracting. I found this not to be the case. In fact, if fans care to look back at the original, not only was Clu represented in an artificial state, Bridges played him totally different. Beyond that, it makes total sense that the program version of the creator is not quite an exact representation of the creator.
Another consistent criticism of the film, both fan and critic, has been the story. As I mentioned earlier, it is less techno babble laden than the first. It is a rather simple story of a son, underachieving and feeling abandoned, drawn into his fathers world and ultimately searching for redemption of his father. Nothing too techno babble there and that could be a problem for the nostalgia clinging fans who were one of the few that enjoyed the original. I personally enjoyed the story and felt it was far more engaging from an emotional standpoint than the original. I have read many reviews saying the film was soulless and I couldn't disagree more. This film is much more of an emotional journey than the original was.
The special effects are outstanding and this is where the film really earns your patronage. I saw the film in IMAX 3D and have to say this is the way to see it. I know people are growing tired of paying extra for the IMAX and 3D experience, but when done well, like here, this is why you go to the theater. We have home-theater systems today that can equal some of the best theaters, but something like this can't be duplicated at home and this is why I go out to see movies. I can stay home and watch dramas and comedy's. When I pay to see a film in a theater, I am doing so because there is a level of experience I can't get at home.
The music by Daft Punk is married perfectly with the film. There has never been a more perfect marriage to music to film. The theater pulsed with the score that Daft Punk laid down.
Spectacle, again, that is what your expectations should be for this film. For those shackled by nostalgia, I say break away from your chains and let this film be exactly what it is intended to be; spectacle with equal parts technology and emotion.
A fine start to the end
19 November 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I have only read one book in the series, which is Deathly Hallows. I have been a fan of all 6 previous films solely based on the films themselves. Having read Deathly Hallows I came into this film with a little nagging concern. Would I be like some who are readers of the books and have felt the films removed way too much? Or would I continue to be content with the story and enjoy it the same? The answer is a resounding I loved this! Having read the book previous actually helped me to enjoy this film even more.
This is by far my favorite film to date. I was worried how Kloves would handle the tremendous amount of exposition that comes with this book. I need not have worried as there are elements which are downplayed considerably; most notably Harry's growing doubt of Dumbledore (this is only hinted at), his farewell to the Dursley's and the efforts on the home-front, mainly the Lovegood updates from the home-front. The camping scenes, as they have come to be known, are handled expertly and it is these segments that are some of the most enjoyable.
There are some embellishments here and there, all work well, especially a dancing segment during the camping montage. There are no surprise deaths, fans will be relived to know the deaths from the book have not been softened or changed.
Cinematography,music, SFX's, all are some of the best to date. The acting too is fantastic. I had read many a review previous to seeing the film that highlighted Grint's turn as Ron this go around as being the stand out. I have to agree he is the best he has ever been. But to me, Emma Watson is the diamond here. She has probably matured the most of the three leads, funny that she is the one who really isn't set on continuing to act after all the Potter films have come out.
One of the best films I have seen this year, it whets the appetite and has me anxious for the finale in July.
This is by far my favorite film to date. I was worried how Kloves would handle the tremendous amount of exposition that comes with this book. I need not have worried as there are elements which are downplayed considerably; most notably Harry's growing doubt of Dumbledore (this is only hinted at), his farewell to the Dursley's and the efforts on the home-front, mainly the Lovegood updates from the home-front. The camping scenes, as they have come to be known, are handled expertly and it is these segments that are some of the most enjoyable.
There are some embellishments here and there, all work well, especially a dancing segment during the camping montage. There are no surprise deaths, fans will be relived to know the deaths from the book have not been softened or changed.
Cinematography,music, SFX's, all are some of the best to date. The acting too is fantastic. I had read many a review previous to seeing the film that highlighted Grint's turn as Ron this go around as being the stand out. I have to agree he is the best he has ever been. But to me, Emma Watson is the diamond here. She has probably matured the most of the three leads, funny that she is the one who really isn't set on continuing to act after all the Potter films have come out.
One of the best films I have seen this year, it whets the appetite and has me anxious for the finale in July.
The American
(2010)
A slow burn that may not be for everyone
3 September 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Do not let the trailers fool you, there is about 10mins total of action in this film. The bulk of this film is long shots of Clooney, coming to grasp with his life and going about completing his last job.
The landscapes are breathtaking. The action is sparse with more of a dread sense than any real kind of action. But then again, this film presents the life of an assassin more the way it probably is. Not a lot of flash, just a lot of looking over your shoulder, day to day mundane mixed in with an occasional beat of action.
Clooney is fantastic here. Gone is the swagger and charm of characters he has played in the past. He shows here why he is today one of our best actors. The rest of the cast is relative unknown Italian actors. All wonderfully cast and wonderfully subtle yet dis-alarmingly complex. Violante Placido is wonderful as Clooney's love interest "Carla". Paolo Bonacelli as Father Benedetto gives the film its polar opposite to Clooney and Bonacelli is wonderfully reserved yet bold in his performance.
The film is not one for everyone, it is, as I titled this review, a slow burn. The opening scene sets things up with you really not too sure just what is going on and in the end, you are still not quite sure what the final outcome is. Make no mistake, this is a film that must be digested slowly with no expectation of explosions and gun play galore.
For those who are fans of Clooney or director Anton Corbijn, a must see. The casual viewer will probably want to wait. This is a high art film that will probably not be to the taste of the casual cinema goer. But if you appreciate technique, then perhaps this film may be to your liking.
The landscapes are breathtaking. The action is sparse with more of a dread sense than any real kind of action. But then again, this film presents the life of an assassin more the way it probably is. Not a lot of flash, just a lot of looking over your shoulder, day to day mundane mixed in with an occasional beat of action.
Clooney is fantastic here. Gone is the swagger and charm of characters he has played in the past. He shows here why he is today one of our best actors. The rest of the cast is relative unknown Italian actors. All wonderfully cast and wonderfully subtle yet dis-alarmingly complex. Violante Placido is wonderful as Clooney's love interest "Carla". Paolo Bonacelli as Father Benedetto gives the film its polar opposite to Clooney and Bonacelli is wonderfully reserved yet bold in his performance.
The film is not one for everyone, it is, as I titled this review, a slow burn. The opening scene sets things up with you really not too sure just what is going on and in the end, you are still not quite sure what the final outcome is. Make no mistake, this is a film that must be digested slowly with no expectation of explosions and gun play galore.
For those who are fans of Clooney or director Anton Corbijn, a must see. The casual viewer will probably want to wait. This is a high art film that will probably not be to the taste of the casual cinema goer. But if you appreciate technique, then perhaps this film may be to your liking.
Inception
(2010)
A complex masterpiece that requires multiple viewings
25 July 2010
Warning: Spoilers
My summary is not meant to infer this film is so complex that you have to be a genius on some level to understand it. What it means is that Nolan has crafted a film which has so many layers going on that you inevitably miss a piece of detail from one of those layers and it is only through subsequent viewings that you are able to fully appreciate the film.
Camereon touted Avatar as a film created for the cinema experience and he successfully did that. It is a film which seen in a smaller format does no justice. So too is Nolan's film created for a specific experience; that of multiple viewings and group discussion. This is a film that you have to discuss with other people. You have to see multiple times as it is a sensory overload. This is a film which truly is a personal and group experience all in one.
The story is not that complex in its genesis; it is a heist film. But whereas most heist films are after an object, this one is about taking over someones subconscious and planting something, not taking anything, though it could be said they are taking away free will. You have a group of people led by DeCaprio's character, all specialists in a certain area, working for the common goal. However in this story, ultimately, DeCaprio's character is working for a very singular goal; to get back home, to achieve a certain level of redemption.
The film works on many levels in a very literal sense. You must be paying attention to know what level you are in. This is a simple heist movie, but Nolan takes that seed and creates a world of opened and closed levels. In the amongst the goal of the group there are trials and tribulations. Ultimately, all of those trials are a product of what each team member brings to the heist. When you are dealing with dreams, the subconscious plays a huge role. How messed up your subconscious is determines just how deep the rabbit hole is that you are about to go down.
That is all I will say about the film's story, you must experience this for yourself with as little upfront info as possible. Suffice to say performances are fantastic. There is no one person to single out, it is a complete ensemble cast. Effects are crazy, would love to see film in an IMAX environment. As good as they are, they only serve the story, not the other way around. Finally the music is some of Zimmerman's best work to date. He tends to create many of the same signature notes but this go around he has created a score that is as complex and on as many levels as the film.
Get out and see this film, enjoy it, talk about it with your friends and see it again.
Camereon touted Avatar as a film created for the cinema experience and he successfully did that. It is a film which seen in a smaller format does no justice. So too is Nolan's film created for a specific experience; that of multiple viewings and group discussion. This is a film that you have to discuss with other people. You have to see multiple times as it is a sensory overload. This is a film which truly is a personal and group experience all in one.
The story is not that complex in its genesis; it is a heist film. But whereas most heist films are after an object, this one is about taking over someones subconscious and planting something, not taking anything, though it could be said they are taking away free will. You have a group of people led by DeCaprio's character, all specialists in a certain area, working for the common goal. However in this story, ultimately, DeCaprio's character is working for a very singular goal; to get back home, to achieve a certain level of redemption.
The film works on many levels in a very literal sense. You must be paying attention to know what level you are in. This is a simple heist movie, but Nolan takes that seed and creates a world of opened and closed levels. In the amongst the goal of the group there are trials and tribulations. Ultimately, all of those trials are a product of what each team member brings to the heist. When you are dealing with dreams, the subconscious plays a huge role. How messed up your subconscious is determines just how deep the rabbit hole is that you are about to go down.
That is all I will say about the film's story, you must experience this for yourself with as little upfront info as possible. Suffice to say performances are fantastic. There is no one person to single out, it is a complete ensemble cast. Effects are crazy, would love to see film in an IMAX environment. As good as they are, they only serve the story, not the other way around. Finally the music is some of Zimmerman's best work to date. He tends to create many of the same signature notes but this go around he has created a score that is as complex and on as many levels as the film.
Get out and see this film, enjoy it, talk about it with your friends and see it again.
The Twilight Saga: Eclipse
(2010)
Eclipses New Moon
4 July 2010
I enjoyed Twilight. New Moon, was not thrilled with and still is not a movie I have seen more than once in the theater and on DVD. I think it was the morose, depressing feel of the movie. That is how the book is, but still, the music, score and soundtrack, and performances/chemistry just seemed off. That is all corrected with Eclipse.
Performances are the best of the series. Stewart and Pattinson have a natural ease to their relationship now that was great to see. Stuart in particular has come a long way. Her constant eye fluttering when she tries to emote is all but gone and she has ditched the continual stop and go delivery that even my 9 year old daughter noticed and grew tired of in the previous films. Still on the relationship front, Stewart and Lautner's chemistry is MUCH improved over New Moon. I never bought into their relationship in New Moon, here, I sense more of a bond between them. All of this is can be created to the actor's finally getting into the groove with their characters, as well as being more seasoned. Also, director Slade should be credited. Who knew that the guy who brought us scary as hell vamps could turn around and take a story that is polar opposite and improve upon the previous two entries. Charlie is back with a lot more to say and that is welcome return to the first film.
The story is much more gripping this go around, it is not focused on just Bella mourning her relationship with Edward. We get more information about the Cullen family. We get much more time between Bella and Charlie, we also get more with Jacob's family/tribe. It is a more full story than we have had in any of the entries thus far. We still only get a brief glimpse of the Volturi, wish we had more. The most enjoyable is the continual questioning if immortality is a gift or curse. We are given arguments on both side, though mostly on the curse side. This is something that has set this story apart from other vampire incarnations. Immortality is seen as all wonderful, but is it really? That is the question here. One element of the story that is actually expanded on is Edward's virtue of waiting until he and Bella are married to "consumate" their relationship. There is a scene where this is explained and it is something today's young women should take heed of; if their relationship is true, then it doesn't have to include having sex, but that be kept for the right time and that makes it much more special. Hoaky perhaps in today's world, but a welcome stance for a series to take. A relationship's power/truth is not measured by the physical side, but the actual love and respect between the guy/girl.
The Cullen family is a lot more involved and for me that made this film a lot more enjoyable. Jasper in particular, who we hadn't heard much from gets a lot more to do and say here. I have mentioned this before, but the FULL story we get here is what makes Eclipse a lot more enjoyable and really sets up the final book's two-part movie venture.
Special effects continue to improve. They are still not up there with some of the best FX I have seen, but compared to the first film, they are light years ahead.
There was an element of humor in the script I was surprised by and again, a welcome. These moments came during times of banter between characters that came as very natural. It made them more real to me. In all of our relationships we get to a sense of full ease and can say most anything and that is where these characters are.
All in all, Eclipse has made me excited about the movie series again and now I am anxious to see it completed with Breaking Dawn.
Performances are the best of the series. Stewart and Pattinson have a natural ease to their relationship now that was great to see. Stuart in particular has come a long way. Her constant eye fluttering when she tries to emote is all but gone and she has ditched the continual stop and go delivery that even my 9 year old daughter noticed and grew tired of in the previous films. Still on the relationship front, Stewart and Lautner's chemistry is MUCH improved over New Moon. I never bought into their relationship in New Moon, here, I sense more of a bond between them. All of this is can be created to the actor's finally getting into the groove with their characters, as well as being more seasoned. Also, director Slade should be credited. Who knew that the guy who brought us scary as hell vamps could turn around and take a story that is polar opposite and improve upon the previous two entries. Charlie is back with a lot more to say and that is welcome return to the first film.
The story is much more gripping this go around, it is not focused on just Bella mourning her relationship with Edward. We get more information about the Cullen family. We get much more time between Bella and Charlie, we also get more with Jacob's family/tribe. It is a more full story than we have had in any of the entries thus far. We still only get a brief glimpse of the Volturi, wish we had more. The most enjoyable is the continual questioning if immortality is a gift or curse. We are given arguments on both side, though mostly on the curse side. This is something that has set this story apart from other vampire incarnations. Immortality is seen as all wonderful, but is it really? That is the question here. One element of the story that is actually expanded on is Edward's virtue of waiting until he and Bella are married to "consumate" their relationship. There is a scene where this is explained and it is something today's young women should take heed of; if their relationship is true, then it doesn't have to include having sex, but that be kept for the right time and that makes it much more special. Hoaky perhaps in today's world, but a welcome stance for a series to take. A relationship's power/truth is not measured by the physical side, but the actual love and respect between the guy/girl.
The Cullen family is a lot more involved and for me that made this film a lot more enjoyable. Jasper in particular, who we hadn't heard much from gets a lot more to do and say here. I have mentioned this before, but the FULL story we get here is what makes Eclipse a lot more enjoyable and really sets up the final book's two-part movie venture.
Special effects continue to improve. They are still not up there with some of the best FX I have seen, but compared to the first film, they are light years ahead.
There was an element of humor in the script I was surprised by and again, a welcome. These moments came during times of banter between characters that came as very natural. It made them more real to me. In all of our relationships we get to a sense of full ease and can say most anything and that is where these characters are.
All in all, Eclipse has made me excited about the movie series again and now I am anxious to see it completed with Breaking Dawn.
Toy Story 3
(2010)
Toy Story saga given a fitting end
19 June 2010
The rule of thumb has been the 3rd film of any franchise ends up bloated and overall, lacking the magic of the first two films. Not this time. As Disney/Pixar have proved time and again, Toy Story 3 doesn't suffer from bloat nor does it lack the magic. It is as fun, magical and heartfelt as the previous films.
It would have seemed with Toy Story 2, the saga was completed. However, there was the overriding sense that there was one more story to tell. What happened when Andy eventually moved on. That is the crux of Toy Story 3; moving on.
Our favorite toys start out looking like they will end up in the attic, but through the course of events, they end up going to a day-care. All would seem to be great, but as always is the case, looks are deceiving.
We end up being introduced to some new characters. One of the biggest voice talent surprises is Michael Keaton as Ken. Keaton is fantastic and a big surprise. Ned Beaty is also wonderful in the role of Lotso. These two add considerably to the goings on. Hanks, Allen, Cusak, Rickles, Ratzenberg and company once again deliver fantastic character work.
This film has plenty of what made the first two films some of the most beloved animated stories ever. Toy Story 3 adds a golden feather to the cap of the series and proves once again, Disney/Pixar are fantastic story tellers.
It would have seemed with Toy Story 2, the saga was completed. However, there was the overriding sense that there was one more story to tell. What happened when Andy eventually moved on. That is the crux of Toy Story 3; moving on.
Our favorite toys start out looking like they will end up in the attic, but through the course of events, they end up going to a day-care. All would seem to be great, but as always is the case, looks are deceiving.
We end up being introduced to some new characters. One of the biggest voice talent surprises is Michael Keaton as Ken. Keaton is fantastic and a big surprise. Ned Beaty is also wonderful in the role of Lotso. These two add considerably to the goings on. Hanks, Allen, Cusak, Rickles, Ratzenberg and company once again deliver fantastic character work.
This film has plenty of what made the first two films some of the most beloved animated stories ever. Toy Story 3 adds a golden feather to the cap of the series and proves once again, Disney/Pixar are fantastic story tellers.
Alice in Wonderland
(I) (2010)
Misunderstood
19 June 2010
I am not sure the expectations of most people going into a Tim Burton film. It seems there is a certain expectation and when they don't see what they thought they were going to see, they are disappointed or confused. I think that this film is a prime example of that. Burton has become such an iconic director that his celebrity, not what his talent, precedes him and sets an expectation.
Of all of Burton's latest films, I feel Alice is the most in line with his earlier work. It is a warped commercial vehicle that does exactly opposite of what you expect, which is the fun of going to see his films.
This Alice is a grownup version, as played wonderfully by Mia Wasikowska. She is caught between the young girl who is expected to do as she is told, yet like the younger Alice, walks her own path. Wasikowska's fresh face is welcomed; a more well known actress probably would not have worked as well.
Johnny Depp's Mad Hatter is warped, just as one would expect. Everything from an off center eye to breaking into a Scottish accent when remembering the past or in battle, Depp gives the Mad Hatter a sense of uneasiness. This is best exhibited in the scenes between he and Wasikowska. There is an uneasy attraction between Alice and the Hatter, one that has been lost from the books in the other adaptations. Here, Burton goes for showcasing that attraction and it pays off.
Bonham Carter devours the Red Queen, relishing every single minute and she is a joy to watch. Crispen Glover is perfectly cast as Stayne, her main man in many ways and himself eating up the scenery. In a surprise, Anne Hathaway's White Queen is purposely too calm and serene, almost to a chilling affect. Hathaway's gestures and manner of delivery give an uneasiness, that is fun to watch.
The rest of the cast is voice talent; Matt Lucas as Tweeledee & dumb, Stephen Fry as the Cheshire Cat, Michael Sheen as the White Rabbit and Alan Rickman as the Blue caterpillar. All are perfectly voice cast and give weight to the creatures they play.
The special effects are wonderful to watch, I only wish I had seen it in 3-D. The effects are wonderfully warped, as usual with a Burton production. If anything, his warped artistic flair is perfect for this kind of story.
As with Charlie and the Chocolate Factory and Sleepy Hollow, Burton is far more faithful to the source than previous incarnations and coupled with his visual style, Alice is a fun film to watch over and over.
Alan Rickman ... Blue Caterpillar (voice)
Of all of Burton's latest films, I feel Alice is the most in line with his earlier work. It is a warped commercial vehicle that does exactly opposite of what you expect, which is the fun of going to see his films.
This Alice is a grownup version, as played wonderfully by Mia Wasikowska. She is caught between the young girl who is expected to do as she is told, yet like the younger Alice, walks her own path. Wasikowska's fresh face is welcomed; a more well known actress probably would not have worked as well.
Johnny Depp's Mad Hatter is warped, just as one would expect. Everything from an off center eye to breaking into a Scottish accent when remembering the past or in battle, Depp gives the Mad Hatter a sense of uneasiness. This is best exhibited in the scenes between he and Wasikowska. There is an uneasy attraction between Alice and the Hatter, one that has been lost from the books in the other adaptations. Here, Burton goes for showcasing that attraction and it pays off.
Bonham Carter devours the Red Queen, relishing every single minute and she is a joy to watch. Crispen Glover is perfectly cast as Stayne, her main man in many ways and himself eating up the scenery. In a surprise, Anne Hathaway's White Queen is purposely too calm and serene, almost to a chilling affect. Hathaway's gestures and manner of delivery give an uneasiness, that is fun to watch.
The rest of the cast is voice talent; Matt Lucas as Tweeledee & dumb, Stephen Fry as the Cheshire Cat, Michael Sheen as the White Rabbit and Alan Rickman as the Blue caterpillar. All are perfectly voice cast and give weight to the creatures they play.
The special effects are wonderful to watch, I only wish I had seen it in 3-D. The effects are wonderfully warped, as usual with a Burton production. If anything, his warped artistic flair is perfect for this kind of story.
As with Charlie and the Chocolate Factory and Sleepy Hollow, Burton is far more faithful to the source than previous incarnations and coupled with his visual style, Alice is a fun film to watch over and over.
Alan Rickman ... Blue Caterpillar (voice)
The Karate Kid
(2010)
This is how to do a remake
11 June 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This movie, more so than any film this year, has had the most "noise" generated. Mostly from people ignorant of the film and just exactly how good or bad it is. The discussion has been centered on why call it "The Karate Kid" if he is learning Kung Fu. It is easy; the name is recognition and "Kung Fu Kid" sounds like a ripoff, not a remake and this is a remake and they are not hiding the fact. Enough said, explanation done, go back to your bowl of cereal.
This film takes what was done in the original film and has nicely upgraded across the board. First, we have more of a threat from the kid doing the bullying this time around rather than a caricature. The mother/son dynamic is stronger and given much more screen time. The romance is more playful and innocent, with the friendship aspect ultimately being the plot focus. The student/teacher dynamic has an even stronger father/son underlying tone and finally, the action is much much improved upon.
All of the above is due to excellent performances across the board. Jaden Smith shows to be a more than capable actor in the making and with no doubt observation of Chan, who we FINALLY get to see in a dramatic role rather than action/comedy role. Smith and Chan have a fun chemistry that helps make the film enjoyable.
I was afraid through the ads that Smith's abilities would be over the top great, but through an excellent training montage and philosophical lessons, we buy that this kid is as good as he is in the tournament.
A standout moment for me was the final bonding scene between Chan and Smith. It is during a moment reminiscent of the original film's scene where Daniel finds out about Mr. Miagi's family. Here, we have a similar scene, but it is what happens after it that establishes their relationship and seals the audiences relationship to these two characters. Excellent excellent scene.
One other standout moment is the climax where they do a great job of ending the movie on a pitch perfect note. I had heard of audiences literally standing up and cheering, but I figured that was embellished. That is until the very same thing happened at the showing I caught this afternoon. You literally do want to stand up and cheer. They also take the moment a step further than the original did and provided an close to the lesson that Jackie's Mr Han was teaching Smith's Dre. It became a full circle lesson and really helped the movie have an even more satisfying end.
The extended scenes of life in China really help to ground this film in the philosophical realm, even more so than the original. There is a richness and texture to everything that takes place against the backdrop of China. It has an even more "fish out of water" feel that lends to the believability and desperation of Smith's character. We also have a lot more character building time spent in this film that gives it about 13 more minutes run time than the original, but those extra moments really pay off in a big way. As I mentioned previously, we get more of Dre and his mom. They don't just show up and then she gets thrown into a few scenes like in the original. She is an important part of Dre's life and it is shown.
The one thing I noticed the most about this film was the amount of families that attended it. I think it is the first film of the year where adults and kids can go and enjoy a film together and both come out with the same emotions and lessons learned. That would be a reflection of the film itself as it shows Mr Han learning from his student, something that gives the film a welcome twist when compared to the original.
Those that have pre-judged this film or gotten caught up in the name game really need to see the film before they make any judgments. This film is a VERY welcome surprise and more than holds it own against the original. It stays loyal to the lessons and relationships of the original film and brings them forward 25 years later.
This film takes what was done in the original film and has nicely upgraded across the board. First, we have more of a threat from the kid doing the bullying this time around rather than a caricature. The mother/son dynamic is stronger and given much more screen time. The romance is more playful and innocent, with the friendship aspect ultimately being the plot focus. The student/teacher dynamic has an even stronger father/son underlying tone and finally, the action is much much improved upon.
All of the above is due to excellent performances across the board. Jaden Smith shows to be a more than capable actor in the making and with no doubt observation of Chan, who we FINALLY get to see in a dramatic role rather than action/comedy role. Smith and Chan have a fun chemistry that helps make the film enjoyable.
I was afraid through the ads that Smith's abilities would be over the top great, but through an excellent training montage and philosophical lessons, we buy that this kid is as good as he is in the tournament.
A standout moment for me was the final bonding scene between Chan and Smith. It is during a moment reminiscent of the original film's scene where Daniel finds out about Mr. Miagi's family. Here, we have a similar scene, but it is what happens after it that establishes their relationship and seals the audiences relationship to these two characters. Excellent excellent scene.
One other standout moment is the climax where they do a great job of ending the movie on a pitch perfect note. I had heard of audiences literally standing up and cheering, but I figured that was embellished. That is until the very same thing happened at the showing I caught this afternoon. You literally do want to stand up and cheer. They also take the moment a step further than the original did and provided an close to the lesson that Jackie's Mr Han was teaching Smith's Dre. It became a full circle lesson and really helped the movie have an even more satisfying end.
The extended scenes of life in China really help to ground this film in the philosophical realm, even more so than the original. There is a richness and texture to everything that takes place against the backdrop of China. It has an even more "fish out of water" feel that lends to the believability and desperation of Smith's character. We also have a lot more character building time spent in this film that gives it about 13 more minutes run time than the original, but those extra moments really pay off in a big way. As I mentioned previously, we get more of Dre and his mom. They don't just show up and then she gets thrown into a few scenes like in the original. She is an important part of Dre's life and it is shown.
The one thing I noticed the most about this film was the amount of families that attended it. I think it is the first film of the year where adults and kids can go and enjoy a film together and both come out with the same emotions and lessons learned. That would be a reflection of the film itself as it shows Mr Han learning from his student, something that gives the film a welcome twist when compared to the original.
Those that have pre-judged this film or gotten caught up in the name game really need to see the film before they make any judgments. This film is a VERY welcome surprise and more than holds it own against the original. It stays loyal to the lessons and relationships of the original film and brings them forward 25 years later.
Wow!!
3 June 2010
There are movies that come along every once in a while and leave you pleasantly surprised. The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus is one of those.
I was very curious about this film, but was cautiously curious as it seemed to be waaaaaaaaaay out there. And it is. But in the middle of the bizarre is a morality tale that is charming and instructive.
Depp, Law and Farrell, seamlessly stand in for Ledger during fantasy sequences that actually work better having Ledger replaced as it adds to the fun mess happening.
The film has some of the most unique sets and effects seen this past year. It makes you wonder what the director might have done had he been given the Alice in Wonderland project and not Burton.
Christopher Plumber and Tom Waits are excellent as the dueling forces of good and bad. Necomers Andrew Garfield and Lily Cole bring a fresh face and air to the proceedings. Verne Troyer, made famous for playing Mini-Me in the Powers movies, is wonderful as the assistant to Plumber's Parnassus. Ledger brings his usual flair for the odd and as mentioned previously, Depp, Farrell and Law step in for Ledger and all three deliver performances that enhance Ledger's.
This is a definite rental for the curious and I bet, like me, you will want to purchase it so you can experience the absolute joyful bizarreness of it all as much as you can.
I was very curious about this film, but was cautiously curious as it seemed to be waaaaaaaaaay out there. And it is. But in the middle of the bizarre is a morality tale that is charming and instructive.
Depp, Law and Farrell, seamlessly stand in for Ledger during fantasy sequences that actually work better having Ledger replaced as it adds to the fun mess happening.
The film has some of the most unique sets and effects seen this past year. It makes you wonder what the director might have done had he been given the Alice in Wonderland project and not Burton.
Christopher Plumber and Tom Waits are excellent as the dueling forces of good and bad. Necomers Andrew Garfield and Lily Cole bring a fresh face and air to the proceedings. Verne Troyer, made famous for playing Mini-Me in the Powers movies, is wonderful as the assistant to Plumber's Parnassus. Ledger brings his usual flair for the odd and as mentioned previously, Depp, Farrell and Law step in for Ledger and all three deliver performances that enhance Ledger's.
This is a definite rental for the curious and I bet, like me, you will want to purchase it so you can experience the absolute joyful bizarreness of it all as much as you can.
Tell Your Friends